CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Concurrency Management. What is Concurrency? Chapter , F.S. requires Comprehensive Plans to adopt a concurrency management system,
Advertisements

Wastewater Permit Renewals
Industrial Wastewater Treatment and Zero Liquid Discharge
WWTF’s MPCA Permit Renewal January 14,  Our current NPDES permit expired Sept. 30,  NPDES permits are a 5 year term.  Upon expiration,
Berkeley Charleston Dorchester Water Quality Management (208) Program Vonie Gilreath, Regional Planner, BCDCOG Coastal Community Workshop February 7, 2006.
City of South Burlington City Council Adopted January 12, 2013 FY 2014 Budget - Keys to Financial Success Prepared by Sandy Miller, City Manager and Bob.
Water Rates Utility Rates & SDCs Presentation to the West Linn City Council October 5, 2009.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Membrane Softening Water Treatment Plant completed in –Upper Floridan groundwater wells provide the source water for treatment. –Treatment process.
11 City of Hallandale Beach Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Facilities Plan Public Meeting.
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
Introduction: We will start with an overview of treatment processes 1) Why do we treat water and wastewater? The main objectives of the conventional wastewater.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) Permit.
Water System Planning Study
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Volvo Group North America, LLC Reuse of Wastewater - A Manufacturer’s Experience Steve Pierett, Env.Mgr. CEM, CRM, CP EnMS-Industrial.
Water Treatment Plant No. 2 Concentrate Zero Liquid Discharge August 30, 2011.
BORDER ENVIRONMENT COOPERATION COMMISSION Mitigating Impacts on Water Resources: Environmental Infrastructure Investment.
Comprehensive Wastewater Management Planning (CWMP) Project Update for East Falmouth Watersheds Board of Selectmen Progress Meeting October 22, 2007 Nathan.
Independent Review of FY 2008 Proposed Rates D.C. Water and Sewer Authority Public Hearing June 13, 2007.
Water for Monterey County Regional Project Capital and O&M Cost Description 1 Lyndel Melton, P.E. RMC Water and Environment.
Waste Water Facilities Plan Update November 2, 2009 Palmer Engineering Company / Hazen & Sawyer / CDP Public Hearing Presentation.
Source Control Planning for Municipal Wastewater System Permit Compliance Environmental Trade Fair & Conference Austin, TX. May 6, 2015 David James Santiago.
Short and Long Range Water Supply Planning and Aquifer Performance Test (APT)
Infrastructure management system Managers and engineers need clear guidelines for life-cycle management of infrastructure systems for water, sewer, and.
Orange County Board of County Commissioners Update on USEPA Rulemaking for Numeric Nutrient Criteria Utilities Department January 26, 2010 Utilities Department.
Council Workshop, June 24, Image Date: 1/15/2014 Future WWTF No. 2 Capacity 2.0 MGD., Expandable to 6.0 MGD. Future WWTF No. 2 Capacity 2.0 MGD.,
Winchester Municipal Utilities 2009 Rate Plan April 9, 2009.
Wastewater Treatment Plant # 2 Engineering Services Council Workshop July 8, 2014.
Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Planning a Capital Project Iowa League of Cities Annual Conference September 2015 Kelley BrownSteve Troyer, P.E. City AdministratorFOX.
Road Map to the Future: The Consolidation of Sewer Infrastructure in Rutherford County, NC November 16 th, 2015.
Introduction to Environmental Engineering Dr. Kagan ERYURUK
Public Information Meeting Wastewater Treatment January 26, 2016.
The Clean Water Act (1977, 1981, 1987) By: Jonas Szajowitz.
PROPOSED BRUNSWICK COUNTY INTERBASIN TRANSFER PETITION REQUEST NOVEMBER 14, 2013.
Water System Master Plan & Rate Study City of DeKalb, Illinois City Council Presentation May 16, 2015.
City of Fillmore Facing a Chloride Pollution Problem July 7, 2008.
Phase II and Compost Facility Upgrade Projects February 16, 2012.
Town of Enfield : Upgrading the Water Pollution Control Facility & Collection System Jay Sheehan, PE Michael Burns, PE.
Operating Efficiencies Costs to operate and maintain the water and sewer system have not varied significantly during the first 5 years of operation.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA FINANCIAL FORECAST AND CAPITAL FACILITIES FEES ANALYSIS Prepared in Conjunction With the Utility System Revenue.
1 Highland Water District CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN.
UTILITY PARTNERSHIP CITY OF STOCKTON & OMI / THAMES WATER SERVICE CONTRACT.
1 | emwd.org AquaSel Brine Concentration Demonstration Project Khos Ghaderi, P.E. May 18, 2016.
Grey Owl Municipal Water feasibility study
Recycled Water Project Basis of Design Report
Removal efficiency of nitrate.
Effluents Standards In Pakistan Environmental protection agency (EPA) is responsible for all aspects of the environment; regulation of sanitation and.
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS AND GOALS
Sustainable Water Infrastructure through Innovative Financing
RUSSELL - ROSSBURN WATER SUPPLY
Chromium 6 Regulation Corrective Action Plan October 6, 2015
A Coordinated Approach to Reduce Potential Lead Exposure
Jon Risgaard, Wastewater Branch Rick Bolich, Raleigh Regional Office
Sewer User Rate Increase PUBLIC HEARING
Wastewater Treatment.
Wastewater Surcharge Reduction for Manufacturing Processes
Development Charge Public Meeting October 23, 2017
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
Wastewater Treatment.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework
Wastewater Facilities Upgrade Project
CP-TXT Amendment to the Capital Improvements Element & Public School Facilities Element (Annual Update) October 2008.
Controlling Project Cost and Schedule
Future Water Supply Evaluation
City of Sunrise Wastewater Reuse Program
City of Janesville Wastewater Facility Plan Amendment Public Hearing
2018 Water/Wastewater Rate Study and Financial Forecast
Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Water Quality
Presentation transcript:

CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016 The MPCA issued the City of Marshall Wastewater Facility a Chloride limit in its NPDES Permit issued in 2014. The limit has a compliance schedule to meet this limit by 2024. The new limit is 261 mg/l and we are currently discharging about 560 mg/l.

