Blended learning By: Hayati Wasistya Astri Ulvi

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Teacher Foundation A Look at the Evaluation Process by The Teacher Foundation (TTF)
Advertisements

Creating the Map To Set the Direction. Educational Positioning System (EPS – a play on GPS)
A didactic plan for a communicative translation class Dr. Constanza Gerding Salas Leipzig Universität - Universidad de Concepción May 2012.
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
A Quality Matters “Quickie”
Bringing it all together!
1 SESSION 3 FORMAL ASSESSMENT TASKS CAT and IT ASSESSMENT TOOLS.
Action Plan Mr. Ahmed Zaki Uddin Mathematics O-Level.
Instructional Plan and Presentation Bernard Q Mallada CUR/516 Dr
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Husnul atiyah Lily Meilia Hari suci Akhmad Riyanto.
Blended Courses: How to have the best of both worlds in higher education By Susan C. Slowey.
STRATEGIES FOR ONLINE LEARNING IN A GLOBAL NETWORK UNIVERSITY INTED 2013 Annette Smith, Kristopher Moore, Erica Osher Reifer New York University.
Recommendations for Best Practice. Best Practice This section will present an analysis of the literature in the following categories: Organization of.
LISA HOLMES INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN. The process of creating an effective learning experience that takes into consideration: what needs to be learned what.
BLENDED LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION: UTILITY OR FUTILITY?
Lecture 8A Designing and Conducting Formative Evaluations English Study Program FKIP _ UNSRI
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment LO 1.1&1.2&1.3.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
The selection of appropriate assessment methods in a course is influenced by many factors: the intended learning outcomes, the discipline and related professional.
Making educational practices more open with OER Professor Andy Lane, Senior Fellow, Support Centre for Open Resources in Education.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
QTC Tel: : Yan Li QTC Tel: : Student-Centred Learning The Challenge of Change.
The combination of traditional Learning and e-learning.
An AAC Professional Learning Module Book Study based on the AAC publication Scaffolding for Student Success Scaffolding for Student Success Module 3: A.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Blended Learning Applications in K-12 Social Studies Instruction Nicholas Glading
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
For the Students Students in elementary school right now have always used technology, classes seem outdated and boring to most because of the lack of.
Learning to Teach System Skill Building Three.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
MAKING THE SHIFT: FROM CLASSROOM TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN: SESSION 4 Patricia McGee, PhD and Veronica Diaz, PhD.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Teacher Work Sample. Lectures Objectives: 1.Define the teacher work sample. 2.Integrate lesson plans with a practice Teacher Work Sample in terms of the.
Anthony Williams, Maria Northcote, Jason Morton and John Seddon
MODULE 15 – ORGANISATIONAL COMMUNICATION
Hybrid Innovation Strategies (HIS) in Course Features
Instructional Design Groundwork:
A community of learners improving our world
The need for student’s awareness, language and judgement to evaluate, plan and take action on their learning Keith Willey (USYD) Anne Gardner (UTS)
MAKING THE MOST OF OUR NEW ONLINE and INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT
M-LANG project  Ref. n NO01-KA Interactive Exchange Workshop on how to use response systems and ICT tools for creating interactive learning.
Unit 3 The National English Curriculum
Assessment and Feedback – Module 1
BUMP IT UP STRATEGY in NSW Public Schools
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Networks that work A review of 2 network resources for Teachers
Teaching and Learning with Technology
2nd Annual Faculty e-Learning Symposium 26th May 2016 Mrs E D Joubert
Instructional Design Gibran Carter.
Classroom-based assessment to promote equity
Transforming Grading Robert Marzano
COMPETENCIES & STANDARDS
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Study group #5 Distance learning enhanced by technology
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
REPORTING.
A Community of Education Technology Professionals
Clinical Educator and Teacher Candidate Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
From the beginning: CAP Project Received full commissioning in 2007 to provide two levels of service. NHS England commissioned 13 AAC Hub Services in 2014.
PREPARED BY: NABIRA BT MANSOR NUR SOLEHAH BT HANAFIAH
February 21-22, 2018.
Chapter 8 Further Concerns in Developing ICT in Language Learning
FEEDBACK Dr. Mohammed Moizuddin Khan Associate Professor.
MAKING THE MOST OF OUR NEW ONLINE and INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT
Providing feedback to learners
OTLA Report Writing Training
Cooperating Teacher and Student Teacher Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
Presentation transcript:

Blended learning By: Hayati Wasistya 2201414067 Astri Ulvi 2201414094 Nurjannah Mutiara 2201414084 Dini Puspitasarii 2201414140 Anjar Pangestu 2201414135 Ahmad Khoirul A. 2201414113

Introduction Education E-learning Traditional Learning Development of Technology Education E-learning Traditional Learning Blended Learning

Blended learning: what and why? 1. Blended e-learning (BeL) 2. Blended Learning Levels 3. Why Blended Learning 4. Blended Learning Approach 5. Blended Learning Application in Language Learning 6. Blended Learning Prospect 7. Factors that Promotes Successful Blended Learning

1. What is blended learning? Blended learning is an approach to learning and eaching which combines and aligns learning undertaken in face-to-face sessions with learning opportunities created online (University if Wolverhampton, 2010) Blended learning is new types of learning activities challenge our thinking as how learning might be facilitated, creating new etiquettes of learning and teaching, and shifting the locus of control from the teacher to the learner. (Littlejohn and Pegler, 2006:4) Blended learning approach combines face-to-face classroom methods with computer-mediated activities to form an integrated instructional approach.(Pesylvania State University, 2009) The goal of blended learning is to join the best aspects of both face-to-face and online intstruction

Blended learning has gaind considerably currency in recent years as a description f particular form of teaching technology.(Oliver and Trigwell, 2005:2) Blended learning is the mix of different didactic methods and delievery formats, arguing that these two are independent.(Kerres and De Witt, 2003) Blended learning means different things to different people, which illustrate its widely untapped potential.(Doscroll,2002)

2. Blended Learning Levels Four levels of blended learning by Graham : 1. Activity Level 2. Class Level 3. Program Level 4. Institution Level

3. Why Blended Learning? The purpose of blended learning is to intersect best aspects of face-to-face with on-line learning. Osguthrope and Graham (2003) identified 6 reason why blended learning is recommended: Enriching education Knowledge access Social interaction Personal agent Efficiency, and Ease of revision

4. Blended Learning Approach Research studies suggest that the following types of blend will be most useful In providing complete learning environment for students. full provision of module related documents in electronic format; regular formative assessment with feedback; opportunities to learn from each other collaboratively; electronic personal development planning; the opportunity to submit all appropriate summative assessments electronically; and that all face-to-face learning is interactive.

The rationale for supporting each of these perspectives on blended learning is that every learner Is able to: have 24/7 access to all learning content, and to ensure equality of access; gauge their progress against the learning outcomes, to receive supporting feedback on this progress, and for staff to have information on Student progress; ‘ participate in, and engage with interactive learning opportunities in her or his face to face learning sessions There Is no expectation that this need necessarily involve the use of technologies; use asynchronous collaborative learning which extends the face to face learning, creating supportive learning networks, managed by learners at a time and place best Suited to their needs, understand students’ learning process, act on feedback, so as to become more effective and successful, as well as collecting evidence on achievement to enhance our learners employability; save time and paper and provide feedback quickly to each learner.

BLENDED LEARNING PROSPECT – STEPS TO DEVELOP 1. ANALYSIS 4. IMPLEMENTATION 2. DESIGN 5. EVALUATION 3. DEVELOPMENT ADDIE Model (Dick, Carey and Carey, 2011)

Further Steps ANALYSIS DESIGN EVALUATION FEEDBACK EXECUTION DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION

STEPS (7 PHASES) 1. Analysis What is going to be taught Students’ characteristics & needs 2. Design How materials will be taught Place, approach, source, standard, criteria, expected outcome 3. Develop-ment Preparation Tools, materials, strategies, sequence

STEPS (7 PHASES) 4. Implemen-tation The use of software for e-learning Pre-test and post-test 5. Execution Module is ready for learning 6. Evaluation Test results Problems and difficulties during learning 7. Feedback Comments and suggestions Base for improving modules and materials

3 TYPES OF INTERACTION IN BELCA SOCIAL INTERACTION CONTENT INTERACTION TEACHER INTERACTION

Factors that Promotes Successful Blended Learning Institutional success factors Blended learning models should be developed that respond to local, community or organizational needs rather than using generic approach. Institutional building blocks are in place including organizational readiness, sufficient technical resources, motivated faculty, good communication and feedback channels with students. There is room for staff to develop their own meanings for blended learning. Blended learning should be introduced as a scholarly and transformative redesign process within the institution. There should be institutional practice of carrying out regular evaluations and publicizing the result.

Factors that Promotes Successful Blended Learning Regarding teachers The importance of, and need for, continuing professional development for teachers with sufficient time for development should be acknowledged. On-going pedagogical and technical support through membership of a blended community. The importance of dealing with teachers’ fears of losing control, lower students feedback grades and general uneasiness. The impact on teachers’ workloads must be taken into account.

Factors that Promotes Successful Blended Learning Regarding students Students’ learning maturity and readiness for blended learning with its demands for independent learning must be considered. Students’ expectations, especially their ideas that fewer face-to-face classes mean less work and the need to develop more responsibility for their learning and time management skills. Consistent and transparent communication around the new expectations is needed in order to help students understand the blended learning process.