NH PUC Grid Modernization: Working Group-DRAFT Groundrules

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to do Action and Change. How to… A. Engage people in Action & Change B. Prepare for an Action & Change session C. Facilitate an Action & Change session.
Advertisements

Conference for FOOD PROTECTION Promoting Food Safety Through Collaboration.
Practical Skills for Leaders Archdiocese of Cape Town Centre for Pastoral Development.
An Introduction to the ABCD For the Casualty Actuarial Society Course on Professionalism Copyright © 2013 by the American Academy of Actuaries.
The chapter will address the following questions:
CAMPUT 2015 Energy Regulation Course Donald Gordon Conference Centre Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Role of Tribunal Staff, Interveners and Independent.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
1 Public Outreach October 2008 By Adelina Murtezaj – Public Relation Officer For Inaugural Partnership Activity between ICC and ERO.
Market Meeting Support Susan Munson ERCOT Retail Market Liaison Commercial Operations Subcommittee (COPS) June 10, 2008.
TRANSITION PLAN STAKEHOLDER GROUP CENTER FOR DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING EDUCATION.
1 Deborah Dalton, Elena Gonzalez, and Patrick Field EPA, DOI, CBI Overview - Negotiated Rulemaking.
2015 ICPC Service & Commodity Planning Meeting Wednesday, January 28, 2015 from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Franklin County Dog Shelter & Adoption Center.
1 HRSA Division of Independent Review The Review Process Regional AIDS Education and Training Centers HRSA Toni Thomas, MPA Lead Review Administrator.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
TAA2 Assessor Workshop Learning and Innovation. PROGRAM OUTLINE Workshop Introduction Overview of the TAA Scheme Outline of the TAA2 Activity Break TAA.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
CTI Technical Committee Convener Call 11 May
LEADING DECISION GROUPS APAMSA Leadership Development Module.
Welcome Rep Council October 5, Goals for  Greater Level of Communication  School Board Relations  Board Contact Teams  Organizing.
Unit 9 Seminar Business Organizations. Things to do this unit: UNIT 9 – Read Chapter 13 and 14 – Respond to the Discussion Board – Attend the Weekly Seminar.
51 st Meeting of the Pacific Island Health Officers Association November 14-18, 2011 Honolulu.
Chapter 9* Managing Meetings. Chapter 10/Managing Meetings Hilgert & Leonard © Explain why meetings, committees, and being able to lead meetings.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
What is meeting? Two or more people come together for the purpose of discussing a predetermined topic such as business or community event often on formal.
Welcome to Cora Howe School Annual Title 1 Meeting September 14, 2010 Title 1 Program LuAnn Seale – Principal K. C. Winfrey – ESEA Facilitator.
Academic Senate Orientation – Fall Roles and Responsibilities of Local Senates  Familiarity with the statutory context in which the senate operates.
The A.A. group… where A.A.’s service structure begins
SEPRC Special Education Program Recommendation Committee
Club Meetings 101.
Standards and Certification Training
California Marine Life Protection Act Evaluation of the Central Coast
Stakeholder consultations
Multiple Parties and Teams
Current Stakeholder Timelines for Issues Needing a Rapid Response
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Community Development Department April 3, 2017
The NEW Distance Education Guidelines
NEGOTIATION SEVENTH EDITION
Chapter 9: Project Communications Management
Developing charter and covenants
The Role of the GSR.
CONSENSUS DECISION MAKING???
Consensus Based Decision Making
Tim Ahern Consultancy Ltd. tim. Tel;
OFFICE OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
AGENDA ANNOUNCEMENTS Attendance Announcements Synthesizing Sources
Assigning evaluators Deans (Education) appoint a pool of evaluators who are trained by the Centre for Innovation in Learning and Teaching Dean (Education)
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESCIND RESOLUTION NO AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE RULES GOVERNING.
Community Development Department April 3, 2017
Virtual Case Study Competition
A Managers Guide to Parental Leave
NH Grid Modernization Working Group: Slides for 1st Meeting
Preparing to Mediate: Serving as a Respondent
Multiple Parties and Teams
Terms of Reference – Project Design Authority
OFFICE OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
June HR Lunch & Learn: Introduction to Learning Circles
Resolving Issues ADR, Due Process and CDE Complaints
Manage Meetings.
IEP Team Meeting Facilitation: What is it and How can it benefit Georgia districts? Today we are here to introduce to you a new and exciting initiative.
CSC 492 – Senior Design – Spring 2019
Teaming Class 2 Notes – Section 1
Meetings.
III. Government Transparency Laws
Chapter 9: Project Communications Management
B P Poudyal I P Ghimire NASC
The City of East Lansing Board & Commission Training Seminar
Catholic School Councils: Making a Difference 1.1
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
Community Development Department April 3, 2017
Presentation transcript:

