Neighborhood Revitalization Plans Neighborhoods and Downtown

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
City of North Liberty North Liberty Area Development Corporation University of Iowa Community Credit Union Economic Development Partnership Project October.
Advertisements

Working with the Office of Community Development and Other Partners for Downtown Revitalization November 9, 2012.
Alternatives to Financing Lake Development Infrastructure in Mississippi Public Improvement Districts and Tax Increment Financing February 4, 2009 Lucien.
1. 2 Municipal Management Districts (MMD) are special districts that are: Self governed, but must be approved by the host municipality; and have the.
REAL PROPERTY REASSESSMENT. This is the County’s sixth reassessment The 2013 property values for property tax purposes are as of December 31,
Tax Increment Financing Town Center Project Midwest City, OK.
WASHINGTON JOBS INVESTMENT COALITION SUPPORTING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING AUTHORITY December, 2010.
1 Understanding Revenue Allocation Districts (“RADs”) Prepared for the Jersey City Redevelopment Agency Presented by: Glenn F. Scotland, Esq. & Jennifer.
Economic Development Financing Tools 101. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Generic term for using future tax revenue to pay for something today Usually used.
Kansas Economic Development Finance Toolbox 2405 Grand, Suite 1100 Kansas City, Missouri Phone: Gary Anderson
Eastside Community Redevelopment Area Response to BoCC request for additional information Alachua County Department of Growth Management November 15, 2011.
Indian Trail Town Council Town Council January 12, 2010.
Tools for Redevelopment Courtney Knight Managing Director, Redevelopment Revitalizing Atlanta 1.
City of Dover Downtown Development District. Downtown Development District Act Approved unanimously by General Assembly in June 2014 Designation of Downtown.
Tax Increment Financing TIF: A method for funding public investments in an area slated for redevelopment by capturing for a time all or a portion of the.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
Alliance Management Group Tax Year 2012 Update 1.
Municipal Tax Increment Financing
2004 Budget Presentation City Commission Budget Study Session July 2, 2003.
Beech Grove, Indiana TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Heather R. James, Ice Miller LLP April 18, 2013.
Tax Increment Thomas Chapman Raymond James John Repsholdt Ehlers Steven Langert Consolidated High School District 230.
Temple City Housing Element City Council /Planning Commission Study Session September 27, 2012.
Municipal Tax Increment Financing Daniel Stevenson, Office of the Commissioner, DECD Phone:
Village of Ossining Vision Presentation Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. May 11 th, 2005.
HOUSING INCENTIVE POLICY February 20, 2010 Presentation to Area Banks.
Board of County Commissioners May 8, Authorize staff to prepare a draft ordinance revising Chapter 37 of the Alachua County Code to include specific.
TIF and Beyond: City Economic Development Projects Patricia Martin, Ahlers & Cooney, P. C. R. Mark Cory, Ahlers & Cooney, P. C. 1.
3TB Project Review Tax Increment Financing (“TIF”) Overview January 25, 2013.
Board of County Commissioners June 30, 2015 Neighborhood Improvement Districts Neighborhood Preservation and Revitalization Division.
MORRIS MILL PROPOSED URBAN SERVICES DISTRICT Presentation to County Council September 17, 2013.
2014 City Budget and Outside Agency Requests Fourth City Budget Work Session.
Board of County Commissioners March 24, 2015 Neighborhood Improvement Districts Neighborhood Preservation and Revitalization Division.
SCHOOL BUILDING AID Ed 321 Administrative Rule Revision.
Single Family Housing Development Program A Briefing to the Housing Committee Housing/Community Services Department November 2, 2015.
Department of Transportation City Council August 31, 2015 Annual Self Certification Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County.
Dockets R-11-06;07;09 Zoning Regulation Amendments Proposed Amendments to the Cochise County Zoning Regulations regarding Lot Development Administrative.
Department of Sustainable Development and Construction Proposed Revision to the Historic Preservation Tax Exemptions and Economic Development Incentives.
Ordinance Amending Chapter 37 Orange County Code Utilities Department October 21,
Neighborhood Stabilization Program “The Power of Community”
Created by Way Development Ventures as a public service The following presentation provides background information to assist voters in gaining an understanding.
Community Redevelopment for Eastside Report on Advisory Committee Input and Request for Board Direction June 26, 2012.
Alliance Policy & Management Group TAX YEAR 2015 UPDATE SEPTEMBER 18,
Land Use & Code Basics Baseline Information on Permits and Processes for Vacation Home Rental Task Force 12/04/14 Vacation Home Rental Task Force Meeting.
H ONIGMAN Leveraging Michigan Brownfield Incentives with Other Development Incentives Richard A. Barr Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP Detroit, Michigan.
Fiscal Year 2015 Classification Hearing Presented by: Alyce Johns Principal Assessor.
Ordinance Planning, Zoning and Economic Development Committee 5/11/16 Grand Reserve.
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
Agenda Issues and Concerns Adoption Potential Capital Projects.
Neighborhood Commission Reinvestment Committee Recommendation to Expand the Hampton Housing Venture City Council Meeting April 11, 2007.
Presentation to NORA 2016 Annual Summit Creative Financing Strategies
Community Improvement Districts County Counselors Association of Kansas Annual Meeting November 15, 2010 Janet S. Garms
Planning & Development Services
Measuring the Tax Increment
City Commission Meeting September 5, , 2016
Home Improvement Rebate Program
Implementing and Understanding Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Districts
Implementing and Understanding Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Districts Prepared for the Village of Alsip May, 2017.
City Revitalization Investment Zone Tamaqua, Pennsylvania
Urban Land Bank Demonstration Program
School Funding 101 St. Clairsville-Richland City School District
I. OPERATING MILLAGE RENEWAL PROPOSAL
What is TIF? TIF = Tax Increment Financing
Property Tax Rates Property Taxes.
Neighborhood Revitalization Plans Neighborhoods and Downtown
Partnerships in Neighborhood Revitalization
Village of North Aurora, Illinois
Economic Development & finance Committee July 8, 2019
Housing Policy Meeting
Housing Tax Exemptions
COMMUNITIES A PARTNER TO 2020 Levy Request County Board Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Neighborhood Revitalization Plans Neighborhoods and Downtown City of Lawrence 1/1/2019

