Reduced-order Jet Noise Modelling for Chevrons

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics
Advertisements

Usefulness of velocity profiles based on 3D cine PC MR used as boundary conditions for computational fluid dynamics of an intracranial aneurysm : investigation.
Computational Investigation of Two-Dimensional Ejector Performance
Some Experiments on Thermo - Acoustics of RIJKE Tube with Geometric Modifications and Forced Vorticity S.D. Sharma Aerospace Engineering Department IIT.
Development of Simulation Methodologies for Forced Mixers Anastasios Lyrintzis School of Aeronautics & Astronautics Purdue University.
10 o d e f g h i M=2 Method of characteristics solution for wave reflection from wall, showing PowerPoint construction of flow field, for a total turn.
SCHOOL OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS Anastasios (Tasos) Lyrintzis Ph.D. Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University (1988) –Helicopter blade-vortex interactions.
AeroAcoustics & Noise Control Laboratory, Seoul National University
Application of Boundary Element Methods in Modeling Multidimensional Flame- Acoustic Interactions Tim Lieuwen and Ben T. Zinn Depts. Of Mechanical and.
Who Wants to Be a CFD Expert? In the ME 566 course title, CFD for Engineering Design, what does the acronym CFD stand for? A.Car Free Day B.Cash Flow Diagram.
Mark Claywell & Donald Horkheimer University of Minnesota
Formula sheet No explanation is made on purpose Do not assume that you need to use every formula In this test always assume that K entrance = 0.5, K exit.
3-D Large Eddy Simulation for Jet Noise Prediction A.Uzun, G. Blaisdell, A. Lyrintzis School of Aeronautics and Astronautics Purdue University Funded by.
Development of Low-Noise Aircraft Engines Anastasios Lyrintzis School of Aeronautics & Astronautics Purdue University.
Oscillatory Baffled Reactors for Biological Applications
1 B. Frohnapfel, Jordanian German Winter Academy 2006 Turbulence modeling II: Anisotropy Considerations Bettina Frohnapfel LSTM - Chair of Fluid Dynamics.
1 Effects of Inflow Forcing on Jet Noise Using Large Eddy Simulation P. Lew, A. Uzun, G. A. Blaisdell & A. S. Lyrintzis School of Aeronautics & Astronautics.
9 th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference Purdue University School of Aeronautics and Astronautics 1 An Investigation of Extensions of the Four- Source Method.
Surface Integral Methods for Jet Aeroacoustics Anastasios (Tasos) Lyrintzis Aeronautics & Astronautics Purdue University West Lafayette, IN
Estimation of Prandtls Mixing Length
APPROXIMATING PDFs FOR MULTIPHASE PARTICULATE FLOW USING THE MAXIMUM ENTROPY METHOD Stephen J. Scott, John S. Shrimpton Thermofluids Section, Department.
Results of Kern Method Basic Kinematic Details Group No. Tube Side Velocity (m/s) Number of Tubes Shell Diameter length STHX (m) Ds/L
1 A combined RANS-LES strategy with arbitrary interface location for near-wall flows Michael Leschziner and Lionel Temmerman Imperial College London.
Computational Modelling of Unsteady Rotor Effects Duncan McNae – PhD candidate Professor J Michael R Graham.
Computational Modeling of Turbulent Asymmetric Jet Flows Prof. Ed Akin Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science Rice University Houston, Texas Jon.
Numerical methods in flow metrology Sampo Sillanpää, Centre for metrology and accreditation.
Ben Falconer Supervisors: Peter Bryanston-Cross, Brenda Timmerman.
Steven J. Massey Eagle Aeronautics, Inc. Alaa A. Elmiligui
Choking Pressure Ratio Guidelines for Small Critical Flow Venturis
ICHS4, San Francisco, September E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi Joint Research Centre - Institute for Energy and Transport
Design of Engine Cylinder for Creation of A Selected Turbulent Flow P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Geometry to create qualitatively.
Andrew Dougherty Franklin Stinner (‘11) Physics Department Lafayette College, Easton PA Sidebranching in the Dendritic.
10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Manchester, UK, May, Refraction Corrections for Surface Integral Methods in Jet Aeroacoustics FongLoon.
DESIGN OF CASCADE for AXIAL FLOW COMPRESSORS
UPWIND, Aerodynamics and aero-elasticity
Auto Ignition, Premixed & Diffusive Combustion in CI Engines
Jet With No Cross Flow RANS Simulations of Unstart Due to Mass Injection J. Fike, K. Duraisamy, J. Alonso Acknowledgments This work was supported by the.
IESVic 1 QUANTITATIVE IMAGING OF MULTI-COMPONENT TURBULENT JETS Arash Ash Supervisors: Dr. Djilali Dr. Oshkai Institute for Integrated Energy Systems University.
Computational Fluid Dynamics Applied to the Analysis of 10-mm Hydrocyclone Solids Separation Performance S. A. Grady, M. M. Abdullah, and G. D. Wesson.
Geometric Construction
Turbulence Modeling Benchmarks Survey P. G. Huang Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Wright State University Dayton, OH RANS Turbulence.
1 GMUWCollaborative Research Lab Advanced Turbulence Modeling for engine applications Chan Hee Son University of Wisconsin, Engine Research Center Advisor:
1 LES of Turbulent Flows: Lecture 7 (ME EN ) Prof. Rob Stoll Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Utah Spring 2011.
Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Noise
© Copyright 2014 COMSOL. Any of the images, text, and equations here may be copied and modified for your own internal use. All trademarks are the property.
Prediction of jet mixing noise in flight from static tests
Objective Introduce Reynolds Navier Stokes Equations (RANS)
The Prediction of Low Frequency Rumble in Combustion Systems
A V&V Overview of the 31st Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics
UPWIND, Aerodynamics and aero-elasticity
Date of download: 11/5/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
C. F. Panagiotou and Y. Hasegawa
Control of Boundary Layer Structure for Low Re Blades
Blade Design for Modern Wind Turbines
CFD-Team Weekly Meeting - 8th March 2012
Development of Low Jet Noise Aircraft Engines
Analyzing the Sound Pressure of Airfoil Self-Generated Noise
Rotors in Complex Inflow, AVATAR, WP2
Pipe Components, Piping System.
AIRFRAME NOISE MODELING APPROPRIATE FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION AIAA Serhat Hosder, Joseph A. Schetz, Bernard Grossman and.
Sunny Ri Li, Nasser Ashgriz
Fluid Dynamic Analysis of Wind Turbine Wakes
IELTS WRITING TASK 1 (Describing a chart).
Pressure drop prediction models
VORTICITY AND CIRCULATION WITHIN TWIN JETS ISSUING INTO A CROSSFLOW
E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi
I. Di Piazza (ENEA), R. Marinari, N. Forgione (UNIPI), F
Chapter 2 Navier-Stokes Modeling for HAWT by CFX 5.7
Scatterplots line of best fit trend line interpolation extrapolation
Probabilistic Surrogate Models
Presentation transcript:

