Dr. Judith Bradbury Dr. Seth Tuler

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASTM Work Item Collaboration Area February Purpose of Collaboration Space Web forum that enables a task group to accelerate the development of a.
Advertisements

Involving the Public in Risk Communication Katherine A. McComas, Ph.D. University of Maryland.
Department of Public Works Robinson Park Recreation Center Renovation – Revised Selection Process for Design Services November 4, 2013.
Lesson Design Study Suggestions from our text: Leading Lesson Study.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Member Survey of Process: Ratings of Satisfaction.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
Tuesday 13 th October MIREC Documents Procedures MIREC-1 - Terms of Reference & Procedure for MIREC Review of Research Projects Involving Human.
SWIS Digital Inspections Project (SWIS DIP) Chris Allen, Information Management Branch California Integrated Waste Management Board November 5, 2008 The.
NASA’s Process of Community Endorsement Standards or: How the NASA Standards Process seeks to “Cross the Chasm” CEOS WGISS, Annapolis MD Richard Ullman,
SMSU University Mission Southwest Minnesota State University prepares students to meet the complex challenges of this century as engaged citizens in their.
Qikiqtani Inuit Association Nunavut Water Board Technical Meeting and Pre-Hearing Conference January 16 th and 17 th, 2013.
Publishing on the Web 6th Grade Literacy – Session 7 of 8.
Pediatric Terminology Harmonization Initiative Introduction October2014 National Cancer Institute EVS.
District Conference Awards. Documents Letter Rotary District 7570 Awards Awards Application Award Criteria Award Evaluation Form.
1 Identify Preferred Alternative and Finalize Plan Planning Steps 7 & 8.
Public Involvement. Why? Who Cares? –What we do matters to the public –Effective PI enables proactive input and enhances the decision- making process.
STUDENT FACULTY / ITP COMMITTEE SENATE START 2. Look for company for ITP placement END 1. Generate the list of eligible students for ITP and conduct briefing.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Aspects of pharmacovigilance: Public hearings.
Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) Open Forum Session 19.
WP7Joint and sustainable transport in health and care Action plan for the period July-December Dr Snežana Manić AdriHealthMob, Steering Committee.
SPDG Competition FY 2011 Management Plan. (f) Quality of the management plan. (20 points) (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan.
Meeting of the Parties to the Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers to the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Conducting Concerns Surveys.
Getting Prepared October 2016 District Meetings
Chapter 11 Communicating in Person, by Telephone, and in Meetings
Performance Management
Communities and Conventional Munitions Demilitarization
Setting Performance Expectations
State Coordinator Intervention
IEEE FDC – IEEE-CS-SAB BRIEFING
Initiating Heritage Tourism in your Community
PowerPoint to accompany:
Teaching Evaluations at TTU Using the IDEA Instrument
ITS Strategic Planning Guidelines
Introduction to educational research
B.A. 4 Placement Overview (Placement 1) 4th October 2016
National PTA School of Excellence
Lesson Design Study Leading Lesson Study.
Welcome to SSCC Structure and Roles (Workbook)
Stakeholder engagement Principles for stakeholder engagement
Leadership Forum Session 4: Interface Issues with and Among Professionals: A Building Official Perspective LMCBO Panellist: Kyle Bentley, P.Eng. Chief.
THE CURRENT STATE OF ICT WEB 2.0. The term "Web 2.0" was first used in January 1999 by Darcy DiNucci describes World Wide Web sites that emphasize user-
Roles and Responsibilities of an External Examiner
Goals and documentation of quality decision-making practices
The role of task groups within committees:
Objective 3.02: Utilize critical-thinking skills to determine best options/outcomes. Making Decisions.
Development of a Process for Conducting review & Assessment of PSAR of a NPP Group I.
Conducting Concerns Surveys
Dr. Mwangi Engineering and Technology
National PTA School of Excellence
Community Engagement Model
A Framework for Program Evaluation
TCL Online Welcome to the TCL Online course demo. This brief tour will give you an overview of our learning platform and a preview of what to expect from.
Student: Ravi Arvapally, Computer Science Department
ENDING A COMMUNICATION
Preview of Moore County Board of Education
Evaluation Report Investigates a problem or a set of options.
1915(c) WAIVER REDESIGN 2019 Brain Injury Summit
Objective 3.02: Utilize critical-thinking skills to determine best options/outcomes. Making Decisions.
Curriculum Selection Process
Member Survey of Process: Ratings of Satisfaction
Presentation by Bill Pauley European Division DFP
Evaluation Plan Group interview Post-session questionnaire
The Big6 Skills Model Dr. Dania. Bilal IS 551 Fall 2005.
Public Involvement Involvement Public – who?
Timeline and Key Milestones for One Health Platform Launch
HMPPS Innovation Grant Programme (2020 – 2022)
Evaluation Research Defined as the process of making judgments about the merits, value, or worth of any component of education. (e.g. best text books to.
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Judith Bradbury Dr. Seth Tuler Public Engagement Approach October 23, 2017 Presented to: Committee on Alternatives for the Demilitarization of Conventional Munitions Dr. Judith Bradbury Dr. Seth Tuler

Goal Seek the perspective of the public on - Opinions about OB/OD for demilitarization of conventional munitions - Opinions about alternative technologies - Criteria that could be used to evaluate and choose among alternative technologies for demilitarization of conventional munitions - Suggestions for communication and engagement

How We Will Gather and Consider Public Input Review documentation e.g., web sites, previous reports, and comments submitted to the Committee Review key technical and regulatory issues of concern to the public Conduct telephone discussions with representatives of the public on issues of concern, e.g., use of OB/OD, criteria for alternatives and suggestions for communication and engagement

How We Will Gather and Consider Public Input (Continued) Summarize telephone discussions and confirm their accuracy with participants Consider public concerns, criteria and communication/engagement preferences Invite briefings from public interest groups Public email inbox: cmdcommittee@nas.edu