Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (February 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Advertisements

A Robust Network of Double-Strand Break Repair Pathways Governs Genome Integrity during C. elegans Development  Daphne B. Pontier, Marcel Tijsterman 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Cosuppression in Drosophila: Gene Silencing of Alcohol dehydrogenase by white-Adh Transgenes Is Polycomb Dependent  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Jayne Griffiths, Marco Catoni, Mayumi Iwasaki, Jerzy Paszkowski 
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
RNAi Related Mechanisms Affect Both Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Transgene Silencing in Drosophila  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Reccurrent F8 Intronic Deletion Found in Mild Hemophilia A Causes Alu Exonization  Yohann Jourdy, Alexandre Janin, Mathilde Fretigny, Anne Lienhart, Claude.
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (May 2007)
Savitha Kalidas, Dean P. Smith  Neuron 
Hierarchical Rules for Argonaute Loading in Drosophila
Exon Circularization Requires Canonical Splice Signals
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
Adrien Le Thomas, Georgi K. Marinov, Alexei A. Aravin  Cell Reports 
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Genome Engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti
Douglas J Guarnieri, G.Steven Dodson, Michael A Simon  Molecular Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Germline Stem Cell Heterogeneity Supports Homeostasis in Drosophila
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (February 2018)
Andrew R. Bassett, Charlotte Tibbit, Chris P. Ponting, Ji-Long Liu 
Volume 137, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Jacob Gonzalez, Hongying Qi, Na Liu, Haifan Lin  Cell Reports 
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Olga Minkina, Craig P. Hunter  Molecular Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Mara Schvarzstein, Andrew M. Spence  Developmental Cell 
ELAC2 Mutations Cause a Mitochondrial RNA Processing Defect Associated with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy  Tobias B. Haack, Robert Kopajtich, Peter Freisinger,
TALEN Gene Knockouts Reveal No Requirement for the Conserved Human Shelterin Protein Rap1 in Telomere Protection and Length Regulation  Shaheen Kabir,
Karmella A. Haynes, Amy A. Caudy, Lynne Collins, Sarah C.R. Elgin 
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
insomniac and Cullin-3 Regulate Sleep and Wakefulness in Drosophila
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Reccurrent F8 Intronic Deletion Found in Mild Hemophilia A Causes Alu Exonization  Yohann Jourdy, Alexandre Janin, Mathilde Fretigny, Anne Lienhart, Claude.
Increased Expression of Laminin Subunit Alpha 1 Chain by dCas9-VP160
Maternal piRNAs Are Essential for Germline Development following De Novo Establishment of Endo-siRNAs in Caenorhabditis elegans  Bruno F.M. de Albuquerque,
Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages (October 1999)
Human Telomerase RNA Processing and Quality Control
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (July 2013)
Maternally Inherited Stable Intronic Sequence RNA Triggers a Self-Reinforcing Feedback Loop during Development  Mandy Li-Ian Tay, Jun Wei Pek  Current.
Assessing the Functional Characteristics of Synonymous and Nonsynonymous Mutation Candidates by Use of Large DNA Constructs  A.M. Eeds, D. Mortlock, R.
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Dnmt2 mutants show delayed immune responses and Dnmt2–EGFP relocalizes and interacts with DCV RNA during infection. Dnmt2 mutants show delayed immune responses.
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Cosuppression of Nonhomologous Transgenes in Drosophila Involves Mutually Related Endogenous Sequences  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James A. Birchler 
The Drosophila dCREB2 Gene Affects the Circadian Clock
Polycomb Silencing Blocks Transcription Initiation
Nucleoporin Nup98 Associates with Trx/MLL and NSL Histone-Modifying Complexes and Regulates Hox Gene Expression  Pau Pascual-Garcia, Jieun Jeong, Maya.
