Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Facilitating Student-Led Discussions, K-12 Part 1: Rationale and Discussion Formats Cynde Snider.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Socratic Seminars.
Advertisements

When Students Can’t Read…
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
DOinG SoMeTHing KOoL #wordwall#comparative wordwall#speaking&listen ing#CCSS Cheryl Shelton, Social Hash Tags for summarizing ideas–Andrew.
Module 4: Unit 2, Session 3 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 2, Session 3.
Things We Think About What is it that we want to assess? –What are the benchmarks and standards for my grade level? What a tools are we required to use.
Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Facilitating Student-Led Discussions, K-12 Part 2: Developing an Age-Appropriate Teaching Rubric Cynde Snider.
Whole site approach to improvement Leading the Learning Workshop 3 - for leadership teams in secondary sites Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit.
Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Universal Design for Learning, Part 2 Cynde Snider, PhD, NBCT Program Specialist, Georgia Department of Education.
Collaborative Conversations
Common Core Planning for Content & Practice Preparing Los Angeles Students for College and Career.
Visual Thinking Strategies and the Common Core State Standards Cara Goger M A R I P O S A C O U N T Y A R T S C O U N C I L
Assisting Struggling Readers and Writers: Using Evidence-Based Resources to Support Adult Learners Michigan Conference 2014 Kathy Houghton-- LINCS.
WRITING NEXT: A Report to Carnegie Corporation of New York
Secondary Intensive Reading Block Evan Lefsky, Ph.D. Reading Specialist, 6-12.
What is Flexible Grouping?
Unit 2 – Making It Real Learning Objectives Reflect on your classroom instruction to identify the literacy components you are already using and how they.
Foreign language and English as a Second Language: Getting to the Common Core of Communication. Are we there yet? Marisol Marcin
Module 4: Unit 3, Session 1 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 3, Session 1.
Welcome! Independent Reading, Leveled Libraries, and Fluency Every child is a good reader with the right book.
 State Standards Initiative.  The standards are not intended to be a new name for old ways of doing business. They are a call to take the next step.
General Considerations for Implementation
Engaging Students: Speaking and Listening Standards.
E MBEDDING C OMMON C ORE L ITERACY IN S ECONDARY C ONTENT A REA L ESSONS Deborah Chapman, presenter Darby Junior High Media Center June 4, :00 –
Revisiting LDC, Day 2 Elementary Bowling Green, Kentucky – Reach Associates November 15,
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What does it look like and sound like when students use evidence to support their thinking?
ELA: Focus on Collaborative Conversations & Writing FCUSD Instructional Focus Meeting Sara Parenzin September 20, 2012 Welcome! Please sign in and start.
Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Facilitating Student-Led Discussions, K-12 Part 1: Rationale and Discussion Formats Cynde Snider.
1 An Overview of the 6 Shifts in ELA Literacy.
ENGAGING STUDENTS FOSTERING ACHIEVEMENT CULTIVATING 21st CENTURY GLOBAL SKILLS Designing Engaging Units for 21 st Century Learners Consider the 21st Century.
Chapter 1 –organizing principle
Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Facilitating Student-Led Discussions, K-12 Part 3: Using Student-Led Discussion to Assess Understanding—Elementary.
4 Transforming Our Use of Images in ELT. MEXTESOL’s OBJECTIVES * Promote the professional development of English teachers * Assist teachers in updating.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
Small Group Instruction Prepared by Andrea Hnatiuk.
Adolescent Vocabulary Designed for Year II, Day 3 Literacy Lab Participants.
Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Facilitating Student-Led Discussions, K-12 Part 4: Using Student-Led Discussion to Assess Understanding—Secondary.
The CORE SIX Essential Strategies for Achieving Excellence With the Common Core Professional Study Group Facilitator: Kristen Trahan.
Mathematical Literacy Roland O’Daniel, Jo Ann Mosier KCTM October 2007.
1 Secondary Content Area Reading An introduction.
Schoolwide Reading: Day Instructional Priorities
Constructive Conversation Smart Start Lessons
Patricia Colorado / Irina Pereyra Oxford 2014 Retention Strategies Reading Street.
An Overview of Making Standards Work Developed by: Jane Cook EASTCONN Staff Dev/Literacy & Ed Tech Specialist Adapted from materials from The Leadership.
Common Core.  Find your group assignment.  As a group, read over the descriptors for mastery of this standard. (The writing standards apply to more.
From Identifying to Supporting All Learners. Last month: 2 things for successful schools A systematic process of identifying students in need of targeted.
Fitting It All In Incorporating phonics and other word study work into reading instruction Michelle Fitzsimmons.
COMMON CORE FOR THE NOT-SO-COMMON LEARNER
6 + 1 Writing Traits Selma City Schools Summer Conference
Small Group Instruction
HUBBARD ELEMENTARY October 29, 2013 Susan Belgrad & Steve Holle
Literacy In the Content Areas
IES Recommendations Explicit vocabulary instruction
HUBBARD ELEMENTARY October 29, 2013 Susan Belgrad & Steve Holle
The Role of Teachers and Technology in Assessing the CCSS Speaking and
Read-Listen-view Essay Rationale
Visual Thinking Strategies and the Common Core State Standards
Model Demonstration Projects
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) &
AVID and The Common Core
What is a Socratic Seminar?
Socratic Seminars.
Socratic Seminar This PowerPoint is meant to be used with either teachers or students schoolwide to assist in implementing Socratic Seminar. It is written.
Doug Fisher Follow me: dfisherSDSU
University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning
Using the 7 Step Lesson Plan to Enhance Student Learning
Warm-Up: Take a ¼ sheet of paper.
Socratic Seminars.
HUBBARD ELEMENTARY October 29, 2013 Susan Belgrad & Steve Holle
Presentation transcript:

Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Facilitating Student-Led Discussions, K-12 Part 1: Rationale and Discussion Formats Cynde Snider

Essential Question How might I incorporate discussion in my classroom?

Learning Targets I can cite evidence to support the teaching of discussion skills. I can describe 3 to 5 different types of age-appropriate student-led discussions.

Improving Adolescent Literacy Evidence-Based Practice Recommendations for Improving Adolescent Literacy Recommendation Level of Evidence Provide explicit vocabulary instruction. Strong Provide direct and explicit comprehension strategy instruction. Provide opportunities for extended discussion of text meaning and interpretation. Moderate Increase student motivation and engagement in literacy learning. Make available intensive and individualized interventions for struggling readers that can be provided by trained specialists. Source: Kamil, et al. (2008)

CCR Anchor Standards for Speaking & Listening Comprehension & Collaboration Prepare for and participate effectively in a range of conversations and collaborations with diverse partners, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively. Presentation of Knowledge & Ideas Present information, findings, and supporting evidence such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning and the organization, development, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience. PARCC non-summative assessment of speaking and listening skills: locally scored, required

Learning Targets I can cite evidence to support the teaching of discussion skills. I can describe 3 to 5 different types of age-appropriate student-led discussions.

Structured Student-Led Discussion Formats (Handouts 1a & 1b) Body voting Chalk Talks* Conversational Moves Generating Truth Statements Rotating Stations* Snowballing Socratic Seminars Think/Pair/Share

Empowering (Rather than Enabling) Start small—allow student to discuss with teacher, then with selected peer, additional peers, etc. Provide student with opportunities to practice “scripted” contributions before the actual discussion. Establish cueing system between teacher and student. Plan threaded discussions using Wiggio, Google Docs, etc. Conduct real time, online discussions.

Learning Targets I can cite evidence to support the teaching of discussion skills. I can describe 3 to 5 different types of age-appropriate student-led discussions.

Essential Question How might I incorporate discussion in my classroom?

Resources Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York: Routledge. Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger T., & Torgensen, J. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices (NCEE #2008-4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide.aspx?sid=8.

Cynde Snider Georgia Department of Education csnider@doe. k1. ga Cynde Snider Georgia Department of Education csnider@doe.k1.ga.us 404-657-9971