Reduced-order Jet Noise Modelling for Chevrons Karthik Depuru PhD in Engineering Acoustics Research Laboratory E-mail: nkd25@cam.ac.uk Supervisor: Professor Dame Ann Dowling Department of Engineering St John’s College

Jet Noise Large velocity gradient Large shear tends to be noisy Acoustic noise level scales as U6jet-U8jet

Motivation Annoyance to aircraft noise Components of aircraft noise

Objective Significance To develop a methodology to identify the noise sources of chevrons using a reduced-order turbulence model (RANS) with higher accuracy. Significance The methodology will enable accurate prediction of jet acoustic field by using RANS data (less expensive) instead of LES data (expensive). It will significantly reduce computational cost involved in jet noise prediction.

Geometric and Flow Details Courtesy: NASA Geometric Details: Nozzle ID - SMC006 # of chevrons = 6 Effective diameter = 50.8 mm Bend angle = 18.2 degrees Penetration = 3.525 mm Tip-to-tip distance = 42.9 mm Flow Details: Reynolds number = 1.03 x 106 Mach number = 0.9

Correlations 4th order space time correlation is given by, Gaussian approximation:

Axial Correlations R11,11 Time

Relationship among Length Scales Length scale (m) x/D Axial Radial Azimuthal Radial/Axial Azimuthal/Axial 2 0.004067 0.001170 0.001583 0.29 0.39 4 0.005554 0.001841 0.001970 0.33 0.35 8 0.008400 0.002941 0.002402 10 0.009545 0.003292 0.002863 0.34 0.30 Laxial ~ 3 Lradial and 3 Lazimuthal

Length Scale (Cl = 0.3)

Time Scale (Cτ = 0.16)

Directivity 45 degrees 60 degrees

Comparison of R22,22 & R33,33 with R11,11 Tips x/D Rel. R22,22 Rel. R33,33 2 0.47 0.49 4 0.43 6 0.42 0.36 8 0.29 0.30 10 0.32 Roots x/D Rel. R22,22 Rel. R33,33 2 0.56 4 0.49 0.59 6 0.45 0.46 8 0.33 0.36 10 0.34 For x/D ≤ 2, R11,11 is ~2 times the R22,22 and R33,33 For x/D ≥ 8, R11,11 is ~3 times the R22,22 and R33,33

Conclusion Gaussian form fits well the axial, radial and azimuthal correlations Axial length scale is ~3 times the radial and azimuthal length scales Constants of Proportionality are evaluated: Cl = 0.30; Cτ = 0.16 Relationship exists among tips, roots and slants till x/D = 6; Ltip > Lslant > Lroot Chevron behaves as a round jet beyond x/D = 6 R11,11 is the predominant noise source; other major noise sources are: R22,22 and R33,33; R12,12, R13,13 and R23,23 For x/D ≥ 8, R11,11 is approximately 3 times the R22,22 and R33,33 With the proportionality constants, RANS scales can describe the noise sources as accurately as LES scales. This is a huge cost saving!