Troposphere and Clock Parameterization During Continuous VLBI Campaigns Kamil Teke1, 2, Johannes Boehm1, Hana Spicakova1, Andrea Pany1, Harald Schuh1 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dennis D. McCarthy Elements of Prediction. Why are we here? IERS Working Group on Predictions IERS Working Group on Predictions Definitive user requirements.
Advertisements

A comparison of R1 and R4 IVS networks S.B. Lambert, Royal Observatory of Belgium, formerly at NVI, Inc./US Naval Observatory A.-M. Gontier, Paris Observatory.
Processing of VLBI observation in St. Petersburg University Kudryashova Maria Astronomical Institute of Saint Petersburg University.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Vie_LSM Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm.
Ludovico Biagi & Athanasios Dermanis Politecnico di Milano, DIIAR Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Geodesy and Surveying Crustal Deformation.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Hana Spicakova Results obtained using VieVS: Love numbers and FCN period presented at IVS General Meeting.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna Processing Intensive Sessions with VieVS Johannes Böhm.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_MOD Lucia Plank.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 21 September, 2011 Vienna Reprocessing the complete history of VLBI observations with VieVS Sigrid Böhm.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_GLOB Hana Spicakova.
Epipolar geometry. (i)Correspondence geometry: Given an image point x in the first view, how does this constrain the position of the corresponding point.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna High frequency EOP estimated from the CONT campaigns Tobias Nilsson.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna VIE_GLOB Hana Spicakova.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_SIM Jing SUN, Andrea PANY.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_SCHED Jing SUN.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Creating OPT-files Detecting and solving problems Tobias Nilsson.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_LSM Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 11 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, June 2008 Comparison of GMF/GPT with VMF1/ECMWF and Implications for Atmospheric Loading Peter Steigenberger.
Deflection of light induced by the Sun gravity field and measured with geodetic VLBI Oleg Titov (Geoscience Australia) Anastasiia Girdiuk (Institute of.
1 SVY207: Lecture 18 Network Solutions Given many GPS solutions for vectors between pairs of observed stations Compute a unique network solution (for many.
Chalmers / Radio and Space / Space Geodesy 1 CHALMERS Institute’s report Space Geodesy group Department for Radio and Space Science.
(Station Dependent) Correlation in VLBI Observations John M. Gipson NVI, Inc./NASA GSFC 4 th IVS General Meeting 9-11 January 2006 Concepcion, Chile.
03/000 Future operations of the AuScope network Australian Government Geoscience Australia.
Space Geodesy (1/3) Geodesy provides a foundation for all Earth observations Space geodesy is the use of precise measurements between space objects (e.g.,
Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Florida, USA GPS in the ITRF Combination D. Angermann, H. Drewes, M. Krügel, B. Meisel Deutsches Geodätisches.
EGU General Assembly 2013, 7 – 12 April 2013, Vienna, Austria This study: is pioneer in modeling the upper atmosphere, using space geodetic techniques,
An improved and extended GPS derived velocity field of the postglacial adjustment in Fennoscandia Martin Lidberg 1,3, Jan M. Johansson 1, Hans-Georg Scherneck.
35th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, Paris, July 18-25, IVS Products for Precise Global Reference Frames Wolfgang Schlüter Bundesamt für Kartographie.
A comparison of the ability of artificial neural network and polynomial fitting was carried out in order to model the horizontal deformation field. It.
Prospective Improvements of IVS Products and Evolvement of Observing Programs Harald Schuh WG2 Chair Vienna University of Technology
E. Tanir(1), V. Tornatore(2), K. Teke(3,4) (1) Dept. of Geodesy and Photogrammetry Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey (2) Dept. of Hydraulics,
4-PARAMETER TRANSFORMATION OF DIGITIZED ASTRONOMICAL IMAGES Yavor Chapanov 1 1 – National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography, Bulgarian Academy.
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado 1 STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION ASEN 5070 LECTURE 11 9/16,18/09.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 GPS Error Sources: Part 2 –Satellite: ephemeris, clock, S/A, and A/S –Propagation: ionosphere, troposphere, multipath –Receiver:antenna,
Unified Analysis Workshop, December 5-7, 2007, Beach Resort Monterey, CA GG S Proposals for Extended Parameterization in SINEX Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado 1 STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION The Minimum Variance Estimate ASEN 5070 LECTURE.
January 14, 2003GPS Meteorology Workshop1 Information from a Numerical Weather Model for Improving Atmosphere Delay Estimation in Geodesy Arthur Niell.
S/X receiver for Parkes geodetic VLBI program 29 October 2012 ATNF, Sydney 29 October 2012 Оleg Titov (Geoscience Australia)
Combination of long time series of tropospheric parameters observed by VLBI R. Heinkelmann, J. Boehm, H. Schuh Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, TU.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 12 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
Global VLBI Solution IGG05R01 1 Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics (IGG), Vienna, Austria 2 German Geodetic Research Institute (DGFI), Munich, Germany.
Singular value decomposition (SVD) – a tool for VLBI simulations Markus Vennebusch VLBI – group of the Geodetic Institute of the University of Bonn M.
SVY207: Lecture 10 Computation of Relative Position from Carrier Phase u Observation Equation u Linear dependence of observations u Baseline solution –Weighted.
Satellite geodesy (ge-2112) Introduction E. Schrama.
1 Satellite geodesy (ge-2112) Processing of observations E. Schrama.
03/000 Statistical properties of CRF solution from VLBI data analysis Oleg Titov Australian Government Geoscience Australia GAIA-2005, Dresden, 15-16,
Do we need WVRs for geodetic VLBI? Joerg Wresnik (1), Johannes Boehm (1), Harald Schuh (1), Arthur Niell (2) Workshop on Measurement of Atmospheric Water.
Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Vienna University of Technology Vienna, February 2004 Harald Schuh Subgroup "Data Analysis" of Working Group 3 VLBI2010.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 26: Cholesky and Singular Value.
REC Savannah, Febr. 22, 2006 Title Outlier Detection in Geodetic Applications with respect to Observation Imprecision Ingo Neumann and Hansjörg.
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado 1 STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION Statistical Interpretation of Least Squares ASEN.
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Aurore Sibois and Shailen Desai
Space Geodesy Branch Highlights, August 2002 CONT02 VLBI Campaign
EMS Annual Meeting 2017 September 4-8, 2017 Dublin, Ireland
IVS contribution to the ITRF2014
Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm
Multi-technique comparison of troposphere zenith delays and gradients during CONT08 Kamil Teke (1,2), Johannes Böhm(1), Tobias Nilsson(1), Harald Schuh(1),
IDS workshop, Venice, Italy, September 2012
Crustal Deformation Analysis from Permanent GPS Networks
X SERBIAN-BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL CONFERENCE 30 MAY - 3 JUNE, 2016, BELGRADE, SERBIA EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS AND GRAVITY VARIATIONS DETERMINED FROM.
VLBI Estimates of Vertical Crustal Motion in Europe
T. Hobiger R. Ichikawa Y. Koyama T. Gotoh T. Otsubo T. Kubooka
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 11
Tidal Corrections to Direction Observations
Correlation coefficients
Suggested Guidance for OPUS Projects Processing
Presentation transcript:

Troposphere and Clock Parameterization During Continuous VLBI Campaigns Kamil Teke1, 2, Johannes Boehm1, Hana Spicakova1, Andrea Pany1, Harald Schuh1 1 Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, TU Wien, Gusshausstrasse 27-29, E128/1, 1040, Vienna, Austria 2 Department of Geodesy and Photogrammetry Engineering, Hacettepe University, Beytepe, 06800, Ankara, Turkey Abstract. The Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics of the Vienna University of Technology is developing new software (Vienna VLBI Software, VieVS) for the analysis of Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) observations. In order to estimate realistic and reliable sub-daily and daily geodetic parameters the basic pre-requisites in the analysis stage are introducing precise a priori geophysical models to the observed minus computed vector. In addition, in the parameter estimation high degrees of freedom, proper selection of estimation intervals and appropriate constraints for each parameter should be ensured. In VieVS, all parameters to be estimated are basically modelled with piecewise linear offsets at integer hours, or at integer fractions or integer multiples of integer hours. In this presentation, we show some outputs of the new software with several plots. These are the piecewise linear offsets of the estimates of clocks, troposphere zenith wet delays, troposphere gradients, Earth orientation parameters, and antenna coordinates with their respective covariance matrices. Table 5. Earth orientation parameters (EOPs) estimation options Estimated Parameters Estimation Intervals Constraints over parameters for each estimation interval Clocks (Fixed clock Gilcreek) 60 minutes 0.1 picosec2/sec (loose) Zenith wet delays 20 minutes 0.7 picosec2/sec (loose) Troposphere east gradients 120 minutes 2 mm/day (loose) Troposphere north gradients Xpol (No antenna coordinate is estimated) 3 mas/day (loose) 0.001 mas/day (tight) Ypol (No antenna coordinate is estimated) dUT1 (No antenna coordinate is estimated) 0.3 ms/day (loose) 0.001 ms/day (tight) deps (No antenna coordinate is estimated) 1440 minutes dpsi (No antenna coordinate is estimated) Piecewise linear offsets. Clocks, troposphere zenith wet delays, troposphere gradients, Earth orientation parameters, and coordinates of the radio telescopes are estimated as piecewise linear offsets (Equation 1). (1) Estimating piecewise linear offsets with least squares. VLBI parameters can be estimated as piecewise linear offsets with Least Squares (LS) (Titov et al. 2004). Offsets are chosen as the parameters of a continuous piecewise linear function. The partial derivatives of the observation equations are given below. Figure 5. The piecewise troposphere east gradients‘ offset estimates for 20, 60, and 120 minutes estimation intervals. Figure 6. The piecewise troposphere north gradients‘ offset estimates for 20, 60, and 120 minutes estimation intervals. Figure 11. Covariance matrix of the EOP offset