NRA Goals: K.S.A. 12-17,114 et seq. Create a revitalization area – must meet statutory requirements, determined by the legislative bodies Provide incentives for capital investment Goal is to promote the revitalization of residential and commercial properties 1/1/2019

How does the NRA work? Property tax rebates for improvements that increase appraised value – fixed rebate on the incremental increase Two year initial program period; $500,000/year rebate cap. $50,000 individual project cap. Projects must meet plan requirements and codes Eligibility criteria Rebate is based upon the taxing entities that have adopted the plan – works best if City, County and School District are all participants 1/1/2019

How does the NRA work? (cont.) 95% rebate on incremental increase over 10 years 95% rebate on incremental increase over 15 years for qualified historic properties .5% of the rebate allocated for administration 4.5% of the rebate allocated to Neighborhood Revitalization Fund Rebate stays with property Modeled after the 8th and Penn Plan 1/1/2019

Impact on Taxing Entities 1/1/2019

Neighborhood Revitalization Fund Used for infrastructure and other redevelopment improvements. Allocated by joint City/County/USD committee. 1/1/2019

Criteria for Participation Property located in designated district Improve existing buildings or new construction including vacant parcels Residential, commercial, mixed-use Minimum appraised valuation increase of $10,000 for neighborhoods and $5,000 for downtown 1/1/2019

Criteria for Participation (cont.) Conform to existing codes/plans Property taxes current TIF district is not eligible Owner-occupied and rental properties 1/1/2019

Neighborhood NRA Areas 1/1/2019

Downtown NRA Area 1/1/2019

Areas of Overlap with Downtown NRA 1/1/2019

Some Rebate Examples* $30,000 addition to single family residence Pre-construction appraised value of $125,000 Pre-construction assessed value (11.5% rate - residential) = $14,375 Post-construction appraised value of $150,000 Increase of $25,000 in appraised value Post-construction assessed value = $17,250 ($150,000 x 11.5%) Assessed value increase $17,250-$14,375 = $2,875 Incremental Increase $2,875 (assessed valuation) Potential rebate under proposed plan: City mill 26.358 County mill 30.013 USD 497 57.804 (total mill 114.175) $2,875 x mill/1000 = $328.25 taxes on increase Eligible for 95% rebate = $312 (annually for 10 years) * Rebate examples are hypothetical and are presented for discussion purposes only 1/1/2019

Some Rebate Examples* New home construction on vacant parcel single family residence Pre-construction appraised value of $30,000 Pre-construction assessed value (11.5% rate - residential) = $3,600 Post-construction appraised value of $160,000 Increase of $130,000 in appraised value Post-construction assessed value = $18,400 ($160,000 x 11.5%) Assessed value increase $18,400-$3,600 = $14,800 Incremental Increase $14,800 (assessed valuation) Potential rebate under proposed plan: City mill 26.358 County mill 30.013 USD 497 57.804 (total mill 114.175) $14,800 x mill/1000 = $1,690 taxes on increase Eligible for 95% rebate = $1,605 (annually for 10 years) * Rebate examples are hypothetical and are presented for discussion purposes only 1/1/2019

Some Rebate Examples* Eldridge Renovation 2005 Appraised Value $1,826,600 2005 Assessed Value $456,645 (25% of appraised – commercial rate) 2007 Appraised Value $2,700,00 2007 Assessed Value $675,000 Incremental Increase $218,555 (assessed valuation) Potential rebate under proposed plan: City mill 26.358 County mill 30.013 USD 497 57.804 (total mill 114.175) $218,555 x mill/1000 = $24,931 taxes on increase Eligible for 95% rebate = $23,684 (annually for 15 years) * Rebate examples are hypothetical and are presented for discussion purposes only 1/1/2019

What the plan does not do Does not guarantee a set tax rebate – rebate is based on the project and its impact on appraised valuation Does not guarantee increased capital investment Does not provide up front funds for capital improvements, e.g. – sidewalk repair Does not address neighborhood concerns related to land use or other development issues 1/1/2019

Other Issues for Consideration Increased valuation of surrounding properties Revitalization means different things to different people Potential for gentrification Simple, customer-friendly process Is plan feasible outside of 8th & Penn? 1/1/2019

Process from Here Revise and update plans Take plans to City Commission for consideration If plans are approved, take to County and USD 497 for adoption prior to January 1, 2008 Stakeholder meetings Revise & update City, County, USD 497 FOR MORE INFO... Contact Scott McCullough (832-3154) – Planning and Development Services 1/1/2019

Questions? Comments? Draft copies available for review in the Lawrence-Douglas County Metropolitan Planning Office Draft plans available on-line at www.lawrenceks.org 1/1/2019