Reversible pulmonary trunk banding

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Max B. Mitchell, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Advertisements

Lost in translation The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc 
Renato S. Assad, MD, PhD, Marina M
Aortic valve replacement in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: Left ventricular ejection fraction matters  Victor Dayan, MD, PhD, Philippe Pibarot,
T.K. Susheel Kumar, MD, Christopher J. Knott-Craig, MD 
An unusual case of severe aortic valve stenosis in an adult caused by aortic valve inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor  Dong Zhao, MD, Chunsheng Wang,
Long-term mechanical circulatory support: A new disease state?
Mitral stenosis with pulmonary hypertension: We should operate early
Expanding options to manage traumatic thoracic vascular injuries
Reversible Pulmonary Trunk Banding VIII: Intermittent Overload Causes Harmless Hypertrophy in Adult Goat  Leonardo A. Miana, MD, PhD, Renato S. Assad,
Pulmonary hypertension in valve disease: A beast of the past?
Juan A. Crestanello, MD, Richard C. Daly, MD 
Reversible pulmonary trunk banding III: Assessment of myocardial adaptive mechanisms—contribution of cell proliferation  Maria C.D. Abduch, DVM, PhD,
Form ever follows function
Christopher J. Petit, MD, Matthew J. Gillespie, MD, Matthew A
Pulmonary artery banding for idiopathic dilative cardiomyopathy: A novel therapeutic strategy using an old surgical procedure  Dietmar Schranz, MD, Alex.
Influence of size disparity of transplanted hearts on cardiac growth in infants and children  Eva Maria Delmo Walter, MS, MD, PhD, Michael Huebler, MD,
The lord of the rings  Antonio Miceli, MD, PhD 
Regression of pressure-induced left ventricular hypertrophy is characterized by a distinct gene expression profile  William E. Stansfield, MD, Peter C.
Acute left ventricular failure after bilateral lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension  Tom Verbelen, MD, Sophie Van Cromphaut,
Expanding left ventricular assist device use to patients with disabilities: The role of assistive technology  Juan A. Crestanello, MD  The Journal of.
Myriad manifestations of myxoma
Right ventricular outflow tract resection for treatment of refractory ventricular tachycardia in a 2-year-old child  S. Kanaan, MD, K. Shamsuddin, MD,
Maher N. Abadeer, MD, Peter C. Kouretas, MD, PhD, Ronald K
Intra-aortic balloon pumps and continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: Don't let balloon pumps overstay their welcome  Kevin G. Soucy, PhD, Steven.
Anish Krishnan, BSc, Douglas Drak, BSc, Shisan Bao, PhD, David S
Transection with pseudoaneurysm formation of the pulmonary trunk after placement of an adjustable pulmonary artery banding device (FloWatch-PAB) in a.
Left ventricular assist device therapy in a patient with hearing and speech disabilities  Sotirios Spiliopoulos, MD, PhD, Vera Hergesell, MD, Otto Dapunt,
Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion: The welcome parameter
Abdul Rahman Dakkak, MD, Angelo M. Dell'Aquila, MD, Juergen R
It's not “just a shunt” but sometimes it should be…
A first start for lung transplantation?
Right ventricular failure after cardiac surgery: Why can't right ventricular assist device support fix the problem?  Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD  The Journal.
Role of myocardial hypertrophy on acute and chronic right ventricular performance in relation to chronic volume overload in a porcine model: Relevance.
Minimally invasive off-pump implantation of HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device  Diyar Saeed, MD, PhD, Stephan Sixt, MD, PhD, Alexander Albert,
Navin K. Kapur, MD, Jenica Upshaw, MD, Michael S
Reversible pulmonary trunk banding: VII
Leora B. Balsam, MD, Abe DeAnda, MD 
Left sinus of Valsalva aneurysm: Rare disease, rarer presentation
Right ventricular failure from severe pulmonary hypertension after surgery for shone complex: Back to fetal physiology with reducting, atrioseptectomy,
Reversible pulmonary trunk banding. II
Is endoluminal vacuum therapy “sponge worthy”?
Frozen elephant trunk technique: Ready to get back to the future?
Rapid progression of midventricular obstruction in adults with double-chambered right ventricle  José María Oliver, MD, Ana Garrido, MD, Ana González,
A fate worse than death  Jennifer S. Lawton, MD 
The Ross procedure: Time to reevaluate the guidelines
Pulmonary flow study predicts survival in pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect and major aortopulmonary collateral arteries  Jiaquan Zhu,
Passing the torch The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Shunt right or left? Decision 2016
Complete myocardial revascularization and Dor technique in a case of left lung agenesis  Rafael García Fuster, MD, PhD, José Alfonso Buendía, MD, Jordi.
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide
Ventricular assistant in restrictive cardiomyopathy: Making the right connection  Robert D.B. Jaquiss, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Time-dependent response of both ventricles after septal ablation: Implications for biventricular support after left ventricular assist device placement 
Establishment and comparison of two reliable hyperkinetic pulmonary hypertension models in rabbits  Chuanzhen Liu, MD, Zhibo Yan, MD, PhD, Changcun Fang,
“The more things change…”: The challenges ahead
Apples remain apples NO matter what
Energized lung resections
Respect the aorta The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Preoperative PFTs: The answer is blowing in the wind
Lipomatous septal hypertrophy
Myocardial function after fetal cardiac bypass in an ovine model
Did you like Terminator 3 better than Terminator 2
A good chimney requires a good sweep
The significance of pulmonary annulus size in the surgical management of transposition of the great arteries with ventricular septal defect and pulmonary.
Edward Y. Chan, MD, Michael J. Reardon, MD 
Cavoaortic shunt improves hemodynamics with preserved oxygen delivery in experimental right ventricular failure during left ventricular assist device.
Deciding how much to pay for effective care
Presentation transcript:

Reversible pulmonary trunk banding Reversible pulmonary trunk banding. VI: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity in rapid ventricular hypertrophy in young goats  Renato S. Assad, MD, PhD, Fernando A. Atik, MD, Fernanda S. Oliveira, Miriam H. Fonseca-Alaniz, BPh, PhD, Maria C.D. Abduch, VMD, PhD, Gustavo J.J. Silva, PE, PhD, Gustavo G. Favaro, MD, Jose E. Krieger, MD, PhD, Noedir A.G. Stolf, MD, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  Volume 142, Issue 5, Pages 1108-1113.e1 (November 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.007 Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 A, RV-PA gradient (mm Hg) temporal pattern of sham, continuous, and intermittent groups. B, According to variations in RV-PA gradients in relation to time, the area under the curve (mm Hg h) was calculated to determine the systolic overload imposed on each group. RV, Right ventricle; PA, pulmonary artery. ∗P < .001 compared with that of the sham group. #P < .001 compared with the intermittent group. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 142, 1108-1113.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.007) Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 RV myocardial performance index during the 96-hour protocol in sham, continuous, and intermittent groups. RV, Right ventricle. ¤P < .04 compared with that in the sham group at the same time. #P < .001 compared with that in the intermittent group at the same time. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 142, 1108-1113.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.007) Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 RV, ventricular septum, and LV weights in the 3 groups, indexed to body weight. Values (g/kg) = mean ± standard deviation. RV, Right ventricle; LV, left ventricle. ∗P < .05 compared with that in the sham group. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 142, 1108-1113.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.007) Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 RV/LV ratio of G6PD activity in the sham, continuous, and intermittent groups. Values = mean ± standard deviation. Sham: n = 5; continuous: n = 5; intermittent: n = 10. RV, Right ventricle; LV, left ventricle; G6PD, glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase. ∗P < .05 compared with that in the sham and intermittent groups. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 142, 1108-1113.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.007) Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure E1 Pulmonary trunk adjustable banding device used in the protocol, manufactured by SILIMED, Silicone e Instrumental Médico-Cirúrgico e Hospitalar Ltda, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 142, 1108-1113.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.007) Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure E2 RV/aorta systolic pressure ratio of sham, continuous, and intermittent groups, throughout the protocol. RV, Right ventricle. ∗P < .05 compared with its respective baseline and with that in the sham group at the same time. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 142, 1108-1113.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.007) Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure E3 Δ% changes of RV wall thickness of sham, continuous, and intermittent groups throughout the protocol. RV, Right ventricle. ∗P < .001 compared with the respective baseline value. #P < .001 compared with the sham group at the same time. ++P < .02 compared with the continuous group at the same time. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 142, 1108-1113.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.007) Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure E4 Δ% changes of RV end-diastolic volume of sham, continuous, and intermittent groups throughout the protocol. RV, Right ventricle. ∗P < .001 compared with the respective baseline value. #P < .001 compared with the sham group at the same time. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 142, 1108-1113.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.007) Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions