DISCERN: The Discerning Student

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christopher Graham Garnet Education UK. I dont do rhetorical questions !
Advertisements

Building Knowledge for Themselves Engaging Students in Building Knowledge for Themselves.
LG 546 MATERIALS EVALUATION Evaluating ESP and EAP Materials.
Productive Math Talk Math Alliance April 3, 2012.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
UNIT 9. CLIL THINKING SKILLS
Jude Carroll, author of Tools for Teaching in an Educationally Mobile World (Routledge 2015) Supporting teaching across cultures: the role of good practice.
CRITICAL REFLECTION FOR CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: using the SOAP strategy to analyze pedagogical experience Padmini Boruah Department of English.
Dr E. Lugo Morales1 6/28/2012. Develop academic vocabulary Read to acquire new information Understand information presented orally Participate in classroom.
COETC Grant May 17, 2012 Facilitators: Ruth Brancard and Elaine Baker.
“Knowledge” Do Now: As a teacher, what does this statement make think about or feel: “He Who Can Does He Who cannot Teaches” George Bernard Shaw.
Discussions and Oral Presentations as Teaching Material in English for Medicine Zorica Antic Natasa Milosavljevic English language department Faculty of.
Measured Progress ©2011 ASDN Webinar Series Spring 2013 Session Four March 27, 2013 New Alaska State Standards for Math: Connecting Content with Classroom.
Is it Necessary to Develop Grammar Learning Materials?
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
Academic Writing and Critical Thinking some ideas for the classroom Christopher Graham Russia, November 2013.
Copyright © 2008 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Opposing Viewpoints Teaching American History In Miami-Dade County December 14, 2012 Fran Macko, Ph.D.
New Pathways to Academic Achievement for K-12 English Learners TESOL March 26, 2009 Anna Uhl Chamot The George Washington University.
Turning engaging mathematics classroom experiences into robust learning Peter Sullivan and Caroline Brown MAV secondary.
Why do Discussion? One way to learn content and practice academic language is to “talk yourself into understanding”
Learners doing it for themselves.  Identify what an autonomous learner is:  good learners / bad learners  Look at how that affects teaching  Examine.
Approaches to teaching English The differences between EAP and General EFL Louis Rogers.
Common Core.  Find your group assignment.  As a group, read over the descriptors for mastery of this standard. (The writing standards apply to more.
A blended collaborative approach to writing: Implications for second language learning and teaching Yue-en Anita Pu 2016 CARN Waikato Symposium.
UNDERSTANDING ACADEMIC EXPECTATIONS Linda Williams Learnings Strategies Student Academic Success Services sass.queensu.ca Learning Strategies, Student.
Anne Karin Larsen, Bergen University College, Norway
Maths No Problem; A Mastery Approach.
edTPA: Task 1 Support Module
Developing EAP reading materials for teaching and publication
Use of Literature in Language Teaching
Subject specialist teaching
Academic Conversations
JOT2 – LEARNING THEORIES
Graduate Attributes in Syllabus design for EAP
Metacognition and Learning
Integrating an ESAP component into an EGAP course. BALEAP 2017 Bristol
Writing your reflection in Stage 1 & 2 Indonesian (continuers)
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Paul Stocks. Centre for English Language & Academic Writing.
Olwyn Alexander & Sue Argent
Session 4: Planning Lessons Tuesday 12th October 2010
OSEP Leadership Conference July 28, 2015 Margaret Heritage, WestEd
CLIL: the next teaching challenge!
Introduction to the Five Tools and Processes for Translating the NGSS into Instruction and Classroom Assessment.
The Power of Anchor Charts to Transform Reading Instruction
SSP4000 Introduction to the Research Process Wk1: Module Introduction
CHAPTER 3 Teaching Through Problem Solving
Welcome Back! 4th Grade Planning
Pronunciation in action: Reflections from the classroom
Exeter Model of ITE Induction for ITE Coordinators,
English Teacher Education
Writing - Grade 3.
Making Meaning Through Art
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Lesson Planning Establishing Compelling Input
And a short comment on note taking
Maths No Problem; A Mastery Approach.
Teacher Aide Interaction that Supports Student Learning
Chloe Courtenay and Sophia Vanttinen-Newton
Caroline Fletcher Innovations in developing teacher assessment literacy: A scholarship circle model Caroline Fletcher
Concept English Orientation 2015/2016.
WHAT DO STUDENTS KNOW? ENGINEERING EFFECTIVE DISCUSSION THAT ELICITS EVIDENCE OF LEARNING AND CREATES A CHALLENGE MAKE LEARNING VISIBLE.
. NGSS Tool and Process 1 . Advancing Tools and Processes for Next Generation Science Planning for Instruction Introduction to the Five Tools and Processes.
The Intersection of Literacy and Digital Literacy in the classroom:
DEVELOPING ACADEMIC LANGUAGE AND TEACHING LEARNING STRATEGIES
Approaches to Learning (ATL)
DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION USING ASSESSMENT EFFECTIVELY.
CLIL Teacher Training Methodology Course
MATSDA Conference, Liverpool, June 2019 Issues and Relationships in the Use of Materials Rod Bolitho.
Presentation transcript:

DISCERN: The Discerning Student InForm Conference 2018 Dave Watton & Jake Groves, Birmingham International Academy

Our teaching context Birmingham Foundation Pathways EAP & study skills module Non-EAP modules = college-based Entry level: IELTS 5.5 Contact hours vary

Outline Problem Action research Findings Implications

The problem They don’t think for themselves – they should give their own opinions more. They never question what they read – they should be more critical. They just regurgitate – they should be more original. (Alexander, Argent & Spencer, 2008) Typical lecturer comments

A vague concept Critical thinking A vague and fuzzy concept, difficult to articulate & pin down. Whole books have been published on the subject. Critical thinking

A language of thinking “If we can talk to students using [the terms for the cognitive skills they need]…, then teaching thinking becomes like teaching a physical process such as a sport.” (Ellerton, 2014) From critical thinking to a language of thinking

Questions What cognitive skills do students need? Can we help them develop these skills by teaching a ‘language of thinking’?

The “discerning” student The ideal student The “discerning” student Our concept of the ideal student who can discern quality.

A framework for thinking D = I = S = C = E = R = N = differentiates interprets selects strategies (is) critical evaluates reflects notices A framework for thinking using the ‘DISCERN’ acronym

Action research Monolingual group: 11 Chinese learners DISCERN framework superimposed on existing course Weekly reflective writing tasks End-of-course survey Taught ‘DISCERN’ terms Integrated terms into learning objectives & classroom discourse Elicited skills used in tasks & activities

Example: Lesson on combining sources in academic writing Learning objectives: Select appropriate reading strategies Interpret author stance Differentiate between contrasting perspectives Evaluate the strength of different arguments

Responses: End-of-course survey

Responses: End-of-course survey Explain your choice. Critical thinking allows us to see things with a sceptical eye.

Responses: Online discussion Which DISCERN skill has been most useful to you this week? Give examples of how you have used this skill. My choice is ‘selects strategies’. In the reading exam, I chose skim reading to get the main idea of the paragraphs. Then I looked at the question and went back to the paragraph to find what I needed to focus on. I underlined the key words I found and compared with the ideas in the choices to choose the best answer.

Partial understandings ‘Reflects’ helped me to study effectively this week. I usually memorise the content which teachers mentioned in the class.

Strengths & weaknesses ‘DISCERN’ acronym = memorable Planning opportunities for thinking Clarifying rationale for activities ? ‘DISCERN’ acronym = contrived / too much ? Metacognitive load / abstraction ? Partial understandings Memorable: posters, mugs…

Implications Need for exemplification & consolidation Integration in course design The right tools for the job The third point is in contrast to students’ default strategy of “Just Google it!” or “Just translate it”.

Chasing the butterfly All models are wrong but some are useful. Closing metaphor: thinking skills are elusive & hard to pin down. Aphorism: All models are wrong but some are useful (George Box). All models are wrong but some are useful.

References Alexander, O., Argent, S. and Spencer, J. (2008). EAP Essentials – A teacher’s guide to principles & practice. Reading: Garnet Publishing Ltd. Ellerton, P. (2014). How to teach all students to think critically. The Conversation [online] Available at: https://theconversation.com/how- to-teach-all-students-to-think-critically-35331