A decolonial critique of a colonial project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
Advertisements

What is Social Theory?. Theory Harrington 2005: 1-3 Greek word theōria, opp. of praxis contemplation / reflection Reflection on the value and meaning.
Turn in papers at the end of class. Violence and Liberation Poli 110DA 11 Decolonization is always a violent event.
Copyright © 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved Statistics for the Behavioral and Social Sciences: A Brief Course Fifth Edition Arthur.
Honors Western Civilization Mrs. Civitella.  During the Scientific Revolution, scientists began to look at how living things interacted with nature to.
What is “Good Science”?. WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is a process by which we try to understand how the natural and physical world works and how it came.
Philosophy A crash course.. Schools of Thought O These are some of the philosophical areas of thought or study. O We’ll look at specific scholars later—today.
CHAPTER FIVE: THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE P H I L O S O P H Y A Text with Readings ELEVENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z.
The Philosophy of Science Claude Oscar Monet: London: Houses of Parliament at Sunset, 1903.
Introduction to Legal Theories
Truth, the Archives, and the Archivist Dr. Shelley Sweeney, University of Manitoba Archives & Special Collections, August 21, 2015.
Honors Debate Friday, August 14, Preview Intro to argument Argument activities We will go over the quiz on Monday Debate practice, Wednesday after.
Kantian ethics (& suicide): Kantian ethics (& suicide): Immanuel Kant ( ). A German philosopher. Ought implies Can Maxims Categorical Imperative.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?. SCIENTIFIC WORLD VIEW 1.The Universe Is Understandable. 2.The Universe Is a Vast Single System In Which the Basic Rules.
Scientific Method. My 4 out of 5 Rule If you make an observation.
Philosophy 220 The Moral Status of War.
Training and Doctrine David Chuter Training and Doctrine This may seem like a dry and technical subject … But it is fundamental to what the military.
Lecture №1 Role of science in modern society. Role of science in modern society.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory Just War Theory   Jus ad bellum: proposals to justify the use of force in a particular type of situation   Jus.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?. THEORIES ARE THE SCIENTIFIC WORLD VIEW 1.The Universe Is Understandable. 2.The Universe Is a Vast Single System In Which.
One Sample Inf-1 In statistical testing, we use deductive reasoning to specify what should happen if the conjecture or null hypothesis is true. A study.
US History. Create a list of the 5 worst crimes you can imagine on the back of your handout Learning Goal: Students will be able to explain the purpose.
LG514: International Relations Theory Lecture 7: Postpositivism – Critique or Crisis? Ken McDonagh School of Law and Government.
DEATH PENALTY Mr.Centeno Government Class NRHS. The Death Penalty, legally known as capital punishment, is the lawful imposition of death as punishment.
The philosophy of Ayn Rand…. Objectivism Ayn Rand is quoted as saying, “I had to originate a philosophical framework of my own, because my basic view.
PHIL 2 Philosophy: Ethics in Contemporary Society Week 2 Topic Outlines.
Sacco and Vanzetti. The Fears: Communism & Anarchy Communism: political ideology promoting a violent revolution in order to redistribute property and.
Religion, Peace and Justice Unit A review of the main topics.
Morality and the Moral Life. Ethics (moral philosophy): The study of morality using the methods of philosophy. Morality: Our beliefs about right and wrong.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
PHILOSOPHY AS A SECOND ORDER DISCIPLINE
Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle
Ethics: Theory and Practice
Ethics and Values for Professionals Chapter 2: Ethical Relativism
History of Philosophy.
KARL POPPER ON THE PROBLEM OF A THEORY OF SCIENTIFIC METHOD
How science works.
Bias.
It is unclear exactly what counts as a benefit or a cost
Do Now – 9/20/16 12 Angry Men – Anticipation Questions
Chapter 21 More About Tests.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
More about Tests and Intervals
Michael Mann’s “IEMP” Model of Power
Bellwork In two large groups, analyze the post-it notes for ABSTRACT or CONCRETE concepts Does the example fit the description of ABSTRACT or CONCRETE?
Sociology & Science: Sociology is often referred to as a ‘Social Science’ but can it truly be classified as a science? Scientific methodology can be used.
What is a crime? Write a brief definition.
Contemporary Legal Theories
Section 2: The Nature of Science
The Taking of Human Life
Research Methods Research Methods Lecturer/ Facilitator :
Lions Led by Donkeys? V.
Theories of Punishment
Dept. of Public Administration,
LO: Analyse the JWT and explain your own view on war
Section 2: The Nature of Science
Nature of Science Dr. Charles Ophardt EDU 370.
Key words on Peace and Justice
“Scope & Methods of Social Science”
Do these phrases describe: Meta or Normative ethics?
Conflict.
ETHICS & WAR.
Chapter 2 The World of Science
JUST WAR.
Is There a God? This presentation is intended to give a visual description of my viewpoint on God’s existence. This presentation presents historical philosophers.
Important Concepts Above and Beyond Biology I
The Scientific Process
STA 291 Spring 2008 Lecture 17 Dustin Lueker.
Introduction To Hypothesis Testing
Presentation transcript:

A decolonial critique of a colonial project Sandew Hira

If you are a professor, that does not mean that you are a scientist, you can be an ideologue of colonialism

Truths, errors and lies Western epistemology David Hume (1711-1776) Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) George Hegel (1770-1831) Truths, errors and lies

DTM epistemology: five elements of a concept Terminology Observation (facts) Analysis, storyline and logic Theory Ethics

What happens when you hide your ethics in knowledge production? Knowledge is only about true or false and not about right or wrong Unjust claim of objectivity Unjust claim of universality You present lies as scientific knowledge

critique #1: extreme and normal violence is not about facts, but about morality "The program, which consist of nine parts, should answer questions about the nature, extent and causes of structural extreme (they use the Dutch term 'grensoverschrijdend') violence in Indonesia, seen from a broader political, social and international context. In this regard extensive attention will be paid to the chaotic period of August 1945 till the beginning of 1946 - often termed as the Bersiap - and the political and social legacy in the Netherlands, Indonesia and other places."

Critique #2: the concept of extreme violence is an insult to the victim of oppression On May 14, 1940 the German bombed the Dutch city of Rotterdam which killed 650-900 victims. On February 13-14 1954 the allied forces carried out a massive bombardment of the city of Dresden which killed 25.000 German, 25 times more than in Rotterdam. How would the Dutch feel when German historians would then claim that the bombing of Rotterdam was not extreme violence but normal violence compared to Dresden?

Critique #3: the concept of extreme violence is a direct legitimization of the crime of colonialism Normal violence means the acceptance of the relationship of power. Colonial power is legitimate as long as they use normal violence. This is nonsense presented as science.

Critique #4: the moral judgment of violence should be related to its purpose and cannot be judged in absolute terms There are two moral categories of violence: the category of the injustice of oppressors violence and the category of the justice of the violence for freedom and liberation. The violence of a woman who is raped by a man cannot be placed in the same moral category of the violence of the rapist.

Critique #5: the most obvious comparison is not made: extreme and normal violence of Nazism and colonialism Scientific research often has a comparative dimension. You compare the phenomenon you want to study in different situations in order to get a better understanding of the phenomenon. In 1945 the Dutch just came out of a struggle for freedom in which they also used violence. The Dutch resistance organized violent resistance in coordination with the allied forces. Shortly after their fight for freedom from Nazism they used violence against the freedom fighters of Indonesia. If you are an objective researcher into violence, why don't you take this obvious comparison into account?

Critique #6: this colonial research project is a racist project Gert Oostindie: "Until now no Indonesian government has ever showed any interest in serious historical research into the war of decolonization, whether it is carried out in cooperation with the Netherlands or not. That is not strange. Open-minded research would undermine the image of a united heroic people that expelled the colonizer under the leadership of the army." How can you know the result of a research that was never started according to your own account?

Critique #7: the legitimization of the racist colonial rule deligitimizes the fight for freedom Jeffry Pondaag: “Who gave you white people the moral right to occupy my country that is 11.000 km away from your country and oppress, exploit and humiliate people of color?”

Critique #7: the legitimization of the racist colonial rule delegitimizes the fight for freedom - 2 Oostindie: "It is clear without any doubt the Indonesian side have committed cruel crimes - probably on a much larger scale and directly mostly against other Indonesians.“ "An important part of violence in the Archipel can be explained by the absence of an effective (colonial) power, but reflected further local contradictions of which the Netherland was partly party to, other than in the function of the keeper of public order." "The Dutch military actions should be understood in the context that was given then by the Dutch: protection of the population en restoring law and order."

Critique #8: the colonial project turns the victim into the criminal and the criminal into the victim Oostindie: "Veterans reject Dutch apologies with reference to war crimes of the opponents.“ "It is clear that the other party was guilty of war crimes on a large scale." His book on Dutch soldiers is "a testimony of honor to these men."

What is Decolonizing The Mind (DTM)? The articulation of a scientific critique of Western knowledge production The production of alternative decolonial concepts. The translation of the alternative knowledge in activism.

Understanding the nature of Westernized academia and the colonization of the mind Universities are not institutes for education but for training the colonized mind Education is the liberation of the mind through free discussion and open debate, critical research and the search for the truth. Training is the imposition of limitations on the mind, disciplining the mind to think in one particular way, acquiring the skills to produce lies and developing the attitude to criminalize people who disagree with you and criticize you.

An alternative decolonial research project Systematically document the crimes of Dutch colonialism Calculate the amount of reparations that the Dutch should pay as compensation for colonialism Documents the resistance struggle against the racist colonizer and its colonial apartheid system

Websites: International Institute for Scientific Research: www.iisr.nl Decolonial International Network: www.din.today Email: sandew.hira@iisr.nl Tel: 0031 64 12 83 785