E 2 G 1 P h e i g.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principles of Genetic Epidemiology Kirsten Ohm Kyvik.
Advertisements

Fitting Bivariate Models October 21, 2014 Elizabeth Prom-Wormley & Hermine Maes
Genetics Human Genome Behavioral Genetics Family Studies Twin Studies
Extended sibships Danielle Posthuma Kate Morley Files: \\danielle\ExtSibs.
Reminder - Means, Variances and Covariances. Covariance Algebra.
Vocabulary Chapter 6.
Adapted from Walch Education Proving Equivalencies.
3.5 Solving systems of equations in 3 variables
© 2007 by S - Squared, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Multifactorial Traits
Karri Silventoinen University of Helsinki Osaka University.
1-8 An Introduction to Equations. Vocabulary Equation: A mathematical sentence that uses an equal sign. Open Sentence: An equation is an open sentence.
General Learning Outcome #1 By: Rafal Zerebecki & Nada Abdel-Hamid.
SOLUTION Write an inverse variation equation EXAMPLE 5 x–5–34824 y2.44–3–1.5–0.5 Tell whether the table represents inverse variation. If so, write the.
Heritability Demonstrating heritability: show that people who are more similar genetically are also more similar on the trait. Adoption studies Similarity.
Genetics Basics Heritability Environment Modification of gene expression.
Achievement & Ascription in Educational Attainment Genetic & Environmental Influences on Adolescent Schooling François Nielsen.
Session 6 Genetic Influence on Behaviour. What do attached ear lobes, blue eyes, and tongue-rolling have in common?
Session 8 Genetic Influence on Behaviour. What do attached ear lobes, blue eyes, and tongue-rolling have in common?
Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer and its Risk Factors Hermine Maes Cancer Control March 2006.
Systems of Linear Equations in Two Variables. 1. Determine whether the given ordered pair is a solution of the system.
Chapter 1: Variables in Algebra
NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF PHENOTYPES Mice Fruit Flies In:Introduction to Quantitative Genetics Falconer & Mackay 1996.
Model building & assumptions Matt Keller, Sarah Medland, Hermine Maes TC21 March 2008.
Elimination using Multiplication Honors Math – Grade 8.
Genetics and Behavior With reference to relevant research studies, to what extent does genetic inheritance influence behavior?
 Builds on what we know about the differences between species and applies these concepts to studying humans  Deals with understanding how both genetics.
Elimination Method - Systems. Elimination Method  With the elimination method, you create like terms that add to zero.
LO #10: With reference to relevant research studies, to what extent does genetics influence behavior?
Direct Variation If two quantities vary directly, their relationship can be described as: y = kx where x and y are the two quantities and k is the constant.
The Nature-Nurture Debates The Pursuit of Heritability Nature-Nurture Debate –The debate over the extent to which human behavior is determined by genetics.
Equations and Inequalities. Unit 8 – Solving Inequalities.
Simultaneous Equations 1
Extended Pedigrees HGEN619 class 2007.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci ;57(1): doi: /iovs Figure Legend:
NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF PHENOTYPES
Testing and Individual Differences pt. 2 Intelligence
Univariate Twin Analysis
Gene-environment interaction
Finding a Percent of a Number
A proportion is an equation that states two ratios are equal
NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF PHENOTYPES
MRC SGDP Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience
Genetics of Personality
Can resemblance (e.g. correlations) between sib pairs, or DZ twins, be modeled as a function of DNA marker sharing at a particular chromosomal location?
Behavior Genetics The Study of Variation and Heredity
Structural Equation Modeling
Schizophrenia Family studies, show that the more closely related an individual to a schizophrenic patient the higher the risk to develop it . Kendler.
PedStats Introduction
3.2 Solve Linear Systems Algebraically
Univariate modeling Sarah Medland.
Nature VS Nurture intelligence.
6-3 Solving Systems Using Elimination
Solving Systems of Equations by Elimination
3.5 Solving systems of equations in 3 variables
Solving Systems of Equations By Elimination
Behavior Genetics Dr. Blakemore PSY 235.
Correlation for a pair of relatives
Schizophrenia Family studies, show that the more closely related an individual to a schizophrenic patient the higher the risk to develop it . Kendler.
Systems of Linear Equations in Two Variables
Sarah Medland faculty/sarah/2018/Tuesday
Genetics and Personality
SIMULTANEOUS EQUATIONS 1
The Nature-Nurture Debates
Nonpaternity in Linkage Studies of Extremely Discordant Sib Pairs
Equations …. are mathematical sentences stating that two expressions are equivalent.
TO WHAT EXTENT DOES GENETIC INHERITANCE INFLUENCE BEHAVIOR?
Twin studies October 3, 2017.
Biological approach and OCD
Presentation transcript:

E 2 G 1 P h e i g

C 2 U G 1 P h u c g a i

Total Environment (55%)

Twin Method (1) Rmz = .52 = h2 + he2 (2) Rdz = .31 = .5h2 + he2 Solution: (1) Subtract Equation (2) from Equation (1): Rmz = .52 = h2 + he2 -Rdz = -.31 = -.5h2 - he2 .21 = .5h2 (2) Multiply this result by 2: 2(.21) = 2(.5h2), so .42 = h2 (3) Substitute this quantity into Equation (3): .42 + e2 = 1, so e2 = .58 (4) Substitute the results from steps (2) and (3) into Equation (1) & solve for h: .52 = .42 + h(.58), so h = .10/.58 = .17

Adoption Method (1) RBioSibs = .24 = .5h2 + he2 (2) RAdpSibs = .06 = he2 (3) h2 + e2 = 1 Solution: (1) Subtract Equation (2) from Equation (1): RBioSibs = .24 = .5h2 + he2 - RAdpSibs = -.06 = - he2 .18 = .5h2 (2) Multiply this result by 2: 2(.18) = 2(.5h2), so .36 = h2 (3) Substitute this quantity into Equation (3): .36 + e2 = 1, so e2 = .64 (4) Substitute the results from steps (2) and (3) into Equation (1) & solve for h: .06 = h(.64), so h = .06/.64 = .09

Table 19.1. Values of g and h for different types of genetic and adoptive relationships under a general model and under a simple model that assumes only additive genetic action, random mating, and random placement of adoptees. g h Relationship: Notation: General Simple MZ twins together mzt 1.0 hmzt htwin MZ twins apart mza hmza DZ twins together dzt gsibs .50 hdzt DZ twins apart dza hdza Siblings together sibst hsibst hsib Siblings apart sibsa hsibsa Parent-offspring together pot gpo hpot hpo Parent-offspring apart poa hpoa Grandparent-grandchild gg ggg .25 hggt hgg Uncle/aunt-nephew/niece uann guann huannt huann Half-sibs, together hst ghs hhst Half-sibs, apart hsa hhsa Cousins cous gcous .125 hcous Adoptive parent-offspring apo gapo 0.0 hapo Adoptive sibs asibs gasibs hasibs

Table 19.2. Estimation of heritability, environmentability, and the correlation between twins’ environments using the twin method and the assumptions of equal environments for MZ and DZ twins raised together and no selective placement of adoptees. Notation follows that in Table 19.1 and Figure 19.1. A dot (.) denotes that a quantity cannot be estimated using that design. Design: h2 e2 htwin Twins raised together = 2(Rmzt – Rdzt) 1 – h2 Twins raised apart = Rmza . = .5Rdza

Sibs Apart and Together = .5Rsibsa 1 – h2 Table 19.3. Estimation of heritability, environmentability, and the correlation between relatives’ environments using the adoption method and assumption of no selective placement. Notation follows that in Table 19.1 and Figure 19.1. Design: h2 e2 h Sibs Apart and Together = .5Rsibsa 1 – h2 Sibs Together and Adoptive Sibs = 2(Rsibst – Rasibs) Parent-offspring Together and Apart = 2Rpoa

Table 19.4. Estimation of heritability, common environmentability, and unique environmentability in twin studies using the assumptions of equal environments for MZ and DZ twins raised together and no selective placement of adoptees. Notation follows that in Figure 19.2. A dot (.) denotes that a quantity cannot be estimated using a particular design. Design: h2 ci2 ui2 Twins raised together = 2(Rmzt – Rdzt) = 2Rdzt - Rmzt = 1 – h2 – c2 Twins raised apart = Rmza . = .5Rdza

Sibs Apart and Together = .5Rsibsa = Rsibst – .5h2 = 1 – h2 – c2 Table 19.5. Estimation of heritability, environmentability, and the correlation between relatives’ environments using the adoption method and assumption of no selective placement. (Notation follows that in Table 19.1 and Figure 19.2). Design: h2 ci2 ui2 Sibs Apart and Together = .5Rsibsa = Rsibst – .5h2 = 1 – h2 – c2 Sibs Together and Adoptive Sibs = 2(Rsibst – Rasibs) Parent-offspring Together and Apart = 2Rpoa = Rapo

Table 19.6. Twin correlations for the English and Mathematics subtests of the National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test. (From Loehlin & Nichols, 1976) Correlation: Zygosity: MZ (N = 509 pairs) DZ (N = 330 pairs) Within Individuals .61 .59 Cross-Twin: . Twin 1: Twin 2: English .75 .56 Math .37 .72 .44

Table 19.7. Testing mathematical models. Quantity: Observed General h2 = 0 htwin = 0 Rmzt .41 .34 .43 Rdzt .27 c2 0.00 4.94 1.60