VICTOR HUGO SANCHEZ ESPINOZA and I. GÓMEZ-GARCÍA-TORAÑO

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Generic Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR): Safety Systems Overview
Advertisements

FZK/IRS-AS W. Hering, Ch. Homann1 Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft 11th International QUENCH Workshop, Karlsruhe, Germany W. Hering,
OVERVIEW - RELAP/SCDAPSIM
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
Slide 1 NRC Perspectives on Reactor Safety Course Special Features of BWR Severe Accident Mitigation and Progression L. J. Ott Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Presented by: Muhammad Ayub Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Safety Enhancement at Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan Prospects of Nuclear Energy in.
Jiří Duspiva Nuclear Research Institute Řež, plc. Nuclear Power and Safety Division Dept. of Reactor Technology 11 th International QUENCH Workshop Karlsruhe,
Nuclear Energy University Programs Small Modular Reactors August 10, 2011 Dan Ingersoll presented by Bob Hill.
Outlook for the Requirements of the Nuclear Power Plant Irradiation Test in China SONG DANRONG Nuclear Power Institute of China.
Investigation of "dry" recriticality of the melt during late in-vessel phase of severe accident in Light Water Reactor D.Popov, KNPP, BG O.Runevall, KTH,
TRAMPUS Consultancy Virtual Defense-in-Depth Concept in RPV Integrity Assessment P. Trampus 1st Hungarian-Ukrainian Joint.
SISIFO-GAS A COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM TO SUPPORT SEVERE ACCIDENTS TRAINING AND MANAGEMENT WGRisk Workshop March 29-31, 2004 Köln, Germany César Serrano.
Investigation into the Viability of a Passively Active Decay Heat Removal System In ALLEGRO Laura Carroll, Graduate Physicist Physics & Licensing Team,
March “Experience Gained from the Mexican Nuclear Regulatory Authority in the Probabilistic Safety Assessment Level 2 Development for Laguna.
Overview of Conventional 2-loop PWR Simulator. PCTRAN Dr
STATUS OF IRSN LEVEL 2 PSA (PWR 900)
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Assessment of Margin for In-Vessel Retention in Higher Power Reactors 2004 RELAP5 International.
ASTEC validation on PANDA tests A. BENTAIB, A. BLEYER Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire BP 17, Fontenay aux Roses Cedex, FRANCE.
Generation Aino Ahonen CABABILITY OF APROS IN THE ANALYSES OF DIESEL LOADING SEQUENCES E. Raiko, H.Kontio, K.Porkholm, presented by A. Ahonen.
Nuclear Research Institute Řež plc 1 DEVELOPMENT OF RELAP5-3D MODEL FOR VVER-440 REACTOR 2010 RELAP5 International User’s Seminar West Yellowstone, Montana.
26-27 September 2005 Colloque GDR Intéraction Fluide-Structure, Sophia Antipolis 1 Fluid-Structure Interaction Modelling with Europlexus Fast Dynamics.
Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU Energy Forum 2011 Nuclear Safety Regulation in Romania Recent Developments.
1 RIC 2009 MELCOR Analyses to Address Regulatory Issues: Evaluation of System Success Criteria Hossein Esmaili USNRC March 12, 2009.
9 th Workshop on European Collaboration for Higher Education and Research in Nuclear Engineering & Radiological Protection Salamanca, Spain 5-7 June 2013.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 ESTIMATION OF THERMAL-HYDRAULIC LOADING FOR VVER-1000 UNDER SEVERE ACCIDENT SCENARIO Barun Chatterjee 1, Deb Mukhopadhyay.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 MELCOR Severe Accident Simulation for a “CAREM-like” Integral Reactor M. Caputo, J. M. García, M. Giménez, S.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 Analysis of Corium Behavior in the Lower Plenum of the Reactor Vessel during a Severe Accident Rae-Joon Park,
E3 Teacher Summer Research Program. Willie L. Smith - IPC, Physics Tidehaven ISD Tidehaven High School.
0 Overview of Fukushima-Accident Analysis ERMSAR 2012, Cologne (Germany) March 21 – 23, 2012 JNES Masanori FUKASAWA.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 In-vessel retention as retrofitting measure for existing nuclear power plants M. Bauer, Westinghouse Electric.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Defence in Depth Safety Culture Lecturer.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 OECD Benchmark Exercise on the TMI-2 Plant: Analysis of an Alternative Severe Accident Scenario G. Bandini (ENEA),
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 ASTEC V2.0 rev 1 Reactor Applications French PWR 900 MWe Accident Sequences Comparison with MAAP4 V. Lombard,
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 Post-test calculations of CERES experiments using ASTEC code Lajos Tarczal 1, Gabor Lajtha 2 1 Paks Nuclear Power.
8 th European conference on Euratom research and training in reactor systems FISA 2013 Co-organised by FISA 2013 Euratom Research Programme on Reactor.
MEHB 513 Introduction on nuclear technology assignment GROUP MEMBERS:ID: SEEH CHONG CHIN ME YEE QIAN WAHME TING DING PINGME LIM JIA YINGME
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making “Overview of Level 2 PSA” Workshop Information IAEA Workshop City, Country.
Workshop on Risk informed decision making on nuclear power plant safety January 2011 SNRC, Kyiv, Ukraine Benefits and limitations of RIDM by Géza.
Post-Fukushima Severe Accident Management Update Kim, Hyeong Taek KHNP- Central Research Institute July KINS Safety Analysis Symposium.
REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL
(NURETH-16)-Chicago, Illinois
Summary of Int’l ITL Program (1)
International Topical Conferences on Nuclear Safety, IAEA, June 6-9, 2017, Vienna Workshop 2: An Introduction and Further Explanation on Design Extension.
Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XIV Surveillance Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared by the IAEA and co-funded.
Role of the TSO in Public Information/ Debate Openness, Transparency Technical support to regulatory body for the new NPP (OL3) project Keijo Valtonen.
T. Steinrötter, M. Kowalik, H. Löffler, M. Sonnenkalb, I. Bakalov
Approach to Practical Elimination in Finland
RELAP/SCDAP Sensitivity Study on the Efficiency in Severe Core Degradation Prevention of Depressurization and Water Injection into Steam Generators following.
Complementarity of deterministic and probabilistic approaches
Diversity analysis for advanced reactor design
IVR Design and Safety Demonstration of Advanced NPPs in China
Sandia National Laboratories
Jiří Duspiva ÚJV Řež, a. s. Division of Nuclear Safety and Reliability
Armenia Training and Tutoring Feedback
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module III Basic principles of nuclear safety Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared.
International Topical Conferences on Nuclear Safety, IAEA, June 6-9, 2017, Vienna Analyses of DEC Events in the Czech Republic and their Implementation.
SAFETY AND SITTING ASSESSMENT FOR NPPs DEPLOYMENT IN INDONESIA
BEPU and Safety Margins in Nuclear Reactor Safety
Session Name: Lessons Learned from Mega Projects
IAEA International Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety, 6-9 June, 2017 Investigation of performance of Passive heat removal system.
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module VII Probabilistic Safety Assessment Case Studies Version 1.0, July 2015 This material was prepared.
(INDIAN PRESSURISED WATER REACTOR) Distinguished Scientist & RRF
Mixing of the Atmosphere within the EPR Design Containment in Design Basis and Severe Accident Conditions Prof. Ali Tehrani ONR Principal Inspector –
NUMERICAL STUDY OF IN-VESSEL CORIUM RETENTION IN A BWR REACTOR M
BWROG – Emergency Procedures and Severe Accident Guidelines (EPG/SAG) Revision 4 Highlights Ken Klass (Talen Energy), Lesa Hill (Southern Nuclear) & Phillip.
THE ROLE OF PASSIVE SYSTEMS IN ENHANCING SAFETY AND PREVENTING ACCIDENTS IN ADVANCED REACTORS Moustafa Aziz Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Authority.
New Regulatory Requirements in Japan
Presentation transcript:

