Descartes Scepticism.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Philosophy Through the Centuries
Advertisements

the argument from sensory error
Meditation IV God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error.
The ontological argument. I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor.
The Role of God in the Meditations (1) Context
Descartes God.
The evil demon argument. I will suppose, then, not that Deity, who is sovereignly good and the fountain of truth, but that some malignant demon, who is.
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ rationalism
René Descartes ( ). The popular version of Descartes.
Meditations on First Philosophy
1.Why does Descartes want certainty? 2.What area of philosophy was Descartes concerned with? 3.Explain the differences between the sceptical approach and.
Lecture Three “The Problem of Knowledge” Think (pp. 32 – 48)  Review last lecture  Descartes’ Clear and Distinct Ideas  “The Trademark Argument”  The.
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
1 The Rationalists: Descartes The Cartesian Doubt Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
Descartes on scepticism
How Claims of Knowledge Are Justified Foundationalism: knowledge claims are based on indubitable foundations –I can doubt whether there is a world, whether.
The Evil Demon Argument
Results from Meditation 2
Descartes’ First Meditation
Descartes & Rationalism
Philosophy of Mind Week 2: Descartes and Dualism
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
Epistemology Section 1 What is knowledge?
Descartes. Descartes - b.1596 d.1650 ❑ Not a skeptic – “there really is a world, that men have bodies, and the like (things which no one of sound mind.
Descartes’ Meditations
© Michael Lacewing Doubt in Descartes’ Meditations Michael Lacewing
Descartes Meditations. Knowledge needs a foundation Descartes knows he has false beliefs, but he does not know which ones are false So, we need a method.
Meditation 1. Argument From Illusion We needn’t reject sources of knowledge one by one – we can reject by class. Authorities – parents, books, famous people,
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
Meditation 6. Trusting the Senses The senses certainly appear real. Rejects God or himself as the source of sense impression & concludes they are real.
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 12 Minds and bodies #1 (Descartes) By David Kelsey.
Descartes' Evil Demon Hypothesis:
Varieties of Scepticism. Academic Scepticism Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy A return to the Socratic.
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Descates Meditations II A starting point for reconstructing the world.
DESCARTES MEDITATION 1. René Descartes
Descartes' Meditations : Introduction to Philosophy June 4, 2009 Instructor: Karin Howe Carnegie Mellon University.
Argument From Dreaming. 1 This is the second sceptical argument – the second wave of doubt, after the argument from illusion – senses cannot be trusted.
Chapter 3: Knowledge The Rationalist’s Confidence: Descartes Introducing Philosophy, 10th edition Robert C. Solomon, Kathleen Higgins, and Clancy Martin.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
Rene Descartes: March – February Father of Modern Philosophy Attempts to reconcile the new scientific method with traditional metaphysics.
DESCARTES: MEDITATION 3 OR: THE WORLD REGAINED — WITH CERTAINTY(?)
Introduction to Philosophy Descartes’ First Meditation
Meditation Six Of God: That He Exists.
Jim Fahey Department of Cognitive Science 9/16/2010
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Skepticism.
Skepticism Introduction.
Descartes’ Meditations
1st wave: Illusion Descartes begins his method of doubt by considering that in the past he has been deceived by his senses: Things in the distance looked.
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Descartes, Meditations 1 and 2
External World Skepticism
Descartes' Meditations
March, 26, 2010 EPISTEMOLOGY.
The Evil Demon Argument
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
Descartes -- Meditations One
René Descartes The Quest for Certainty
Philosophy Sept 28th Objective Opener 10 minutes
March, 26, 2010 EPISTEMOLOGY.
Meditation 2: The Nature of the Mind, which is Better Known than the Body Descartes Meditation I.
First Meditation – paragraph 1
Descartes The Cogito.
God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error
Descartes and Hume on knowledge of the external world
Presentation transcript:

Descartes Scepticism

Foundations Admittedly, we never see people pulling down all the houses of a city for the sole purpose of rebuilding them in a different style to make the streets more attractive; but we do see many individuals having their houses pulled down in order to rebuild them, some even being forced to do so when the houses are in danger of falling down and their foundations are insecure [AT, Vol. VI, pp.13-14].

Reply to Hobbes Third Set of Objections AT Vol. VII, p 171-2. Distinction between intellectual and sensory knowledge To set up the arguments so that they could be refuted Truths of philosophy are made invulnerable to ‘metaphysical doubt’

Metaphysical Doubt Classical Scepticism Metaphysical Doubt

Foundations Some years ago I was struck by the large number of falsehoods that I had accepted as true in my childhood, and by the highly doubtful nature of the whole edifice that I had subsequently based on them. I realised that it was, once in the course of my life, to demolish everything completely and start again from the foundations if I wanted to establish anything at in the sciences that was stable and likely to last [AT VII, p. 17.]

Method of Doubt I should hold back my assent from opinions which are not completely certain and indubitable. So for the purpose pf rejecting all my opinions, it will be enough if I find in each of them at least some reasons for doubt. ATVII, p. 17

Sensible Knowledge Whatever I have up till now accepted as most true I have acquired either from the senses or through the senses. But from time to time I have found that the senses deceive, and it is prudent never to trust them completely those who have deceived us even once [AT VII, p. 18].

Dreaming As I think about this more clearly, I see plainly that there are never any sure signs by means of which being awake can be distinguished from being asleep. The result is that I begin to feel dazed, and this very feeling only reinforces the notion that I may be asleep [AT VII, p. 19].

Corporeal Nature The class that appears to include corporeal nature in general, and its extension; the shape of extended things; the quantity, or size and number of these things; the place in which they may exist, the time through which they may endure, and so on [AT VII, p. 20].

Hyperbolic Doubt Any yet firmly rooted in my mind is the long-standing opinion that there is an omnipotent God who made me the kind of creature that I am. How do I know that he has not brought about that there is no earth, no sky, no extended thing, no shape, no size, no place, while at the same time ensuring that all these things appear to me to exist just as they do now [AT VII, p. 21]?

Malicious Demon I will suppose therefore not God, who is supremely good and the source of truth, but rather some malicious demon of the utmost power and cunning has employed all his energies in order to deceive me. I shall think that the sky, the air, the earth, colours, shapes, sounds and all external things are merely the delusions of dreams which he has devised to ensnare my judgement. I shall consider myself as not having hands or eyes, or flesh, or blood or senses, but as falsely believing that I have all these things [AT VII, pp. 22-3].