Estimation techniques for missing intra-EU trade

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional Seminar on Developing a Program for the Implementation of the 2008 SNA and Supporting Statistics Murat EKŞİ September 2013 Ankara - Turkey.
Advertisements

Gerry Brady CSO Meeting of the Enterprise Statistics Liaison Group External Trade in Goods November
Existing EU Regulations concerning pesticide statistics and Latvia experience in pesticide statistics Guna Karlsone, CSB of Latvia.
France : Improving checks in customs data OCDE – 7 November 2011.
Carmela Pascucci – Istat - Italy Meeting of the Working Party on International Trade in Goods and Trade in Services Statistics (WPTGS) Linking business.
Sébastien CHAMI 5 May, 2010 Reengineering French structural business statistics An extended use of administrative data.
Reconciling merchandise trade statistics and Balance of Payments: the recommendations of the Task Force BoP/FTS Item 13 of the Agenda Document STD/SES/WPTGS(2008)23.
Selected Transfer Pricing issues/Advance pricing agreements (APA) in Polish practice (2006 – 2011) Tomasz Michalik Moscow, 3 February 2012.
The forthcoming statistics on intra-community services in the framework of the new EU Regulation on VAT taxation Paola Anitori - ISTAT 2 nd WPTGS, Paris.
Communication campaign Most common issues identified: analysis per cost category Antonio Requena Fernández FCH JU Financial Officer.
10 September 2009 OECD STESEG Introducing NACE rev 2 in EU Short-term business Statistics Brian Newson Head of STS unit Eurostat.
1 Calculation of unit value indices at Eurostat Training course on Trade Indices Beirut, December 2009 European Commission, DG Eurostat Unit G3 International.
QUALITY ASPECTS WHEN MODERNIZING INTRASTAT Ales Capek Eurostat.
12 October 2009 EU-OECD Workshop Introducing NACE rev 2 in EU Short-term business Statistics Brian Newson Head of STS unit Eurostat.
© Federal Statistical Office Germany Statistisches Bundesamt Statistical analysis through linking Intra Trade Register and General Business Registers Christiane.
VIES data -using in ITGS production Olli-Pekka Penttilä Director of Statistics / Co-ordinator Finnish Customs Nordic meeting 2014.
Data sources of the EuroGroups Register Presentation by Eurostat
Implementation of the new recommendations of IMTS 2010 and MSITS 2010 in Hungary Challenges Anita Bány Hungarian Central Statistical Office Foreign Trade.
Improvements of the Swedish estimated Intrastat data by adding estimations based on VIES data Nordic meeting 16 September 2014 Jennie Bergman & Ari Mansikkaviita.
ESTP course on International Trade in Goods Statistics
Doc MET 400 (2015) & Data validation Training course
Estimated bilateral trade in services by industry (EBTSI) Methodology used to create a matrix of bilateral trade in services by industry for the OECD global.
05/12/03 Mr Jacques Lanneluc : Eurostat - Unit C4 External Trade Statistics: legal aspects.
E-PRTR incompleteness check Irene Olivares Industrial Pollution Group Air and Climate Change Programme Eionet NRC workshop on Industrial Pollution Copenhagen.
Producer Price Indices in Denmark - Producer price index for commodities (PPI) March 20 th 2015.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 18 – Statistics Bilateral screening: Chapter.
ESTP course, SBS module 13 March 2013 Structural Business Statistics Data reporting to Eurostat, transmission format and tools.
Regional aggregation of statistics on water abstraction and use Seminar on water statistics for countries in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia.
Value Added Tax Value Added Tax (VAT) Indirect Tax
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Invoice requirements according to the Spanish domestic regulation
LEGAL ASPECTS OF FINANCE Lecture 5
Returns under GST Manoj Malpani CA, CMA.
Chapter 18 Automatic Account Assignment
Presentation by Eurostat
International Trade in Goods Statistics in the EU Lídia Bassó
Measuring the Impact of Business Profiling in the UK Wiesbaden Group on Business Registers Profiling (Costs and Benefits) Tallinn, Estonia, September.
SUTs – data sources and bridge tables
OECD SHORT-TERM ECONOMIC STATISTICS WORKING PARTY (STESWP) MEETING
Quality Aspects and Approaches in Business Statistics
Some elements on compliance actions and threshold setting in the Italian Intrastat system ADVANCED ISSUES IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN GOODS STATISTICS ESTP.
Structural Business Statistics Data validation
Structural Business Statistics Data reporting to Eurostat, transmission format and tools ESTP course, SBS module 13 March 2013.
Domestic extraction of mineral raw materials
Price Indices for External Trade of Goods Eleonora Baghy 26/05/2013
Organizational background of the external trade in goods
New estimation system in Danish Intrastat Mr Søren Rich, Senior Adviser, Statistics Denmark ESTP course 'Advanced issues in international trade in goods.
A New Business Statistics in Finland - Quarterly Investments
Validation in International Trade in Goods Statistics Lídia Bassó
Price and Volume Measures
Validation of WStatR-Data
Prodcom ESTP course October 2010
SUTs – data sources and bridge tables
Provisions of totals and zero records (point for decision)
DEVELOPMENT OF IMPUTATION MODEL FOR SMALL ENTERPRISES
ESTP COURSE ON ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CLASSIFICATIONS Introductory course Day 2 – second afternoon session PRODCOM Marie-Madeleine Fuger INSEE – France.
Zsófia Ercsey - KSH – Hungary Marie-Madeleine Fuger - INSEE – France
Data validation handbook
DATA VALIDATION Foreign Trade Statistics
Data processing German foreign trade statistics
Market Access Database (MADB)
Hungarian Central Statistical Office
Structural Business Statistics
Estimating as a Way of Improving and Completing Administrative Data
Linking trade statistics with business statistics
ESTP course on 'Advanced issues in International Trade in Goods Statistics' 2-4 April 2014 QUALITY HANDBOOK.
Threshold setting in UK trade statistics compilation
ESTP course on International Trade in Goods Statistics
Zsófia Ercsey - KSH – Hungary Marie-Madeleine Fuger - INSEE – France
Simplification of Intrastat: Current State of Play
Presentation transcript:

Estimation techniques for missing intra-EU trade ADVANCED ISSUES IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN GOODS STATISTICS ESTP training course 2 – 4 April 2014

Estimation techniques for missing intra-EU trade According to the Regulation (EC) No 638/2004 art. 12 ‘Member States shall provide to the Commission (Eurostat) with monthly results which cover their total trade in goods by using estimates, where necessary’

Estimation techniques - prerequisities Arrivals 2012 2013 Exemption threshold 269 348 EUR (1.1 mln PLN) 265 239 EUR (1.1 mln PLN) Trade coverage 96.3% 96.0% Number of PSIs 18 547 15 080 Statistical value thresh. 8 805 831 EUR (36 mln PLN) 10 127 315 EUR (42 mln PLN) Trade coverage 70% 70% Number of PSIs 3 876 3 141 Dispatches Exemption threshold 269 348 EUR (1.1 mln PLN) 265 239 EUR (1.1 mln PLN) Trade coverage 97.9% 97.9% Number of PSIs 12 295 10 458 Statistical value thresh. 17 611 662 EUR (72 mln PLN) 18 325 617 EUR (76 mln PLN) Trade coverage 70% 71% Number of PSIs 2 668 2 141

Estimation techniques – data sources Data sources for estimation techniques for missing intra-EU trade come from the Analytical Database of the IT system: Intrastat data (INTRASTAT system) Extrastat data (CELINA system ) – for new MS VAT data - for taxable persons below the exemption threshold and for new PSIs above the exemption threshold for which the trade pattern is unknown. VAT data are also used for comparison of data coming from the INTRASTAT/CELINA system Business register (the national tax ID number called NIP, the ID number assigned to each company in the national register of business entities called REGON, threshold category, priority code) Table of trade pattern covering turnover between PL and partner Countries for the year t-1

Method of estimating non/ late response – prerequisites Threshold category – the IT system checks if Intrastat declarations were submitted according to the corresponding threshold Priority code – the code granted to all categories of intra-EU trade operators: code 1 – for trade operators below the exemption threshold (the lowest level) code 2 - for PSIs above the exemption threshold and below the statistical value threshold (basic data required ) code 3 - for chosen PSIs above the exemption threshold and below the statistical value threshold (detailed data required ) code 4 - for the biggest PSIs above the exemption threshold and below the statistical value threshold (detailed data required) code 5 - for PSIs above the statistical value threshold (detailed data required )

Description of the estimation method Estimation method consists of 3 stages: - Estimating trade for trade operators with trade volume below the exemption threshold (category 1, priority 1) Estimating trade for PSIs with trade volume below the statistical value threshold (category 2, priorities 2, 3, 4) Estimating statistical value for PSIs with category 2 and for PSIs with trade volume above the statistical value threshold (category 3, priority 5) which did not report statistical value or reported null

Assumptions for estimating trade below the exemption threshold The basis for calculating the total value of trade of those trade operators that in a given reference year did not exceed the exemption thresholds established separately for dispatches and arrivals, is the sum of the values registered in the VAT system. In fact, as estimation refers to the particular month, this is the monthly average value calculated on the basis of the sum of VAT values in the year t-1 of PSIs above the exemption threshold. The trade pattern (commodity code, country of destination/consignment/origin, nature of transaction) of trade operators below the exemption threshold is created on the basis of a real trade pattern of PSIs most similar in value.

What is the PSI most similar in value The notion of ‘PSIs most similar in value’ is used in the algorithm created for estimating trade below the threshold. These are the PSIs which are used to create the pattern of trade of ‘0000000000’ PSI, representing the whole trade value of trade operators below the threshold. The PSIs most similar in value in Poland mean PSIs reporting their trade value to the system due to having exceeded the established threshold. The simplified picture of the algorithm creating the set of ‘PSIs most similar in value’ consists of: Calculating the average monthly trade value of operators below the threshold (A value) Creating the initial set of PSIs consisting of those PSIs above the threshold which declare a trade value >0 for each month under estimation The created set is sorted in ascending order Starting from the PSI with the lowest reported trade, the algorithm takes subsequent PSIs comparing the sum of their monthly trade value (B value) with the average monthly trade value of trade operators below the threshold (A value) Step 4 is repeated until B<=A PSIs identified in steps 4 and 5 create the set of ‘PSIs similar in value’ and their trade pattern is used to estimate the pattern of trade for ‘0000000000’ PSI

Estimating trade below the exemption threshold – category 1 Estimating trade of trade operators with trade volume below the exemption threshold (category 1, priority 1) Value (statistical and invoiced), quantities (net mass, supplementary units), mode of transaction, country of origin/destination/consignment are calculated in total on the basis of VAT data (VAT-7 form) from the year t-1 Values calculated in total are redistributed on the basis of the pattern of trade The pattern of trade is determined on the basis of PSIs which are similar in value (PSIs just above the threshold - JATT) taking into account all categories of PSIs different than category 1 The pattern of trade is used as the basis to generate declarations and lines on declarations for trade operators belonging to category 1. Such declarations are registered in data sets under the NIP (tax ID number)/REGON (ID number assigned to each company) code consisting of zeros

Estimating trade above the exemption threshold – PSIs category 2 Trade data for PSIs above the exemption threshold are estimated for each PSI separately and include all data elements The system starts the imputation process for the PSI of priority >1 when the declaration is missing or when the declaration is not accepted by the IT system The real pattern of trade is determined on the basis of average monthly volume of trade in the year t-1 for each PSI above the exemption threshold (priorities 2, 3, 4) The real trade pattern is used to generate lines on declarations If the real trade pattern for the PSI for the year t-1 is unknown, the data for such PSIs are estimated collectively

Estimating trade above the exemption threshold –category 2 Total values which are calculated colectively are redistributed on the basis of the ‘artificial’ pattern of trade for the year t-1 ‘Artificial’ pattern of trade is calculated on the basis of chosen PSIs among those with the biggest ratio of declared trade All chosen PSIs are supplied with the same ‘artificial’ ratio of turnover ‘Artificial’ pattern of trade is used as the basis to generate lines on declarations for PSIs belonging to category 2 (priorities 2,3,4). Such lines are registered in data sets under the NIP (tax ID number)/REGON (ID number of PSI assigned to each company) code consisting of all digits 1

Description of the method – non response estimation Statistical value is estimated for each individual PSI on the basis of an average statistical value from the year t-1 Distribution of the estimated data is carried out on the basis of the trade pattern of the trade volume for PSIs of priority <5 and for PSIs of priority=5 Imputation of net mass and supplementary units is carried out for each CN8 In case of the lack of average price of net mass per 1 kilo or 1 supplementary unit required for data imputation - the IT system will be searching any values on a higher level of data aggregation. If there is no data available on any higher level of aggregation such data are not estimated but stored in the created table of mistakes being subject to the decision of the operator

Distribution of missing trade by partner and product For distribution of non/late/partial response, Poland uses the trade pattern of defined (qualified) characteristics, i.e. trade patterns of PSIs which declare the highest trade value The trade pattern of PSIs with similar characteristics was abandoned since this approach is possible only if - in the IT system information about the characteristics of activities of each PSI is available - classes of similar PSIs are also required because they allow mapping by PKD (NACE) codes A significant number of trading units are trading agents which have been grouped in Section G, Division 46 of NACE rev. 2. Each individual agent deals with products classified under Division 46 which displays what specific goods each agent deals with. This causes problems with NLPR trade distribution by PSIs according to similar characteristics

What is the Polish method like? It is: simple efficient of a high quality being constantly confirmed in reconciliation exercises with Partner Countries

Thank you