Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages (August 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Advertisements

Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
The Origin of the Bone Scan as a Tumour Marker in Prostate Cancer
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Testosterone Therapy in Men With Prostate Cancer
Global Trends in Testicular Cancer Incidence and Mortality
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Prostate Cancer 2008: Challenges in Diagnosis and Management
Volume 62, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 73, Issue 6, Pages (June 2018)
Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Tumour Grade, Treatment, and Relative Survival in a Population-based Cohort of Men with Potentially Curable Prostate Cancer  Sam Ladjevardi, Gabriel Sandblom,
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Elizabeth K. Bancroft, Rosalind A. Eeles
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Towards Early and More Specific Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer Detection: A View of the Future
Diagnostic Strategies for Prostate Cancer
Ongoing Gleason Grade Migration in Localized Prostate Cancer and Implications for Use of Active Surveillance  Adam B. Weiner, Ruth Etzioni, Scott E. Eggener 
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
The Origin of the Bone Scan as a Tumour Marker in Prostate Cancer
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Validation of Preoperative Nomograms Predicting Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer: A Bi-institutional Study  Alexander I. Hinev, Vesselin I. Hadjiev,
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Shifting Paradigms for High-grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Volume 71, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 71, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Is It Necessary to Detect All Prostate Cancers in Men with Serum PSA Levels
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
Selma Masic, Janet E. Cowan, Samuel L. Washington, Hao G
European Urology Oncology
Prostate Cancer Nomograms: An Update
The Diverse Genomic Landscape of Clinically Low-risk Prostate Cancer
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages (March 2019)
European Urology is “Your” Journal
Jonathan S. Brajtbord, Michael S. Leapman, Matthew R. Cooperberg 
Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages (December 2018)
Prostate Cancer 2008: Challenges in Diagnosis and Management
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
The Comparability of Models for Predicting the Risk of a Positive Prostate Biopsy with Prostate-Specific Antigen Alone: A Systematic Review  Fritz Schröder,
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Edith Canby-Hagino, Javier Hernandez, Timothy C. Brand, Ian Thompson 
Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages (December 2018)
European Urology Oncology
Does PSA Testing Influence the Natural History of Prostate Cancer?
Development of an international prostate cancer risk tool integrating data from multiple heterogeneous cohorts Donna Pauler Ankerst, Johanna Tolksdorf.
Assessing a Patient’s Individual Risk of Biopsy-detectable Prostate Cancer: Be Aware of Case Mix Heterogeneity and A Priori Likelihood  Jan F.M. Verbeek,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages 197-203 (August 2018) A Contemporary Prostate Biopsy Risk Calculator Based on Multiple Heterogeneous Cohorts  Donna P. Ankerst, Johanna Straubinger, Katharina Selig, Lourdes Guerrios, Amanda De Hoedt, Javier Hernandez, Michael A. Liss, Robin J. Leach, Stephen J. Freedland, Michael W. Kattan, Robert Nam, Alexander Haese, Francesco Montorsi, Stephen A. Boorjian, Matthew R. Cooperberg, Cedric Poyet, Emily Vertosick, Andrew J. Vickers  European Urology  Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages 197-203 (August 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.003 Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Baseline demographics and univariate odds ratios for association between risk factor and high-grade cancer by cohort. Data not shown for African ancestry for Hamburg, Zurich, San Raffaele, Mayo Clinic, and UCSF. No prior negative biopsy for Hamburg and family history for UCSF because numbers were too low to reliably estimate the odds ratios. DRE=digital rectal exam; MSKCC=Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; PCPT=Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial; PSA=prostate-specific antigen; UCSF=University of California San Francisco; VA=Veterans Affairs. European Urology 2018 74, 197-203DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.003) Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Odds ratios (in favor of endpoint listed to right over left) with 95% confidence intervals for the PBCG and PCPTRC multinomial logistic regression models. DRE=digital rectal exam; PBCG=Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group; PCPTRC=Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator; PSA=prostate-specific antigen. European Urology 2018 74, 197-203DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.003) Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Calibration plot showing predicted versus observed risks for the PBCG risk model for high-grade cancer compared to the PCPTRC. Stacked histograms (PBCG on top of PCPTRC) showing distributions of risks from the two models are shown at the bottom. (A) North American cohorts. (B) External validation on European cohorts. PBCG=Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group; PCPTRC=Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator. European Urology 2018 74, 197-203DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.003) Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Net benefit curves comparing the PBCG model for high-grade risk to the PCPTRC and the strategy of referring to biopsy all men. (A) North American cohorts. (B) External validation on European cohorts. PBCG=Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group; PCPTRC=Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator. European Urology 2018 74, 197-203DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.003) Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions