USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module N° 3 – ICAO SARPs related to safety management
Advertisements

ICAO Safety Oversight Audit and Safety Oversight Status in Nepal
HIGH LEVEL SAFETY CONFERENCE Montreal 29 March 2010
Ensure the Disaster Housing Strategy is institutionalized throughout the jurisdiction Identify a process to update and maintain the Disaster Housing Strategy.
ICAO USOAP CMA Seminar Exercise 1: LEG/02 – Article 83 bis Group 5 Verónica Decarlos Carlos F. Silva Rueda Ankar Doobay Tomás Abrego Clifford Themen.
ICAO Provisions for Safety Management
EASA Verification Milen Dentchev ANS Standardisation Section Manager.
Page 1 USOAP CMA on SSP – Rollout. Page 2 Annex 19 Adopted by the Council on 25 February 2013; Became effective on 15 July 2013; and Became applicable.
Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme (USOAP) - Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Henry Gourdji Chief, Safety Oversight Audit Section HIGH LEVEL.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
Presented to: Pacific Aviation Directors’ Workshop By: Jim Spillane, Sr. FAA Representative, Pacific Rim Date: 3/14/2012 Transition to the USOAP Continuous.
International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office 1 ICAO EUR HLSC Preparatory Seminar 9-11 February 2010 Baku, Azerbaijan Theme.
ICAO Requirements on Certification of Aerodromes Module - 2
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
USOAP Comprehensive Systems Approach
Module N° 6 – SMS regulation
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
WORKSHOP ON COMMON REQUIREMENTS FOR SERVICE PROVISION  Introduction to SESIS Guidance Material  Gerald Amar, SESIS Project Manager European Organisation.
ICAO SAR Regional Framework “AVIATION SAFETY FOR OFF-SHORE OPERATIONS/ SEARCH AND RESCUE” 19 May 2016ICAO EUR/NAT Office1 Mr. Celso FIGUEIREDO Regional.
An Update Of the ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme An Update Of the ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme.
Compliance Management System. Intelex System Overview Focus Modules: –Permits Management –Monitoring & Measurement –Training Management –Document Control.
Electronic Filing of Differences(EFOD) System and Filing of Differences Task Force (FDTF) Air Navigation Bureau.
System of Systems (DRAFT) To be approved by the ICAO Council
ICAO USOAP CMA Seminar Exercise 1: LEG/02 – Article 83 bis
Irena Prat and Josée Hansen World Health Organization
IRB reporting updates.
Reportable Events & Other IRB Updates February 2017
Understanding the Principles and Their Effect on the Audit
HIGH LEVEL SAFETY CONFERENCE Montreal 29 March 2010
Prepared by Rand E Winters, Jr. ASR Senior Auditor October 2014
ALLPIRG/4 MEETING PARTICIPANTS (Montreal , 8 February 2001)
Evaluating performance management
COSCAP-SEA Work Programme Discussion Paper 3
Outcome TFCS-11// February Washington DC
USOAP CMA Workshop Module 5 Updates on CMA Online Framework and
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
Understanding the entity
Setting Actuarial Standards
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
ICAO AFI Plan African ANSP
Outcome TFCS-11// February Washington DC
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
ICAO AFI Plan African ANSP Presented by: ESAF Regional Office
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
Module 5 Functionalities of the CMA Online Framework
Review of Part C of the Code – Inducements & Applicability
Joint WG on Guidance for an Integrated Transport and Storage Safety Case for Dual Purpose Casks TM TM to Produce Consolidated Drafts of the IAEA’s.
Module 2 Key Principles of the Peer Review Programme
IAASB-IESBA Coordination
HIGH LEVEL SAFETY CONFERENCE Montreal 30 March 2010
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
NCMC/2 – P/* Name of State/Territory Second Regional Meeting for National Continuous Monitoring Coordinators (NCMCs) Presented by ***/NCMC November.
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18
Informal document GRVA nd GRVA, 28 Jan Feb. 2019
Amendment 40 to ANNEX 15 Air Navigation Procedures for AIM Seminar
AIM Global Strategy Air Navigation Procedures for AIM Seminar
AIS Manual (Doc 8126) Air Navigation Procedures for AIM Seminar
PANS-AIM (Doc 10066) Air Navigation Procedures for AIM Seminar
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
USOAP AIG EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION(EI) AAIB MALAYSIAN EXPERIENCE
RSOO Role in Relation to New ICAO Strategies
NCMC/3 – P/* Name of State/Territory Third Regional Meeting for National Continuous Monitoring Coordinators (NCMCs) Presented by ***/NCMC November.
Overview of the recommendations on software updates
DRAFT ISO 10007:2017 Revision Overview Quality management – Guidelines for configuration management ISO/TC176 TG 01.
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
Briefing to ICAO TCB Seminar
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Interoperability of metadata systems: Follow-up actions
Presentation transcript:

USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop Module 3 Information on the amendments to the Protocol Questions (PQs)

Objective The objective of this module is to inform States about: the PQ revision; their impact on the LEI; and actions to be taken by States as a result of these changes.

Outline Changes in PQ methodology from CSA to CMA cycle (from 2012) Overview of the new PQ revision Summaries of amendments Highlights of the latest PQ changes per audit area The impact of PQ revision on PQ status Actions required by States

Change in PQ methodology (F&R based to PQ based)

Change in PQ methodology (F&R based to PQ based) Old system New system ORG/01 ORG/01 ORG PEL ANS . Finding text One CAP/CAP update 2.011 One CAP assessment 3.101 7.327 2.011 3.101 3.103 4.027 5.021 5.023 5.045 7.031 7.053 7.203 7.271 7.327 … Finding text The current organizational structure of the CAD is not determined in sufficient detail as to provide a clear definition of the regulatory and safety oversight functions and responsibilities related to PEL, IOS, AIR< ANS and AGA. In addition, the available organizational charts have not been approved yet. One CAP/CAP update including: Item 1 . Item 20 One CAP assessment -Previous cycle findings and recommendations -New cycle PQ findings

Overview of the new PQ revision

Overview of the new PQ revision In preparation for USOAP CMA, all PQs from the CSA cycle were revised and updated in 2012 to reflect the latest changes in ICAO provisions. Note: The review also took into consideration comments from States, ICAO (ROs, ANB, etc.), USOAP audit team members and external stakeholders. Another review has recently take place in order to include the Annex 19 related PQs in all of the relevant areas. In the future, PQs will be reviewed and updated on a periodic basis to reflect emerging issues and changes in Annex provisions and guidance materials.

Summaries of amendments

Summaries of amendments These summary of amendments tables are now available on the OLF under the CMA Library icon for all areas. A summary of amendments for each of the 8 audit areas has been provided for States.

Summaries of amendments PQ template layout has been revised for simplicity and clarity and changes incorporated (as per the previous slide)

Highlights of the latest PQ changes per audit area Types of changes Question and/or guidance revised for clarity; Questions deleted; New questions added on safety management; Other new questions added not related to safety management; Questions revised to address safety management; CE changed (where applicable); Audit sub-group changed; ICAO reference revised; and PQs related to establishment and implementation of procedures and systems separated into two separate questions (one on development, and the other on implementation).

The impact of PQ revision on PQ status

The impact of PQ revision on PQ status Newly added PQs will be considered undetermined, thus not impacting the EI/LEI; Split PQs will maintain the previous PQ status; PQs revised for clarity will maintain the same status; PQs with revised guidance/reference will maintain the same status; and All other changes will not affect the PQ status

Actions required by States

Actions required by States As per the CMA MoU, Using the OLF, States shall: Continuously update PQ compliance status; Provide evidence related to compliance; Reply promptly to MIRs; Follow-up on status of compliance of merged PQs; and Continuously update SAAQ and the CCs/EFOD.

Review Changes in PQ methodology from CSA to CMA cycle (from 2012) Overview of the new PQ revision Summaries of amendments Highlights of the latest PQ changes per audit area The impact of PQ revision on PQ status Actions required by States What conditions will generate PQ changes in the future? In the future, PQs will be reviewed and updated on a periodic basis to reflect emerging issues and changes in Annex provisions and guidance materials. Will Protocol Findings in the future involve multiple or individual PQs? Individual PQs When will the new PQs become effective? As of 1 May 2013-All modules of CMA online framework will be updated with revised PQs When will a new PQ have the (S, NS, NA) status? After validation What are the 2 options for PQ validation? Offsite validation (with reference with CE-1 to CE-5) Onsite validation activity (CE-1-CE-8)