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (June 2004)
5S Ribosomal RNA Is an Essential Component of a Nascent Ribosomal Precursor Complex that Regulates the Hdm2-p53 Checkpoint  Giulio Donati, Suresh Peddigari,
Sharon Si Jia Ng, Ruther Teo Zheng, Ismail Osman, Jun Wei Pek
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Exon Skipping in IVD RNA Processing in Isovaleric Acidemia Caused by Point Mutations in the Coding Region of the IVD Gene  Jerry Vockley, Peter K. Rogan,
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
MRT, Functioning with NURF Complex, Regulates Lipid Droplet Size
Genome-Edited Triple-Recessive Mutation Alters Seed Dormancy in Wheat
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Hierarchical Rules for Argonaute Loading in Drosophila
Presentation transcript:

Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages 1861-1874 (February 2018) Mutations in Cytosine-5 tRNA Methyltransferases Impact Mobile Element Expression and Genome Stability at Specific DNA Repeats  Bianca Genenncher, Zeljko Durdevic, Katharina Hanna, Daniela Zinkl, Mehrpouya Balaghy Mobin, Nevcin Senturk, Bruno Da Silva, Carine Legrand, Clément Carré, Frank Lyko, Matthias Schaefer  Cell Reports  Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages 1861-1874 (February 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.061 Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2018 22, 1861-1874DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.061) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Inefficient Silencing of Stress-Induced TEs in Dnmt2 Mutants (A) qRT-PCR analysis for Hsp70A and TE sequences in w1118 and Dnmt2 mutant flies during a single and multiple heat shock experiment. Three independent experiments were performed and normalized to 18S rRNA expression for quantification (mean ± SD). (B) qRT-PCR analysis for Hsp70A and TE sequences in w1118 and Dnmt2 mutant flies during the long-term recovery from a single heat shock. Three independent experiments were performed and normalized to 18S rRNA expression for quantification (mean ± SD). (C) Cartoon summarizing the observed transient derepression/transcriptional activation of LTR-TEs in control flies and the failure to downregulate these sequences in Dnmt2 mutant flies during the recovery from heat shock. (D) Schematic illustration of the long terminal repeat (LTR)-TE Invader4 (Flybase: FBte0000292), with primers used for DNA bisulfite sequencing analysis. (E) DNA bisulfite sequencing on Invader4 LTR sequences in w1118 and Dnmt2 mutant flies during a single heat shock experiment. Heatmap representation: each row shows one sequence read; each column shows one cytosine in the analyzed region; red, unconverted cytosine (C); green, converted cytosine (T); white, sequencing gaps (n.d.); sequencing depth indicated by numbers; bc, barcodes of forward 454 sequencing primers. For PCR primers and deamination conditions, see the Supplemental Experimental Procedures. See also Figure S1. Cell Reports 2018 22, 1861-1874DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.061) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Global Gene Expression Changes in Dnmt2 Mutants after Heat Shock (A) Ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel containing total RNA from w1118 and Dnmt2 mutant flies from a heat shock experiment. Bracket indicates size range of extracted RNAs from Dnmt2 mutant lanes; black arrowhead, 28S and 18S rRNA; gray arrowhead, 5S rRNA. (B) Pie chart depicting the identification of sequencing reads (%) obtained from extracted RNAs. (C) Bar chart depicting the distribution of all Drosophila sequencing reads (%) in four main categories: LSU, large subunit-rRNA; SSU, small subunit-rRNA; cRNA, coding RNA; non-cRNA, non-coding RNA; TEs, transposable elements. (D) Pie chart depicting the distribution of sequencing reads (%) that mapped to annotated TEs in the Drosophila genome. (E) Bar charts depicting the distribution of sequencing reads (%) among TE families that belong to the three main classes (LTR-TE, non-LTR-TE, and DNA-TE). See also Figure S2 and Tables S1–S3. Cell Reports 2018 22, 1861-1874DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.061) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 An NSun2 Mutant Allele Affects TE Expression Heat Shock Independently (A) Cartoon depicting the targeting of the NSun2 locus with guide RNA sequence (gRNA, underlined) and PAM domain (bold). Recovered NSun2 mutant (NSun2Δ21.5) locus is shown below. (B) RNA bisulfite sequencing of tRNAs in w1118 and NSun2 mutant flies. Heatmap representation: each row shows one sequence read; each column shows one cytosine in the analyzed region; blue, unconverted cytosine (C); yellow, converted cytosine (T); red, mismatch; sequencing depth indicated by numbers; black arrowheads, NSun2 target sites; gray arrowheads, Dnmt2 target sites. For PCR primers and deamination conditions, see the Supplemental Experimental Procedures. (C) Cartoon depicting the targeting of the Dnmt2 locus with gRNA and PAM as depicted in (A). Recovered Dnmt2 mutant (Dnmt2Δ5.4) locus is shown below. (D) RNA bisulfite sequencing of tRNAs in w1118 and Dnmt2 mutant flies. Heatmap representation as in (C). Black arrowheads, Dnmt2 target sites; gray arrowheads, NSun2 target sites. (E) Western blotting on NSun2Δ21.54- and Dnmt2Δ5.4-null mutant alleles using antibodies against endogenous proteins. (F) qRT-PCR analysis for TE sequences in w1118, Dnmt2Δ5.4, and NSun2Δ21.5 mutant larval brain tissues at standard culture conditions. Data were normalized to RpL32 expression (mean ± SEM). (G) qRT-PCR analysis for Hsp70A and TE sequences in w1118 and Dnmt2Δ5.4 mutant flies during the recovery from a single heat shock. Data were normalized to Actin5C expression (mean ± SEM). (H) qRT-PCR analysis for TE sequences in w1118 and NSun2Δ21.5 mutant flies during a heat shock experiment. Two independent experiments were performed and normalized to RpL32 RNA expression for quantification (mean ± SD). (I) qRT-PCR analysis for TE sequences in female and male soma from w1118, NSun2Δ21.5, Dnmt2Δ5.4, and NSun2Δ21.5; Dnmt2Δ5.4 homozygous double mutants at standard culture conditions. For Gypsy spliced see below (Figure S4). Data were normalized to RpL32 RNA expression for quantification (mean ± SEM). See also Figure S3. Cell Reports 2018 22, 1861-1874DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.061) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Somatic TE Expression Changes in RCMT Mutants (A) qRT-PCR analysis for Hsp70A and LTR-TEs during a heat shock experiment in dissected tissues (ovaries and remaining soma) from w1118 and Dnmt2 mutant females. (B) qRT-PCR analysis for Hsp70A and LTR-TEs during a heat shock experiment in dissected tissues (testes and remaining soma) from w1118 and Dnmt2 mutant males. Three independent experiments were performed and normalized to 18S rRNA expression (mean ± SD). (C) Expression of a Copia::LTR-lacZ construct (blue) in testes tips and regions of sperm maturation in w1118 and Dnmt2 mutant males. (D) Somatic and germline TE sensor activation (β-Gal staining, blue) in ovaries after GAL4-mediated knockdown of the indicated genes (indicated promoters: traffic jam, tj; and nanos, nos). Magnification, 20×. (E) Somatic TE sensor activation in Dnmt2 and Nsun2 mutant ovaries. Magnification, 20×. (F) Germline TE sensor activation before and after a single heat shock in ovaries after NGT > GAL4-mediated knockdown of piwi (positive control) and in RCMT mutants. Magnification, 20×. See also Figure S4. Cell Reports 2018 22, 1861-1874DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.061) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 RCMT Mutants Display Instability at a Y Chromosome Locus (A) Eye pigmentation variation in F1 progeny of Tag-Inv4; Dnmt2Δ149 males after a single heat shock. Possible genotypes, white expression (P-element), and sex of F1-scored flies are depicted (for scoring scheme, see the Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Y, Y chromosome; X, X chromosome; A, autosome; w+, Tag-Inv4; F, female; M, male. (B) Quantification of pigmentation changes in F1 originating from single Tag-Inv4; w1118 and Tag-Inv4; Dnmt2 mutant males under standard conditions. (C) Quantification of pigmentation changes in F1 originating from single heat-shocked Tag-Inv4 adult males crossed to females under standard conditions. Genotypes as in (B). The p values were determined by the test of hypothesis for two populations. (D) Quantification of pigmentation changes in flies with genotypes as in (B) origination from single Tag-Inv4 males that were heat-shocked as third instar larvae and crossed to females under standard conditions. (E) Quantification of male fertility after a single heat shock, and mating with non-heat-shocked females under standard conditions (male) or in the F1 progeny from males that were heat-shocked as third instar larvae and crossed to females under standard conditions (3∗). (F) Eye pigmentation of Tag-Inv4 in w1118, Dnmt2Δ5.4 homozygous and NSun2Δ21.5 hemizygous mutant male flies under standard conditions. (G) Quantification of pigmentation changes in w1118 or hemizygous male and heterozygous female NSun2Δ21.5 mutant progeny from single Tag-Inv4 male crosses under standard conditions. (H) Quantification of pigmentation changes in w1118 or hemizygous male and heterozygous female NSun2Δ21.5 mutant progeny from single Tag-Inv4 males that were heat-shocked and crossed to females under standard conditions. (I) Cartoon of the mapping approach by inverse PCR. Restriction (RE) within the P-element reverted repeat at the 5′ end and at unknown genomic sites close to the Invader4 LTR creates genomic DNA fragments suitable for ligation and inverse PCR mapping. PCR was carried out with primers from within the 5′ inverted repeat. (J) Inverse PCR on single F1 progeny from experiments as described in (C). Paternal Tag-Inv4 insertion: PCR product (a); males with darker eyes than their fathers and females with red eyes yielded additional PCR products (b and c). Fertility of individual F1 progeny was tested by crossing to control flies. (K) Cartoon depicting Tag-Inv4 insertion sites as determined by inverse PCR and sequencing (see also Table S5). See also Figure S5 and Tables S4 and S5. Cell Reports 2018 22, 1861-1874DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.061) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 RCMT Mutants Display Reduced tRNA Stability and tRNA Abundance (A) Northern blots of RNA from adult flies using a 5′ probe against the common RCMT substrates (tRNA-GlyGCC and tRNA-AspGUC) and two NSun2-specific substrates tRNA-Leu and tRNA-MetCAU. Black arrowhead, mature tRNAs; bracket, region containing tRNA fragments (tRFs); gray arrowhead, loading control. (B) Northern blots on RNA from w1118 and Dnmt2 mutant flies during a heat shock experiment using 5′ probes against common substrates for Dnmt2 and NSun2 (tRNA-AspGUC and tRNA-GlyGCC) and an NSun2-substrate (tRNA-MetCAU). Black arrowhead and brackets, depiction as in (A); SYBR indicates loading. (C) Northern blots on RNA from Dnmt2 mutants and Dnmt2Δ5.4 mutants carrying an UASp-controlled Dnmt2 (wild-type or C78A-mutated) and expressed with tubulin-Gal4 during a heat shock experiment. Blots were analyzed with a combination of 5′ probes against common substrates for Dnmt2. Black arrowhead and brackets, depiction as in (A). (D) Northern blots on RNA from w1118 and NSun2 mutant flies during a heat shock experiment. Probes and depictions are as in (B). (E) Northern blot on RNA from w1118 and NSun2 mutant flies during the recovery from a single heat shock using probes against tRNA-Leu (all except LeuAAG). Arrowheads, depiction as in (A). (F) RNA bisulfite sequencing of the intron-containing tRNA-LeuCAA_2.3 in control and NSun2 mutant flies. Heatmap representation: each row shows one sequence read; each column shows one cytosine in the analyzed region; blue, unconverted cytosine (C); yellow, converted cytosine (T); red, mismatch; sequencing depth indicated by numbers; black arrowhead, NSun2 target site at C34; gray arrowhead, C48. (G) RNA bisulfite sequencing of the isoacceptor tRNA-LeuCAG in w1118 and NSun2 mutant flies. Heatmap representation is as in (F); black arrowhead, NSun2 target site at C48; gray arrowhead, C34. (H) Northern blot on RNA from w1118 and NSun2 mutant flies during the recovery from a single heat shock using probes against a specific isoacceptor of tRNA-Leu (LeuCAA). Black and gray arrowheads, depiction as in (E). The blot was stripped and re-analyzed (black vertical arrowhead) with a probe against the intron of one isodecoder of tRNA-LeuCAA (CAA_2.3); blue arrowhead, size of non-spliced tRNA precursor; red arrowhead, size of intron. See also Figure S6. Cell Reports 2018 22, 1861-1874DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.061) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions