Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Opioid Receptor Three-Dimensional Structures from Distance Geometry Calculations with Hydrogen Bonding Constraints  Irina D. Pogozheva, Andrei L. Lomize,
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Hong Ye, Young Chul Park, Mara Kreishman, Elliott Kieff, Hao Wu 
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Volume 83, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (May 2000)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Crystal Structure of the Human Myeloid Cell Activating Receptor TREM-1
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
Structural Basis for Ligand Binding to the Guanidine-I Riboswitch
Matthew T. Eddy, Tatiana Didenko, Raymond C. Stevens, Kurt Wüthrich 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages 1283-1293 (September 2011) Structure of the Adenosine A2A Receptor in Complex with ZM241385 and the Xanthines XAC and Caffeine  Andrew S. Doré, Nathan Robertson, James C. Errey, Irene Ng, Kaspar Hollenstein, Ben Tehan, Edward Hurrell, Kirstie Bennett, Miles Congreve, Francesca Magnani, Christopher G. Tate, Malcolm Weir, Fiona H. Marshall  Structure  Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages 1283-1293 (September 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2011.06.014 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2011 19, 1283-1293DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Effect of StaR Mutations on Receptor Thermostability and Their Location on the Receptor (A) Thermostability plots of the wild-type adenosine A2A receptor (purple circles), A2A-T4L (orange squares), A2A-StaR1 (previously Rant21, yellow triangles), A2A-T4L engineered to include the A2A-StaR1 mutations in combination with the T4L fusion (A54L2.52/T88A3.36/K122A4.43/V239A6.41) (green triangles), and versus A2A-StaR2 (blue diamonds). Error bars are derived from standard deviation and calculated from duplicated temperature points (n = 2) within a single experiment. (B) Sequence of the wild-type A2A receptor in relation to the secondary structure determined from the structure of A2A-StaR2. Thermostabilizing residues are shown in red circles and the glycosylation site mutation N154A in blue. Disulfide bonds are in yellow. Numbers refer to the first and last residue in each transmembrane helix (TM) (blue boxes) with the Ballesteros-Weinstein numbering in superscript (same for all subsequent figures). See also Figure S2 and Table S2. Structure 2011 19, 1283-1293DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Pharmacological Characterization of the StaR Receptor and the Ligands Used in Crystallization (A) Comparison of the pharmacology of A2A-StaR2 with the wild-type adenosine A2A receptor. Radioligand competition binding assays for a range of antagonists (closed circles) and agonists (open circles) were carried out with [3H]-ZM-241385 on membranes from cells transiently transfected with receptors. (B) Effects of the ligands ZM241385 (filled squares), XAC (filled circles), caffeine (open circles), and istradefylline (open squares) on the levels of cAMP measured after overexpression of the wild-type A2A receptor that results in high levels of constitutive activity and elevated levels of cAMP. All ligands are inverse agonists although istradefylline is a weak partial inverse agonist compared to ZM241385, XAC, and caffeine. See also Table S1. Structure 2011 19, 1283-1293DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Overall Structure of the Adenosine A2A Receptor (A) Structure of A2A-StaR2-ZM241385 in rainbow coloration (blue to red) from the N terminus to the C terminus, ZM241385 is represented as a stick model (blue), oxygen atoms are red and nitrogen atoms deep blue. The visible extracellular and intracellular loops are labeled. The disordered portion of ECL2 is shown as a dashed line. Dotted lines denote approximate boundaries of the plasma membrane. (B) TM5 and TM6 of the A2A-StaR2 (pale green) with ICL3 represented as a stick model. The potential H-bonding network connecting the two TM helices is shown (dashed red lines) involving Arg2226.24/Met2115.72/Gln214/Pro217. See also Figure S1. Individual TMs are numbered using Roman numerals and in all figures forthwith. Structure 2011 19, 1283-1293DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Comparison of A2A-StaR2-ZM241385 with A2A-T4L-ZM241385 and Rhodopsin (A) Superposition of A2A-StaR2-ZM241385 (pale green) with A2A-T4L-ZM241385 (dark red) using consensus Cα atoms of TM1-7, note the difference in TM5/6 helical trajectory. Inset: close-up of interactions across the DRY motif of A2A-StaR2 and A2A-T4L structures demonstrating ionic lock formation in the A2A-StaR2 (potential hydrogen bonds represented as dashed red lines). See also Figure S3A. (B) Superposition of A2A-StaR2-ZM241385 (pale green) with bovine rhodopsin (orange-1F88) using consensus Cα atoms of TM1-7. Inset: close up of interactions across the A2A-StaR2 DRY and Rhodopsin ERY motif illustrating the similarity of the ionic lock (second subscript residue numbers refer to rhodopsin 1F88). Structure 2011 19, 1283-1293DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Residues Involved in Ligand Binding of the Xanthines and ZM241385 Two-dimensional schematics of the A2A-StaR2 ligand binding interactions; (A) ZM241385, (B) XAC, and (C) caffeine. Diagrams were generated using the LigPlot software (Wallace et al., 1995). Structure 2011 19, 1283-1293DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Comparison of Ligand Positions in the A2A-StaR2 Cocrystal Structure Binding Site Cavity The structure of A2A-StaR2 is depicted as a gray surface, cut away to reveal the ligand binding pocket with TM2 and TM5 depicted as green helices. The ligands are represented as sticks (gray), oxygen atoms are red, and nitrogen atoms blue. Amino acid side chains are similarly depicted with carbons in purple, oxygen in red, and nitrogen in blue. Specific hydrogen bonds are marked as dashed red lines with Asn2536.55 and Ala632.61 shown. Structures are A2A-StaR2 in complex with (A) ZM241385, (B) XAC, and (C) caffeine. See also Figure S3 and Figure S4. Structure 2011 19, 1283-1293DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Comparison of Specific Interactions in the Ligand Binding Site between the A2A-StaR2-ZM241385/XAC/Caffeine Costructures (A) Superposition of A2A-StaR2 (pale green) bound to ZM241385 (blue) with A2A-StaR2 (orange) bound to XAC (green). (B) Superposition of A2A-StaR2 (orange) bound to XAC (green) with A2A-StaR2 (yellow) bound to caffeine (bright yellow). (C) Superposition of A2A-StaR2 (pale green) bound to ZM241385 (blue) with A2A-StaR2 (yellow) bound to caffeine (bright yellow). A2A-StaR2 is shown in helical representation with specific side chains making important ligand receptor interactions marked. Specific hydrogen bonds are marked as dashed red lines. Ligands are represented as stick models (colored according to the ligand) with oxygen atoms red and nitrogen atoms blue. Structure 2011 19, 1283-1293DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Comparison of the Conformations of Different A2A Receptor Structures (A) Superposition of the A2A-StaR2-ZM241385 (pale green) (PDB code: 3PWH), A2A-T4L-ZM241385 (dark red) (PDB code: 3EML), A2AR-GL31 (yellow) (PDB code: 2YDV), and agonist-β2AR Nb80 (gray) (PDB code: 3P0G) structures in cartoon representation, ligands have been omitted. The N- and C-termini are marked, and TM5 and 6 are labeled. Inset: close-up view of TM6 illustrating the degree of helix rotation from the ground state (3PWH) to R∗ (3P0G). 3EML and 2YDV sit at intermediate points on the activation pathway. (B) Superposition of the A2AR structures, colored and represented as in (A); close-up view of the extracellular side of the receptor, demonstrating the conformational changes occurring in ECL1 and 2 on activation. Structure 2011 19, 1283-1293DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Activation Mechanism of the Adenosine A2A Receptor (A) Close-up of the ligand binding sites of the A2AR structures superposed and colored as in Figure 8 (ECL regions have been omitted for clarity). Only the ZM241385 and NECA ligands are shown in blue and green stick representation, respectively. Specific hydrogen bonds made between A2AR-GL31 and NECA are marked as dashed red lines. Residues implicated in ligand binding and transmission of conformational changes through the receptor are labeled and only shown for 3PWH and 2YDV. Transmembrane helices are denoted by green discs. The black arrows show transmembrane helical movements occurring on activation. In summary, agonist binding leads to inward shifts of TM1, 5, and 7, an upward movement (toward the extracellular side of the receptor) of TM3 and a rigid body rotation of TM4. (B) Superposition of A2AR-GL31-NECA (yellow cartoon and ligand in green stick representation) and A2A-StaR2-ZM241385 (green cartoon and ligand in blue stick representation) TMs 2, 6, and 7 labeled. Only the A2AR-GL31 is depicted as a gray surface, cut away to reveal the NECA agonist binding deeper in the receptor ligand binding pocket compared to the ZM241385 inverse agonist. Structure 2011 19, 1283-1293DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions