Final COAST working group meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alan Edwards European Commission 5 th GEO Project Workshop London, UK 8-9 February 2011 * The views expressed in these slides may not in any circumstances.
Advertisements

6th EC Framework Programme for Research Scientific Support to Policies: “Integrating and Strengthening the European Research Area” Area (i) Policy-oriented.
DG ResearchEuropean Commission 1 DG RTD/E.2/JL - 8/16/2014 Scientific Support to Policies Dr. Hans-Jörg Lutzeyer European Commission Research Directorate-General.
November 2004 The Research Infrastructures in FP7 DG RTD – Directorate ‘Structuring ERA’
NMP-NCP meeting - Brussels, 27 Jan 2005 Towards FP 7: Preliminary principles and orientations… Nicholas Hartley European Commission DG Research DG Research.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on activities and partnership JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME.
Fostering entrepreneurial mindsets through education and learning
Dr Costas Papaconstantinou
COST 356 EST - Towards the definition of a measurable environmentally sustainable transport CONTACTS Dr Robert Joumard, chairman, INRETS, tel
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 LESSONS FROM THE THEMATIC EVALUATION OF THE TERRITORIAL EMPLOYMENT PACTS Veronica Gaffey, DG Regional.
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
Ingenious-science.eu ECB National Needs Analysis Workshop – Israel Charmaine Kerr ECB Project Coordination.
Participatory research to enhance climate change policy and institutions in the Caribbean: ARIA toolkit pilot 27 th meeting of the CANARI Partnership January.
Implementation Instruments for FP6 Thematic Priorities Joseph Prieur - Aeronautics DG Research- Space &Transport.
Sophie Sergent Ifremer European Affairs Department / MariFish WP7 ERANET MariFish COORDINATION OF EUROPEAN MARINE FISHERIES RESEARCH Presentation of MariFish.
1 SMEs – a priority for FP6 Barend Verachtert DG Research Unit B3 - Research and SMEs.
Warszawa 18 luty th Framework Programme NMP - 2nd Calls Integrated Projects for SMEs Hervé Péro, Christophe Lesniak DG Research.
Poznan 19 April Kwietnia 2005 Poznan FP6 The Next Calls for 2005 Technology Platforms FP7.
1 UNEP/IETC EST Initiative Proposed Cooperation Framework 4 December 2003 Otsu, Japan.
European Commission Research 1 Participation in the EU 6th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development Peter Härtwich, DG Research,
Bureau for International Research and Technology Cooperation Herlitschka 1 Warsaw FP6 Launch Conference - 26 Nov Small and Medium Enterprises -
European Commission Directorate General Environment Page 1 Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning monitoring.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
COST Action and European GBIF Nodes Anne-Sophie Archambeau.
Leader Axis Rural Development Policy by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
European Topic Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production (ETC/SCP) Lars Fogh Mortensen, Head of Group Sustainable Consumption and Production.
ITC - ETUC European Sectoral Social Dialogue in the construction industry Werner Buelen Tel : 02/ (ext.45)
European Commission “Intelligent Energy for Europe”
GEF governance reforms to enhance effectiveness and civil society engagement Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point , GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation.
Strengthening the foundations of ERA
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
“CareerGuide for Schools”
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Project Presentation Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator: BRGM (Fr)
Priority 3 NMP: generalities
Marine Strategy Framework Directive:
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
The ERA.Net instrument Aims and benefits
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
The challenge of European Research
Fitness Check of environmental reporting
Enterprise and Industry Directorate General
the European Qualifications Framework (EQF)
AMICI WP1 – Management, coordination and dissemination
Development of a protocol for identification of reference conditions, and boundaries between high, good and moderate status in lakes and watercourses (REFCOND)
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Update on progress since last WG meeting (13-14 June 2002)
7th EU Research FP has ten themes defined in order:
EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.
Information on projects
REPORTING ON DELIVERY OF EU BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Summary of BRIDGE achievements Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator:
eEurope 2005 What’s new? What’s still important?
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds: BRIDGE Co-ordinator: BRGM (Fr) Groundwater Characterisation workshop, 25 June 2004.
Strong needs for coordination at EU level
Part I.
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation CGBN meeting
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
Implementation of the EMEP monitoring strategy
The Joint Action on Health Information InfAct
WORKSHOP “Emerging environmental pollutants: key issues and challenges” Stresa, Italy June 2006.
Water Science-Policy Interface (CIS-SPI) Progress report
EIONET and EUROWATERNET Common Implementation Strategy
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Scientific Support to Policies
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Experience of the implementation of FP6; preparations towards FP7
Presentation transcript:

Final COAST working group meeting Lisbon, 27-28 February 2003 AMBITION proposal: Linking ecologicAl and chemical status of the Marine waters, using BenthIc communiTy Indicators in a pan-EurOpeaN scale European Commission The Sixth Framework Programme covers Community activities in the field of research, technological development and demonstration (RTD) for the period 2002 to 2006 Javier Franco & Ángel Borja Dept. Oceanography and Marine Environment, AZTI Foundation Herrera Kaia, Portualdea, z/g 20110 – Pasaia, Gipuzkoa (Spain)

What is the EU’s Research Framework Programme (FP)? The FP is the EU’s main instrument for research funding in Europe. The FP is proposed by the European Commission and adopted by Council and the European Parliament following a co-decision procedure. FPs cover a period of five years with the last year of one FP and the first year of the following FP overlapping. FPs have been implemented since 1984. The Sixth FP (FP6) is fully operational as of January 1, 2003. FP6 aims to contribute to the creation of a true “European Research Area” (ERA). ERA is a vision for the future of research in Europe, an internal market for science and technology. It fosters scientific excellence, competitiveness and innovation through the promotion of better co-operation and co-ordination between relevant actors at all levels. At their summit in Lisbon in March 2000, heads of state and governments called for better leveraging of European research efforts through the creation of ERA. The FP is the financial instrument that will help make the European Research Area a reality.

What is the main difference between FP6 and previous research framework programmes? Past FPs have helped to develop a culture of scientific and technological co-operation between different EU countries and they have been instrumental in achieving good research results. They have not, however, created a lasting impact on greater coherence at European level. FP6 has therefore been re-defined and streamlined with the following objectives: - concentrating European efforts on fewer priorities - in particular on areas where co-operation at European level presents clear added value; - moving towards progressive integration of activities of all relevant participants working at different levels; - promoting research activities designed to have a lasting, “structuring” impact; - supporting activities that will strengthen Europe’s general scientific and technological basis; - using the scientific potential of candidate countries to prepare and assist their accession to the EU for the benefit of European science at large.

What are the FP’s instruments? New instruments Integrated projects Networks of excellence Traditional instruments Specific targeted research projects Coordination actions Specific support actions … Marie Curie actions Host-driven actions Individual-driven actions

The AMBITION proposal The AMBITION Specific Targeted Research Project (STREP) is focused directly within the FP6 Specific Programme "Integrating and Strengthening the European Research Area", specifically in the RTD “Supporting European Policies”, in the area under priority “Sustainable management of Europe's natural resources”, subpriority 8.1.B.1.5. “Environmental assessment (soil, water, air, noise, including the effects of chemical substances)” and Task 5: “Contribution to prevent the deterioration of the water status and ensure the achievement and maintenance of the good status of surface and ground waters (WFD)”, through studying the relationships between ecological and chemical status of surface waters: to establish relationships between the chemical and ecological status of surface waters in order to link the deterioration of the ecological status to well identified chemicals. Task 5 Problem description … In many instances, problems detected on the basis of ecological quality criteria are not directly linked to chemical pressures (e.g. surface waters of a “good chemical status” may have a poor ecological status). This may be due to the presence of unknown or not monitored substances, combined effects of various substances etc. In this respect, research is deemed necessary to investigate the causes of deterioration of ecological status of surface waters, linking them to chemical or other significant pressures. Such research would support the analysis as described under Annex II and V of the Directive. Objective Research is to establish relationships between the chemical and ecological status of surface waters in order to link the deterioration of the ecological status to well identified chemicals.

