School Improvement Grant - SIG 1003(g)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
Advertisements

MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
What type of support is available to meet our school-community integration goals and improve student outcomes?
How does Wisconsin Use Indistar to Establish Goals and Track Results? Aundrea Kerkenbush, MS Education Consultant; Title I WI Department of Public Instruction.
Supporting the SIG Application Process with the Transformation Toolkit Pacesetters Distance Learning Session November 2010.
MS SOARS November 18, Agenda Overview Indicators Wise Ways Expectations Upcoming training 2.
Rubrics-Based Evaluation of a Statewide System of Support A Tool to Enhance Statewide Systems of Support.
1 TA Customizer Project—TAC Cheryl M. Lange
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
RESULTS DRIVEN ACCOUNTABILITY SSIP Implementation Support Activity 1 OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
Results-Driven Accountability OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1.
Overview of Idaho’s State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Division of Special Education Dr. Charlie Silva State Director of Special Education 1.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
Statewide System of Support Services and Programs Greg Alexander, Director.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
Monitoring LEA McKinney-Vento Programs State Coordinators Meeting February 2009 Arlington, Virginia.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Indistar Summit 2015 District Leadership: Strategies that Work… Moving from Compliance to QUALITY! Idaho Statewide System of Support Supporting districts,
Indistar Summit – Coaching with Indistar February 2012 Presenters: Yvonne Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director, Office of School Improvement Michael Hill.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Measurement of Academic Performance and Progress.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction September 1, 2009 Webinar Fred Balcom, Director, District.
Please be sure that your audio is working properly. Go to: Tools Audio Audio Setup Wizard Differentiation in the Statewide System of Support Distance Learning.
Colorado Prevention Partners SPF-SIG Overview Colorado Prevention Partners.
Division Liaison Update Division Liaison Meeting The College of William and Mary January 7, 2013.
Successful Program Implementation: Meeting Compliance Statutes Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
EDUCAUSE 2014 Top Ten IT Issues. Today’s Agenda Introduction to EDUCAUSE IT Issues History & Methodology 2014 Top Ten IT Issues Selected Issues Reviewed.
Indistar Summit February 28-29, 2012 Biloxi, Mississippi Mississippi Department of Education School Improvement Grants: SIGnaling Positive Changes in Mississippi.
Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals National Network of State School Improvement.
VIRTUAL monitoring What is Virtual Monitoring EXAMPLES:  STAR SYSTEM – Vehicles Cell Phones – I phones or Smart Phones used as a security system detector.
©2007 Dr. Karl Squier 1 The RISCA Toolkits Approach to Implementing Comprehensive School Counseling Programs.
Successful Practices Network CTE Technical Assistance Center Work Plan 1.Improve CTE data collection to create an accurate picture.
Organizational Self-Assessment to Achieve Health Equity Gail Brandt Health Equity Consultant National Association of Chronic Disease Directors November.
WVDE System of Support Michele Blatt Office of School Improvement.
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results Reviewed & Revised with COP April 2011.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs December 10, 2013.
A Capacity Building Program of the Virginia Department of Education Division Support for Substantial School Improvement 1.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
E VALUATION C RITERIA & R EPORTING M ETRICS School Improvement Grant Monitoring LEA Review Process.
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Lynn Sodat Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
Capacity Building An Integrated Outreach Approach For Measurable Results Angel L. LaLuz, Jr., Director, Agency Programs and Services Jamie Stanesa, Director,
Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Implementation Drivers: Selection The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, #H323A However,
Federal Reviews: What to Expect Laura Lawrence Lavonne Juhl.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Chair: Linda Miller, Great Lakes West Comprehensive Center Statewide Systems of Support: The RCC & State Story.
Zelphine Smith-Dixon, State Director of Special Education
Lessons from Virginia: Growing a System of Support for
Division Liaison Update
Agenda Welcome and Introductions Purpose of Investment
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Monitoring LEA Implementation of SIG Interventions:
Rural Health Clinic Practice Transformation Collaborative
Joann Hooper Patty Rooks Paulette Richmond Gary Wenzel
Michigan School Improvement Grant
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section
Division of Long-Term Services and Supports
Update on the TEA Sped corrective action plan
PLC Team Development Year 2 Training Module 1 Enter Name of RPDC HERE
School Leadership Team Conference
Getting Everyone Together:
Implementing, Sustaining and Scaling-Up High Quality Inclusive Preschool Policies and Practices: Application for Intensive TA September 10, 2019 Lise.
Cascading Strategic Objectives – Hoshin Planning Template
Presentation transcript:

School Improvement Grant - SIG 1003(g) Steve Underwood Director, Statewide System of Support

Primary Goal Our state’s primary goal in monitoring is not compliance, but rather effectiveness. Compliance is necessary, but not sufficient.

Monitoring as Leverage for Technical Assistance Our technical assistance processes strike a balance between assistance and monitoring. Typically our TA projects are voluntary and much of the work gets done off the record. However, many of the SIG participants never accessed outside TA projects before. Through monitoring requirements for SIG, we have partnered the schools with TA projects. The work of and response to the TA project then becomes information for compliance monitoring.

Monitoring Processes Instructional Core Focus Visit A modification of The Idaho Building Capacity Project SEA staff quarterly visits/interviews with LEA and School leadership Review of implementation progress through the State online strategic planning tool Review of local data – achievement & perceptual

Instructional Core Focus Visit Baseline – a comprehensive visit Follow-up – a return, scaled down visit each year

IBC – Capacity Builders A modification – The normal project is completely separated from compliance procedures. Records are maintained by an intermediary agency. For SIG, monthly service records become part of public record held at SEA for review of the improvement process at each site.

Onsite Visits / Interviews Quarterly visits from SEA staff to interview local LEA and school leadership Interviews based on SIG required activities

Indistar™ by CII – WISE Tool Indistar – an online strategic planning tool Schools outline goals, tasks, timelines, etc., and monitor their own progress SEA has access to all schools and can review in depth or by spot-check for ongoing improvements in either the base tool or the Transformation Toolkit

Other State achievement data Local perceptual data SIG reporting metrics – per final req’s Fiscal requests/reimbursements

C’est fini… Compliance is a minimum requirement We leverage monitoring requirements to further build local capacity for change We depend on established relationships as a motivator for change… but we make sure that our LEAs know continued funding is dependent on compliance and progress.

Division of Student Achievement & School Improvement Steve Underwood Director, Statewide System of Support Phone: (208) 332-9922 Email: sunderwood@sde.idaho.gov Division of Student Achievement & School Improvement Idaho State Department of Education 650 West State Street Boise, ID 83720-0027 Web: www.sde.idaho.gov/site/sasa/