Performance of SLD Students on ISAT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact on Student Learning The conversation is about multiple indicators for this category BUT Few if any places actually have viable multiple indicators.
Advertisements

BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.
1 Update to Idaho Hospital Association June 25th, 2010.
Geology of Idaho Cities and Industries. Idaho – vast forests, rolling plains, soaring peaks, and surging rivers.
The Lights are Much Brighter There: Successful Downtown Revitalization Strategies Sheri Freemuth, AICP Program Officer NTHP Boise Field Office.
1 Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress. 2.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Scale Score Distributions Reading, Language Arts, Mathematics, and Science ISAT, Spring 2009 State Department of Education Boise, Idaho.
Accountability data overview August Topics  Changes to 2014 accountability reporting  Overview of accountability measures  Progress & Performance.
PurposeTo practice making valid inferences.Related Documents DescriptionThis activity can be used within your Data Team or with other audiences to improve.
ANGELA BYINGTON HEALTH INFORMATICS. 7 Hospitals  Boise, Meridian, Twin Falls, McCall, Sun Valley, Mountain Home, Jerome 150+ clinics and outpatient facilities.
1. Canadian Results PISA PISA 2012 by the numbers 3.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
Smoke Management in Idaho Fire, Smoke, and Health Workshop Diane Riley, DEQ Air Quality Analysis June 5-6, 2001, Seattle.
Scale Score Distributions Idaho Standards Achievement Tests (ISAT) Reading, Language Usage, Mathematics, and Science Spring 2010 Idaho State Department.
JUNE 26, 2012 BOARD MEETING Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
Idaho Spring Flood Potential and Weather Briefing Idaho Department of Water Resources May 12, 2011 Jay Breidenbach, NOAA National Weather Service Snowpack.
District Performance Union County Public Schools.
Making Demonstrable Improvement: Request for Feedback (Updated) July 2015 Presented by: Ira Schwartz Assistant Commissioner of Accountability.
1 Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress. 2.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
Adequate Yearly Progress
Idaho Regional Mathematics Centers Christine Avila Mathematics Coordinator State Department of Education.
Meeting Every Student’s Needs: Alternate Routes to Graduation Nick Smith, Deputy Superintendent School Support Services
AN OPPORTUNITY FOR 3 RD GRADERS MOVE ON WHEN READING Welcome STATE BOARD OF EDUCATIONK-12 ACADEMIC STANDARDS&
+ Voorheesville CSD Strategic Plan Community Forum September 30, 2015.
Ensuring Equitable Access to Excellent Educators Copyright © 2014 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Jennifer Baker Office of Next.
Jackson County School District A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following: Mississippi Curriculum Test Writing.
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. How Do They Do That? EVAAS and the New Tests October 2013 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
Review of Special Education in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts: Findings and Recommendations Dr. Thomas Hehir Silvana and Christopher Pascucci Professor.
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. How Do They Do That? EVAAS and the New Tests October 2013 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
2009 Report Card and TVAAS Update Recalibration 2009 October 26, 2009.
OUR GOALS Reinforce partnerships with our communities Provide leadership - state workforce development efforts Identify, define community workforce needs.
LinkIDAHO A Statewide Broadband Development Project July 28, 2011 Presented by Matt Mitchell
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
IMPACTS OF SERVICE DELIVERY ON SLD IDENTIFICATION, TEACHER EMPLOYMENT, AND OUTCOMES Dr. Paul Sindelar Christopher Leko University of Florida.
Specific Learning Disability Criteria Implementation Update Richard Henderson Idaho State Department of Education Division of Federal Programs Division.
Idaho Private Proxy IP Server. Get a dedicated Idaho IP address Surf the web through a Idaho server Track search competition in Idaho.
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
Data Snapshot Matt Bednorz Englewood High School Spring 2013.
Post-Secondary Options
Stephanie Graff, Chief Accountability Officer
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Welcome! Ohio’s State Tests and the Third Grade Guarantee
Comparability of Assessment Results in the Era of Flexibility
Release of PARCC Student Results
WWAMI Medical Education in Idaho
Ginni May, ASCCC Area A Representative
CMSD Fall Data Check In November 3, 2017.
Higher education: investing in idaho
Idaho RESULTS Work OSEP Visit 2011
PARCC Results: Spring 2018 Administrations
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
California School Dashboard
Hollydale Elementary Data Overview
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
ECHOLS COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL April 12, 2016 Middle School Teachers
Background This slide should be removed from the deck once the template is updated. During the 2018 Legislative Session, Act 555 was passed requiring schools.
Renée E. Jackson Superintendent Local District G September, 2001
Ohio’s State Tests and the Third Grade Guarantee
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
PARCC RESULTS: PRESENTATION FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT OCTOBER 2, 2018
Understanding How the Ranking is Calculated
Anne Arundel County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Understanding the CAASPP Student Score Reports
ISAT Effect Sizes Idaho Standards Achievement Tests (SBAC)
Presentation transcript:

Performance of SLD Students on ISAT Baseline Data: 2010-2011 Performance of SLD Students on ISAT Data Sources: Idaho State Department of Education www.IdeaData.org