estimates for different estimation intervals and for the loosely constrained case (number of estimates in total is 222). Figure 12. The piecewise dUT1 – Earth rotation angle rate offset estimates for 20 minutes estimation intervals (for the loosely and tightly constrained cases) Table 3. Tropospheric east and north gradient parameter estimation options partial derivatives of the continuous piecewise linear offset functions which are the elements of the design matrix (2) Estimated Parameters Estimation Intervals Constraints over parameters for each estimation interval Clocks (Fixed clock Gilcreek) 60 minutes 0.1 picosec2/sec (loose) Zenith wet delays 10 minutes 0.7 picosec2/sec (loose) Troposphere east gradients 20 minutes 120 minutes 2 mm/day (loose) 0.001 mm/day (tight) Troposphere north gradients Table 1. Clock parameter estimation options Estimated Parameters Estimation Intervals Constraints over parameters for each estimation interval Clocks (Fixed clock Gilcreek) 10 minutes 60 minutes 120 minutes 360 minutes 0.1 picosec2/sec (loose) Zenith wet delays 5 minutes 0.7 picosec2/sec (loose) Troposphere east gradients 2 mm/day (loose) Troposphere north gradients Figure 7. Covariance matrix of the east gradients‘ offsets for 11 antennas and 20 minutes estimation intervals (number of estimates in total is 789). Figure 14. The piecewise Ypol - polar motion coordinate offset estimates for 20 minutes estimation intervals (for the loosely and tightly constrained cases) Figure 13. The piecewise Xpol - polar motion coordinate offset estimates for 20 minutes estimation intervals (for the loosely and tightly constrained cases) Figure 15. The piecewise dpsi – nutation angle offset estimates for 1440 minutes estimation intervals (tightly constrained) Figure 16. The piecewise deps – nutation angle offset estimates for 1440 minutes estimation intervals (tightly constrained) Table 4. Antenna coordinates estimation options Figure 1. Piecewise linear clock offsets and quadratic functions of the antenna Westford, for 10, 60, 120, and 360 minutes estimation intervals for the first 24 hour session of CONT05. Estimated Parameters Estimation Intervals Constraints over parameters for each estimation interval Clocks (Fixed clock Gilcreek) 60 minutes 0.1 picosec2/sec (loose) Zenith wet delays 10 minutes 0.7 picosec2/sec (loose) Troposphere east gradients 30 minutes 2 mm/day (loose) Troposphere north gradients Antenna coordinates (No Net Translation (NNT) and No Net Rotation (NNR) condition equations are introduced to the Normal equation matrix) 120 minutes 360 minutes 100 mm/day (loose) 0.1 mm/day (tight) Figure 8. Covariance matrix of the dY coordinate offsets for 11 antennas (30 minutes estimation intervals, number of estimates in total is 527). Figure 9. The piecewise Z coordinate offset estimates of the antenna Tigoconc for 30, 60, 120, and 360 minutes estimation intervals. Figure 10. The piecewise Y coordinate offset estimates of the antenna Hartrao for 30, 60, 120, and 360 minutes estimation intervals. Figure 2. Covariance matrix of the piecewise linear clock offsets for 10 minutes estimation intervals (number of clock offset estimates in total is 1416 for 10 clocks). Gilcreek clock is fixed. The offset errors increase proportionally to the elapsed time from the first scan time (t0) of the session. Figure 3. Covariance matrix of the rate and quadratic terms of the clock function (number of estimates in total is 20 for 10 clocks). Table 2. Zenith wet delay parameter estimation options Estimated Parameters Estimation Intervals Constraints over parameters for each estimation interval Clocks (Fixed clock Gilcreek) 60 minutes 0.1 picosec2/sec (loose) Zenith wet delays 5 minutes 90 minutes 120 minutes 0.7 picosec2/sec (loose) Troposphere east gradients 2 mm/day (loose) Troposphere north gradients Conclusion. From the investigations carried out within this study the following conclusions can be drawn: Piecewise linear offsets can be applied for all parameters, i.e. zenith wet delays, troposphere gradients, clocks, Earth orientation parameters, antenna and quasar coordinates. The offsets should be determined at integer days, integer hours, or integer fractions of integer hours, respectively. The weights of the constraints (pseudo-observations) have to be chosen properly if the usage of the constraints is necessary. Troposphere and clock models should be improved in order to increase the accuracies of all estimated parameters. More investigations on the magnitude of the amplitudes and respective sub-daily periods of the estimated parameters will be carried out. Acknowledgements. This work was sponsored by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) (Project: P20902-N10) and we are grateful to the International VLBI Service for Geodesy and Astrometry (IVS) for providing the observations. References. Titov, O., Tesmer, V., Boehm, J. OCCAM v. 6.0 software for VLBI data analysis. In International VLBI Service for Geodesy and Astrometry 2004 General Meeting Proceedings, Ed.; Nancy, R., Vandenberg and Karen D. Baver, NASA/CP-2004-212255, pp. 267-271, 2004. Figure 4. The piecewise zenith wet delay offset estimates for 5, 60, 90, and 120 minutes estimation intervals.