The AMBITION proposal Task 5 Approach The project should take into consideration the WFD requirements regarding chemical and ecological indicators. It should be built on existing information (literature review, networking) followed by laboratory-based experiments (e.g. tank experiments with relevant parameters) and statistical analyses to study the chemical/ecological interactions, and field experiments in different locations to support/validate the findings. Expected outputs The research outputs should enable to link the ecological status of surface waters with their chemical status, which should enable to better define the good surface water status in the WFD. The results should hence support the options of the WFD regarding to the Environmental Quality Standards and the choice of ecological indicators, and provide data to validate these options and possibly update them. Types of instruments Specific targeted research project. Potential EC contribution: between 3,5 and 4 Mio€. Nature of partnership The partnership should involve research organisations (research institutes and universities) and policy-makers in charge of the implementation of the WFD. SMEs specialised in bioassays should, if possible, be involved. In addition, networking with other stakeholders (e.g. NGOs, industrial associations etc.) should be envisaged. Organisation of the work and duration Considering the requirement of WFD monitoring programmes to be operational by the end of 2006, the duration of the project should be 36 months at a maximum.

The AMBITION proposal Taking into account the work to be done, and the expected outputs, the critical mass must be important, involving 27 groups or institutes; and at least 60-70 researchers, policy makers, managers, environmental planners, etc. The ambition of this STREP is to mobilise all this scientific potential, focused on a clear objective related with the WFD. It is clear that this Directive has other potential areas of development (phytoplankton, fishes, etc.) and, if there are other complementary proposals to the Task 5, they should be coordinated as mentioned above. Moreover, this STREP could be horizontally and vertically related to some EU research projects already existing (BEEP, TARGET, BIOMARE, CHARM, etc.). AMBITION WILL DEAL WITH BENTHIC BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS: MACROZOBENTHOS AND MACROPHYTOBENTHOS Participants: Spain (COORD.) Belgium Bulgaria Denmark Finland France Germany Greece Ireland Italy Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Spain Sweden UK

The AMBITION proposal - Project management activities: the WP 1 directly addressed to ensure the successful delivery of the objectives of the project in the most cost-effective manner, to establish successful channels of communication between project partners, the end-user partners, the EU Commission, other related European and national projects, and the scientific community. - Research activities: addressed to achieve the overall objective and the scientific and technological objectives. They will assess the ecological status on the basis of macrozoobenthos (WP 2) and macrophytobenthos (WP 3), and their relationships with the chemical status. These WPs will include the selection of case-study areas, laboratory experiments, statistical analyses to study the chemical/ecological interactions, and field studies in different locations to support and validate the findings, taking into consideration the WFD requirements regarding chemical and ecological indicators. - Demonstration activities: the WP 4 includes the development of software for the assessment of ecological status, both in macrobenthos and phytobenthos, decision-support manuals, workshops with OSPAR, ICES, …, training courses for the dissemination of the methodologies (including end-users throughout Europe), and publications.

The AMBITION proposal Steering Committee General Coordinator (WP1) Staff Staff End Users Board Scientific Board ICES ICES Benthos Benthos Ecology Ecology WG WG WP2 WP2 European Environmental Agency European Environmental Agency WP3 WP3 WFD WFD Working Groups Working Groups WP4 National Ministry of Environment National Ministry of Environment Data Base Data Base National Monitoring Networks National Monitoring Networks Relationships with other potential STREPs , based upon the WFD: fishes , phytoplankton , pollutants , etc. Scientific External Advisory Group

The AMBITION proposal: key ideas The role of projects like AMBITION is exactly to give empirically derived relations or other more or less linear functions between pressure factors, chemical indicators and ecological status. AMBITION will hopefully be a tool to improve our understanding of reference conditions and how deterioration of these is linked to pressure factors with special emphasis on deriving relations between pressure factors and ecological status, that allow us to seperate the different quality classes objectively and consistent across the ecoregions. AMBITION has a pan-European approach AMBITION will be focussed on transitional and coastal water masses AMBITION will be focussed on macrophytobenthos and macrozobenthos