Performance of SLD Students on ISAT SY 2010-2011 ISAT Language Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced Null Total SLD Students 2,975 2,219 1,398 100 19 6,711 % by Performance Level 44.3% 33.1% 20.8% 1.5% 0.3% 100.0% ISAT Mathematics 2,296 2,160 1,899 354 20 6,729 34.1% 32.1% 28.2% 5.3% ISAT Reading 1,863 1,912 2,577 405 21 6,778 27.5% 38.0% 6.0% ISAT Science This is the baseline data for Idaho’s result area. It is the performance of students with specific learning disabilities in the ISAT. We do not have longitudinal data due to a recent change in student identification codes. Although this is our official baseline data, once we have a second year of data we may need to change the baseline to fit only the students who will have two years worth of data, and so forth for the third and subsequent years of this priority. This is our starting point.

Statewide ISAT Language Results 2010-11 (SLD Students) Performance in the ISAT language.

Statewide ISAT Mathematics Results 2010-11 (SLD Students) Performance in the ISAT Mathematics.

Statewide ISAT Reading Results 2010-11 (SLD Students) Performance in the ISAT Reading.

Statewide ISAT Science Results 2010-11 (SLD Students) Performance in the ISAT Science.

Idaho Regions Region 1: Bonners Ferry, Sandpoint, Coeur d'Alene Region 2: Moscow, Lewiston, Orofino, Grangeville Region 3: McCall, Boise, Mountain Home Region 4: Hailey, Jerome, Burley, Twin Falls Region 5: Pocatello, Soda Springs, American Falls, Dayton Region 6: Salmon, Rexburg, Idaho Falls, Rigby

ISAT Results by Region % SLD Students Proficient 2010-11 Language Mathematics Reading Science # SLD Students % SLD Students Proficient Region 1 797 27.10% 798 39.97% 801 51.56% 316 19.94% Region 2 420 24.29% 422 32.70% 418 45.22% 161 18.63% Region 3 2842 22.38% 2847 2872 44.81% 1057 19.77% Region 4 593 23.27% 592 34.29% 39.80% 217 19.35% Region 5 1074 18.90% 1084 27.95% 1085 38.25% 409 18.83% Region 6 985 20.61% 986 36.41% 1009 43.81% 369 18.43% State 6711 22.32% 6729 33.48% 6778 44.00% 2529 19.34%

ISAT Language Results by Region % SLD Students Proficient 2010-11

ISAT Mathematics Results by Region % SLD Students Proficient 2010-11

ISAT Reading Results by Region % SLD Students Proficient 2010-11

ISAT Science Results by Region % SLD Students Proficient 2010-11

SLD Identification Rate, 2008-2010 (Idaho and National Data, 3-21) 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 All Disabilities Specific Learning Disabilities Idaho 27,930 8,919 27,787 8,334 27,045 7,604 50 states, D.C., and P.R. 6,593,220 2,536,780 6,608,446 2,497,581 6,552,766 2,422,688 We would like to bring the attention of the stakeholders and others who will be following our progress, the reasons why we need to follow only the progress of students that continue in the system. With the implementation of RTI and other similar initiatives across the state, there may be a reduction on the number of students with SLD. This is also a national trend.

SLD Identification Rate, 2008-2010 (Idaho and National Data, 3-21) 1.51% 3.80% And Idaho is ahead of this curve, with a higher reduction on the identification rate of students with SLD when compared to the national average.

SLD Identification Rate, 2008-2010 (School Districts Implementing RTI vs. State) 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 All Disabilities SLD State 27,931 8,920 27,787 8,330 27,388 7,712 RTI 3 Years (5 school districts) 1,296 479 1,311 465 1,255 406 RTI 2 Years 950 389 921 365 889 328 A possible impact of such reduction might affect the performance of the group of students identified under the SLD classification. As an example, we are showing here three sets of data: one is statewide SLD rates for the last three years in Idaho. The other two sets are of five school districts only, that have been implementing RTI with some level of state assistance, for the last two and three years.

SLD Identification Rate, 2008-2010 (School Districts Implementing RTI vs. State) 4.05% 4.61% 3.80% These two sets of five districts (RTI 3 years and RTI 2 years) have shown a larger decrease in SLD identification rates than the state average in the last years.

Performance on ISAT vs. RTI Implementation (SY 2010-11) ISAT Language Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced Null Total % Proficient and Advanced State 2,975 2,219 1,398 100 19 6,711 22.32% RTI 3 Years 182 119 67 1 370 18.38% RTI 2 Years 137 91 70 2 301 23.92% ISAT Mathematics 2,296 2,160 1,899 354 20 6,729 33.48% 133 131 87 - 28.65% 106 88 83 12 290 32.76% ISAT Reading 1,863 1,912 2,577 405 21 6,778 44.00% 120 117 115 373 36.46% 84 110 9 296 40.20% ISAT Science 19.34% 60 48 5 18.05% 66 30 14 113 14.16% This may impact the performance of SLD students as a group. The reasons may be that as districts implement RTI, the reduction of improper referrals

ISAT Language

ISAT Mathematics

ISAT Reading

ISAT Science