Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Outcomes and Phase III WIPs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning for Our Future:
Advertisements

Jack E. Frye Virginia Director Chesapeake Bay Commission December 2012 Market Solutions and Restoring the Chesapeake The Economics of Nutrient Trading.
Title Text for Slide “ The region’s environmental and economic health will improve when we fully implement the Blueprint. The cleanup plan was designed.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
 Jennifer Volk Environmental Quality Specialist; UD Cooperative Extension Chair, Chesapeake Bay Program Water Quality Goal Implementation Team.
Maintaining healthy watersheds in the Chesapeake LGAC meeting December 4, 2014 Mark Bryer The Nature Conservancy Chair, Healthy Watershed Goal Team.
Title Text for Slide “ The region’s environmental and economic health will improve when we fully implement the Blueprint. The cleanup plan was designed.
GIT 6 Role in Advising Management Board on Alignment Issues Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice-chair.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
1 Jim Edward Chair, IRC April 13, 2014 Issues Resolution Committee: Recommendations to PSC on Key Issues Raised during the Public/Partner Comment Period.
Progress Update: Evaluation of Federal Facilities in WIPs and Milestones CBPO Management Board March 6, Jim Edward, EPA Greg Allen, EPA.
A Partnership of U.S. Federal, State and Tribal Fish and Wildlife Agencies with support from the Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies Shared solutions.
Drafting the New Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes – Decision/Actions From Management Board Meetings June 13 and 18, 2013.
Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool CAST Olivia H. Devereux Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 12/13/2011.
James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency November 20, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s.
District of Columbia Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Blue Plains Regional Committee 1 District Department of the Environment Watershed Protection Divsion.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program, EPA 1 CBP Program Update on Bay Agreement Comments, Final Draft, and 2-Year Milestone Status Citizens.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Bay Guidance Programs. The Bay Program partnership includes: 19 federal agencies Nearly 40 state agencies and programs in DE, MD, NY, PA, VA,
Setting Goals for Stream “Health:” The Next Generation of Watershed Plans? The Waterlands Group San Francisco Estuary Institute Aquatic Science Center.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
Chesapeake Bay Program
Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017
CRC Staffer Update Megan Hession Habitat Goal Implementation Team.
Environmental Literacy
* Background Image Courtesy of Kansas State Alumni Association *
Zoë P. Johnson, NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office Mark Bennett, USGS
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
SOUTH ATLANTIC ALLIANCE “PRIMER” FOR TRAIN-THE-TRAINER
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System:
Chesapeake Bay Program Budget & Finance Workgroup Meeting
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Chesapeake Bay Program Updates
Local Planning Process…
2025 Chesapeake Bay Climate Change Load Projections
Watershed Implementation Plan
Concepts and Timeline for Developing a CBP Biennial Strategy Review System (DRAFT) October 31, 2016 (DRAFT)
Chesapeake Bay Program Principals’ Staff Committee December 20, 2017
Jim Edward Chair, IRC April 13, 2014
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office June 1, 2012
FISH HABITAT OUTCOME Gina Hunt MD. Department of Natural Resources
The Watershed Agreement and the Phase 3 WIPs
Concepts and Timeline for Developing a CBP Biennial Strategy Review System DRAFT August 29, 2016 DRAFT 12/4/2018 DRAFT.
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System:
2016 – 17 Bay Barometer.
Hi there! Michelle Williams WQGIT Staffer
2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision October 5, 2017 Local Government Advisory Committee Meeting.
The Watershed Agreement and the Phase 3 WIPs
Local Government Advisory Committee Meeting
Local Official Watershed Education & Capacity Building
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
I AM RACHEL FELVER. Hello!
Monitoring & Assessment, Adaptation Outcomes
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager
Chesapeake Bay Program Climate Change Modeling 2.0
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Architecture
* Background Image Courtesy of Kansas State Alumni Association *
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Citizen Advisory Committee November 30, 2018
Citizens Advisory Committee Discussion & Program Update Dana Aunkst Director USEPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 22,2019 Baltimore, MD.
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
VIRGINIA’S Phase iii watershed implementation plan
Presentation transcript:

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Outcomes and Phase III WIPs Are we making progress? Gina Hunt MD. Department of natural Resources

Process Small Group of Outcome Coordinators was formed based on the Management Board recommendation. Led by Nicki Kasi (PA Board Member). Bay Program surveyed the following partners to determine their interest: Virginia, Maryland, District of Columbia, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Delaware, New York, Department of Defense/ Department of Navy

Survey Questions Which outcomes would your jurisdiction be interested in incorporating into their Phase III WIP development and/or implementation? Which outcomes would your jurisdiction be interested in incorporating into their Phase III WIP outreach and communication materials? For each outcome, what kind of materials/tools would be helpful to your jurisdiction?

Phase III WIP Development or Implementation

Phase III WIP Development or Implementation After reviewing the survey results, the action team decided to select outcomes that scored a four or above on the development/implementation graph. These are: fish habitat, brook trout, SAV, forest buffers, tree canopy, toxics, healthy watersheds, protected lands, climate resiliency, public access, wetlands, and stream health

What kind of materials/tools would be helpful to your jurisdiction? Fact sheets are good for practitioners (MD, PA) Local government fact sheet (WV, PA) Info sheets and PSAs (DE, VA, WV, PA) Quantitative data on co-benefits and cost savings (DC) Data that can be integrated into CAST (DC) Strawman CAST scenarios (WV) Economic growth associated with cleaning up a fishery (WV) Webinar trainings for CAST, MAST (WV) Case studies (DC, VA) Technical, funding sources (DC) Tools/materials to help farmers understand the benefits and cost-effectiveness of buffers (DE) Summary of actions across watershed to demonstrate partner involvement (VA, PA) Concise summary of multi-benefit BMPs and policy approaches (WV, NY, DoD/DoN, PA) Focus on local stream health and flood protection (NY) Website of searchable BMPs (WV) Weighting of practices relative to their benefits (Simple summary of Tetratech Project) (PA) Supplement BMP Compendium now being done with Benefits and Outcome Information (PA)

Materials in Process Fact sheets are good for practitioners (MD, PA) Local government fact sheet (WV, PA) Info sheets and PSAs (DE, VA, WV, PA) Weighting of practices relative to their benefits (Simple summary of Tetratech Project) (PA) Supplement BMP Compendium now being done with Benefits and Outcome Information (PA)

Next Steps Discuss weighted table of BMPs practices relative to their benefits (Simple summary of Tetratech Project) Develop Co-Benefits language for the WIP Document Develop Fact sheets for each requested Outcome.