New York Higher Education Support Center for

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Towards an Inclusive Culture: Engaging Students in Institutional Enhancement Dr Helen May Senior Adviser Higher Education Academy.

Advertisements

The Teacher Preparation World Cafe September 26, 2008 Statewide Meeting Results and Recommendations New York Higher Education Support Center Task Force.

Why change from PDAS? PDAS 1997

Evaluation Cooperation Group Presentation to the DAC Network on Development Evaluation 9/10 November 2004 Role and functioning of the Evaluation Cooperation.

REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.

An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.

Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.

Connecting State Performance Plans and Technical Assistance Through Evidence-Based Education Melissa Price Higher Education Support Center for SystemsChange.

New York Performance-Based Assessment System Martha Foote New York Performance Standards Consortium Princeton Conference.

Overview Continuous Improvement & Focus Monitoring.

REPORT ON THE OHIO CLINICAL ALLIANCE OCTEO CONFERENCE DUBLIN, OHIO MARCH 6, 2015.

March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.

MCCVLC – Providing Educational Access, Anytime, Anywhere Appropriations Subcommittee Presentation March 11, 2013 St. Clair County Community College.

Overview of the Texas Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems.

SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,

Learning and Teaching Forum Higher Education Review - Update 31 May, 2016Gwendolen Bradshaw1.

A Statewide Partnership Model Barbara Crudale, James Guarino, Arthur Lisi, Kevin Quinn Rhode Island School Counselor Association ASCA 2005 Annual Conference.

REPORT OF THE PROVINCIAL GRADE 3, 6, AND 9 ASSESSMENTS.

Planning and Carrying Out Investigations Progression and Expectations Erica Lockwood, Charlie Haffey Norwood Public Schools © 2015.

State University of New York An Emerging Model for Online Learning MERLOT International Conference – August A Systemic Approach to Online Learning.

Sailing To District Accreditation External Review: October 6-9, 2013… but the journey begins now!

Successful Self Assessment Kae Treadway. Self Assessment Definition Your experiences.

Internal Assessment Report: A qualitative report on the implementation of district performance assessments and an update on the AIM initiative Presentation.

PDE Literacy Design Collaborative Grant February 16, 2011.

MAPPING THE VESID QUALITY INDICATORS INITIATIVE 23B New York Higher Education Support Center Task Force on Quality Inclusive Schooling VESID Syracuse University.

Minnesota Department of Education National, State, and School District Technology Plans TIES Conference November 2003 Mary Mehsikomer, Project Planner.

Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.

Paul V. Sherlock Center on Rhode Island College Promoting Membership in School, Work and Community SPDG BIDDERS’ WEBINAR Tuesday May 4,

Task Force on Quality Inclusive Schooling Peter L. Kozik & Gerald M. Mager School of Education Syracuse University The Higher Education Support Center.

National Professional Standards for Teachers. Focus Role of the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Background on the National Professional.

Grade 3 Student Learning Assessments Year 2 Pilot Collaborative Assessment Session.

Planning and Carrying Out Investigations Progression and Expectations Erica Lockwood, Charlie Haffey Norwood Public Schools © 2016.

: The Year in Anticipation New York Higher Education Support Center for SystemsChange Prepared for the Statewide meeting of the Task Force on.

: The Year in Review New York Higher Education Support Center for SystemsChange Prepared for the Statewide meeting of the Task Force on Quality.

Oregon Department of Education, May 2008 Credit for Proficiency Taskforce Update Presented to: Implementation Advisory Task Force May 22, 2008.

UNGGIM – PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK. AGENDA > OVERVIEW OF PRIVATE SECTOR >PURPOSE AND VISION OF PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK > STRUCTURE AND TERMS OF REFERENCE.

August 5-12, 2011 EDUCATOR EVALUATION PILOT. Overview The “Big Picture” – Where are we headed? – Where have we been? – How will we get there? Previewing.

Student Centered Coaching Teacher Overview. Springdale Background & Vision for Coaching.

Illinois CEEDAR Partnership

MRA: Job Development Curriculum

Social and Emotional Learning

Innovation in T&L: moving the needle?

Preparing for the Lighthouse Journey

Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum

Responding to Times of Challenge ATMCH Meeting March 5, 2006 Jeffrey G

Implementing Career Resources, Service-Delivery Tools, and Services

3rd /4th Grade High Ability and High Achieving Differentiation Plan

District of Innovation Update: International School Development

Working Together to Prepare Illinois School Leaders Initiative

Continuous Quality Improvement Process

Providing Technical Support in Job Skills Development through an ASD Job Club Valerie Smith, MS, Jennifer Ward, Kaitlyn Richardson, MPP, Suzannah Iadarola,

SHEEO Higher Education Policy Conference | August 8–10, 2012 State Agency Workshop Session Learning Outcomes Assessment Development of Statewide Plan.

THE JOURNEY TO BECOMING

Wesley Beddard Associate VP, Programs

The IEPI Framework: Integrated Planning and Disaggregating Data

The VFA Utilizing Your New AACC Membership Benefit

Melissa Zantello, Executive Director of Program Development

Module 9: Category III: Monitoring Student Progress

Transition Resources for Youth

Purdue Electronic Portfolio

Start with the familiar

Research on UTeach: Past, Present, and Future Research

Through Industry Connections & Course-based Industry Projects

Sharing Leadership.

ERASMUS+ Teachex: Teaching excellence in Israel

Essential Elements: Schools-to-Watch Program

Implementing Career Resources, Service-Delivery Tools, and Services

Future of Public Health in Kansas: Local Pilot

Equity and Inclusion and the Role of Boards

Technology Supported Learning

Presentation transcript:

New York Higher Education Support Center for A Rubric for Assessing the Qualities of Partnerships Between Schools and Teacher Preparation Programs at Institutions of Higher Education Melissa Price Syracuse University New York Higher Education Support Center for SystemsChange May 2004

Purpose to assess partnerships between schools and institution of higher education teacher preparation programs.

Uses The rubric may serve as: a pre-program needs assessment from which an action plan can be drawn. an ongoing self-assessment. an observational tool for individuals seeking to learn more about such partnerships.

Origin This rubric is an outgrowth of the work of the Task Force on Quality Inclusive Schooling over the course of 3 statewide meetings.

Developmental Levels Progress on Quality Indicators is stated in terms of developmental levels, which are intended to encourage partners to view the process as an opportunity for continuous improvement. 1 Drawing board 2 Evolving 3 Established 4 Exemplary

Quality Indicators 1: Shared vision 2: Membership 3: Collaboration 4: Communication 5: Institutionalization of the partnership 6: Partnership planning 7: Benefits to teacher preparation 8: Benefits to schools 9. Assessment and refinement

Evidence Developmental levels for each quality indicator should justified by evidence.

“Product” Testing On March 26, 2004, twenty-two members of the Task Force on Quality Inclusive Schooling used the rubric for the first time in a simulation activity. The results of the simulation were used to fine tune this rubric.

Piloting Currently, members of the Long Island Regional Task Force and members of the Midwest Regional Task Force are independently piloting the rubric in May 2004. Feedback from these pilots will inform future revisions.

Next Steps In August 2004, invited partnerships will be invited to meet in Syracuse to use the rubric. The products of this meeting will serve as exemplars. We will develop a catalog of the types of evidence partners cite for each quality indicator.

For more information… Contact Melissa Price at meprice@syr.edu