Discrete Choice Modeling

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Part 12] 1/38 Discrete Choice Modeling Stated Preference Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Advertisements

Econometric Analysis of Panel Data Panel Data Analysis: Extension –Generalized Random Effects Model Seemingly Unrelated Regression –Cross Section Correlation.
[Part 13] 1/30 Discrete Choice Modeling Hybrid Choice Models Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Longitudinal and Multilevel Methods for Models with Discrete Outcomes with Parametric and Non-Parametric Corrections for Unobserved Heterogeneity David.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
1 ESTIMATION OF DRIVERS ROUTE CHOICE USING MULTI-PERIOD MULTINOMIAL CHOICE MODELS Stephen Clark and Dr Richard Batley Institute for Transport Studies University.
[Part 1] 1/15 Discrete Choice Modeling Econometric Methodology Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Riemannian Consumers François Gardes Université Paris I-Panthéon Sorbonne, CES-Cermsem, CREST-LSM personal page
A N E CONOMIC E STIMATION OF THE P RODUCTION C OSTS OF I MPROVING A UTOMOBILE F UEL E FFICIENCY Takahiko Kiso August 8, 2011 Camp Resources XVIII.
1/54: Topic 5.1 – Modeling Stated Preference Data Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA.
Housing Demand in Germany and Japan Borsch-Supan, Heiss, and Seko, JHE 10, (2001) Presented by Mark L. Trueman, 11/25/02.
1/62: Topic 2.3 – Panel Data Binary Choice Models Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA.
Choice modelling in marketing- some examples Hans S. Solgaard, Department of Environmental and Business Economics June 2008.
15. Stated Preference Experiments. Panel Data Repeated Choice Situations Typically RP/SP constructions (experimental) Accommodating “panel data” Multinomial.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
[Part 15] 1/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Substitution between Mass-Produced and High-End Beers Daniel Toro-Gonzalez Ph.D. candidate, School of Economic Sciences (SES) Jill J. McCluskey Visiting.
Discrete Choice Models William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Microeconometric Modeling
GUY ARIE OLEG BARANOV BENN EIFERT HECTOR PEREZ-SAIZ BEN SKRAINKA Bundling Software: An MPEC Approach to BLP.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Empirical Methods for Microeconomic Applications University of Lugano, Switzerland May 27-31, 2013 William Greene Department of Economics Stern School.
Efficiency Measurement William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Spatial Discrete Choice Models Professor William Greene Stern School of Business, New York University.
Berry-Levensohn-Pakes EMA (1995) Paper Notes ECON 721.
1/54: Topic 5.1 – Modeling Stated Preference Data Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA.
[Part 4] 1/43 Discrete Choice Modeling Bivariate & Multivariate Probit Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Part 24: Stated Choice [1/117] Econometric Analysis of Panel Data William Greene Department of Economics Stern School of Business.
Consumer Valuation of Medicare Part D Plans VERY PRELIMINARY-Please do not quote Claudio Lucarelli Dept of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
1/62: Topic 2.3 – Panel Data Binary Choice Models Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Industry Empirical Studies Differentiated Products Structural Models Based on the lectures of Dr Christos Genakos (University of Cambridge)
[Part 15] 1/24 Discrete Choice Modeling Aggregate Share Data - BLP Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
[Part 8] 1/26 Discrete Choice Modeling Nested Logit Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
[Part 5] 1/43 Discrete Choice Modeling Ordered Choice Models Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
STRUCTURAL MODELS Eva Hromádková, Applied Econometrics JEM007, IES Lecture 10.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University April 26-27, 2012 Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
1 Measuring the Welfare Effect of Entry in Differentiated Product Markets: The Case of Medicare HMOs Shiko Maruyama University of New South Wales 19 June,
Logit Models Alexander Spermann, University of Freiburg, SS Logit Models.
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Microeconometric Modeling
M.Sc. in Economics Econometrics Module I
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Consumer Willingness to Pay for Vehicle Attributes: What Do We know?
Discrete Choice Modeling
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
Discrete Choice Models
Discrete Choice Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Econometrics Chengyuan Yin School of Mathematics.
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Microeconometric Modeling
MPHIL AdvancedEconometrics
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Microeconometric Modeling
Presentation transcript:

Discrete Choice Modeling 0 Introduction 1 Summary 2 Binary Choice 3 Panel Data 4 Bivariate Probit 5 Ordered Choice 6 Count Data 7 Multinomial Choice 8 Nested Logit 9 Heterogeneity 10 Latent Class 11 Mixed Logit 12 Stated Preference 13 Hybrid Choice 14. Spatial Data 15. Aggregate Market Data William Greene Stern School of Business New York University

Aggregate Data and Multinomial Choice: The Model of Berry, Levinsohn and Pakes

Resources Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium, S. Berry, J. Levinsohn, A. Pakes, Econometrica, 63, 4, 1995, 841-890. (BLP) http://people.stern.nyu.edu/wgreene/Econometrics/BLP.pdf A Practitioner’s Guide to Estimation of Random-Coefficients Logit Models of Demand, A. Nevo, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 9, 4, 2000, 513-548 http://people.stern.nyu.edu/wgreene/Econometrics/Nevo-BLP.pdf A New Computational Algorithm for Random Coefficients Model with Aggregate-level Data, Jinyoung Lee, UCLA Economics, Dissertation, 2011 http://people.stern.nyu.edu/wgreene/Econometrics/Lee-BLP.pdf Elasticities of Market Shares and Social Health Insurance Choice in Germany: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach, M. Tamm et al., Health Economics, 16, 2007, 243-256. http://people.stern.nyu.edu/wgreene/Econometrics/Tamm.pdf

Aggregate Data and Multinomial Choice: The Model of Berry, Levinsohn and Pakes

Theoretical Foundation Consumer market for J differentiated brands of a good j =1,…, Jt brands or types i = 1,…, N consumers t = i,…,T “markets” (like panel data) Consumer i’s utility for brand j (in market t) depends on p = price x = observable attributes f = unobserved attributes w = unobserved heterogeneity across consumers ε = idiosyncratic aspects of consumer preferences Observed data consist of aggregate choices, prices and features of the brands.

BLP Automobile Market Jt t

Random Utility Model Utility: Uijt=U(wi,pjt,xjt,fjt|), i = 1,…,(large)N, j=1,…,J wi = individual heterogeneity; time (market) invariant. w has a continuous distribution across the population. pjt, xjt, fjt, = price, observed attributes, unobserved features of brand j; all may vary through time (across markets) Revealed Preference: Choice j provides maximum utility Across the population, given market t, set of prices pt and features (Xt,ft), there is a set of values of wi that induces choice j, for each j=1,…,Jt; then, sj(pt,Xt,ft|) is the market share of brand j in market t. There is an outside good that attracts a nonnegligible market share, j=0. Therefore,

Functional Form (Assume one market for now so drop “’t.”) Uij=U(wi,pj,xj,fj|)= xj'β – αpj + fj + εij = δj + εij Econsumers i[εij] = 0, δj is E[Utility]. Will assume logit form to make integration unnecessary. The expectation has a closed form.

Heterogeneity Assumptions so far imply IIA. Cross price elasticities depend only on market shares. Individual heterogeneity: Random parameters Uij=U(wi,pj,xj,fj|i)= xj'βi – αpj + fj + εij βik = βk + σkvik. The mixed model only imposes IIA for a particular consumer, but not for the market as a whole.

Endogenous Prices: Demand side Uij=U(wi,pj,xj,fj|)= xj'βi – αpj + fj + εij fj is unobserved Utility responds to the unobserved fj Price pj is partly determined by features fj. In a choice model based on observables, price is correlated with the unobservables that determine the observed choices.

Endogenous Price: Supply Side There are a small number of competitors in this market Price is determined by firms that maximize profits given the features of its products and its competitors. mcj = g(observed cost characteristics c, unobserved cost characteristics h) At equilibrium, for a profit maximizing firm that produces one product, sj + (pj-mcj)sj/pj = 0 Market share depends on unobserved cost characteristics as well as unobserved demand characteristics, and price is correlated with both.

Instrumental Variables (ξ and ω are our h and f.)

Econometrics: Essential Components

Econometrics

GMM Estimation Strategy - 1

GMM Estimation Strategy - 2

BLP Iteration

ABLP Iteration our ft.  is our (β,) No superscript is our (M); superscript 0 is our (M-1).

Side Results

ABLP Iterative Estimator

BLP Design Data

Exogenous price and nonrandom parameters

IV Estimation

Full Model

Some Elasticities