Individual work Collective work What is Fabricius?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLOs) “Designing” © Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Advertisements

Objective: Demonstrate mastery of cycle content. Today students will take an assessment on the whole cycle's content. They will first reflect briefly on.
TEKS are the standards!. STAAR is composed of the following Readiness Standards: 60%-65% of the TEKS 2-4 Questions on STAAR per standard Supporting Standards:
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Assessment Literacy Series 1 -Module 1- Design & Purpose Statement.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
 Interventions take time and patience.  PLC work is never done.  Hang your hats on making progress.  You and your PLC are the key to the change that.
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
Unit Plan: Branding The Hook Grab brands from around the room A brand is what we say about ourselves, how we act, and what people think of us through our.
Our Community: THINGS ARE JUST NOT THE SAME!. UNIT SUMMARY: Children are often under the impression that the way things are in their world is the way.
TAG and MSEsG 18 & 19 th November 2015 Priorities for enhanced information exchange across sectors and borders: State of play and next steps Common Information.
SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN LAB NARZU TARANNUM(NAT)
Innovation Project Air Filtration Systems. Table of Contents  Project Description  Project Timeline  The Way Ahead 2.
Business and Management Research
Review of Assessment Toolkit
ACA Intermediate March 23, 2017
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Global Coordination Platform
Zaituni Kaijage University of Dar es salaam Tanzania
DESIGNING A LOGO.
PROBLEM SOLVING June 2010 CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC.
The Hope Foundation Presentation on Pre-Funding Appraisal For Partners and New Applicant Organisations.
Readiness Consultations
Project Management (x470)
Handwriting vs. Keyboard Skills
DOCUMENTATION DEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLE (DDLC)
Tuning II ( ) Thematic Networks and Tuning: How to adapt and how to adopt the Tuning methodology? Management Committee.
Objectives of the Training
Assessment Literacy Series
Project Title Presented By Student1 name - Roll no
By : Nesrine Ali Abdel Azim
Follow the Drinking Gourd Showcase
Project plan (Max 5 pages)
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Directions for Expert Review Panel
BUS 370 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
MGMT 404 Enthusiastic Studysnaptutorial.com
BUS 370 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
BUS 370 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Request for Proposal (RFP)
Business and Management Research
Writing to Learn vs. Writing in the Disciplines
Parent Information & Training Session #1
Title: Special Project Template
Chapter 2 Performance Management Process
An Overview of the ACE Collaborative for Curriculum & Instruction
Italian city-states simulation
BUS 370 MART innovative education/bus370mart.com
Chapter 7 Concept Selection
The Six-Column Work Sheet
TGDATA 13/2, WGDIKE 14/2 Good afternoon everyone and thanks for the opportunity of presenting at this meeting the progress.
Performance Evaluation 2015 Performance Evaluation Cycle
Action Research By: Jenna Ferrara.
Business and Management Research
Introduction to Engineering Design II (IE 202)
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
And How Does It Impact Me?
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Tony Ryan tonyryan.com.au
TEAM PERFORMANCE AND PROJECT SUCCESS
Annex A1.6.2b RU access to OBI RNE General Assembly 16 May 2018.
Template for methodological application
And How Does It Impact Me?
PPT Introduction to the Step by Step tools
The Six-Column Work Sheet
<Insert “Title Of The Project”>
The Six-Column Work Sheet
Units 3 & 4 Business management transition
Closing a Project Close a Project or Phase Close Procurements.
EXPLANATORY SYNTHESIS Bawcom
Presentation transcript:

Individual work Collective work What is Fabricius? It’s a model of “Practice Based Learning” that balances the individual and collective work. The model is supported by a technical system that allows to manage the whole process of the practice. Research Team Design Josep Mª Monguet Technology Jaime Meza Support Francisca Grimón Alex Trejo

1. Takeoff 2. Idea 3. Concept 4. Knowledge 5. Development Guesscore Individual work Collective work 1. Takeoff Practice understanding & preparation 2. Idea Generation and assessment of ideas 3. Concept Enhancing and improving ideas Bestidea Individual ideas performance P Collective group dynamics P 4. Knowledge Research & synthesis of content 5. Development Propose & defense prototypes Guesscore Individual knowledge catching E Collective work performance E

1. Takeoff 2. Idea 3. Concept 4. Knowledge 5. Development Individual work Collective work 1. Takeoff Practice understanding & preparation 2. Idea Generation and assessment of ideas 3. Concept Enhancing and improving ideas 4. Knowledge Research & synthesis of content 5. Development Propose & defense prototypes Phases of Fabricius? 2 individual and 3 collective

Bestidea Guesscore Individual work Collective work 1. Takeoff 2. Idea Practice understanding & preparation 2. Idea Generation and assessment of ideas 3. Concept Enhancing and improving ideas Bestidea Tools of Fabricius? Bestidea to manage ideas. Guesscore to manage assessment 4. Knowledge Research & synthesis of content 5. Development Propose & defense prototypes Guesscore

1. Takeoff 2. Idea 3. Concept 4. Knowledge 5. Development Guesscore Individual work Collective work 1. Takeoff Practice understanding & preparation 2. Idea Generation and assessment of ideas 3. Concept Enhancing and improving ideas Bestidea Individual ideas performance P Collective group dynamics P Assessment with Fabricius? 2 individual and 2 collective 2 by peers and 2 by expert 4. Knowledge Research & synthesis of content 5. Development Propose & defense prototypes Guesscore Individual knowledge catching E Collective work performance E

1. Takeoff 2. Idea 3. Concept 4. Knowledge 5. Development Guesscore Individual work Collective work 1. Takeoff Practice understanding & preparation 2. Idea Generation and assessment of ideas 1. Takeoff The practice begins with Takeoff. Presentation of Statement and Lecture. Ensure students understands what is going to be done and why. Students begin to work directly with the first to do’s. Students also become familiarized with “Fabricius” methodology. 3. Concept Enhancing and improving ideas Bestidea Individual ideas performance C Collective group dynamics C 4. Knowledge Research & synthesis of content 5. Development Propose & defense prototypes Guesscore Individual knowledge catching E Collective work performance E

1. Takeoff 2. Idea 3. Concept 4. Knowledge 5. Development Guesscore Individual work Collective work 1. Takeoff Practice understanding & preparation 2. Idea Generation and assessment of ideas 3. Concept Enhancing and improving ideas Bestidea 2. Idea Production and filtering of ideas*. Ideas are proposed individually and voted collectively (group or class). Process is composed of 4 successive to do’s following the same cycle: 1st Students individually propose ideas. 2nd The group (or class) votes ideas for prioritization. 3th The winning ideas, 1 or more, are inspirations for the next to do. There are always 4 to do’s to propose ideas and 2 modalities of vote: Group Vote: The members of the group vote in to do’s 1, 2 & 3. Class Vote: The members of the class randomly vote in the 4th to do. * The term idea may refer to proposals, data or any kind of information relevant for the current to do. Individual ideas performance C Collective group dynamics C 4. Knowledge Research & synthesis of content 5. Development Propose & defense prototypes Guesscore Individual knowledge catching E Collective work performance E

1. Takeoff 2. Idea 3. Concept 4. Knowledge 5. Development Guesscore Individual work Collective work 1. Takeoff Practice understanding & preparation 2. Idea Generation and assessment of ideas 3. Concept Enhancing and improving ideas Bestidea Individual ideas performance C Collective group dynamics C Assessment of individual contribution with ideas Each students win extra points each time one of his or her ideas are prioritized by the votes of their peers. Points = Number of ideas proposed / Position of idea in the ranking 4. Knowledge Research & synthesis of content 5. Development Propose & defense prototypes Guesscore Individual knowledge catching E Collective work performance E