NH PUC Grid Modernization: Working Group-DRAFT Groundrules April 29, 2016 Facilitator/Mediator: Dr. Jonathan Raab, Raab Associates, Ltd

Participation Each representative in the Working Group can designate an alternate (drawn either from their own organization or from another related organization). Only the representative or alternate (in the case of the representative’s absence or delegation), will have a seat at the table and participate in any formal deliberations (negotiation and recommendation decisions). NH PUC Staff (as ex officio councilors) can participate in all discussions but will refrain from participating in any deliberations. Other attendees who are not seated at the the table (alternates and councilors of the public) may also be given a chance to express their opinions and make suggestions at appropriate junctures, as time allows and as determined by the Facilitator/Mediator.

Roles & Responsibilities: Members Working Group representatives and alternates will make every attempt to attend all applicable meetings, to be on-time, and to review all documents disseminated prior to the meeting. If a representative or his\her alternate cannot attend a meeting, the representative should let the Facilitator/Mediator know prior to the meeting (by telephone or e-mail). Representatives, alternates, and other participants are charged with participating in a constructive forum where diverse points of view are voiced and examined in a professional and balanced way. Personal attacks will not be permitted. All representatives and alternates agree to act in good faith in the discussions and negotiations. ‘Good faith’ means that they will be forthright and communicative about the interests and preferences of their organization and will actively seek agreement wherever possible.

Roles & Responsibilities: Members (continued) It is the responsibility of the representatives and alternates to keep their organizations informed of developments in the Working Group process. Representatives and alternates may confer with each other during meeting breaks and in between meetings, and are encouraged to do so. Representative and alternates are not permitted to quote or otherwise represent other members of the Working Group process to the press or other outside entities (including in blogs), or to speak on behalf of the Working Group unless so designated to do so by the Working Group. Representatives and alternates are free to discuss pertinent matters with the Facilitator/Mediator and the PUC Staff’s Consultant if and when the need arises.

Report Recommendations Decision-making The goal of the process is to make substantive recommendations by unanimous agreement (i.e., consensus) of the Working Group members (organizations) where possible. The Working Group’s Final Report to the PUC at the end of the process will identify all areas of agreement, and will provide a description of the alternative approaches preferred by members if and where the Group is split on what to recommend. Where multiple options are offered, Working Group members supporting alternative approaches will ascribe their organizations’ names to their preferred alternative. NH PUC staff will not participate directly in decision- making or add their organizational names to the Final Report.

Roles & Responsibilities: Facilitator/Mediator & Consultant The Facilitator/Mediator’s primary function is to help design and manage productive and well-informed meetings. The Facilitator/Mediator will also be responsible for recording points of agreement and disagreement.  The Facilitator/Mediator will impartially, and in a non-partisan manner, (not favoring any representative, alternate, or organization over another), facilitate all meetings of the Working Group. The Facilitator/Mediator (with assistance from the PUC Staff and its Consultant) will prepare draft agendas and meeting summaries in a timely fashion for distribution to the members. The Facilitator/Mediator (with assistance from the PUC Staff and its Consultant) will take the lead in assembling the Final Report to the Commission on the Working Group’s behalf, and with their review and sign-off. Facilitator/Mediator (and the PUC Staff’s Consultant) are free to talk with representative and alternates outside the regularly scheduled meeting as they deem appropriate.

Documents and Comments All documents will be posted on a web site in a timely manner (maintained by the NH PUC) for the duration of the process. Parties and members of the public will have an opportunity to comment on the Working Group’s recommendations after the Final Report is issued.