Environmental Laboratory Certification Program (ELCP)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiochemical Methods and Data Evaluation
Advertisements

DETECTION LIMITS, PQLs AND NJQLs
Why Lab. Certification? Laboratory certification tries to insure that the laboratory is qualified and capable of analyzing the sample and obtaining quality.
NEW YORK STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH WADSWORTH CENTER
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
LABORATORY CERTIFICATION & DATA QUALITY MICHAEL W. MILLER, Ph.D. NJ-DEP Office of Quality Assurance
Validation of screening methods (2002/657/EC)
UNDERSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY/QC REPORTS Maya Murshak – Merit Laboratories, Inc.
1 Method Selection and Development l Initial Considerations n What does the method need to do? 3 What analyte/s need to be assayed? 3 What range or concentration.
Selectivity, Sensitivity, Signal to Noise, Detection Limit
World Health Organization
Accreditation & Validation
Copyright © 2015, TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 EPAs New MDL Procedure What it Means, Why it Works, and How to Comply Richard Burrows.
Summary 1 l The Analytical Problem l Data Handling.
...Green Technology through Innovation Ensuring Data Accuracy at the Lowest Limit Possible Presented by: Judy Morgan, MS, REM VP, Chief Regulatory Officer.
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON - CLEAR LAKE Quality product (or service) as one that is free of defects and performs those functions for which it was designed.
Detect Limits as Representation for a Standard VAP Rule Discussion Dawn Busalacchi Risk Assessor, DERR, Central Office VAP Rule Discussion Dawn Busalacchi.
Debra Waller NJDEP-Office of Quality Assurance
1 MARLAP SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD CHAPTERS 6 & 7 Stan Morton DOE-RESL April 2002.
Method Validation and Verification: An Overview Patricia Hanson, Biological Administrator I Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Food.
Laboratory Technical Issues Presentation to: KWWOA April 9, 2014 Department for Environmental Protection Environmental & Public Protection Cabinet To Protect.
Quality WHAT IS QUALITY
How to Select a Test Method Marlene Moore Advanced Systems, Inc. June 15, 2010.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC Boiler MACT Compliance Plans: Failure to Develop Plans Is Planning to Fail Susie Bowden|
1 / 9 ASTM D19 Method Validation Procedures William Lipps Analytical & Measuring Instrument Division July, 2015.
Introduction The past, the present and the future.
FSC402H FORENSIC SCIENCE AND THE EXPERT December 2, 2003.
Understanding Your QC Presentation to: KWWOA April 15, 2015 Department for Environmental Protection Energy & Environment Cabinet To Protect and Enhance.
Wastewater Laboratory Certification Presented at: KWWOA April17,
Quality Assurance How do you know your results are correct? How confident are you?
5. Quality Assurance and Calibration Quality assurance is We do to get the right answer for our purpose. Have Sufficient accuracy and precision to support.
Laboratory Certification Update Part 2 Common Findings KWWOA Louisville April 15, 2015 Presented by Frank Hall, Laboratory Certification Coordinator.
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
The TNI National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Board Update Daniel Hickman, NELAP Board Chair.
Industrial Technology Institute Test Method Validation & Verification H.P.P.S.Somasiri Principal Research Scientist / SDD-QAD /QM Industrial Technology.
Control Charts and Trend Analysis for ISO 17025
LECTURE 13 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHOD VALIDATION
Copyright © 2015, TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 EPAs New MDL Procedure What it Means, Why it Works, and How to Comply Richard Burrows.
The 2015 TNI Standard Midwest Water Analysts Association January 29, 2016.
Introduction to Quality Assurance. Quality assurance vs. Quality control.
The Method Update Rule Does this affect me? HOW?
On behalf of Jerry Parr, Executive Director, TNI
The 2016 TNI Standard and the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program OELA May 11, 2016 Plus resources to help laboratories.
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
Clean Water Act Methods Overview of EPA’s CWA Method Activities
An Update to the 40 CFR Part 136 Method Detection Limit
The 2015/2016 TNI Standard and the EPA MDL Update
Serpil KILIÇ, Murat KILIÇ
Required Data Files Review
World Health Organization
2016 Analytical Services Program Workshop
William Lipps Analytical & Measuring Instrument Division August 2017
EPA Method Equivalency
Strategies for Eliminating Interferences in Optical Emission Spectroscopy Best practices to optimize your method and correct for interferences to produce.
Department of Environmental Quality
Practical clinical chemistry
Have Instrument, make method; How new methods are made and validated
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
Clean Water Act Methods Overview of EPA’s CWA Method Activities
EPA Method Equivalency
What it Means, Why it Works, and How to Comply
Florida DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND PROVIDERS: A PARTNERSHIP
Chapter 5 Quality Assurance and Calibration Methods
RPA and the DEQ Drive for Lower Detection Limits
World Health Organization
Quality Assessment The goal of laboratory analysis is to provide the accurate, reliable and timeliness result Quality assurance The overall program that.
The 2016 TNI Chemistry Standard
TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair Water Quality Division
Activities of The NELAC Institute (TNI) to Improve Data Quality
American Council of Independent Labs
Presentation transcript:

Environmental Laboratory Certification Program (ELCP) Utah Department of Health

ELCP Staff Kristin Brown – Program Manager, Certification Officer Robert Aullman – Certification Officer Max Patterson – Certification Officer Alia Rauf – Certification Officer, Quality Assurance Keith Henderson – Certification Officer Cathy Mitchell – Administrative Support

Proficiency Testing All tests results need to be sent by the provider to the ELCP contact. Please make sure all information is included and correct. EPA ID Method Identification

The NELAC Institute (TNI) Standard TNI Status of 2017 TNI Standard

Standards Development TNI Voting Member TNI Conference August 7-11, 2017 TNI Committee Member

40 CFR 136 – Method Update Rule Pending Final Rule. Review tables in 136.3, additions and deletions have been made. Updates to the MDL procedure.

Revised MDL

The Goal Current MDL assumes that blank are Zero and constant variance over time (if they aren’t then a lower MDL and false positives) The true goal is to find the value at which you are positive your results are not the background Make the Quantitation limit meaningful Risk assessment

Current MDL Method 8270 4 preps, 3 spikes, 2 levels each, 2 instruments, 7 replicates = 504 runs

MDL definition Appendix B to part 136 TNI The method detection limit (MDL) is defined as the minimum concentration of a substance that can be measured and reported with 99% confidence that the analyte concentration is greater than zero and is determined from analysis of a sample in a given matrix containing the analyte. TNI The method detection limit (MDL) is defined as the minimum measured concentration of a substance that can be reported with 99% confidence that the measured concentration is distinguishable from the method blank results.

Current MDL Estimate MDL Signal to noise 3-5 3 X standard deviation of blanks plus the mean 3 X standard deviation of spikes Change in slope of standard curve Instrument limitations Previously determined MDL

Current MDL Procedure Spike at 2-10 X MDL (estimate) Process 7 spikes and 7 blanks in 3 or more batches Multiple instruments must analyze a minimum of 2 spikes and 2 blanks MDL = large of MDLs = t(n-1,1-α=0.99) S MDLb = Ẍ + t(n-1,1-α=0.99) Sb

MDL revision One procedure Start with 7 spikes and 7 blanks (initial determination) MDLs = t(n-1,1-α=0.99) Ss (Std Dev of Spikes) MDLb = X + t(n-1,1-α=0.99) Sb (std Dev of blanks) Use the highest as the MDL At least 2 samples per instrument Requires ongoing spikes Minimum 2 spikes per quarter Collect blank data

Verification Recalculate MDLs and MDLb Set MDLb to highest blank if there are non-detects in blank data set and n<100 Set MDLb to 99th percentile if n>100 If MDLrecalculated is within 0.3 -3 times existing, and <2% of method blanks are >MDL, then optionally leave MDL unchanged

Spike concentration Evaluate spike concentration once per year If >5% of spikes are not detected, then raise spike concentration and re-determine MDL

Summary Assessment of blanks Collection of spikes over time Multi-instrument direction

Implementation 7 low level spike 7 Blanks Verification (most labs have this from current yearly MDL) 7 Blanks (routine method blanks) Verification Requires some spikes each quarter, (yearly full study is removed)

MDL revision Initial 7 replicates across at least 3 batches Multiple instruments with the same assigned MDL Spikes results meet qualitative ID criteria Ongoing quarterly spikes Recalculate yearly (but do not redo)

Questions