Luminosity measurement at LHC (The machine point of view)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Accelerator Physics Aspects LHCb Accelerator Physics Aspects LHCb CERN SL/AP n Layout n Crossing Scheme n Luminosity n Collision.
Advertisements

Impact of LHCf on BRAN and beam monitoring Y.Itow, H.Menjo (Nagoya University) The 1 st TAN integration workshop Mar10, 2006.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
January 15, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity December/January vs September/October -Machine studies and instrumentation -Simulation.
S. White, LBS 17 May Van Der Meer Scans: Preliminary Observations.
Beam profile measurements based on modern vertex detectors and beam-gas interactions Slides from: Colin Barschel - TIPP 2014 third international conference.
Beam Commissioning Workshop, 19th January Luminosity Optimization S. White, H. Burkhardt.
1 Luminosity monitor and LHC operation H. Burkhardt AB/ABP, TAN integration workshop, 10/3/2006 Thanks for discussions and input from Enrico Bravin, Ralph.
07-JUL-2003LEADE / JW1 Satellite bunches in the LHC Satellite “definition” Satellite luminosity Satellite detection & tolerances J. Wenninger AB/OP.
P. 1Mario Deile – Summary of Likely Running Scenarios ScenarioInelastic PileupLuminosity [cm  s  ]  * = 90 m with crossing angle  < – 10.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Polarized Proton Acceleration and Collisions Spin dynamics and Siberian Snakes Polarized proton acceleration.
H. Matis, M. Placidi, A. Ratti, W. Turner [+ several students including S. Hedges] (LBNL) E. Bravin (CERN), R. Miyamoto (BNL – now at ESSS) H. Matis -
C. Fischer – LHC Instrumentation Review – 19-20/11/2001 Gas Monitors for Transverse Distribution Studies in the LHC LHC Instrumentation Review Workshop.
The Large Hadron Collider Contents: 1. The machine II. The beam III. The interaction regions IV. First LHC beam [R. Alemany] [CERN AB/OP] [Engineer In.
US LHC Accelerator Research Program Jim Strait For the BNL-FNAL-LBNL LHC Accelerator Collaboration DOE Meeting 18 April 2003 brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley.
1 BNL LARP Accelerator Physics Program Resources BNL role in national program BNL Accelerator Physics Program.
With a lot of help from Reine Versteegen, John Jowett, Richard Jacobson, Burkhard Schmidt, Gilda Scioli, Werner Herr CERN-LHC * IP5 IP1 IP8 Spectrometer.
1 Experience at CERN with luminosity monitoring and calibration, ISR, SPS proton antiproton collider, LEP, and comments for LHC… Werner Herr and Rüdiger.
First Collision of BEPCII C.H. Yu May 10, Methods of collision tuning Procedures and data analysis Luminosity and background Summary.
Beam-beam deflection during Van der Meer scans
Luminosity measurement at LHC (The machine point of view) Enrico Bravin AB/BDI Large part of the material presented here has been produced by the LBNL.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
Beam-beam compensation at RHIC LARP Proposal Tanaji Sen, Wolfram Fischer Thanks to Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Frank Zimmermann.
PPAC in ZDC for Trigger and Luminosity Edwin Norbeck University of Iowa Luminosity Workshop November 5, 2004.
BRANs at HL-LHC Sune Jakobsen (BE-BI-PM) 1st HL-LHC WP13 Project Meeting
Criteria for dynamic aperture limits and impact of the multipolar errors: summary of the simulations with beam-beam for levelling scenarios at 5 and 7.5x10.
LHC Machine Operational Status and Plans LHCC, 22nd September 2010 Steve Myers (On behalf of the LHC team and international collaborators)
Gas detectors in a ZDC (at LHC) Edwin Norbeck and Yasar Onel University of Iowa For7 th CMS Heavy-Ion meeting at Delphi June 2003.
H. Matis, S. Hedges, M. Placidi, A. Ratti, W. Turner [+several students] (LBNL) R. Miyamoto (now at ESSS) H. Matis - LARP CM18 - May 8, Fluka Modeling.
Crossing Schemes Considerations and Beam-Beam Work plan T. Pieloni, J. Barranco, X. Buffat, W. Herr.
BRAN at IR2 and IR8: status, commissioning and operation Enrico Bravin AB-BI Joint LHC Machine-Experiments Workshop on Very Forward Detectors 25 January.
Integration of forward physics detectors into the LSS of the LHC D. Macina (TS/LEA) Technical Support 2004 Workshop.
Requirements from BI and new instruments after LS1 LHC Optics Measurement and Correction Review; B.Dehning 1 Bernd Dehning CERN BE/BI
ODR Diagnostics for Hadron Colliders Tanaji Sen APC.
LARP Mtg Oct 2004 page 1 John Byrd Status of the luminosity monitor 20 Oct, 2004 John Byrd.
LHCf: Integration and compatibility with the luminosity monitor
Fabio Follin Delphine Jacquet For the LHC operation team
FCC-ee Interaction Region design
Luminosity monitor and LHC operation
CMS Luminosity Status Report
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Impact of running with LHCf and early Totem 90 m optics
Energy deposition studies on magnets. Aim. First applications
A.-L. Perrot, TS/LEA-int LEMIC A.L. Perrot – TS/LEA/int LEMIC
Emmanuel Tsesmelis TS/LEA 26 January 2007
Beam-beam Effects in Hadron Colliders
Spectrometer Operation in IP2 & 8
Follow-up of HL-LHC Annual meeting
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Fill 1410 revisited Peak luminosity 1.4e32 Beam current 2.68/2.65 e13
Tue :25 Beams dumped due to RF vacuum interlock
Beam-beam effects in SPPC and future hadron colliders
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
LHC Beam Operations Past, Present and Future
Luminometer Integration at IR2
Summary Thursday h21: Stable beams fill #1303.
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
(On Behalf of CMS Muon Group)
Variable distance from beam.
The Measurement of Forward Particle Production in LHC
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
LHC LUMINOSITY (RATE) MONITORS
HE-JLEIC: Boosting Luminosity at High Energy
Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

Luminosity measurement at LHC (The machine point of view) EnricoBravin AB/BDI 6 September 2004 LEDE meeting Large part of the material presented here has been produced by the LBNL team, M.Placidi and E.Gschwendtner

Scope of the machine luminometers Provide a quantitative tool for the operators bringing the beams in collision optimizing the machine Monitor and eventually correct drifts in the performances of the machine during coasting Equalize luminosity among the various experiments.

Machine parameters that affect luminosity Beam size (emittance, β*) Beam separation (transverse offset) Beam overlap (timing) Crossing angle Collective effects “Packman” effects etc.

Plan of action Install rate monitors in straight line of fly of neutral particles from the Interaction Point D1 triplet TAS TAN IP 140 m n L R

IP1 & IP5 have TAN’s (neutral absorbers) Instrument a Copper Bar IP

What rate monitors can measure The foreseen detectors are position sensitive (four quadrants) and fast (40MHz) The absolute signal value is proportional to the number of particles i.e. to luminosity The asymmetry among the four quadrants can be used to compute the position of the center of gravity

Spatial distribution of n and 

Detector technology The first choice was to use a ionization chamber to measure the integral luminosity Dynamic range considerations and collective effects suggested a bunch by bunch measurement A fast ionization chamber capable of resolving the 40MHz filling pattern was proposed and is currently under development (LBNL) An alternative solid state CdTe detector was explored. The radiation hardness of this technology is however not sufficient for IP1 & 5 (CERN/LETI)

Project status of the detector LBNL (Berkeley) is responsible for the whole luminosity monitor system. The financing of the project comes trough LARP Due to under founding and general resources scarcity the R&D for the F.I.C. is in an advanced state but not yet completed

Project outlook During autumn 2004 the R&D for the F.I.C. should be completed and a review will take place toward the end of the year After the review depending on the results a decision will be made at CERN on the way forward (3 major scenarios) All IP’s F.I.C.’s @40MHz IP1+5 F.I.C’s @ <40MHz; IP2+8 CdTe @40MHz All IP’s F.I.C.’s or other I.C. </<< 40MHz Available CERN resources will matter ;-)

Our wishes Our (and other’s) wishes are collected in the document LHC-B-ES-007 “On The Measurement of The Relative Luminosity at The LHC”. This document contains the specifications according to which we are developing our detectors Nature and resources, though, might limit the results…

Summary of the specifications Total p-p L 2 1026 / 2.3 1034 b.-b. p-p L 2 1026 / 8.2 1030 Crossing angle 0 / +/- 150rad Beam finding (set up) resolution ~10% int. time minutes. Nominal L p-p (coasting for physics) resolution ~1% in 1s (reproducibility from fill to fill at the same level) Absolute calibration (with experiments or other method Van der Meer) 5 – 10%

Luminosity modes at IR1&5 Bunch population Number of bunches Bunch spacing Mode IP beta Luminosity [cm-2 s-1] Collision studies with single pilot bunch, no crossing angle 5x109 1 p-p 18 m 2.01026 Collision studies with single high intensity bunch 1.11011 9.91028 Nominal p-p luminosity run 2808 25 ns 0.5 m 1.01034 Ion runs 7107 Pb-Pb 0.91024 592 0.51027

Resolution and integration times Luminosity sub-range particle Resolution integration time Beam structure Luminosity 1.0  1026 1.0  1028 p-p beam  10% ~ 1 mn 1.0  1028 3.0  1034  1% ~ 1 s 1.0  1033 3.0  1034 bunch ~  1% ~ 10s 1.0  1024 5.0  1025 Pb-Pb 5.0  1025 0.5  1027

Fast Ionization Chamber The detectors Fast Ionization Chamber LBNL CdTe detector (LETI)