eGovernment Working Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regions for Economic Change | LMP Workshop 3C When exchanging is good for innovation: Experiences from the Lisbon Monitoring Platform How can INTERACT.
Advertisements

Technical meeting with the Regional representative offices in Brussels Brussels, 17 March 2009 The INTERACT II Programme – Knowledge Management and Capitalisation.
ICT for Energy Efficiency
Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation
Data Sharing and Linking Service Overview presentation May 2013.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SUSTAINABLE GROWTH LIFE
HORIZON 2020 The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Societal Challenge 6 Topics under DG CONNECT H3 responsibility European Commission,
JOINING UP GOVERNMENTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Establishing a European Union Location Framework.
Performance Stories Evaluation - A Monitoring Method to Enhance Evaluation Influence Riad Naji, Catriona King, Richard Habgood.
Peer Review of E-Government in Arab countries by Marco Daglio, Administrator, Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
49 th DG Meeting EGOVERNMENT Lisbon, December.
WP2 and WP5 work in progress Tallinn - September
Information Technology Planning
Chief Digital Officers (CDOs) are establishing themselves as new executives at the top management level of companies that go through a digital transformation.
Knowledge Transfer Partnership Project Nottingham Trent University and Nottinghamshire County Council Dr Adam Barnard Rachel Clark Catherine Goodall 19/4/16.
Why do we need a compensation survey
REACH FOR POLYMERS Conference presentation Milan - May 2012
The Department of Labour
SSP4000 Introduction to the Research Process Wk9: Introduction to qualitative research, Part 2 The focus of week 9 is to introduce students to the characteristics.
Value for money Guidance Webinar
Leader as a part of the new CAP
Managing performance What is it? Why? How?.
“CareerGuide for Schools”
Is there another way besides accreditation?
BPM in E-Gov <An Empirical Study in Europe>
European Commission Initiatives for eGovernment
EXPLORING GLOBAL COOPERATION OPPORTUNITIES
EPAN – Lisbon ad hoc group Welcome - Agenda Introduction
EUPAN eGOV WG Finnish Presidency Second Semester 2006
The ERA.Net instrument Aims and benefits
ESF Performance reports and Thematic reports
EUPAN DG-Troika 3rd May 2007, Berlin Medium-Term Programme (MTP)
CRUE – The Way Forward Vicki Jackson
Olli-Pekka Rissanen HRWG, Helsinki 11th September 2006
Portuguese Presidency
Portuguese Presidency
Portuguese Presidency
INSPIRE-based e-reporting pilots
EGOVERNMENT WG Troika Secretariat 26 November, 2007.
Assessment of Quality in Statistics GLOBAL ASSESSMENTS, PEER REVIEWS AND SECTOR REVIEWS IN THE ENLARGEMENT AND ENP COUNTRIES Mirela Kadic, Project Manager.
Sustainable Energy Europe
Olli-Pekka Rissanen Troika Secretariat, Helsinki 17th July 2006
DG Troika – 26 October – Portugal
Proposal: Set-up of Interest group and Roundtable
Troika of Directors General – Meeting 24 March 2006 Activities of the Human Resources WG Karin Thienel.
HRWG september 2009 Stockholm Session on MTP and WP
EGOVERNMENT WG Sintra, 22, 23 October Conclusions.
The e-government Conference main issues
Swedish EUPAN Organisation
EUPAN MTP : Strategy for further cooperation
Preparing Ministerial Recommendations for the Medium-Term Programme (MTP)
2nd Meeting of the EPAN Troika of Directors General
EPAN – eGov WG EPAN Good Practice Information System
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
INNOVATION DEALS: A NEW APPROACH TO REGULATION
EPAN – Lisbon ad hoc group Welcome - Agenda Introduction
Customer Satisfaction Measurement in European Public Administrations
EUPAN Troika Secretariat 26 March 2007, Berlin MidTermProgramme (MTP)
EUPAN DG-Troika 3rd May 2007, Berlin Medium-Term Programme (MTP)
STRUCTURE AND METHODS OF CO-OPERATION
Ministerial Declaration
Ministerial Declaration
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
Module No 6: Building Capacity in Rural Micro-Enterprises
e-Government Working Group
Programme Dutch Presidency
Health Impact Assessment in NSW
EPAN – DG Meeting Innovative Public Services
Training on joint doctoral studies
Presentation transcript:

eGovernment Working Group 1st DG Troika Vienna, 24 March 2006

Focus on processes E-Government has caused growing interest in the business processes of the public sector. „Streamlining of business processes“ a task of EPAN working plan 2006 Austria commissioned an exploratory study in the management of business processes (BPM) in Europe. With the maturing of e-Government initiatives all over Europe the focus of the development has turned from front office applications to the back offices. In ICT-enabled public authorities there is a growing interest in applying a process view to service delivery, production and collaboration in order to maximise the potential of ICT. The working plan for the EPAN eGovernment working group also cites the streamlining of business processes as a potential activity for the group. This also shows the intention of the work programme to support the objectives of the i2010 action plan, notably the modernisation of public administration. In alignment with the EPAN working plan and to support its aims, Austria therefore commissioned an exploratory study in the European state of the field of a management approach called Business Process Management. The contract was awarded at the end of last year to an academic consortium and work has started at the beginning of January.

BPM contributes to… efficient public services through leaner and faster processes reduction of administrative burden through integration of processes modernisation through more systematic redesign of processes There are a number of reasons why BPM was chosen as an area of work: Firstly, tools and methods of BPM that originate from the private sector are increasingly adapted to the public sector. Similar to e-business, e-government uses ICT to make processes leaner and faster, resulting in more efficient services. Secondly, the integration of business processes, applications and data sources reduces administrative burdens for citizens and businesses. This ensures for example that the same data only has to be provided once and is not asked for again and again by different public authorities. Thirdly, the modernisation of the public sector is considered a key driver for Europe’s competitiveness. If this modernisation is to succeed, it has to be done in a broad and strategically planned fashion. BPM is an approach that gives a systematic and holistic view on public sector organisations.

For EPAN, BPM… is a cross presidency topic: Finland contiues on business process benchmarking links to work of previous presidencies links to work of other EPAN groups (HRG, IPSG) The Finnish presidency has agreed to continue on with the topic of BPM. Extending the topic to two presidencies would have the benefit of being able to investigate a complex problem in a longer period of time without turning to completely different issues with the handover of presidencies. Another reason is that awareness of organisational change and transformation can hardly be raised within one presidency. In Austria’s view, the subject of BPM is closely related to activities and studies carried out under past presidencies. Up to now, the eGovernment working group has explored various important aspects of eGovernment like identification numbers or eAccessibility. These investigations have laid the ground for a more comprehensive approach to look at the very heart of public administrations – its business processes. Redesigning business processes is a multi-disciplinary approach that influences the structures, the employees and the service provision of public organisations. Therefore, the work of the eGovernment working group will undoubtedly provide valuable inputs to other groups of the EPAN like the HR group and the IPSG.

Study Outline Contractor: University Linz Methodology: Tele-Delphi (online interviews) eGov WG meeting 4-5 May, Vienna: Good Practice Cases Recommendations for BPM in e-government Last December a consortium under the lead of the University of Linz (Upper Austria) was awarded the contract for conducting the study. The contractors have recently conducted BPM projects or worked on e-government and therefore provide experience and a high reputation in the research field. The proposed study will employ a Tele-Delphi methodology which means that two rounds of email based interviews are conducted. Between the two rounds the first results are feed back to the interviewees who themselves evaluate their answers and are then asked again in a second round. This method improves the quality and reliability of the results and provides immediate knowledge transfer to public sector managers. The intended output of the study are recommendations for public sector managers who wish to implement a business process view on e-government. The recommendations will address the applicability of tools and methods to the public sector as well as possible pitfalls and obstacles. For those not yet aware of BPM as a management approach, the potentials and benefits will be pointed out. The interim results of the study will be presented by the contractor during the e-government working group meeting on 4-5 May in Vienna. Delegates will have the opportunity to raise questions and to discuss with the contractor. The lessons learned from the study should not only present an academic view on business processes but also what this means for managing and working in public organisations in practice. It has yet to be decided whether a representative of the private sector will have the opportunity to comment on the findings and to give a presentation how the industry can assist public authorities with the implementation of BPM.

Thank you for your attention. Your questions? gerald.trost@bka.gv.at martin.spitzenberger@bka.gv.at