Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: A randomized controlled trial with comparison of the costs Tero Rautio, MDa, Arto Ohinmaa, PhDb, Jukka Perälä, MD, PhDc, Pasi Ohtonen, MSca, Timo Heikkinen, MD, PhDa, Heikki Wiik, MDa, Pasi Karjalainen, MDd, Kari Haukipuro, MD, PhDa, Tatu Juvonen, MD, PhDa Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 958-965 (May 2002) DOI: 10.1067/mva.2002.123096 Copyright © 2002 Society for Vascular Surgery and The American Association for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Trial profile. GSV, Greater saphenous vein; LSV, lesser saphenous vein. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2002 35, 958-965DOI: (10.1067/mva.2002.123096) Copyright © 2002 Society for Vascular Surgery and The American Association for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Median pain scores with 25th and 75th percentiles at rest and on standing and walking. (Daily P values were calculated with Mann-Whitney U test). EOG, Endovenous obliteration group; SOG, stripping operation group; VAS, visual analogue scale. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2002 35, 958-965DOI: (10.1067/mva.2002.123096) Copyright © 2002 Society for Vascular Surgery and The American Association for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Sensitivity analysis of costs of VNUS Closure and conventional surgery in treatment of primary varicose veins in different numbers of patients per year (US dollars). Journal of Vascular Surgery 2002 35, 958-965DOI: (10.1067/mva.2002.123096) Copyright © 2002 Society for Vascular Surgery and The American Association for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions