Lessons from Schools and Districts on the Performance Frontier

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPROVING ACHIEVEMENT AND CLOSING GAPS BETWEEN GROUPS Charleston, West Virginia October, 2003.
Advertisements

Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Kentucky Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Kentucky is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Tennessee Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Tennessee is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
Is College and Career Readiness an Internationally Competitive Standard? George Schlott Principal Consultant for Program Solutions - Illinois ACT, Inc.
Achieve Data Profile: Pennsylvania April AMERICAN DIPLOMA PROJECT NETWORK The Big Picture n To be successful in today’s economy, all students.
1 Florida Formula for Student Achievement: Lessons for Improving Student Learning John L Winn.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Oklahoma Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Oklahoma is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
HIGH SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT IN AMERICA: What Do We Know? Iowa High School Summit The Education Trust December, 2004.
The Educational Imperative: What Do We Know about Student Achievement? OVAE: American's Career Resource Network (ACRN) National Training Conference Alexandria,
HIGH SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT IN AMERICA: What Do We Know? Louisiana High School Commission The Education Trust December, 2004.
© The Education Trust, Inc., Latino Achievement in America.
CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP University of the State of New York Albany, NY November, 2005.
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
Why College- and Career- Ready Expectations for All Nevada Students? Updated February 2013.
GEAR UP GEAR UP NASSFA Conference Maureen McLaughlin Deputy Assistant Secretary Office of Post Secondary Education JULY 9, 2000.
No Time to Lose The Imperatives to Educate A New Majority: Low Income Students in Georgia “One by one their seats were emptied…Here the circle has been.
Standards In Practice TM : Instructional Gap Analysis The PowerPoint presentation that follows was created by The Education Trust and can be found, together.
It’s Up to Us: Going the Distance to Improve Results and Close Gaps
The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning The Status of the Teaching Profession 2005 California State University, Office of the Chancellor Policy.
IMPROVING ACHIEVEMENT IN HIGH SCHOOLS AND BEYOND Prepared for the Office of Vocational and Adult Education by The Education Trust 2003 Archived Information.
Why College- and Career- Ready Expectations for All District of Columbia Students? Updated February 2013.
IMPROVING ACHIEVEMENT AND CLOSING GAPS BETWEEN GROUPS: How Can Researchers Help? IES June, 2006.
Working Together to Improve Student Achievement and Close Gaps---- Oregon’s Superintendents’ Summer Institute.
Hope for America’s Schools: Lessons for Ohio Columbus Metropolitan Club KidsOhio Education Trust, May 2006.
IMPROVING ACHIEVEMENT AND CLOSING GAPS BETWEEN GROUPS: Lessons from Schools and Districts on the Performance Frontier 22 nd Annual Washington State Assessment.
2005 by The Education Trust, Inc. 1 Achievement In America.
Measuring Up 2004 Oregon. EXHIBIT A Measuring Up: The Basics Looks at higher education for the entire state, not individual colleges and universities.
LOUISIANA 1 Goals for Education Challenge to Lead 2003 Louisiana.
Measuring Up 2004 Texas. Measuring Up: The Basics Looks at higher education for the entire state, not individual colleges and universities. Focuses on.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Georgia Goals for Education Challenge to Lead: Georgia 2006 Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education.
Why College- and Career- Ready Expectations for All Georgia Students? Updated February 2013.
2001 by The Education Trust, Inc. Achievement In America 2001 The Education Trust, Inc.
2001 by The Education Trust, Inc. Achievement In America 2001 The Education Trust, Inc.
© 2010 THE EDUCATION TRUST Raising Achievement and Closing Gaps Between Groups: Roles for Federal Policy.
Achieve Data Profile: Washington January AMERICAN DIPLOMA PROJECT NETWORK The Big Picture n To be successful in today’s economy, all students.
2007 by The Education Trust, Inc. Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2006 Prepared by the Education Trust December 2007.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Mississippi Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Mississippi is Moving Ahead Progress Report 2010.
Vision for Education in Tennessee Our Strategic Priorities ESEA Directors Institute Kathleen Airhart, Deputy Commissioner August 2014.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Challenge to Lead 2020 Joan Lord October 19, 2012 Atlanta Renaissance Concourse Hotel Challenge to.
Nearly 7,000 high school students drop out each day. Alliance for Excellent Education.
HIGH SCHOOLS IN AMERICA 2003 Prepared for the US Department of Education By The Education Trust Archived Information.
1 Perspectives on Public Education for Poor Students and Students of Color Suzanne Adair March 26, 2003 Information provided by the Education Trust.
THE ANATOMY OF SUCCESS: Lessons from Schools on the Achievement Frontier Detroit Public Schools January, 2007.
California State University, Sacramento Nancy Shulock Institute for Higher Education Leadership & Policy Presentation to Conference: Policy Challenges.
10 th Annual Media Symposium Georgia Partnership for Excellence in Education.
Your future – Are you ready to lead?. What are some of the factors that require us to change what we are doing in public education? How will those changes.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Arkansas Goals for Education Challenge to Lead: Arkansas 2006 Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
Trends in Public US Education: Challenges & Opportunities
NJ will enjoy robust STEM growth
Objectives Define what Title I is and why it is important to be a Title I school Highlight your rights as a Title I parent Describe ways you can be involved.
The New American Dilemma
Will Tennessee seize the future?
Will Oregon seize the future?
Release of PARCC Student Results
Can New Jersey seize the future?
NO TIME TO WASTE: Getting Serious about High School Transformation
IMPROVING ACHIEVEMENT AND CLOSING GAPS, Pre-K Through College
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Achievement in America Learning From the Frontier: “Special Focus on Oregon” Closing Gaps and Raising Achievement for All Confederation of Oregon School.
Nettles: Equity & Excellence Project Meeting, May 2018
The Future of Higher Education in Texas
Achievement In America 2000
In America 2001 Achievement The Education Trust, Inc.
Teaching and Learning Strategies for Success
NAEP and International Assessments
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
RECURRING QUESTIONS What are the goals of education?
Challenge to Lead: Texas
Presentation transcript:

Improving Achievement and Closing Gaps Between Groups in Secondary Schools: Lessons from Schools and Districts on the Performance Frontier Florida Statewide Education Conference Orlando October, 2006

First, some good news. After more than a decade of fairly flat achievement and stagnant or growing gaps, we appear to be turning the corner.

NAEP Reading, 9 Year-Olds: Record Performance for All Groups

NAEP Math, 9 Year-Olds: Record Performance for All Groups

Bottom Line: When We Really Focus on Something, We Make Progress

Clearly, much more remains to be done in elementary schools. Too many youngsters still enter middle and high schools way behind.

But at least we have some traction on these problems.

The Same is MUCH LESS True of Secondary Schools

Middle Grades: Results Up a Little in Math

Achievement Up in Math, 13 Year-Olds, NAEP Source: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress (p. 108) Washington, DC: US Department of Education, August 2000

Results in Reading Pretty Flat

Achievement Flat in Reading 13 Year-Olds, NAEP Source: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress (p. 107) Washington, DC: US Department of Education, August 2000

High School

High School Achievement: Math and Science: NAEP Long-Term Trends Source: NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress.

HIGH SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT: READING AND WRITING NAEP Long-Term Trends

Before you take too much credit for the improvements in math, though, take a look…

Value Added Declining in Middle School Math... Age 9-13 Growth Source: NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress

Value Added Declining in High School Math... Age 13-17 Growth Source: NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress

…Still Age 13-17 Growth Source: Main NAEP 1996, 2000

Reading: Students Entering HS Better Prepared, But Leaving Worse Source: NAEP 1996 Trends in Academic Progress

What About Results for Different Groups of Students?

NAEP Math, 13 Year-Olds: Increases and Record Performance for All Groups

NAEP Reading, 13 Year-Olds

NAEP Reading, 17 Year-Olds 21 29

NAEP Math, 17 Year-Olds 28 20

Not just a pattern on NAEP. State assessments show similar trends.