VICTOR HUGO SANCHEZ ESPINOZA and I. GÓMEZ-GARCÍA-TORAÑO IAEA Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety: Safety Demonstration of Advanced Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants, 6-9. June 2017 IAEA-CN-251 Analysis of PWR Severe Accident Sequences including Mitigative Measures to Prevent or Delay the Failure of Safety Barriers with the Severe Accident Code ASTEC VICTOR HUGO SANCHEZ ESPINOZA and I. GÓMEZ-GARCÍA-TORAÑO victor.sanchez@kit.edu

Content Motivation The European SA Reference Code ASTEC Selected Severe Accident sequences (with/without SAM) Conclusions and Outlook IAEA Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety, 6-9. June 2017

Motivation Fukushima accidents showed necessity for review Re-evaluation of accident analysis methodologies Assessment of NPP safety status Review of SAMG Improvement of numerical simulation tools used for SAM e.g. ASTEC, MELCOR, etc. German activities in SA embedded in national (WASA-BOSS) and international projects (CESAM, FASNET, etc.) KIT participation of SAM-optimization for BWR within WASA-BOSS project KIT participation n SAM-optimization for PWR within EU CESAM project IAEA Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety, 6-9. June 2017

The ASTEC Severe Accident Code IAEA Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety, 6-9. June 2017

The European SA Reference Code ASTEC CPA Main Modules ICARE, CESAR, and CPA used in the PWR plant simulations ICARE CESAR Aim of code Explain the picture Modules that are important to us Features KIT contributed to the validation of Version 2.o and 2.1 using KIT facilities e.g. QUENCH, CORA IAEA Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety, 6-9. June 2017

The ASTEC2.0 Simulation of PWR SA Sequences with and without SAMG IAEA Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety, 6-9. June 2017

KIT Approach for PWR SA Simulations (1/3) Steps: Integral plant model Predict stationary plant conditions Extend model depending of scenarios Activate physical models for in-vessel phenomena IAEA Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety, 6-9. June 2017

KIT Approach for PWR SA Simulations (2/3) Model Extension Reactor Protection System AM procedures Mobile equipment IAEA Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety, 6-9. June 2017

KIT Approach for PWR SA Simulations (3/3) Physical phenomena: Chemical interactions Corium oxidation Material interactions (Ag-Fe-Ni-Zry) Movement of materials Stratification lower plenum Mechanical behaviour Vessel failure Core Ring 1 Core Ring 2 Core Ring 3 Core Ring 4 Core Ring 5 Core Ring 6

Investigated SA Scenarios with ASTEC2.0 IAEA Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety, 6-9. June 2017

ASTEC V2.0 Simulations: Selected scenarios Medium Break LOCA (testing purposes) Small Break LOCA (risk core damage) Station Blackout (risk containment damage) Put the screen in white and do the bridge by word Hypotheses: No surge line failure No 100 K/h cooldown Passive seals MCPs No temp-induced SGTR I. Gómez García-Toraño, et. al (2017). Investigation of SAM measures during selected MBLOCA sequences along with Station Blackout in a generic Konvoi PWR using ASTECV2.0. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 105, 226–39. I. Gómez García-Toraño, et. al (2017). Analysis of primary bleed and feed procedures during selected SBLOCA sequences along with Station Blackout in a generic Konvoi PWR using ASTECV2.0. Annals of Nuclear Energy. Submitted. IAEA Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety, 6-9. June 2017

Total Station Blackout Reference Sequence 6.14 RPV-failure at high P! 0.33 h: LL_SGA/B < 4 m 2.61 h: oxidation starts 3.4 h: Clad melting 3.84 h: first corium slump into LP 4.18 h: total core uncover IAEA Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety, 6-9. June 2017

Total Station Blackout Potential Accident Management Measures (1/2) SAMGs SAMGs I. Gómez García-Toraño at. Al (2017) Assessment of selected SAM measures during a Station Blackout in a generic Konvoi PWR using ASTECV2.0. Annals of Nuclear Energy. Submitted. ~ 120 simulations performed IAEA Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety, 6-9. June 2017

Total Station Blackout Potential Accident Management Measures (2/2) Reflooding with mobile equipment IAEA Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety, 6-9. June 2017

Total Station Blackout Core Reflooding (after PSD) IAEA Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety, 6-9. June 2017

Total Station Blackout Core Reflooding (after PSD) ✓ ✓ IAEA Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety, 6-9. June 2017

Total Station Blackout Core reflooding (after PSD) ✓ ✓ Deployment order of mobile pumps within 1 h after SBO to prevent melting! IAEA Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear Installation Safety, 6-9. June 2017

Conclusions Contribution to further development of SAMGs in Konvoi PWR Demonstration of ASTEC V2.0 capabilities to perform severe accident analysis in PWR Robustness, numerical stability (Version 2.1 is even better), etc. Contribution to further development of SAMGs in Konvoi PWR PBF should be initiated at CET=400 °C or with a 20 min delay by means of all pressurizer valves to delay vessel failure Reflooding should be started when CET=650 °C is reached with injection rates > 20 kg/s to prevent RPV-failure must occur 20-30 min before 20 ton of corium has been relocated into the LP to prevent RPV failure regardless of injected mass flow rate Outlook: Repeat plant simulations with latest ASTEC V2.1 using converted models (2.0 to 2.1) Strong cooperation with code developers and other R&D institutions needed KIT provide experimental data (QUENCH BWR, LIVE) for code validation