Chloride (salt) is used in water softeners to recharge the media so the media attracts the hard water chemicals as the water passes through the media. This process produces the soft water for use in our homes. As the media gets full of hard water chemicals, the media needs to be recharged and the brine (salt) solution flushes the hard water chemicals with the brine solution into the sanitary sewer.

This is how chlorides get into the wastewater. Once salt is added to water, it is very difficult to remove. Salt passes through the wastewater plant and is discharged into the river and may cause toxicity to fish and aquatic life. Road salt is also a cause of non-point pollution in rivers.

Marshall has very hard water, and softening is necessary. Marshall Municipal Utilities (MMU) currently partially softens its raw water using lime. MMU has a proposed upgraded design to further soften the raw water using lime and soda ash.

This would allow MMU to treat the raw water to a much softer level where home softening could be greatly reduced or eliminated. The proposed upgrade would be very expensive. Current estimates are in the $9 million range. We are investigating the potential for some grant money from State agencies to help offset the cost.

The increased costs to reduce chlorides is a wastewater permit issue The increased costs to reduce chlorides is a wastewater permit issue. Reduction of chlorides is easier and more cost-effective at the raw water treatment plant, resulting in the reduction of water softener needs. The costs for improvements for elimination of chlorides to permit levels should be funded through wastewater use charges.

SOFTENING SYSTEM MODIFICATION STUDY UPDATE MMU FILTRATION PLANT October 2016 Presented by: Advanced Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (AE2S)

Improve MMUFP Process Performance & Address OBJECTIVES Support the City in Achieving Compliance w/ more stringent Chloride discharge regulations from WWTF Improve MMUFP Process Performance & Address Aging Equipment

EXISTING WATER TREATMENT FACILITY MMU owns and operates a 8.0 MGD Lime Softening Treatment Facility Hardness of the Raw Water ~ 850 mg/L Hardness of the Treated Water ~ 600 mg/LL

EXISTING WATER TREATMENT FACILITY IMPORTANT NOTE: Chlorides in the system do NOT come from the MMUFP. MPCA is proposing chloride concentration limits of: 261 mg/L for the Average Month 302 mg/L for the Maximum Day Average WWTF discharge into the Redwood River: Range from 470 mg/L to 689 mg/L Average of 561.2 mg/L Average finished water chloride concentration from the MMUFP: Range of 22 to 51 mg/l Average Blended scenario ~ 26.28 mg/L

SOFTENING SYSTEM MODIFICATION STUDY PURPOSE: Assess the impact of additional softening at the MMUFP on: Reduced home water softener use Reduced Chloride in industrial discharges APPROACH: Evaluated Feasibility of Softening to 150 mg/L Water Quality Impact Required MMUFP Improvements Technical and Financial

CALCULATED CHLORIDE CONCENTRATION SOFTENING SYSTEM MODIFICATION STUDY WATER QUALITY IMPACT CONCLUSIONS CALCULATED CHLORIDE CONCENTRATION (mg/L) PROPOSED DISCHARGE LIMIT CURRENT DISCHARGE 561 Softening Improvements at MMUFP ONLY 341 261 Reductions of Major Industries to 260mg/L ONLY 443 Softening Improvements at MMUFP AND Reduction of Major Industries to 260mg/L 212

SOFTENING SYSTEM MODIFICATION STUDY WATER QUALITY IMPACT CONCLUSIONS Achieving Required Chloride Concentration will Require both “Residential” and “Industrial” Participation Public Education Compliance Programs, Rebates, Ordinances Industrial Pretreatment Programs Limiting Industrial WW discharge chloride concentrations to 260 mg/L

RECOMMENDED MMUFP IMPROVEMENTS Increased Capacity to Feed Lime New System to Feed Soda Ash Expanded Building to House Equipment Increased Recarbonation Capacity (pH adjustment) Improved System to Manage Residual Waste Product

Summary of Probable Costs SUMMARY COSTS SUMMARY OF PROBABLE TOTAL PROJECT COSTS Summary of Probable Costs Softening – Lime and Soda Ash (Building Expansion) $6,203,000 Recarbonation System $1,041,000 Gravity Thickener $1,799,000 Total $9,043,000 Note: Cost estimates are for an anticipated 2019 construction timeline.

SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED O&M COSTS SUMMARY COSTS SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED O&M COSTS Description *Soften to 150 mg/l = 9 grains/gal* Quantities Estimated Cost TOTALS    Chemical Cost per CCF $1.03 per CCF O&M Cost Staff/Labor Cost 0.54 FTE $32,310 per year Sludge Management Cost $270,000 Power Cost $17,100 Total O&M Cost $319,410 Annual Production 920 MG O&M Cost per CCF $0.26 Total Softening O&M Cost per CCF $1.28 Incremental Increase from Existing $0.98

CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS Improvements at the MMUFP can assist in Achieving Chloride Discharge Compliance Softening to ~150 mg/L Reduce residential water softening practices Industrial Pretreatment Program(s) Improvements at the MMUFP Achieve both increased softening and replacement of aging process equipment New process equipment with improved efficiency Capital Cost ~ $9M Increase in Operating Costs ~$1.00/CCF Estimated 2-years from initiation to operation