Florida

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test, Grade 4 Reading by Race/Ethnicity 25 31 38 Data Source: Florida State Department of Education, http://www.firn.edu/doe/sas/fcat/fcatscor.htm

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test, Grade 8 Reading by Race/Ethnicity 34 32 35 Data Source: Florida State Department of Education, http://www.firn.edu/doe/sas/fcat/fcatscor.htm

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test, Grade 10 Reading by Race/Ethnicity 33 25 30 Data Source: Florida State Department of Education, http://www.firn.edu/doe/sas/fcat/fcatscor.htm

NAEP 2005 Grade 4 Reading, Overall Scale Scores Florida Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde

NAEP 2005 Grade 4 Reading, Latino Scale Scores Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde

NAEP 2005 Grade 4 Reading, African American Scale Scores Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde

NAEP 2005 Grade 4 Reading, Low-Income Scale Scores Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde

NAEP 4th Grade Reading Growth Between 1998 and 2005 Florida vs NAEP 4th Grade Reading Growth Between 1998 and 2005 Florida vs. Other States Source: USDOE, NCES, National Assessment of Educational Progress, (NAEP) Data Explorer

NAEP 2005 Grade 8 Reading, Overall Scale Scores Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde

NAEP 2005 Grade 8 Reading, African American Scale Scores Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde

NAEP 2005 Grade 8 Reading, Latino Scale Scores Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde

NAEP 2005 Grade 8 Reading, Low-Income Scale Scores Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde

NAEP 2005 Grade 8 Math, Overall Scale Scores Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde

NAEP 2005 Grade 8 Math, African American Scale Scores Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde

NAEP 2005 Grade 8 Math, Latino Scale Scores Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde

NAEP 2005 Grade 8 Math, Low-Income Scale Scores Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde

Why?

Hormones?

Students in Other Countries Gain far More in Secondary School TIMSS

PISA

PISA 2003: US 15 Year-Olds Rank Near The End Of The Pack Among 29 OECD Countries Source: NCES, 2005, International Outcomes of Learning in Mathematics, Literacy and Problem Solving: 2003 PISA Results. NCES 2005-003

2003: U.S. Ranked 24th out of 29 OECD Countries in Mathematics Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), PISA 2003 Results, data available at http://www.oecd.org/

Problems are not limited to our high-poverty and high-minority schools . . .

U.S. Ranks Low in the Percent of Students in the Highest Achievement Level (Level 6) in Math Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), PISA 2003 Results, data available at http://www.oecd.org/

U.S. Ranks 23rd out of 29 OECD Countries in the Math Achievement of the Highest-Performing Students* * Students at the 95th Percentile Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), PISA 2003 Results, data available at http://www.oecd.org/

U.S. Ranks 23rd out of 29 OECD Countries in the Math Achievement of High-SES Students Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), PISA 2003 Results, data available at http://www.oecd.org/

Problems not limited to math, either.

2003 PISA Problem-Solving Results: US #23 Source: OECD, PISA. Problem Solving for Today’s World. 2004

55% of our 15 year olds at problem-solving level 1 or below. Closest other country? LATVIA Source: OECD Problem Solving for Tomorrow’s World. 2004

One measure on which we rank high? Inequality!

PISA 2003: Gaps in Performance Of U. S PISA 2003: Gaps in Performance Of U.S.15 Year-Olds Are Among the Largest of OECD Countries *Of 29 OECD countries, based on scores of students at the 5th and 95th percentiles. Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), PISA 2003 Results, data available at http://www.oecd.org/

These gaps begin before children arrive at the schoolhouse door. But, rather than organizing our educational system to ameliorate this problem, we organize it to exacerbate the problem.

By giving students who arrive with less, less in school, too. How? By giving students who arrive with less, less in school, too.

Some of these “lesses” are a result of choices that policymakers make.

Nation: Inequities in State and Local Revenue Per Student Gap High Poverty vs. Low Poverty Districts -$868 per student High Minority vs. Low Minority Districts -$797 per student Source: The Funding Gap, 2004, by Kevin Carey. Data are for 2002

But some of the “lesses” –indeed, perhaps the most devastating ones— are a function of choices that educators make.

Choices we make about what to expect of whom…

Students in Poor Schools Receive ‘A’s for Work That Would Earn ‘Cs’ in Affluent Schools Source: Prospects (ABT Associates, 1993), in “Prospects: Final Report on Student Outcomes”, PES, DOE, 1997.

Choices we make about what to teach whom…

Fewer Latino students are enrolled in Algebra 2 Source: CCSSO, State Indicators of Science and Mathematics Education, 2001

And choices we make about Who teaches whom…

Math and Science Classes of Mostly Minority Students Are More Often Taught by Misassigned Teachers Source: Jeannie Oakes. Multiplying Inequalities: The Effects of Race, Social Class, and Tracking on Opportunities to Learn Mathematics and Science (Rand: 1990)

Poor and Minority Students Get More Inexperienced* Teachers *Teachers with 3 or fewer years of experience. “High” and “low” refer to top and bottom quartiles. Source: National Center for Education Statistics, “Monitoring Quality: An Indicators Report,” December 2000.

Results are devastating. Kids who come in a little behind, leave a lot behind.

By the end of high school?

African American and Latino 17 Year-Olds Do Math at Same Levels As White 13 Year-Olds

African American and Latino 17 Year-Olds Read at Same Levels As White 13 Year-Olds

So What Can We Do?

Many educators have concluded that we can’t do much.

What We Hear Many Educators Say: They’re poor; Their parents don’t care; They come to schools without breakfast; Not enough books Not enough parents . . .

But if they are right, why are low-income students and students of color performing so high in some schools…

Centennial Place Elementary School Atlanta, Georgia 92% African American 64% Low-Income Performed in the top 2% of Georgia schools in 4th grade reading in 2003 Performed in top 7 % of Georgia schools in 4th grade math in 2003 Source: Georgia Department of Education, http://www.doe.k12.ga.us Dispelling the Myth Online, http://www.edtrust.org School Information Partnership, http://www.schoolresults.org

Centennial Place High Achievement for All Students Grade 5 Math, 2005 Source: School Information Partnership, http://www.schoolmatters.com

Centennial Place High Achievement for All Students Grade 5 Reading, 2005 Source: School Information Partnership, http://www.schoolmatters.com

Elmont Memorial Junior-Senior High Elmont, New York 75% African American 12% Latino 11% Asian/Pacific Islander/American Ind. 3% White 24% Low-Income Source: http://emsc33.nysed.gov/repcrd2004/cir/280252070002.pdf

Elmont Memorial High Achievement in Mathematics Source: http://emsc33.nysed.gov/repcrd2004/overview-analysis/280252070002.pdf

Elmont Memorial High Achievement in English Source: http://emsc33.nysed.gov/repcrd2004/overview-analysis/280252070002.pdf

University Park High School Worcester, MA Grades 7-12; 70+% poverty; 50% ELL; Most students enter at least two grade levels behind.

University Park Results: 2004 100% of 10th graders passed MA high school exit exam on first attempt. 87% passed at advanced or proficient level. Fifth most successful school in the state, surpassing many schools serving wealthy students.

Bottom Line: At Every Level of Education, What We Do Matters A Lot!

MOVING FORWARD

#1. Higher performing schools have high and clear goals—and they make no excuses about student achievement. At the high school level, for example, they focus students on college and careers--even when they start with high dropout rates.

That’s Good, Because Education Pays: Annual Earnings of 25-34 yr-olds by Attainment, 2001 Source: US bureau of Labor Statistics and Bureau of the Census, Current Population Survey, March 2002

Growing Need for Higher Levels of Education: Projections of Education Shortages and Surpluses in 2012 Shortage Surplus Bachelor’s Degree Associates Degree Some College Source: Analysis by Anthony Carnevale, 2006 of Current Population Survey (1992-2004) and Census Population Projection Estimates

Even if you have your doubts, NEW STUDY FROM ACT: College ready, workforce training ready=same thing

#2. Higher performing secondary schools put all kids—not just some—in a demanding high school core curriculum.

Cliff Adelman, Answers in the Tool Box, U.S. Department of Education. Single biggest predictor post-high school success is QUALITY AND INTENSITY OF HIGH SCHOOL CURRICULUM Cliff Adelman, Answers in the Tool Box, U.S. Department of Education.

But college prep curriculum has benefits far beyond college.

Students of all sorts will learn more...

Low Quartile Students Gain More From College Prep Courses* *Grade 8-grade 12 test score gains based on 8th grade achievement. Source: USDOE, NCES, Vocational Education in the United States: Toward the Year 2000, in Issue Brief: Students Who Prepare for College and Vocation

They will also fail less often...

Challenging Curriculum Results in Lower Failure Rates, Even for Lowest Achievers Ninth-grade English performance, by high/low level course, and eighth-grade reading achievement quartiles Source: SREB, “Middle Grades to High School: Mending a Weak Link”. Unpublished Draft, 2002.

And they’ll be better prepared for the workplace.

Leading districts, states making college prep the default curriculum. Texas, Indiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Kentucky, Kansas.

#3. Higher performing schools leave very little about teaching and learning to chance.

Historically, most of the really important decisions about what students should learn and what kind of work was “good enough” left to individual teachers.

Result? A System That: Doesn’t expect very much from MOST students; and, Expects much less from some types of students than others.

‘A’ Work in Poor Schools Would Earn ‘Cs’ in Affluent Schools Source: Prospects (ABT Associates, 1993), in “Prospects: Final Report on Student Outcomes”, PES, DOE, 1997.

Students can do no better than the assignments they are given...

Grade 10 Writing Assignment A frequent theme in literature is the conflict between the individual and society. From literature you have read, select a character who struggled with society. In a well-developed essay, identify the character and explain why this character’s conflict with society is important.

Grade 10 Writing Assignment Write a composition of at least 4 paragraphs on Martin Luther King’s most important contribution to this society. Illustrate your work with a neat cover page. Neatness counts.

High Performing Schools and Districts Have clear and specific goals for what students should learn in every grade, including the order in which they should learn it; Provide teachers with common curriculum, assignments; Assess students every 4-8 weeks to measure progress; ACT immediately on the results of those assessments.

#4. Higher performing schools think very hard about how to deploy their resources…both people and time.

Take, for example, the matter of reading. Kids who arrive behind in reading…often simply assigned to courses that don’t demand much reading.

Average High School: Percent of Instructional Time in Reading Intensive Courses Below Grade Level Students On Grade Level Students Advanced Students 24% 29% 35%

Surprise: Gaps Grow.

Higher Performing High Schools: “Behind” students spend 60 additional hours (25% more time) over 1 year in reading related courses) “Behind” students get 240 additional hours over 4 years!

High performing schools are structured around student needs, rather than adult preferences.

#5. In higher performing schools and districts, leaders know that teachers matter a lot. They work hard to attract and hold good teachers. And they work hard to get strong teachers to the students who need them most.

1998 by The Education Trust, Inc.

1998 by The Education Trust, Inc.

1998 by The Education Trust, Inc.

Good teachers matter a lot. But some groups of kids don’t get their fair share of quality teachers.

Classes in High Poverty High Schools More Often Taught by Misassigned Classes in High Poverty High Schools More Often Taught by Misassigned* Teachers *Teachers who lack a major or minor in the field Source: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future, What Matters Most: Teaching for America’s Future (p.16) 1996.

Math and Science Classes of Mostly Minority Students Are More Often Taught by Misassigned Teachers Source: Jeannie Oakes. Multiplying Inequalities: The Effects of Race, Social Class, and Tracking on Opportunities to Learn Mathematics and Science (Rand: 1990)

Poor and Minority Students Get More Inexperienced* Teachers *Teachers with 3 or fewer years of experience. “High” and “low” refer to top and bottom quartiles. Source: National Center for Education Statistics, “Monitoring Quality: An Indicators Report,” December 2000.

Devastating Impact

If we had the courage and creativity to change current patterns?

“By our estimates from Texas schools, having an above average teacher for five years running can completely close the average gap between low-income students and others.” John Kain and Eric Hanushek

Download this Presentation The Education Trust Download this Presentation www.edtrust.org Washington, DC: 202-293-1217 Oakland, CA: 510-465-6444 Register Online Today for the Annual EdTrust Closing the Gap Conference, Nov 3-5, Washington, DC.