Data policy, data usage and dataset update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CEOS-CGMS Working Group on Climate John Bates NOAA/NESDIS/NCEI SIT Workshop Agenda Item 7 CEOS Action / Work Plan Reference CEOS SIT Technical Workshop.
Advertisements

GSICS Data and Products Servers Volker Gärtner (EUMETSAT) For GSICS Data Working Group.
1GSICS Research and Data Working Groups Annual Meeting – Tsukuba, March 2016 S. Wagner, T. Hewison, B. Viticchiè Status of GIRO and GLOD policy, infrastructure.
Report from USGS 17th GSICS Executive Panel, Biot, 2-3 June 2016 Thomas Stone U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, Arizona USA GSICS-EP-17, Biot, 2-3 June.
Lunar Calibration Workshop General discussion Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with Tom Stone (USGS) Sophie Lachérade, Bertrand Fougnie (CNES)
Lunar Calibration Workshop Preparation Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with Tom Stone (USGS) Sophie Lachérade, Bertrand Fougnie (CNES) Jack.
2013 GSICS Joint Meeting, Williamsburg VA, USA, March GSICS Collaboration Servers Status: 2013 Peter Miu (EUMETSAT) CMA, CNES, EUMETSAT, ISRO,
GSICS Reference Documents
GSICS Baseline Review: Tools – e.g. GSICS Bias Plotting Tool
Description of the giro ON THE DETAILS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION
PREPARATION OF THE GiRO executable
GDWG Agenda Item: Tools for GRWG activities
Calibration Events Working Group GSICS TeleConference 23 October 2012
CMA NSMC, Beijing, China 5-8 March 2012
GRWG VIS/NIR Sub-Group Briefing Report
Lunar Calibration Workshop Activities
Lunar Calibration Workshop
Second Joint GSICS-IVOS Lunar Calibration Workshop
DOI Overview to Support its Use in GSICS
Technical Expectations from Organizers & Participants B. Fougnie, S
Spectral Response Function netCDF towards “GSICS Standard netCDF”
The International Plant Protection Convention
GDWG Agenda Item Repository for GSICS Work - Clarification on Archiving Masaya Takahashi, JMA CMA, CNES, EUMETSAT, ISRO, IMD, JAXA, JMA, KMA, NASA, NIST,
Doelling, Wagner 2015 GSICS annual meeting, New Delhi March 20, 2015
Topics & Chairing next Web Meetings
GIRO usage and GSICS Lunar Observation Dataset Policy S. Wagner
Improvement Suggestions to the Procedure for Product Acceptance
Lunar Calibration activities
Status of the Data Preparation Bertrand Fougnie – Sophie Lachérade
GSICS Data Management and Availability to Users
PREPARATION OF THE GiRO executable
Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) Tom Stone (USGS)
Update on the GIRO Benchmark
Outcome of the Second Joint GSICS/IVOS Lunar Calibration Workshop
GRWG VIS/NIR sub-group briefing report
Preparation of the Lunar Workshop # 2014
Update on the GSICS Procedure for Product Acceptance (GPPA)
Sensitivity ANALYSIS Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with
2b. GSICS Coordination Centre (GCC)
Updating GSICS Plotting Tool to support VISNIR products
Moving toward inter-calibration using the Moon as a transfer
GIRO APPLICATION Current status and NEXT STEPS
Sensitivity ANALYSIS Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with
Strategy for calibration references
GDWG Joint Meeting Summary and Actions 2017
Definition of a benchmark for the GIRO
Summary of GDWG breakout session and Actions 2018
Strategy for calibration references
Summary of the Achievements to date
Technical aspects of the GIRO work: inputs from GRWG
DOI Overview and its Usage for EUMETSAT GSICS Objects
GDWG Meeting Summary 2016 and Work Plan 2016 / 2017
Lunar Calibration Workshop
Lunar Calibration Workshop Wrap up, next steps and list of actions
Traceability of the GIRO to the ROLO: Definition of a benchmark
RadCalNet/Landnet process for adding new sites
Masaya Takahashi (JMA)
CEOS WGCV (IVOS) potential interactions with GSICS
Masaya Takahashi Japan Meteorological Agency
A timeline for the lunar calibration workshop
The GSICS Lunar Observation Dataset
Bertrand Fougnie, Sophie Lachérade (CNES)
GRWG VIS/NIR sub-group briefing report
Infrared Sub-Group Report Tim Hewison
GRWG Chairing Dohyeong Kim GRWG Chair.
Automated Validation Tool for GSICS Candidate Products (GPPA automation) Peter Miu CMA, CNES, ESA, EUMETSAT, ISRO, IMD, JAXA, JMA, KMA, NASA, NIST, NOAA,
GSICS Existing Tools Updates
Lunar Calibration Workshop Activities
Lunar Calibration Workshop Status of the preparation
GSICS Documentation Discussion - classification and storage
Presentation transcript:

Data policy, data usage and dataset update Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) Tom Stone (USGS) Sophie Lachérade, Bertrand Fougnie (CNES) Jack Xiong (NASA)

Establishing a Lunar Calibration Dataset From the very first web meeting in June 2014, objectives of the workshop: Work across agencies / operators with a common and validated implementation of the USGS ROLO model  one of GSICS’ goal = instruments inter-calibration To share knowledge and expertise on lunar calibration. First step to provide the international community with validated and traceable version of the USGS ROLO model  version based on publically available literature. Generate for the first time a reference dataset that could be used for validation / comparisons later on.

Questions to be answered… What data are we talking about? Not the Level 1.0 data Not the Lunar imagettes (optional inputs) Although it would be nice to share these too! GIRO inputs SRFs Not GIRO outputs

Questions to be answered… What is the purpose of the data set? Data to be used for: validation? Cross-calibration / cross-comparisons? Understanding better the lunar calibration system? The objectives will drive the needs/requirements for establishing the database (number of files to provide, representativeness of the shared data, etc.) Who can have access? Participants ( = providing data)? Calibration community (GSICS, CEOS-IVOS)? Open Access (access via an unprotected webpage [following GSICS principles])? Can GSICS data servers host such a data set? GSICS wiki?

Data policy and data usage Data policy = driven by the answers to the previous questions Within the group who has access, need for agreeing on principles when using other people data: Before submission, papers should be sent to the data owners for review to ensure data are used in an appropriate manner Should we always offer co-authorship on papers for data owners ?  might be an incentive for sharing more data Then owning organizations can decide whether acknowledgment is enough

Comment from Dohyeong Kim (KMA) Thank you very much for your kind explanation about sharing the sample results of COMS.   As same as EUMETSAT, the KMA's obervation of Moon is not for public release but for calibration internally. If you may use the KMA's sample data for updating and improving GIRO without circulating them outside of the EUMETSAT, it would be no problem. But if you want to circulate and open to the whole participants, I should submit document for internal process to get the permission to provide the data to you. Thus, my question is that who will use the KMA's data? I appreciate for the organizing and hosting this really useful workshop and KMA missed not participating in the workshop. Best regards, Dohyeong

Dataset update Three types of updates: Update of existing data set = more observations Update of existing data set = new image processing New instruments Proposal = follow GSICS approach for product development (versioning system) https://gsics.nesdis.noaa.gov/wiki/Development/NetcdfConvention#Data_Versioning