AMICI Work Package 3 „Cooperation“

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FP7 Preparations ISTC meeting 31 March Content FP7 preparation approach and timetable Context for FP7 and for ICT in FP7 Research in New Financial.
Advertisements

Enav.it Session 3 Steps towards the SESAR deployment and the ATM system modernisation.
Helsinki Sept 2007 S.Galés ERA-NET Supporting Cooperation for research infrastructures in all S&T fields 7 th FP Call Capacity Work Program: Infrastructures.
Provisional FP7-ICT InfoDay, Torino, 11/12/ The ICT Theme in FP7 How to submit a proposal 2. The Funding schemes.
TIARA WP2 Report and wrap-up Final Annual Meeting R. Aleksan Nov. 27 th, 2013.
The Preparatory Phase Proposal a first draft to be discussed.
PROMOTING TECHNOLOGY TO INDUSTRY Technology transfer objectives: enhance commercial value of invention promote technology to partner / investor identify.
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
Technology Strategy Board Driving Innovation Participation in Framework Programme 7 Octavio Pernas, UK NCP for Health (Industry) 11 th April 2012.
2010/12/10 First Skills Council Meeting Brussels, April 14 th 2014 Federico Brugnoli.
WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.
“Thematic Priority 3” Draft Evaluation of IP + NoE.
ESTELA Summer Workshop, 26 June 2013 The EU-SOLARIS project.
EU Funding opportunities : Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme Justice Programme Jose Ortega European Commission DG Justice.
1 SMEs – a priority for FP6 Barend Verachtert DG Research Unit B3 - Research and SMEs.
Integrated Projects & Networks of Excellence Examples in IST.
CLARIN work packages. Conference Place yyyy-mm-dd
Partnership Analysis & Enhancement Tool Kit Cindy S. Soloe Research Triangle Institute (RTI) April Y. Vance Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
WP8 – Innovation Support Kelly Vavasi General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT) 1 st Innovation Dialogue Forum Becici, 8-9 November 2010.
JRC - IRMM – 17/18 June 2008 – EAQC-WISE project workshop – Held1 The EAQC-WISE blueprint: Recommendations for a quality control system for chemical monitoring.
Participation in 7FP Anna Pikalova National Research University “Higher School of Economics” National Contact Points “Mobility” & “INCO”
1 Direction scientifique Networks of Excellence objectives  Reinforce or strengthen scientific and technological excellence on a given research topic.
María Amor Barros del Río Gender as content in research in Horizon 2020 GENDER AS CONTENT IN RESEARCH IN HORIZON 2020 CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP FOR RESEARCHERS.
ELOGMAR-M Review Meeting, Shenzhen, 31/03/ First Review Meeting - Web-based and Mobile Solutions for Collaborative Work Environment with Logistics.
The RDI Governance System Vasileios Pitsinigkos Head of Managing Authority of Eastern Macedonia - Thrace Region.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Atlantic Innovation Fund Round VIII February 5, 2008.
10 February “FP6 Networks of excellence” Colette Renier Research DG.
EU-China: : Demonstrating Smart Cities achievements Dr Shaun Topham EU eForum.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
TIARA – WP6 Involving Industry in TIARA Lucio Rossi (WPD) CERN.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
Thomas Gutberlet HZB User Coordination NMI3-II Neutron scattering and Muon spectroscopy Integrated Initiative WP5 Integrated User Access.
European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA | EUnetHTA European network for Health Technology Assessment THL Info.
2. The funding schemes ICT Proposer’s Day Köln, 1 February 2007 The ICT Theme in FP7 How to participate to ICT in FP 7.
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
FAO NEAR EAST REGIONAL OFFICE. Network definition  Near East Plant Protection Network (NEPP-NET) is a web-based integrated, multilingual regional thematic.
Kick Off Meeting Largs, Scotland
WP2.3 Accelerator and SC magnet TI sustainability
AMICI WP1 – Management, coordination and dissemination
Monitoring Forest Resources for SFM in the UNECE Region
WP3 - Evaluation and proposal selection
Deliverables, final review and final reporting
Connecting ANNETTE with National Networks
Prototyping with industry WP5: Round Table Discussion
Elena Zamsa National Contact Point Network Coordinator
P.Fabbricatore (WP5 Coordinator)
‘Accelerator and Magnet Infrastructure for Cooperation and Innovation’
Sustainable EU Research Infrastructures
European Network for Novel Accelerators (EuroNNAc)
Funded by the Erasmus+ Programme EPP JO-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP Lina Tsakalou
Eurostat D2 – Regional Indicators and Geographical Information
Oceans and Society: Blue Planet
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
The ERA.Net instrument Aims and benefits
Workshop with the 8 PAF related Proposals & the Habitats Committee
Introduction to the training
Olivier Napoly, coordinator CEA/Irfu
P.Fabbricatore (WP5 Coordinator)
AMICI WP1 – Management, coordination and dissemination
First Annual Meeting 21 February 2018 Uppsala University, Sweden
Building Statistical Capacity UNSD perspective
Juan Gonzalez eGovernment & CIP operations
AMICI WP1 – Management, coordination and dissemination
Work Package 3 „Cooperation“
AMICI WP5 INDUSTRIALIZATION
DPN OFFICIAL LAUNCH EVENT
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Draft Charter Community of Practice for Direct Access Entities
Presentation transcript:

AMICI Work Package 3 „Cooperation“ Hans Weise et al. AMICI First Annual Meeting

Reminder: AMICI WP3 Objectives The overall goal of this Work Package is to define the conditions of the coordination of Technology Infrastructures (TI) in the area of accelerators and superconducting magnets in order to harmonize their operation and increase their efficiency, to adapt to the development of present and future European Research Infrastructures and establish a co-innovation platform with industry. Eligibility criteria for the participation and networking of TIs will be investigated in detail, in order to finally propose an appropriate coordination model. 21.02.2018

AMICI WP3 Objectives (cont.) It is anticipated that cooperation between existing major and active TIs can be used for the formation of a core group, with the incorporation of flexible links to smaller TIs as being an essential mechanism for improving innovation and support to smaller research centres and also universities. Possible links to industrial partners will also be identified with the aim to fostering innovation and competitiveness. TIs can foster innovation potential through cooperation, but also by initiating collaboration to achieve shared objectives. This targeted network can support temporary exchange of highly qualified personnel; as innovative expert teams should have access to dedicated TIs for education and training purposes. The elaboration of a consortium agreement reflecting the goals of the overall Cooperation program will be sought. 21.02.2018

WP3.1: Definition of eligibility criteria (CEA, DESY, INFN, CNRS) Task WP3.1, under the lead of CEA Saclay, will investigate, identify and appropriately summarize the eligibility criteria for the envisaged network. This task will elaborate and define the conditions of eligibility for an accelerator or sc magnet European infrastructure to be eligible in the core group of large European Technological Infrastructures. The selection will be based on technical spread, accessibility, innovation and industrial opportunity criteria to avoid clustering a too large number accelerator and magnet based facilities to allow for strong integration and impact of TI activities. 21.02.2018

21.02.2018

OBJ: define a set of eligibility criteria for accessing the core group of Technology Infrastructure Universities? Companies? 2nd circle Future body « AMICI 2 » 21.02.2018

PROPOSAL OF ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA WORK PLAN Census of AMICI TFs and TPs, => Web-based description http://eu-amici.eu/ Brainstorming activity: 3 WP3 meetings in Hamburg (06/2017, 09/2017, 01/2018), - 1 SC meeting (01/2018). 01/2017 02/2018 06/2017 PROPOSAL OF ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA 21.02.2018

PROPOSAL OF ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Criteria based on: Capacity and willingness of the new Member to integrate itself in an organization of Technological Facilities that: coordinate their efforts towards the construction of future Research Infrastructures, are willing to provide access to their Technical Platforms to other partners and to industries, Capability of the new Member to reinforce the technical spread and the expertise of the existing Technology Infrastructure. 21.02.2018

PROPOSAL OF ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Type of eligibility criterion  #  Eligibility criterion Capacity and willingness of the new Member to integrate itself in an organization of Technological Facilities that: coordinate their efforts towards the construction of future research infrastructures, are willing to provide access to their Technical Platforms to other partners and to industries 1 TF record and future plans of contributions to the construction of Research Infrastructures, in collaboration with the existing TI, 2 TF record and future plans of collaboration with industry, 3 Accessibility of the Technological Facility to partner and industry collaborators, 4 Operability of the platforms in terms of financial and human resources, 5 Adaptability and versatility of the Technological Facility to evolving technical needs. 21.02.2018

PROPOSAL OF ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Capability of the new Member to reinforce the technical spread and the expertise of the existing Technology Infrastructure and hence contribute to more efficient sharing of efforts at the European level 1 Complementarity of the Technological Facility within the TI 2 Strength of personnel and technical platforms in some critical areas Self-assessment Current AMICI partners were invited to address the eligibility criteria and identify possible problems. AMICI workshop discussion – Feb 20th 21.02.2018

Notes related to Draft v2 21.02.2018

CEA Self Assessment 21.02.2018

WP3.2: Networking and coordination model (IFJ PAN, CEA, DESY) Organizations have a networking relationship when they exchange information in order to help each individual organization do a better job. Already the least amount of commitment and time from organizations can in itself have significant and positive results. Organizations have a coordinating relationship when they modify their activities so that together, they provide better services to their constituents. Coordination helps fill in the gaps and also helps prevent service duplication. A coordinating relationship requires more organizational involvement, time, and trust than a networking relationship. All AMICI core group members are integrated in collaborative efforts, either project related or as a consequence of long-term R&D programs. Thus a networking relationship exists but AMICI will promote a more systematic analysis of how to improve the actual situation. 21.02.2018

Coordination and Communication Figure 2: Graph representing the model of coordination and the channels of communication (black arrows). Blue area - coordinated EU TIs (AMICI 2), orange area - members of the network (2nd circle), purple area – other networks. Pink, yellow and blue arrows represent possible transfers. NETWORK - 2nd circle COORDINATION - AMICI 2 Coor. team Industry EU TIs RIs EU and gov. Society TFs OTHER NETWORKS Non EU Ind. Universities Commnet on graph elements: EU and gov can contact with both TIs and Coordination team (black arrows). Coor. team can act as an inteface or a support (two black arrows joined). Non EU Ind. can join 2nd circle (yellow arrow) and contact with coordinated structure of TIs (black arrow). Other networks are superimposing partially with AMICI (purple box). TFs can join AMICI 2 (blue arrow). EU TIs are members of Coor. team (pink arrow). All entities inside the network can contact all AMICI 2 entities (black arrows).

Milestone Report MS3.2 21.02.2018

Discussion & Restructuring of MS3.2 21.02.2018

Discussion & Restructuring of MS3.2 AMICI Goals (see eligibility document) To face the long lead time needed for the construction of the future very large Research Infrastructures, and the unavoidable gaps between projects, the core AMICI group believes that the existence of the Technology Infrastructure must be secured and its future capacity reinforced by providing it with an organic constitution allowing, at some level, for organized relationships, dynamical planning and strategy coordination. A stronger organization will also make it possible to diversify further its activity towards innovation by fostering and hosting industrial developments. More specific goals Take items from draft document; add others? Relationship with industry Establish discussion forums in selected technical areas to prepare for project needs; discuss with EU funding for such circles; direct funding to industry consortia with labs ‚only‘ being associated partners but with knowledge about project needs 21.02.2018

Discussion & Restructuring of MS3.2 Coordination structure & Coordination team’s function Final structure only at the end of the AMICI project We now/today define the coordination team’s function It includes all representatives from AMCI members; an efficient executive body needs to be discussed / defined dedicated sub-groups / advisory bodies to be established It interfaces between the assembly of labs and industry It interfaces to large research projects It interfaces (to which extent?) to funding bodies A well-defined Technology Roadmap requires infrastructures to be co-funded by EU; AMICI shall coordinate the further development of the respective infrastructures and the fostering of knowledge (education) 21.02.2018

Discussion & Restructuring of MS3.2 Tasks Identify common needs wrt accelerator technology; develop and update regularly Technology Roadmap (cryogenics, solid state amplifier, high field sc magnets, SRF related technologies, others…. tbc) Discuss need for coordination in selected, well identified fields Promote sustainability of important TFs Support healthy environment in TFs i.e. support R&D and education Support links between TFs and industry e.g. help to find lab partners Support both sides in establishing service contracts by using ‘standardized and ‘harmonized’ contracts Analyze non-successful attempts and help finding solutions Offer advice to projects, companies during project planning Tools Use the already existing paragraphs from draft, but slightly re-ordered and prioritized 21.02.2018

WP3.3: From cooperation to collaboration: elaboration of a collaboration agreement model (DESY, CEA, INFN, CNRS, STFC) Task WP3.3 will study the path from successful cooperation to collaboration. Existing bi- or multilateral agreements between AMICI members and with other partners will be studied in detail. Results of an investigation how to harmonize such agreements within the core group of large Technical Infrastructures will be reported after 18 months. Based on this improved collaboration of the core group the path from cooperation to collaboration i.e. exchange of expertise in the frame of common projects organized within AMICI will be investigated. The definition of dedicated programs for either common TI developments and/or improvements, or training programs possibly including industrial partners will be done. 21.02.2018

Comparison of Contracts 21.02.2018

Milestone MS3.3 in Reach 21.02.2018

Deliverables and Milestones D3.1: Report defining the eligibility criteria for accessing to the core group of large TIs (M18). D3.2: Report on the networking and coordination model (M30) D3.3: Report about the proposed model of collaboration agreement (M30). Milestones M3.1: First version of the report on eligibility criteria (M9) M3.2: First version of the report on Networking and Coordination Model (M12) M3.3: Collection and analysis of existing bi- or multilateral agreements between AMICI members and with other partners (M18)

Thank You 21.02.2018