FLINDERS INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC POLICY AND MANAGEMENT Peer Support Grant Writing Workshop Why Apply for Funding? Developing your Research Ideas Gerry Redmond.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CRA-W Research Strategies Kelly A. Shaw University of Richmond University of Richmond March 6, 2013.
Advertisements

ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
FLINDERS INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC POLICY AND MANAGEMENT Peer Support Grant Writing Workshop Why Apply for Funding? Developing your Research Ideas Gerry Redmond.
Fulbright Scholar Program for U.S. Faculty Much of this is taken from
Page 1 Improving Research Grant Quality at GCU Professor John Marshall Director Academic Research Development.
But nobody told me this! Planning for success Mario Borunda and Girish Chowdhary (The advise I whish I had been told)
Professor Ian Richards University of South Australia.
Facilitators: Janet Lange and Bob Munn
Research Mentoring Sadiq M. Sait 07 February 2005.
Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.
Practical Research: Writing research proposals Hannah Jones SO914 week /14.
On Being a Successful Graduate Student Researcher Much of this material is adapted extensively (and shamelessly) from a presentation given annually at.
As soon as you are given an essay question, begin your thinking. If you don't, you might miss useful information whilst doing other research. The television.
Temple University Russell Conwell Learning Center Office of Senior Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies GETTING INVOLVED IN RESEARCH AT TEMPLE UNIVERSITY.
Defining and Measuring Impact Professor Andy Neely Deputy Director, AIM Research.
Preparing a Successful SHRM Foundation Grant Application Lynn McFarland, Ph.D. August 23, 2012.
Writing Impact into Research Funding Applications Paula Gurteen Centre for Advanced Studies.
Ies.ed.gov Connecting Research, Policy and Practice ELIZABETH R. ALBRO, Ph.D. National Center for Education Research Institute of Education Sciences U.S.
A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.
ScholarSHIP “Undergraduate Research at Shippensburg University”
Nursing Research Capacity Building. Background CON –opened as 9 th College at SQU in 2008 The CON’s next challenge is promoting nursing care based on.
How to develop an independent research plan – review literature with an eye for problem, approach, solution, new ideas – review objectives of funding programs.
1 University Grantscrafting Read the Guidelines Tips for SSHRC Masters Applications Dr. Rosemary E. Ommer University SSHRC Grantscrafter.
Page 1 Improving Research Publication Quality at GCU Professor John Marshall Director Academic Research Development.
Finding the Golden Ticket: How to get your Research Funded Sue White Professor of Social Work University of Lancaster.
AuthorAID Workshop on Proposal Writing Rwanda June 2011.
Writing Describe a problem in education. What is the significance of this issue? What would you like to know about this problem? Who else is interested.
1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.
Working with the NIHR Research Design Service to maximize successful grant applications Dr. Steven Blackburn NIHR Research Design Service West Midlands.
Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.
June REU 2003 How to Conduct Research Some Rules of Thumb.
AuthorAID Workshop on Proposal Writing Rwanda June 2011.
R01? R03? R21? How to choose the right funding mechanism Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Writing for funding Faculty of Humanities Postgraduate Research Training John Canning
Writing Effective Proposals for DUE in NSF Bert E. Holmes Division Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation January 24, 2009.
Queen’s Teaching Awards QUB Teaching Awards Aims of the Briefing Session To raise awareness of the Queen’s Teaching Awards Scheme To encourage colleagues.
NSERC Coach - Dr. Steve Perlman, Dept. of Biology
Feedback for Formative and Summative Assessment
Thoughts on How to Initiate An Academic Career - Research
(Workshop Title) Working Pack
Personal statement Preparation.
Queen’s Teaching Awards 2017
FLINDERS UNIVERSITY Linkage Workshop 7 September 2012 Developing and managing Collaborative Partnerships for successful Linkage Projects Gerry Redmond.
Dr Kieran Fenby-Hulse & Dr Rebekah Smith McGloin
Professor Nelarine Cornelius Queen Mary, University of London
Kurt B. Angstman, MS MD, Associate Professor
Literature Surveys Source : : Keshav P. Dahal (Bradford University)
Formulating and Clarifying the Research Topic
NHMRC – Project Grants 2011 Application Process
NSERC Coach - Dr. Steve Perlman, Dept. of Biology
MSc in Social Research Methods
Applying for NSF CAREER Grants
Writing Competitive Research Funding Applications: Tips and Advice Early-Career Researchers Information Session Friday, 26th October, 2012 Dr Barry Dixon.
Our Research Into Assessment
Wisdom of the Grant-Writing Masters
The NSF Grant Review Process: Some Practical Tips
Tips for getting published and getting noticed
Getting started in a research degree
Labmeeting Gernot Walko 15/12/2017
Building a relationship with your supervisor
Maximizing Your Chances for Promotion and Tenure
The Rosabeth Moss Kanter Award Module 2, Class 2 A Teaching Module Developed by the Curriculum Task Force of the Sloan Work and Family Research Network.
Our Research Into Assessment
TEACHNG AWARDS 2019 BRIEFING SESSION
TEACHNG AWARDS 2018 BRIEFING SESSION
CIFOR Priorities Annual Meeting 2017.
Writing Impact into Funding Applications
Getting shortlisted save time and energy by making strong applications
Project Workshops Introduction.
University of the Incarnate Word
Presentation transcript:

FLINDERS INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC POLICY AND MANAGEMENT Peer Support Grant Writing Workshop Why Apply for Funding? Developing your Research Ideas Gerry Redmond gerry.redmond@flinders.edu.au

Academic Research Funding..... Why do institutions make it available? To support research excellence To support international competitiveness To support particular policy / research agendas To support academics who wish to engage in academic research What about school and faculty grants? Why are they made available? ->> rationale of the granting institution points to what you need to focus on in the grant application

Academic Research Funding..... On what basis do institutions make it available? Originality – makes a new contribution Significance to policy or institutional aims Feasibility – it looks like it can be done Proposer’s track record

Academic Research Funding..... Why would you want to apply for it?

Academic Research Funding..... Why would you want to apply for it? Getting a grant is an indicator of academic standing  does failing to get a grant diminish your standing?

Academic Research Funding..... Why would you want to apply for it? Getting a grant is an indicator of academic standing  does failing to get a grant diminish your standing? You have an idea that you think could make an original contribution (how do you know?)  your experience in the field  your knowledge of the literature  what your colleagues tell you  feedback at conferences, seminars, etc.

Academic Research Funding..... What are the disadvantages of applying? Time consuming Low success rates Failure is depressing

Academic Research Funding..... What are the disadvantages of applying? Time consuming Low success rates Failure is depressing On the other hand.... The process of writing is creative (ideas get better) You can circulate a draft among colleagues (you can’t circulate vague ideas in the same way) A good proposal could be the basis for an academic paper Chances of success improve with each iteration

Academic Research Funding..... So how do you develop your research ideas?

Academic Research Funding..... So how do you develop your research ideas? Engage in random conversations with colleagues Use insights from course materials that you teach Talk with policymakers & practitioners – where to they identify gaps in knowledge? Conferences, workshops & seminars (you often get hints, especially if you present...) Write your ideas down – pass them around Find a collaborator (similar research interests; complementary skills & knowledge; research record; contacts)  commitment

Academic Research Funding..... First steps Formulate your idea as a question Do a Google Scholar search (who’s looked at related issues?) Write a one page draft Single research question How is it original? Why would anyone be interested? Is it feasible to research? Data and methods Circulate to friends, colleagues & relevant policymakers - Get other people involved! - Get advice on most appropriate funding sources Expand as needed

Academic Research Funding..... Work on your own or in a team? On your own You stay firmly in control You set deadlines, etc. Fewer organisational hassles Traditional social science method You get all the credit In a team Two (or more) brains can be better than one Support & motivation Complementary skills and track records (or hitching a ride with an experienced researcher) Mixture of academic and practitioner experience (but organisationally, it can be a hassle....).

Academic Research Funding..... Work on your own or in a team? Or, work on your own project in a teamwork setting Buddy up with others who are also writing their proposals Make commitments Meet regularly, friendly criticism Expect clarity (only general knowledge assumed)

Academic Research Funding..... What if you’re unsuccessful? You don’t get it finished in time There will be a next round. Good ideas do not go out of date You probably managed to get a lot of work done, even if you did not get to submit - Your proposal didn’t get up - You are far advanced from where you were when you started - Start planning for the next round - Read reviewer comments carefully - Ask friends & colleagues for advice - Re-affirm interest of policymakers