DATA EVALUATION VEHICLE #5 Diesel EU6

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Composition of functions constructing a function from 2 functions (g o f) = g[f(x)] –for all x in domain of f such that f(x) is in domain of g –f is applied.

Advertisements

WLTP-06-31e WLTP correction algorithms progress report from TUG (chassis dynamometer corrections) and TNO (coast down corrections) preliminary results.

Range Anxiety, RekkEVidde or Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles Facts about EV range EV or Plug-in Hybrid? TEMPO mai Rolf Hagman

The Best Bridge-WIM in the world. Easy to install Easy to install...

S.T. O’Sullivan D.J. Timoney University College Dublin Ireland On-road measurement of particulate emissions from diesel engined vehicles.

1 Comparison of WLTP unified database distributions and WLTC rev2 distributions Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC

Cost effective hydrogen transport and emissions reduction Amanda Lyne Green Fleet Scotland 2015.

SOCIETY OF MOTOR MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS LIMITED SMMT, the ‘S’ symbol and the ‘Driving the motor industry’ brandline are trademarks of SMMT Ltd SMMT.

RDE Working group Brussels, September 2015 Collection of NO x emissions data - First preliminary results RDE working group 14 September 2015 European Commission.

RDE testing: how to define NTE emission limits?

Runtime dependent change of CO 2 emissions of light duty passenger cars A study, commissioned by the Federal Highway Research Institute.

1 Comparison of the worldwide weighted WLTP database and EU regional database with WLTC rev3 and further modifications performed by JARI, JRC and HS Heinz.

October 22,  26 routes: 23 regular and 3 special needs  26 regular drivers  10 spare drivers  Total Fleet: 34 licensed buses  Average age.

2016/4/25 Japan Automobile Research Institute 11 Asian Round Robin Test WLTP-IWG April 2016 Prepared by JAPAN WLTP-14-11e.

Submitted by the expert from Japan the secretariat

HD CNG ENGINE PN MEASUREMENT

Reduction in Smog Forming Emissions

The effects of urban tolls, low emission zones (and so on)

The effects of urban tolls, low emission zones (and so on)

Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics

Evaluation of PEMS tests Veh 01 & Veh 02 with the CLEAR Method

Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics

وحید فیروزمند موضوع: ارائه دهنده:

RDE Regulation Commission Meeting

Zissis Samaras Professor

Status Januar Verification of test normality

RDE Task Force Meeting, 7th January 2014

Development of the Japan’s RDE (Real Driving Emission) procedure

CLEAR Graz Stefan Hausberger, Nikolaus Furian

RDE Task Force Meeting, 28th November 2013, Brussels

28th of November 2013, Brussels

Pems route and parameters

J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act June 14th, 2017

Weighting Factors impact on WLTP CO2 emissions

Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics

absolutely essential first level

LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Drafting of physical PEMS protocol –

The prospect for diesel and the likely real-world impact of RDE and WLTP: how effective will they be? Aidan Revie 9 November 2017.

NO2 Measurement Method proposed by Japan 9 ~ 10 December 2010.

LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Released datasets -

Additional RDE trip indicator(s)

Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics

Service contract: The impact of changes in vehicle fleet composition and exhaust treatment technology on the attainment of the ambient air quality limit.

EU Emission limits for road vehicles

RDE Discussion of Conformity Factors - JRC views on the ACEA propsal - - August 2015 – RDE Data Evaluation group European Commission - Joint Research Centre.

Emissions testing in the laboratory and on the road: Preliminary results for one Euro 6 diesel vehicle Pierre Bonnel Martin Weiss Joint Research Centre.

Tianjin Motorcycle Technical Center

WLTP Correlation engine modeling

J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act May 18th, 2017

LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Released datasets -

16th of November 2013, Brussels

Real Driving Emissions IWG Recommendations for Data Collection & EU Dataset

WLTP Comparison of WLTP unified database distributions and WLTC rev2 distributions Heinz Steven

LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Assessment criteria and work plan -

Commercial sites or home refueling options, what does the future hold?

Emissions testing with PEMS versus random laboratory driving cycles

Comparing EMROAD and the ACEA RDE Evaluation Tool

Boundary conditions - Status

Update on the LAT work for the NEDC-WLTP correlation exercise

LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Assessment of RDE data evaluation methods: Set-up of "reference database“ - 16th of September 2013, Brussels Pierre Bonnel.

Informal document GRPE-77-30

RDE-LDV working group 20 November 2012, Brussels, EU Pierre Bonnel

Comparison NEDC/WLTC Comparison of the influence of weighting factors as proposed by France on the validation 2 CO2 emission results for the WLTC By H.

Runtime dependent change of CO2 emissions of light duty passenger cars

RDE Task Force Meeting, 16th December 2013, Brussels

Analysis for WLTP UF development

Working Group “Real-Driving Emissions of Light-Duty Vehicles” Work Progress – December

Informal document GRPE Rev.1

Complete Vehicle Systems.

Presentation transcript:

DATA EVALUATION VEHICLE #5 Diesel EU6 BMW Motoren ZM-E-10, 16.12. 2013 Bittermann, Brüne DATA EVALUATION VEHICLE #5 Diesel EU6 Comparison TUG AND JRC Method INFLUENCE OF DRIVING STYLE SITE 1

DATA EVALUATION VEHICLE #5 COMPARISON TUG-JRC WEIGHTING METHOD Post Processed data has been applied by JRC and TUG Diesel EU6 vehicle all results are from the same vehicle All results from the same Test Route nearly the same ambient conditions different drivers  Variation of the driving style

DATA EVALUATION VEHICLE #5 COMPARISON TUG-JRC WEIGHTING METHOD Ø real emission weighted TUG 50% JRC NORMAL Ø real emission CLEAR [TUG] TOOL EMROAD [JRC] TOOL range: 0.095 NOx [g/km] range: 0.165 NOx [g/km] MODERATE HECTIC MODERATE HECTIC

DATA EVALUATION VEHICLE #5 COMPARISON TUG-JRC WEIGHTING METHOD Ø real emission weighted TUG 90% JRC NORMAL Ø real emission CLEAR [TUG] TOOL EMROAD [JRC] TOOL MODERATE HECTIC MODERATE HECTIC

DATA EVALUATION VEHICLE #5 COMPARISON TUG-JRC WEIGHTING METHOD Ø real emission weighted TUG 90% JRC NORMAL WEIGHTED Ø real emission CLEAR [TUG] TOOL EMROAD [JRC] TOOL MODERATE HECTIC MODERATE HECTIC