Sept. 12, 2016 (updated Oct 19, 2016) Program Reviews 2016-2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.
Advertisements

Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
An Update on Novi’s Journey Presentation for MAASE April 13, 2011.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
OTES & OPES DEADLINES/REQUIREMENTS/CHANGES
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
Cleveland Municipal School District Educating Cleveland’s Children.
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
SLO Process A process to document a measure of educator effectiveness based on student achievement of content standards.
The Future of State Technology Support for Instructional Improvement Kentucky Department of Education.
Fremont Unified School District An Informational Session for Families August 2015 Standards-Based Report Cards.
Commit” ” to Program Reviews Rhonda Back Program Review Director Bath County Public Schools Kentucky Association of School Councils September 17, 2014.
TEAM MADRAS: Are YOU on the team? Madras Middle School Professional Development Plan Proposal by Donna Eskut - July 2013 Presented to Madras.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
National Board Certification: What is the Same, Different, and New? North Carolina District Coordinators Meeting September 12, 2014 Prepared by: Amber.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
Iowa Support System for Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance (SINA & DINA) Phase I: Audit Keystone AEA January 28, 2008.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
Assessment and Accountability Update Kentucky Association of School Administrators July 18, 2013 Kentucky Department of Education Office of Assessment.
T WO FOR O NE P ROGRAM R EVIEWS Beth Sumner Assistant Superintendent Trigg County Public Schools Kentucky Association of Assessment Coordinators October.
Westat University of Wisconsin J. Koppich & Associates AIR Synergy Enterprises Tony Milanowski Westat NEFEC/Gilchrist HCM Systems Technical Assistance.
Fall, 2011 Get ready, Get set………..It’s Here. PROGRAM REVIEW Wide Lens View Senate Bill 1-March 2009 Arts & Humanities, Writing, and Practical Living Career.
CAA Options: Reading Collection of Evidence Lesley Klenk, CAA Options Administrator Fall Workshop October 2007.
Objective: Reviewing the vision and restarting the work. Agenda 1.Design 21 overview 2.Accept Fall 09 timetable draft 6 3.Career Academies: Brainstorming.
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Webcast September 7, Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner.
 Nuts & Bolts 2015/16 PAS…. Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the First Observation Cycle Review and Approve.
WELCOME Next Generation Councils. Jan Stone, Director of Data, Assessment and Research Bullitt County Schools Amy Ramage, District Assessment Coordinator.
Moving Forward With Assessment and Accountability August 2011 High School.
The Future of State Technology Support for Instructional Improvement Kentucky Department of Education.
Welcome Arts Teachers October 19, 2011 Professional Development.
Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.
Why set Student Growth Objectives (SGOs)?  Currently the Aldine Growth Model used to measure student growth can only be applied to teachers in content.
PROGRAM REVIEWS GETTING STARTED. THE PURPOSE OF THE PROGRAM REVIEW PROCESS To provide for careful and systematic analysis of current programs.
Cape Cod Tech Educator Plan Presentation. Educator Plan Form Due October 15 th …. It is an extension of your Goal Setting Form It is either a 1-year or.
Presentation to the Nevada Council to Establish Academic Standards Proposed Math I and Math II End of Course Cut Scores December 22, 2015 Carson City,
Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Secondary Assessment & Grade Reporting
Writing and Submitting Student Learning Objectives
Thinking about assessment…
World’s Best Workforce (WBWF)
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Lakeview Community Schools
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
National Board Certification: What is the Same, Different, and New?
Courtney Mills Principal, Midlands Middle College
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Community Project- Guide to Coaching Sessions
Teacher Evaluation Training
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
KDE School Assurances Due October 24, 2018
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Russell County High School
Be Prepared: Federal Program Monitoring
Parent Discussion Meeting
Local Option Plan for Analysis of Student Work (ASW)
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
JCPS Final Corrective Action Plan
Student Growth Measures
Presentation transcript:

Sept. 12, 2016 (updated Oct 19, 2016) Program Reviews 2016-2017

Program Review Areas Visual and Performing Arts (VPA) Music Visual Art Drama Dance Media Arts Practical Living / Career Studies (PLCS) Health Physical Education Consumerism Career Education Writing Global Competency and World Languages (Global) K-3

PR Rubric Structure Standards Standard 1: Curriculum and Instruction Demonstrators Characteristics Standard 1: Curriculum and Instruction Dem 1.1: Student Access Dem 1.2: Aligned and Rigorous Curriculum Dem 1.3: Student Performance Standard 2: Formative and Summative Assessment Dem 2.1: Assessments/Expectations for Student Learning Standard 3: Professional Learning Dem 3.1: Opportunity and Participation Standard 4: Leadership: Support and Monitoring Dem 4.1: Policies and Monitoring

PR Reports/Scoring Due in ASSIST June 1* Only two PRs on which to Report this year (2016-17): Visual and Performing Arts (VPA) Practical Living / Career Studies (PLCS) Overall Scoring VPA – 11.5 points PLCS – 11.5 points Total – 23.0 accountability points “Required” characteristics are worth 2 points each, non-required characteristics are worth 1 point each. Add up the points of the characteristics you “met” and divide by the total number of points possible. If you earn 75% or more of the possible points, then you have earned the full 11.5 points for that PR area. When the PR diagnostics are available (in November), ASSIST will calculate the scores for us. No Rationales No Evidence Lists No Evidence Collection Rubrics are much less vague No more “To what extent…?” Now mostly questions with Yes/No answers

PR Assurances Q: When are they due? A: Not sure yet. Likely January 1. KDE will let us know soon. A: June 1. They are due with the rest of the PR in ASSIST. Q: Where/how do we submit them? A: Not sure yet. Maybe upload to ASSIST. KDE will let us know. A: The Assurances will be completed in ASSIST. The diagnostics should be available in November. Here’s what we do know: PR Assurances are currently in draft form. Will be finalized by mid-October. PR Assurances were approved by KBE in October. PR Assurances are checklists, all contained in one document. PR Assurances certify that your school is complying with all PR requirements. PR Assurances must be signed by the principal. PR Assurances must be approved and signed by SBDM members. PR Assurances are conducted ANNUALLY for ALL areas of the Program Review. PR Assurances are not scored. PR Assurances will be reported on the School Report Card.

PR Audits To my knowledge no Pulaski schools will be audited this year (2016-17) SWHS will receive an audit of their Writing PR in 2016-17 Principals receive an email from KDE to inform them of an audit PR Audits will continue for now. They are mandated by law. KRS requires that all schools must be audited every two years. Impossible! PR Audit process will likely change PR Audits are over only one PR area per school PR Audits are conducted on all PR areas each year There are no punitive measures for an audit. KDE can’t and won’t force you to change your score.

PR Work Plans Due June 1 in ASSIST, with the VPA and PLCS Program Reviews The Work Plan will be entered into a textbox in ASSIST. After you score your programs in ASSIST, you will identify the two lowest scored Demonstrators. You will write a one-page-or-less Work Plan on how you plan to improve the two lowest scored Demonstrators. KDE will eventually provide Work Plan examples and non-examples.

So tell me exactly what I need to do! Buy in. Enjoy the paperwork reduction and use the time to implement. Look for your staff members who are naturally inclined to each PR area. Use them to lead and generate ideas. Continue to emphasize each PR area school-wide. Continue to form committees to plan, encourage, and document implementation. One committee per PR area? One grade-level teacher per committee? (ES & MS) One content-area teacher per committee? (HS) But you said I don’t have to collect evidence! True. But you still need to have a good idea of what you’re doing to meet PR proficiency. In the event of an audit, you need to be able to talk about what you do. In fact, the biggest source of evidence for audit teams are interviews of principals, teachers, and students.