Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Advertisements

Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 Provides a Catalytic Mechanism for APC/C Inhibition by the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhanyun Tang, Hongjun Shu, Dilhan Oncel,
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
DNA Degradation at Unprotected Telomeres in Yeast Is Regulated by the CDK1 (Cdc28/Clb) Cell-Cycle Kinase  Momchil D. Vodenicharov, Raymund J. Wellinger 
Cdc45 Is a Critical Effector of Myc-Dependent DNA Replication Stress
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
Distinct but Concerted Roles of ATR, DNA-PK, and Chk1 in Countering Replication Stress during S Phase  Rémi Buisson, Jessica L. Boisvert, Cyril H. Benes,
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages e8 (October 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (April 2007)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Yutian Peng, Lois S. Weisman  Developmental Cell 
Andrew J. Deans, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages e5 (January 2018)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
The Role of NEDD1 Phosphorylation by Aurora A in Chromosomal Microtubule Nucleation and Spindle Function  Roser Pinyol, Jacopo Scrofani, Isabelle Vernos 
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Ken-ichi Yoshioka, Yoshiko Yoshioka, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Ramiro E. Verdun, Laure Crabbe, Candy Haggblom, Jan Karlseder 
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Septins Regulate Actin Organization and Cell-Cycle Arrest through Nuclear Accumulation of NCK Mediated by SOCS7  Brandon E. Kremer, Laura A. Adang, Ian.
Volume 25, Issue 21, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Telomeric Noncoding RNA TERRA Is Induced by Telomere Shortening to Nucleate Telomerase Molecules at Short Telomeres  Emilio Cusanelli, Carmina Angelica Perez.
TopBP1 Activates the ATR-ATRIP Complex
New Histone Incorporation Marks Sites of UV Repair in Human Cells
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Richard W. Deibler, Marc W. Kirschner  Molecular Cell 
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
DNA Damage Foci at Dysfunctional Telomeres
Cdc18 Enforces Long-Term Maintenance of the S Phase Checkpoint by Anchoring the Rad3-Rad26 Complex to Chromatin  Damien Hermand, Paul Nurse  Molecular.
Lindsey A. Allan, Paul R. Clarke  Molecular Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (November 2008)
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Multiple Rad5 Activities Mediate Sister Chromatid Recombination to Bypass DNA Damage at Stalled Replication Forks  Eugen C. Minca, David Kowalski  Molecular.
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 71, Issue 1, Pages e6 (July 2018)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Yun-Gui Yang, Tomas Lindahl, Deborah E. Barnes  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages 678-690 (September 2013) FANCD2 Binds MCM Proteins and Controls Replisome Function upon Activation of S Phase Checkpoint Signaling  Gérald Lossaint, Marion Larroque, Cyril Ribeyre, Nicole Bec, Christian Larroque, Chantal Décaillet, Kerstin Gari, Angelos Constantinou  Molecular Cell  Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages 678-690 (September 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.07.023 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2013 51, 678-690DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.07.023) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Proteins Identified on Nascent DNA upon Nucleotide Depletion (A) Nascent DNA was pulse labeled with EdU for 5 min in untreated HeLa S3 cells and for 50 min in HeLa S3 cells exposed to 1 mM HU. Identified proteins are represented by the ratio of normalized spectral counts detected in HU-treated versus untreated samples and ranked in the order of increasing ratio. Each dot corresponds to one protein. See also Figure S1 and Table S1. (B) STRING network view of proteins enriched at stalled forks (http://string.embl.de, default settings). Thicker lines represent stronger associations. Among the TOP80 proteins enriched ≥2.8× at stalled forks, we selected proteins that were detected in the three replicates of iPOND EdU-HU and that were absent in control thymidine chase samples. (C) Immunoblots of the indicated proteins isolated on nascent DNA. Lane 1, 5 min of EdU; lane 2, 5 min of EdU + 2 hr thymidine chase (10 mM); lane 3, 50 min of EdU in 1 mM HU; lane 4, 50 min of EdU in 1 mM HU + 2 hr thymidine chase (10 mM). Molecular Cell 2013 51, 678-690DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.07.023) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 MCM Proteins Copurify with FANCD2 (A) Overview of the purification procedure. (B) M2 chromatography eluates from control (M2-FLAG-BAP fusion protein) and FANCD2 purification (M2- FLAGFANCD2) were analyzed by SDS PAGE and silver staining. (C) Interaction network of replisome proteins that associate with FLAGFANCD2. For each protein identified, the number of spectral counts (SpC) is indicated. See also Table S2. (D) Western blot analysis of MCM proteins in FLAGFANCD2 pull-downs performed with or without FLAG peptide (100 μg/ml) as indicated. (E) Left, Superdex 200 fractionation of chromatin extracts from HU-treated HEK 293T cells. The positions and stokes radii of thyroglobulin (85 Å) and ferritin (61 Å) are indicated. Fractions containing FANCD2 and MCM proteins were pooled, supplemented with ethidium bromide (200 μg/ml) and DNase I (100 U/ml), and used for reciprocal coimmunoprecipitations (right). Anti-MCM3, anti-MCM5, and anti-FANCD2 immune precipitates were probed for the indicated proteins by western blotting. (F) Superose 6 fractionation of chromatin extracts from untreated (upper panel) and HU-treated (lower panel) HEK 293T cells. Molecular Cell 2013 51, 678-690DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.07.023) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Analysis of FANCD2 Association with MCM Proteins (A) Upper panel, chromatin extracts from FLAGFANCD2-HEK 293T cells were prepared after increasing exposure time in HU (1 mM). Lower panel, the presence of MCM3, MCM5, MCM7, and Ser108 pMCM2 proteins in FLAGFANCD2 immune precipitates was probed by western blotting. The association of FANCD2 and MCM proteins is transient and maximal after 1 hr in HU. Control immunoprecipitation (Ctrl-IP) was performed in the presence of FLAG peptide (100 μg/ml). (B) Immunofluorescence analysis of FANCD2 (green) and Ser108 pMCM2 on (red) in HDFs treated for 1 hr with 5 mM HU. DNA (Hoechst). The merge picture is an overlay of the red and green channels. A histogram indicates the percentage scored from more than 150 untreated and HU-treated cells with ≥3 colocalizing foci. Data from three independent experiments are represented as mean ± SEM. See also Figure S2. (C) When indicated, FLAGFANCD2-HEK 293T cells were pretreated for 15 min with the ATR inhibitor (ETP-46464, 1 μM) and incubated for 1 hr in 5mM HU, and chromatin extracts were prepared and probed for the indicated proteins. Ser108 pMCM2 and MCM5 in FLAGFANCD2 pull-downs with M2 agarose were probed by western blotting. (D) When indicated, FLAGFANCD2-HEK 293T cells were pretreated with Chk1 inhibitor (SB218078, 50 nM) and processed as described in (C). (E) FLAGK561R-FANCD2-HEK 293T cells were prepared and analyzed as described in (A). (F) When indicated, PD220 (FA-A) and PD220-corrected cells were cultured for 1 hr in HU (5 mM) before the preparation of chromatin extracts and immunoprecipitation of endogenous FANCD2. Ser108 pMCM2 and MCM5 were probed in the anti-FANCD2 immune precipitates. (G) FLAGFANCD2 was coexpressed with each one of the six WILD-TYPE MCM proteins in insect cells with recombinant baculoviruses. Immunoprecipitations were performed in order to verify the direct interaction of FANCD2 with MCM proteins. M2 agarose pull-downs of FLAGFANCD2 were probed for MCM proteins by western blotting. Molecular Cell 2013 51, 678-690DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.07.023) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 FANCD2 Controls Replisome Function upon Nucleotide Depletion (A and B) HDFs were synchronized by serum starvation for 24 hr, released in presence of serum, and labeled in S phase for 20 min with IdU and then for 2 hr with CldU in the presence of 5 mM (A) or 0.5 mM (B) HU. Graphic representations of the length of CldU tracks adjacent to IdU tracts measured in μm (y axis). The bar dissecting the data points represents the median of tract length. Differences between distributions were assessed with the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. ∗∗∗p < 0.0001. (C) A histogram showing the bin ratios of the shorter versus the longer replication track for each pair of sister replication forks labeled with CldU during exposure to HU. (D and E) HDFs were treated as described above (A and B) and washed and maintained in HU-containing medium for 16 hr in the absence of halogenated nucleotides. Next, DNA fibers were analyzed as described above: 5 mM HU (D) and 0.5 mM HU (E). See also Figure S3 and Table S3. Molecular Cell 2013 51, 678-690DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.07.023) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Cells Lacking FANCD2 Accumulate Replication-Associated Lesions HDFs treated with control or FANCD2 siRNAs were synchronized in S phase and then exposed for 1 hr to 5 mM HU when indicated. (A) Representative western blots showing that Ser4 and Ser8 pRPA32 and Ser345 pChk1 accumulate as a result of Chk1 inhibition (UCN01, 250 nM) or FANCD2 depletion. See also Figure S4. (B) Representatives image of HDFs treated with the indicated siRNAs, synchronized in S phase by release from serum starvation, and cultured for 1 hr in the presence of 5 mM HU prior to fixation and immunofluorescence staining of Ser4 and Ser8 pRPA32. (C) Quantification of Ser4 and Ser8 pRPA32-positive cells (expressed as a percentage) scored for more than 200 cells. Data from three independent experiments are represented as mean ± SEM. (D) Genomic DNA from HDFs treated with the indicated siRNAs and cultured for 2 hr in the presence of the indicated concentration of HU was slot blotted and probed for ssDNA with anti-guanosine. Total DNA was revealed after denaturation with the same antibody. (E) Quantification of the ratio between ssDNA and total DNA with ImageJ software. Data from three independent experiments are represented as mean ± SEM. Molecular Cell 2013 51, 678-690DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.07.023) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 FANCD2-Depleted Cells Exhibit Cell Proliferation Defects Due to Premature Entry into Senescence (A) Overview of the experimental procedure. HDFs were synchronized by serum starvation for 24 hr and released in presence of serum. After 12 hr, 5 mM HU was added to the cell culture medium to block the cell cycle at the G1/S transition. (B) Microphotographs (from video microscopy sequences) showing control and FANCD2-depleted HDFs immediately and 3 days after release from G1/S, as indicated. Red asterisks indicate mitotic cells. White arrows indicate cells with a senescent-like morphology. (C) A representative graph showing the number of cells in mitosis as a function of time after release from G1/S. Mitotic cells were counted from three different wells. (D) The cells were stained for SA-β-Gal activity 2 weeks after release from HU. (E) A histogram showing the percentage of cells with SA-β-Gal activity. Data from three independent experiments are represented as mean ± SEM. (F) Representative images of synchronized HDFs exposed to HU (5 mM) for 5 hr and cultured for 16 hr before fixation and p21 staining by indirect immunofluorescence. DNA was stained with Hoechst. (G) Quantification of the percentage of p21-positive cells in a population of more than 200 cells. Data from three independent experiments are represented as mean ± SEM. (H) Growth of synchronized HDFs treated with the indicated siRNAs. When indicated, S phase cells were treated with HU (5 mM) for 5 hr, washed, seeded in six-well plates (12 × 104), and the increase in cell number was determined by counting Trypan blue-excluding cells with a hemocytometer at daily intervals. Data from one representative experiment performed in triplicate are represented as mean ± SEM. Molecular Cell 2013 51, 678-690DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.07.023) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 FANCD2 Functions in Replisome Surveillance DNA synthesis is controlled by ATR signaling, which phosphorylates multiple replisome components, including MCM proteins. FANCD2 binds the MCM2–MCM7 replicative helicase and is necessary for slowing down replisomes ongoing under stressful conditions, thereby limiting the formation of replication-associated DNA damage. In cells lacking FANCD2, unrestrained replisomes produce ssDNA gaps that can be further processed by promiscuous nucleases, leading to genomic instability, p21 induction, and cell-cycle arrest. Molecular Cell 2013 51, 678-690DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.07.023) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions