Paul C Megee, Cathy Mistrot, Vincent Guacci, Douglas Koshland 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 Mismatch Repair Protein Localizes to Recombination Intermediates In Vivo  Elizabeth Evans, Neal Sugawara, James E Haber,
Advertisements

The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
The Kleisin Subunit of Cohesin Dictates Damage-Induced Cohesion
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Dynamic Alterations of Replication Timing in Mammalian Cells
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
DNA Diagnostics by Surface-Bound Melt-Curve Reactions
Highly Transcribed RNA Polymerase II Genes Are Impediments to Replication Fork Progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae  Anna Azvolinsky, Paul G. Giresi,
Brca1 Controls Homology-Directed DNA Repair
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Volume 120, Issue 5, Pages (March 2005)
Early Replication of Short Telomeres in Budding Yeast
Volume 27, Issue 15, Pages e8 (August 2017)
Michelle Sabourin, Creighton T. Tuzon, Virginia A. Zakian 
Chromosome-wide Rad51 Spreading and SUMO-H2A
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Tomoyuki Tanaka, Maria Pia Cosma, Karin Wirth, Kim Nasmyth  Cell 
Histone Acetylation Regulates the Time of Replication Origin Firing
Branden Wolner, Stephen van Komen, Patrick Sung, Craig L. Peterson 
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages (June 2005)
Components and Dynamics of DNA Replication Complexes in S
Sean D. Taverna, Robert S. Coyne, C.David Allis  Cell 
Neal Sugawara, Xuan Wang, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
Distinct Targets of the Eco1 Acetyltransferase Modulate Cohesion in S Phase and in Response to DNA Damage  Jill M. Heidinger-Pauli, Elçin Ünal, Douglas.
Chromatin Remodeling In Vivo
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
The Basis for IL-2-Induced IL-2 Receptor α Chain Gene Regulation
Conserved Histone Variant H2A
Jörg Renkawitz, Claudio A. Lademann, Marian Kalocsay, Stefan Jentsch 
Rif1 and Rif2 Inhibit Localization of Tel1 to DNA Ends
Marie Frank-Vaillant, Stéphane Marcand  Molecular Cell 
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages (July 2013)
Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell 
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Jérôme Wuarin, Vicky Buck, Paul Nurse, Jonathan B.A. Millar  Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 94, Issue 5, Pages (September 1998)
A Transcription-Independent Role for TFIIB in Gene Looping
A Transient Histone Hyperacetylation Signal Marks Nucleosomes for Remodeling at the PHO8 Promoter In Vivo  Hans Reinke, Philip D. Gregory, Wolfram Hörz 
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Hong-Guo Yu, Douglas Koshland  Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Chromatin Disassembly Mediated by the Histone Chaperone Asf1 Is Essential for Transcriptional Activation of the Yeast PHO5 and PHO8 Genes  Melissa W Adkins,
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (May 2010)
A Direct Link between Sister Chromatid Cohesion and Chromosome Condensation Revealed through the Analysis of MCD1 in S. cerevisiae  Vincent Guacci, Douglas.
Alessandro Bianchi, Simona Negrini, David Shore  Molecular Cell 
Beyond Homing: Competition between Intron Endonucleases Confers a Selective Advantage on Flanking Genetic Markers  Heidi Goodrich-Blair, David A Shub 
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Scott J Diede, Daniel E Gottschling  Current Biology 
J.Russell Lipford, Stephen P Bell  Molecular Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Simon W.-L Chan, Elizabeth H Blackburn  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Regulation of TCRβ Gene Assembly by a Promoter/Enhancer Holocomplex
The Kleisin Subunit of Cohesin Dictates Damage-Induced Cohesion
Volume 13, Issue 14, Pages (July 2003)
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Presentation transcript:

The Centromeric Sister Chromatid Cohesion Site Directs Mcd1p Binding to Adjacent Sequences  Paul C Megee, Cathy Mistrot, Vincent Guacci, Douglas Koshland  Molecular Cell  Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 445-450 (September 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80347-0

Figure 1 Mcd1-6HAp Association with Endogenous Chromosomes Schematics represent portions of endogenous chromosomes (III, IV, VII, and XVI) with the relevant PCR products (bars). PCR products were generated with oligonucleotides that amplify ∼300 bp DNA fragments (see Experimental Procedures). Ovals indicate positions of the centromeres, and dotted lines represent the remainder of the chromosomes not drawn to scale. Total corresponds to input chromatin before immunoprecipitation. (A) ChIP of CEN3 DNA in strains with (+) or without (−) HA epitope–tagged Mcd1p. The tagged protein is the sole source of Mcd1p and provides wild-type Mcd1p function. (B) ChIP of ARS1 and ADE3 DNA from endogenous chromosomes in G1 and M cells. Cells were staged in G1 or M using mating pheromone and nocodazole, respectively. Lane numbers correspond to the indicated PCR products. (C) Coimmunoprecipitated DNA in Mif2p and Mcd1-6HAp ChIPs as a percentage of input chromatin is shown for centromeric and noncentromeric loci in G1 or M cells. Numbered ARS1 and ADE3 PCR products correspond to those in (B). Inset shows relative pixel intensities for PCRs of input DNA from G1 (squares) and M stage (circles) cells, demonstrating that our PCR conditions respond linearly to the levels of input DNA used for these and all subsequent quantitations of ChIP samples. (D) CEN3-proximal DNA in Mif2p and Mcd1-6HAp CHIPs. The presence of a small amount of CEN-flanking DNA in the Mif2p ChIP is attributed to variable lengths of sheared chromatin, which include occasional long chromatin pieces with both the CEN DNA and flanking sequences. (E) Quantification of CEN3 or CEN16 and proximal sequences as a percentage of total DNA in Mif2p and Mcd1-6HAp ChIPs. Molecular Cell 1999 4, 445-450DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80347-0)

Figure 2 Ectopically Placed Centromere Directs Mcd1p Binding to Adjacent Sequences (A) Schematic of the minichromosome centromeric region. The centromere (oval) is flanked by site-specific recombination target sites (triangles, see Figure 3). (B) Mcd1-6HAp ChIP of centromere-proximal DNA from minichromosome-bearing cells staged in G1 or M. Lane numbers correspond to PCR products in (A). (C) Quantification of ARS1 and ADE3 DNA as a percentage of input DNA in Mcd1-6HAp coimmunoprecipitates from M-staged cells with and without the minichromosome. Molecular Cell 1999 4, 445-450DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80347-0)

Figure 3 Establishment and Maintenance of Mcd1-6HAp Binding Adjacent to the Centromere Cohesion Site The minichromosome centromere was excised during G1 (A) or M (B) using a site-specific recombination event under the control of an inducible recombinase (see Figure 2A) (Megee and Koshland 1999). It is unlikely that the loss of Mcd1-6HAp association in centromere-proximal regions is the consequence of recombination per se because sister minichromatid cohesion is unaffected by a recombination event that inverts the centromere (Megee and Koshland 1999). Only PCR products from ChIP samples with excised centromeres are shown. Quantification of these results and the corresponding centric (uninduced) controls are shown. Lane and column numbers correspond to PCR products in Figure 2A. Molecular Cell 1999 4, 445-450DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80347-0)

Figure 4 Mcd1p-6HAp Association with the Minichromosome Is Biased for A+T-Rich DNA (A) A+T base composition within a sliding 100 bp window was plotted using MacVector software (Oxford Molecular) for 2 kb regions flanking the centromere (ovals) on endogenous chromosomes III and XVI and for pPCM69. (B) The minichromosome is drawn to scale. Red bars indicate PCR products that are specific for the minichromosome. Specificity is derived from minichromosome sequence-specific oligonucleotides in PCR or is inferred because corresponding sequences on endogenous chromosomal loci showed minimal Mcd1p association (see Figure 1). Black bars represent PCR products amplified from either chromosome or minichromosome sequences. (C) Cells harboring the minichromosome were arrested in M and processed for ChIP. The coimmunoprecipitated DNA from two independent experiments (circles or squares) was analyzed using the 47 primer pairs that generate the PCR products shown in (B). Percentages of PCR products bound in Mcd1-6HAp ChIPs are plotted relative to the minichromosome nucleotide using midpoints of amplified PCR products. (D) Plot of minichromosome A+T base composition within a sliding 100 bp window. Molecular Cell 1999 4, 445-450DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80347-0)