Synchronization Requirements and Solutions for n

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /319 Submission May 2001 Georg Dickmann, BridgeCo AG. AV Timing BridgeCo AG Georg Dickmann
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE e SubmissionSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Time.
Doc.: IEEE /250r0 Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: IEEE :
Power-aware Routing in Wireless Sensor Network Lee, Chen-Pang.
Pedro Moreira CERN BE-CO-HT
The Transport Layer Congestion Control & UDP
Synchronization Quality of IEEE 802
Proposal for Statistical Channel Error Model
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
OFDMA performance in 11ax
AP Power Saving Date: Authors: May 2017 Month Year
Performance Evaluation for 11ac
Co-BCast: High-Rate WiFi Broadcasting in Crowded Scenarios via Lightweight Coordination of Multiple Access Points Hang Qiu, Konstantinos Psounis, Giuseppe.
GI Overhead/Performance Impact on Open-Loop SU-MIMO
WUR Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2017
Closed versus Open Loop Comparisons
Intel Validation of TGn Simulation Scenarios
January 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: pureLiFi r1 proposal for High Speed.
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Briarcliff Manor, New York
Closed versus Open Loop
VHT Packet Duration Signaling
WUR SYNC Preamble Design
160 MHz PHY Transmission Date: Authors: March 2010
John Ketchum, Bjorn A. Bjerke, and Irina Medvedev Qualcomm, Inc.
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
WUR SYNC Preamble Design
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
WUR Discovery Frame Content
WUR SYNC Preamble Design
Sharp Laboratories USA
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Wake up packet contents
MIMO performance Test Methodology proposal
Consideration of Common Doppler in C2C Channel
Speaker: Po-Hung Chen Advisor: Dr. Ho-Ting Wu 2016/10/12
May 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: OFDM PHY Proposal Date Submitted: 7 May 07.
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
Hemanth Sampath Erik Lindskog Ravi Narasimhan
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Phase Rotation for the 80 MHz ac Mixed Mode Packet
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
Phase Rotation for the 80 MHz ac Mixed Mode Packet
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
A Fair Scheduling Scheme for HCF
PHY Abstraction based on PER Prediction
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
WUR FDMA Padding Content
OFDMA performance in 11ax
5-GHz Unified Protocol (5-UP) Proposal OFDM Extensions for a
E-MiLi: Energy-Minimizing Idle Listening in Wireless Networks
120 MHz PHY Transmission Date: Authors: January 2010
Schedule Element Synchronization and Simplification
November 2007 doc.: IEEE /2752r1 July 2008
Erik Lindskog Hemanth Sampath Ravi Narasimhan
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
Aug Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Explanation and Revision of Previous Time.
Proposed Timestamp Field for Strictly Ordered Indication
Panasonic Singapore Laboratories
Intel Validation of TGn Simulation Scenarios
Consideration on HARQ Unit
20 MHz transmission in NGV
Analysis on IEEE n MAC Efficiency
20 MHz transmission in NGV
Presentation transcript:

Synchronization Requirements and Solutions for 802.11n Month 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 July 2004 Synchronization Requirements and Solutions for 802.11n Morgan H. Miki, John M. Kowalski Sharp Morgan H. Miki, John M. Kowalski, Sharp John Doe, His Company

July 2004 Problem: Consumer electronic devices figure prominently in 802.11n usage models. CE devices however, require tight synchronization to maintain high quality audio if multicasting is done. This presentation presents some results on the state of the art for synchronization in 11a, and recommendations to improve it for 802.11n. Without some solution in this regard, the user experience of CE over 802.11n may be compromised. Morgan H. Miki, John M. Kowalski

Clock Synchronization July 2004 1 Clock difference jitter Clock difference jitter: Depends on clock precision and how often TSs are distributed Tx clock: 20MHz ± 20ppm Rx clock: 20MHz ± 20ppm TS: Time Stamp TSF: Timing synchronization function TSF timer TSF timer TS Channel TS RX TX Packet detection jitter 3 Packet detection jitter: Depends on synchronization algorithm, PHY rate and PER Channel jitter 2 Channel jitter: Depends on the movement of stations (1ns jitter for 30cm) Clock synchronization is affected by Morgan H. Miki, John M. Kowalski

Clock Synchronization requirements July 2004 Clock Synchronization requirements Desired for stereo audio (professional level) [1] Acceptable for one receiver Acceptable for stereo audio[1] Synchronization jitter 10ms 1ms 100us 10us 1us 100ns 10ns 1ns 100ps 802.11a MPEG2: 500ns 1394: app 40ns Why improve 802.11 synchronization? HDTV/STDV/audio streams are 802.11n applications. The jitter generated by wireless link should be reduced at wireless level, to minimize overall delay. The effect is to make CSMA/CA behave more truly like a discrete time system. Technology has improved anyway since 11a was introduced. Morgan H. Miki, John M. Kowalski

Possible solution: July 2004 Add 8 byte 10ns unit Time Stamp in every QoS packet (Option) Example of implementation may use DLL (Delay locked loop) eP eQ ef TX TSF Timer TimeStamp + PHY/MAC processing time 1 / T KP eI KI 1 fRX Z-1 fTX Loop Filter RX TSF Timer rf Tx/Rx timer synchronization error jitter PHY/MAC processing time is the time between packet detection and MAC to output the Time Stamp for DLL Morgan H. Miki, John M. Kowalski

Simulation conditions July 2004 Simulation conditions Tx and Rx clock precision: 20 ppm Packet detection with legacy 11a preambles and PLCP. App. 10% PER @ 16QAM ¾ coding rate. This results in packet detection jitter of ±100ns. (video applications) Simulations with Channel B/D/E Channel jitter considered as 0ns i.e. no station mobility (1ns jitter/30cm). Interval between packets: 500us (max 30ms at high error rate region) Morgan H. Miki, John M. Kowalski

Simulation results (channel B) July 2004 Synchronization error jitter (ns) Jitter: < ±25ns Convergence time: 40s Time(s) Similar results for channel D/E Morgan H. Miki, John M. Kowalski

Comparison Mode Time to convergence Synchronization error jitter -- July 2004 Mode Time to convergence Synchronization error jitter 1us TS, TS in beacons, no DLL, 20ppm oscillator(11a) -- ±10us with DLL, 20ppm oscillator(11a) 20 min ±250ns 10ns TS, TS in beacons, with DLL, 20ppm oscillator 20min ±50ns 10ns TS, TS in every QoS packets, with DLL, 20ppm oscillator 40s ±25ns 10ns TS, TS in every QoS packets, with DLL, 1ppm oscillator 60s ±10ns Morgan H. Miki, John M. Kowalski

July 2004 Conclusions The use of 8 byte 10ns unit time stamp in all QoS packets should be considered as option. A great improvement from legacy 802.11 (10us to 25ns) can be achieved. Synchronization can be further improved to acceptable stereo audio level by using higher precision oscillators (10ns) Presently investigating the effects of synchronization when MIMO preambles, other information, other preamble formats, etc. are used. Morgan H. Miki, John M. Kowalski

July 2004 References [1] Julian Dunn: “Sample clock jitter and real-time audio over the IEEE1394 high performance serial bus”, Nanophon Limited Morgan H. Miki, John M. Kowalski