1. Takeoff 2. Idea 3. Concept 4. Knowledge 5. Development Guesscore Individual work Collective work 1. Takeoff Practice understanding & preparation 2. Idea Generation and assessment of ideas 3. Concept Enhancing and improving ideas Bestidea 3. Concept Once the to do’s 1, 2 and 3 have been completed it begins the work with the final deliverable of the 4th to do, that begins with ideas proposed individually by members of the group. Individual contributions to the 4th to do have been voted in the modality “Class Vote” the group is ready to produce a “Concept” by enhancing and improving previous ideas and working ahead proposing and prioritizing new ideas. Now the group will use again Bestidea system to gradually prepare the deliverable. The work may be done synchronous or asynchronous. Individual ideas performance C Collective group dynamics C 4. Knowledge Research & synthesis of content 5. Development Propose & defense prototypes Guesscore Individual knowledge catching E Collective work performance E

1. Takeoff 2. Idea 3. Concept 4. Knowledge 5. Development Guesscore Individual work Collective work 1. Takeoff Practice understanding & preparation 2. Idea Generation and assessment of ideas 3. Concept Enhancing and improving ideas Bestidea Individual ideas performance P Collective group dynamics P Assessment of dynamics of collective group work Members of the group win extra points if the work is done according to a pattern that takes into account regularity, equilibrium and other parameters that indicates the work is seriously performed Points = To be studied 4. Knowledge Research & synthesis of content 5. Development Propose & defense prototypes Guesscore Individual knowledge catching E Collective work performance E

1. Takeoff 2. Idea 3. Concept 4. Knowledge 5. Development Guesscore Individual work Collective work 4. Knowledge The content has been presented* in the lecture during the Takeoff and it’s going to be applied to the practice along the 4 to do’s. Each student is asked to contribute with some original knowledge to the content of the practice. Original knowledge may came in form of: Interesting people that has applied the content object of the practice Products, services or any kind of organization that that highlights the content object of the practice. *The presentation of the content has to follow a specific template. 1. Takeoff Practice understanding & preparation 2. Idea Generation and assessment of ideas 3. Concept Enhancing and improving ideas Bestidea Individual ideas performance C Collective group dynamics C 4. Knowledge Research & synthesis of content 5. Development Propose & defense prototypes Guesscore Individual knowledge catching E Collective work performance E

1. Takeoff 2. Idea 3. Concept 4. Knowledge 5. Development Guesscore Individual work Collective work 1. Takeoff Practice understanding & preparation 2. Idea Generation and assessment of ideas 3. Concept Enhancing and improving ideas Bestidea Individual ideas performance C Collective group dynamics C Assessment of knowledge contribution Final score of each student will be the average between the score of the expert and the score of the class. Each student gets extra points depending on how close is his score to the final score obtained by the group. Points = 10 – Difference [My vote – Average vote (Expert-Class)] 4. Knowledge Research & synthesis of content 5. Development Propose & defense prototypes Guesscore Individual knowledge catching E Collective work performance E

1. Takeoff 2. Idea 3. Concept 4. Knowledge 5. Development Guesscore Individual work Collective work 1. Takeoff Practice understanding & preparation 2. Idea Generation and assessment of ideas 3. Concept Enhancing and improving ideas Bestidea 5. Development The practice finishes with the presentation* and collective assessment of the work developed by each one of the groups. * The format of the presentation is free. Individual ideas performance C Collective group dynamics C 4. Knowledge Research & synthesis of content 5. Development Propose & defense prototypes Guesscore Individual knowledge catching E Collective work performance E

1. Takeoff 2. Idea 3. Concept 4. Knowledge 5. Development Guesscore Individual work Collective work 1. Takeoff Practice understanding & preparation 2. Idea Generation and assessment of ideas 3. Concept Enhancing and improving ideas Bestidea Individual ideas performance C Collective group dynamics C Assessment of collective performance Final score of the group will be the average between the score of the expert and the score of the class. Each student gets extra points depending on how close is his score to the final score obtained by the group. Points = 10 – Difference [My vote – Average vote (Expert-Class)] 4. Knowledge Research & synthesis of content 5. Development Propose & defense prototypes Guesscore Individual knowledge catching E Collective work performance E