2013 Paralympic Leadership Conference

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 Session Objectives Increase participant understanding of effective financial monitoring based upon risk assessments of sub-grantees Increase participant.
Advertisements

Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Governance Ellie A. Fogarty, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 2010 Annual Conference Philadelphia,
C OMMON C ORE S TATE S TANDARDS I NITIATIVE March 2010.
1 Documentation Legal Framework Air Navigation Orders Guidelines ATS Manual Airport Manual Safety Management Manual ICAO Annexes Licenses / Certificates.
1 Regulation. 2 Organisational separation 3 Functional Separation.
Organizational Governance
Document Categorization Steve Ashbaker Director of Operations Joint Guidance Committee WECC Leadership Annual Training Session Salt Lake City, UT May 6-7,
Paris, 11th of July 2008 Quality Assurance in Higher Education Recognition procedures of agencies Bruno CURVALE Head of international affairs at AÉRES.
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 EVALUATION PROCESS AND AWARD CRITERIA Anna Livieratou-Toll TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Policy & Programme Coordinator.
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
“Train the trainers” seminar
1 Managing Authority Conducting a self assessment 10 June 2008 A. Badrichani – DG Regional Policy – Audit Unit J3.
IBM Corporate Environmental Affairs and Product Safety
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Draft Change Management Strategy Framework and Toolkit An Overview TAU Workshop: Vulindlela Academy (DBSA) 12 April 2012 Presenter: Dr Patrick Sokhela.
The Paralympics and Athletes with Intellectual Disabilities An Introduction to Eligibility and Classification.
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
Code of Student Conduct (CSC) Tutorial Lesson 4 Adopting and Implementing Your CSC – The Rewards of Long-Term Investment This tutorial has been prepared.
Subchapter M-Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act Program Part 273-Education Contracts under Johnson-OMalley Act.
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
Lake Bonavista Hockey Novice Coaches Meeting September 29, 2013.
Internal Control–Integrated Framework
NIMS Resource Management IS-703.A – August 2010 Visual 2.1 Unit 2: Resource Management Overview.
1 Professional Development Quality Standards 2010 Professional Developer’s Program.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Leadership in Organizations 10-1 Chapter 10 Leading Change in Organizations.
ACCREDITATION PROCESS SASSETA ETQA DIVISION PRESENTER: LYDIA MACHOBANE
2013 Paralympic Leadership Conference Classification How a Better Understanding of the Classification Process & Data can Bring Greater Success to.
WMO Competency Standards: Development and Implementation Status
NATIONAL CLASSIFICATION THEORY 2013 – Julie O’Neill & Erin Popovich.
Supporting & promoting Equality & Diversity through REF Dianne Berry, Chair REF E&D Advisory Panel Ellen Pugh, Senior Policy Officer ECU.
Quality Management Systems
Purpose of the Standards
DISABILITY SPORT SOUTH AFRICA SPORT FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES Presentation to the portfolio committee on sport and recreation Cape Town - 28 August.
ELIGIBILITY AND CLASSIFICATION IN THE PARALYMPICS: HOW DOES THIS WORK FOR ATHLETES WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES? 2012 IASSID World Congress Prof Jan.
FMSiS and benchmarking a seminar at the bursars conference 05 July 2010 Presented by Simon Maddocks Dave Phillips David Dilling.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
International Paralympic Committee
PRESENTATION Strategic Workshop. Overview  National Federation’s Key deliverable  Strategic Plan  Strategic Imperatives: - Transformation - School.
Implementation of the Essential Standards The Australian Quality Framework (AQTF) is the national set of standards which assures nationally consistent,
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Preview of the Summer Paralympic Games.
1 OCA Anti-Doping Rules Mohammad Reza, SHARIF, MD Member of OCA Anti-Doping Commission
Safety Auditors Conference 2005 A Practical Approach…….
Use of Student Conciliators at the University of Glamorgan Denise Williams Deputy Academic Registrar ©University of Glamorgan.
The Facts About Schoolsite Councils The Roles and Responsibilities of a Schoolsite Council.
Winter Paralympic Games
1 The Future Role of the Food and Veterinary Office M.C. Gaynor, Director, FVO EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Moving To the Year 2000:Implementing 4010 Implementation Resolution Process Rich Emrich EDI Manager J.M. Schneider.
Director Competencies for the 21 st Century Dan Kent, Vice President Member Services The Triangle Companies.
Assessment Validation. MORE THAN YOU IMAGINE ASQA (Australian Skills Quality Authority) New National Regulator ASQA as of 1 July, 2011.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
Author name here for Edited books Chapter 11 Inclusive Sports 11 Inclusive Sports chapter Ronald Davis.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
EMPOWER INSPIRE ACHIEVE Photos: Lieven Coudneys, Serena Ovens “To enable Paralympic athletes to achieve sporting excellence and inspire and excite the.
C.C.C.P Caribbean Coaching Certification Program.
GCSE Disability. Aims Consider the types of disabilities that exist To understand how sports can be adapted to promote inclusion Discuss ways that facilities.
Leading Your District To Be All That It Can Be David Williams, Deputy Director Div. of Soil & Water Conservation 2016 Spring Area Meetings.
Seminar for Certified Secretaries Working in State Corporations and County Governments Imperial Hotel Kisumu 13 – 15 April 2016 Session Facilitator: CS.
National 4 & 5 Physical Education. Documents available on website Unit by Unit approach to Performance (package 1) Unit by Unit approach to Factors impacting.
Yachting Australia Instructor Training {Location}
Accountability and Internal Controls – Best Practices
Classification – Para Powerlifting
ACCREDITATION PROCESS SASSETA ETQA DIVISION PRESENTER: LYDIA MACHOBANE
Quality Assurance of Assessment Arrangements
Schools of Excellence Recognition Program For Century Learning
The Paralympics and Athletes with Intellectual Disabilities An Introduction to Eligibility and Classification.
Presentation transcript:

2013 Paralympic Leadership Conference Classification 101 – Paralympic Classification at the Grassroots Level

Classification 101  Classification 101 – Paralympic Classification at the Grassroots Level West Wing Conference Center Presenter: Julie O’Neill, U.S. Olympic Committee/U.S. Paralympics This session will provide a broad overview of the basics of classification, including review of the International Classification Code and the U.S. Paralympics National Classification Policies & Procedures – what they are, what’s new, what has changed, how they affect your program, what the impact is for athletes, and where to go for resources and more detailed information when needed. Ample time will be provided for Q&A to address specific programmatic and/or sport-related questions.

Classification 101 What is Classification? Classification is a structure for competition. Paralympic athletes have an impairment in body structures and functions that leads to a competitive disadvantage in sport. Consequently, criteria are put in place to ensure that winning is determined by skill, fitness, power, endurance, tactical ability and mental focus, the same factors that account for success in sport for athletes who are able-bodied.   Classification is the process by which athletes are assessed by reference to the impact of impairment on their ability to compete in a specific sport.

Classification 101 Paralympic Classification Impairment Groups Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) – includes Spina Bifida Cerebral Palsy (CP) – includes TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury / Stroke) Amputee (Dysmelia) Les Autres Blind / Visual Impairment Intellectual Impairment

CLASSIFICATION 101 Paralympic Classification Impairment Groups + SPORTS

CLASSIFICATION 101 The “CODE” The International Paralympic Committee (IPC) adopted a universal classification code in an effort to support and coordinate the development and implementation of accurate, reliable, consistent, and credible sport-specific classification systems. The Code was voted upon at the 2007 IPC General Assembly. The Code was signed by National Paralympic Committees (NPCs), International Federations (IFs), and other relevant parties at the 2008 Beijing Paralympic Games. The Code became effective for all signatories as of the Opening Ceremonies of the 2010 Vancouver Paralympic Games (March 12, 2010). The Code outlines policies and procedures that are to be addressed and included within all sports’ classification rules. Protests & Appeals Classifier Education Athlete Evaluation Sport Class Status Allocation Master List

CLASSIFICATION 101 Policy, Rules & Regulations Each sport International Federation (IF) may have its own classification rules, but those rules must comply with the Code. Each sport IF must maintain a classification master list. It is incumbent upon each National Paralympic Committee (NPC) that is a signatory of the Code to ensure that national classification policies and procedures are in compliance with the Code. A Protest is the procedure by which a formal objection to an Athlete’s Sport Class is submitted and subsequently resolved. An Appeal is the procedure by which a formal objection to the manner in which classification procedures have been conducted is submitted and subsequently resolved.

CLASSIFICATION 101 U.S. Paralympics National Classification Strategy The three core documents of the U.S. Paralympics Classification strategy are available as PDF downloadable documents at www.usparalympics.org. The USA Classification Policies and Procedures – GENERAL document addresses the aspects of classification that are applicable across all sports including governance; sport class statuses; protests, reviews and appeals; classification panels; and roles and responsibilities. The USA Classification Policies and Procedures – LOC document includes information for local organizing committees that wish to conduct national classification at their competitions including how to request a classification panel, determination of athletes to be classified, facility needs, and roles and responsibilities. The USA Classification Policies and Procedures – Education and Training document covers roles and responsibilities of the classifier, prerequisites for classifier training, levels of classifier certification and competency, and classifier training and education.

Classification 101 Sport Class A sport class is a category defined by each International Federation [IF] in which athletes are categorized in reference to activity limitation resulting from impairment for that particular sport. Athletes are allocated a sport class (or sport classes as relevant) based on the classification rules of each IF. Ineligibility to compete is considered a sport class. 26 Paralympic sports – each has own classification system and SPORT CLASSES. Complex systems ATH – 29 sport classes CYC – 12 sport classes SWI – 14 sport classes SKA – 15 sport classes Simple systems – eligible vs. not eligible (PWR, ICE, VBL) Not Eligible is a “sport class”.

Classification 101 Sport Class Status International Sport Class Status The Code defines three (3) international sport class statuses for allocation following athlete evaluation. A sport class status is allocated to each athlete to indicate evaluation requirements and protest opportunities.   The three international sport class statuses are: N – New R – Review C – Confirmed National Sport Class Status & Sport Class National sport classes will strictly adhere to the athlete evaluation guidelines set out by each respective IF. There will be no variation from the IPC/IF Sport Class evaluation system and the respective Sport Class designations in the national classification process. The three national sport class statuses are: NN – National Classified NR – National Review NC – National Confirmed

CLASSIFICATION 101 Resources International Paralympic Committee (IPC) International Classification Code Paralympic Games Classification Guides www.paralympic.org U.S. Paralympics (NPC) National Policy & Procedure documents National SPORT Master Lists www.usparalympics.org Sport-specific rules/regulations/policies IPC and IFs (International) NGBs / NFs (National)