N.N.Som Consulting Geotechnical Engineer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dublin Port Tunnel Xiaowei Jin, Xinni Wang, Mingqiu Mao.
Advertisements

RETAINING EARTH STRUCTURE Session 11 – 16
Foundations and basements
DUBLIN PORT TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION CHRIS PAGE & THOMAS SMITH 19/03/2009 H24GGY GEOLOGY FOR CIVIL ENGINEERS Dublin Port Tunnel Project.
GROUNDWATER CONTROL.
Project details • New headquarters for HKSB
Construction Monitoring For Earth Dams 1 Fars Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University.
Foundations Excavations
Issues to be considered :foundations Professor Chris Gorse and Ian Dickinson These slides should be read in conjunction with Emmitt, S. and Gorse, C. (2010)
Pile Testing and Evaluation for the Sand Creek Byway, Sandpoint, Idaho Presented by Dean E. Harris, P.E., CH2M HILL.
Web-based Class Project on Ground Improvement Report prepared as part of course CEE 542: Soil and Site Improvement Winter 2014 Semester Instructor: Professor.
PILE FOUNDATION BY-.
Soils Investigation Soil Investigation
SOIL, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Foundation Engineering CE 483
Bridge Engineering (4) Foundations – Caisson Foundations 1. *Caisson foundations 1.1 IntroductionIntroduction A caisson is basically a structure.
Lecture 11 Advance Design of RC Structure Retaining walls
SEMBODAI RUKMANI VARATHARAJAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING FOUNDATION ENGINEERING BY KARTHIVELU.
Footings.
Commercial Foundations
C ONTACT STRESS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING. Introduction 1 Skyscrapers Bridges Dams How are these constructions supported? Why are all these large constructions.
CIE Soil Mechanics and Foundations II èSoil Properties and Site Investigation èShallow Foundation Design èDeep Foundation Design èRetaining Structures.
Roof Terms Span –Distance across the building. Roof Terms Run –1/2 the distance across the building (1/2 span distance)
Latest Advancements in Instrumentation, Monitoring and QA/QC Techniques for Deep Excavation Support Systems: Al Hilal Project, Abu Dhabi – A Case History.
Underground Stations Typical Station Site Plan. Underground Stations Ground Conditions: Key Issues.
19 February Summary: Updating on the activities completed (Done) since the last meeting List activities on going (Next steps) and related Actions.
9. Seepage (Das, chapter 8) Sections: All except 8.2, 8.6, 8.7, 8.8, 8.9.
Session 15 – 16 SHEET PILE STRUCTURES
Site Work.
4.4 SOIL NAILING SOIL NAILING IS A REINFORCEMENT METHOD TO REINFORCE THE GROUND WITH STEEL BARS OR STEEL BARS IN GROUT FILLED HOLES. IT IS MAINLY USED.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE 10 TOPIC : 3
Roof Terms Span –Distance across the building. Roof Terms Run –1/2 the distance across the building (1/2 span distance)
City of Winnipeg SOUTHWESTERN RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDOR Bidder Meeting October 16 th, 2009.
SITE INVESTIGATION.
SEMBODAI RUKMANI VARATHARAJAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING FOUNDATION ENGINEERING BY KARTHIVELU.
19 February Extension of Building Neutrino Platform General Meetings N.Lopez – M.Manfredi EHN1 civil engineering project status Summary: Updating.
COFFERDAMS.
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
Leads Institute of Technology & Engineering Subject Code : Name Of Subject :Building Construction Name of Unit : Soil Foundation Topic : Bearing.
Lecture 8 Elements of Soil Mechanics
SITE INVESTIGATION ARUN MUCHHALA ENGINEERING COLLEGE-DHARI
FOUNDATIONS.
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-III (CE 434)
Chapter 13 Lateral Earth Pressure – Curved Failure Surface
Soil mechanics and foundation engineering-III (CE-434)
DIAPHRAGM WALLS.
SARDAR PATEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
SAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND ENGEENIRING RESEARCH Ahmedabad B.E (3rd Semester)-Civil-Shift 2 December-2014 Shah Disha R.( ) Gosai Beran.( )
Topic: soil investigation
The Challenge of Urban Rail Infrastructure The Design of William Street Underground Station Barry Moore 23 rd November 2005 AusRAIL PLUS 2005.
SETTLEMENT ANALYSIS By: Engr. Hammad Akbar. Contents 1. Definition 2. Types & Modes of settlements 3. Primary and secondary consolidation settlements.
Use of Modern Retrofitting Techniques in Udaipur Station Building
Fall 2016 ASSE 4311: Learning Outcome Assessment III/Civil Engineering 18/1/2017 Final Presentation Structural & Geotechnical Design of a Hotel in the.
Soft Soil Engineering (Class note) Junhwan Lee School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Yonsei University.
Diaphragm Wall: Construction and Design
CHAPTER FOUR LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE. 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Definitions of Key Terms 3.2 Lateral Earth Pressure at Rest 3.3 Active and Passive Lateral Earth.
EXCAVATION, LATERAL RESTRAINMENT FOR IT AND DEWATERING
{Graduation Project} An-Najah National University
SOIL, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Aspek Geoteknik.
B.V.Patel Institute of Technology-Diploma studies
Aspek Geoteknik.
MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION I
4th Annual Construction Law Summit
CIE Soil Mechanics and Foundations II
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE 10 TOPIC : 3
Chapter 14 Lateral Earth Pressure – Curved Failure Surface
Lecturer: Dr. Frederick Owusu-Nimo
An Introduction to Subway Construction Technology
Graduation Project Bracing system for deep excavation.
Presentation transcript:

BRACED EXCAVATION IN SOFT CLAY A CASE STUDY OF KOLKATA METRO CONSTRUCTION BY CUT AND COVER METHOD N.N.Som Consulting Geotechnical Engineer Former Professor of Civil Engineering Jadavpur University, Kolkata

MAP OF WEST BENGAL SHOWING LOCATION OF CALCUTTA METROPOLITAN DISTRICT

CALCUTTA METROPOLITAN DISTRICT

RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM FOR KOLKATA METRO - FIRST PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION BY CUT AND COVER METHOD

CALCUTTA METRO ALIGNMENT

GEOLOGICAL FEATURES OF CALCUTTA SOIL

SUBSOIL OF KOLKATA : NORMAL CALCUTTA DEPOSIT Soil Properties (average) Description of Strata N blows/30 cm W LL PL Cu mv (%) (%) (%) (t/m2) m2/t Light brown/brownish grey silty clay/clayey silt with occasional lenses of fine sand 5 – 8 30 54 24 4.0 0.002 4 II. Grey/dark grey silty clay, clayey silt with semi-decomposed timber pieces 2 – 4 50 55 28 2.5 0.007 14 III Bluish grey silty clay with calcareous modules DEPTH (M) 10 30 60 25 6.0 0.003 20 IV. Brown/yellowish brown sandy silt/silty fine sand with occasional lenses of brown and grey silty clay 20 --- 25 V. Mottled brown/grey silty clay with laminations often with rusty brown spots 20 – 30 30 65 25 10.0 0.002 30 VI Brown /light brown silty fine to medium sand 40 / = 350 40 SUBSOIL OF KOLKATA : NORMAL CALCUTTA DEPOSIT

3 25 30 I. Light grey/brownish grey silty clay/clayey silt I. Light grey/brownish grey silty clay/clayey silt 3 IIA. Grey / light grey fine to medium sand DEPTH (M) N = 15 – 30 blows / 30 cm 25 Mottled brown /grey silty clay with laminations often with rusty brown silt 30 SUBSOIL OF KOLKATA : RIVER CHANNEL DEPOSIT

LENGTH OF FIRST LINE OF KOLKATA METRO – 16. 633 Km Elevated – 1. 228 Km. Surface – 0. 270 Km. Underground – 15. 135 Km Sheet Piles : 0.356 Km. H-Pile with Timber Lagging : 0.684 Km. Diaphragm Wall : 12.687 Km. Shield Tunnel : 1.090 Km.

OPEN CUT IN MAIDAN AREA

Dessiccated Brownish grey silty clay 0 (m) STRUT 1 Dessiccated Brownish grey silty clay - 1.5 - 2.0 Cu = 4 t/m2 - 3.8 2 - 6.0 Grey / dark grey silty clay with decomposed wood - 6.5 3 - 9.0 - 9.5 Cu = 2.5 t/m2 - 13.2 4 - 11.0 - 11.5 - 13.5 Bluish grey silty clay with kankar Cu = 6 t/m2 - 17.2 Yellowish Brown sandy silt with clay N = 21 - 37 TYPICAL EXCAVATION PROFILE OF CUT-AND-COVER CONSTRUCTION WITH DIAPHRAGM WALL AND STRUTS

SHIELD TUNNELLING BETWEEN BELGACHIA AND SHYAMBAZAR F I L L + 1.80 = 1.9 t/m3 Cu = 3 t/m2 Brownish grey clayey silt - 0.12 Grey silty clay / clayey silt  = 1.9 t/m3 - 2.00 Silt with Decayed Wood LL = 58 PL = 32 Cu = 2 t/m2 W = 50 T u n n e l s - 8.00 = 1.9 t/m3 Cu = 3 t/m2 Bluish grey silty clay LL = 1.9 t/m3 PL = 3.6 t/m2 - 13.00 Brown silty fine sand - 19.50 SHIELD TUNNELLING BETWEEN BELGACHIA AND SHYAMBAZAR

BRACED CUT WITH DIAPHRAGM WALL Excavation & Strutting Box Construction Backfilling

STABILITY AGAINST BOTTOM HEAVE IN STRATIFIED SOIL C N + γ3D + γ D + å C (H + D + D ) /D F = u 4 c 2 4 f u 2 f 1 å γ (H + D + D ) 2 γ STABILITY AGAINST BOTTOM HEAVE IN STRATIFIED SOIL

GUIDE WALL FOR DIAPHRAGM WALL TRENCH

REINFORCEMENT CAGE OF DIAPHRAGM WALL

DESIGN OF BRACED CUTS

Adjacent building movement Buckled struts Wall position Movement of wall (a) (b) Water pressure Bottom heave (c) (d) Sand and/or gravel bottom BRACED CUT : MODES OF FAILURE (WINTERKORN & FANG 1972)

GROUND SETTLEMENT FOR EXCAVATION BELOW 1ST STRUT

WALL DEFLECTION IN SEQUENTIAL EXCAVATION AND STRUTTING (CONCEPTUAL)

APPARENT EARTH PRESSURE DIAGRAM IN BRACED CUT (PECK 1969)

GROUND SETTLEMENT IN BRACED CUT WITH SHEET PILE SUPPORT (PECK 1969)

INSTRUMENTATION

OBJECTIVE To Study Earth Pressure on Diaphragm Wall Diaphragm Wall Movement Strut Load Ground Settlement

CALCUTTA METRO CUT : LOCATION OF INSTRUMENTED TEST SECTIONS BETWEEN GIRISH PARK AND M. G. ROAD STATION

LOCATION OF EARTH PRESSURE CELLS IN DIAPHRAGM WALL

FLUID PRESSURE MEASURED BY EARTH PRESSURE CELLS IN DIAPHRAGM WALL TRENCH BEFORE CONCRETING

GROUND SETTLEMENT MEASURING POINTS Concrete Cover G.L Pit 600x600 600 50 mm Lean Concrete Settlement Stud GROUND SETTLEMENT MEASURING POINTS

PORE PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION AS MEASURED BY VIBRATING WIRE PIEZOMETERS

EARTH PRESSURE ON DIAPHRAGM WALL BEFORE COMMENCEMENT OF EXCAVATION

VALUES OF IN – SITU KO Depth Location Location Location Average (m) 1 2 3 2 1.65 0.77* 0.55* 1.0 4 1.70 0.85 0.80 6 0.95 0.85 0.73 8 0.83 1.16 0.70 10 0.70 0.84 0.65 0.70 12 0.67 0.90 0.60 13.5 0.50 0.80 0.70 16 0.37 0.48 0.30 0.50 17.5 0.44 0.65 0.45 * Low values due to inadequate seating

DIAPHRAGM WALL DEFLECTION AT DIRRERENT STAGES OF EXCAVATION

MEASURED STRESSES ON DIAPHRAGM WALL AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF EXCAVATION

SUMMARY OF MEASURED EARTH PRESSURE AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF EXCAVATION

COMPARISTON OF EARTH PRESSURE BY PECK’S METHOD AND OBSERVED DATA Depth Method Maximum earth m Depth at which pressure linear variation changes to constant pressure m (t/m2) (m) 10.0 Peck 10.8 0.80 2.5 Observation 12.5 0.55 6.0 12.0 Peck 12.0 1.00 3.0 Observation 17.0 0.50 7.2 13.6 Peck 15.0 1.00 4.4 Observation 18.0 0.65 8.2

FORCES ON DIAPHRAGM WALL

FORCES ON DIAPHRAGM WALL

DISTANCE FROM EXCAVATION MAX. DEPTH OF EXCAVATION VARIATION OF GROUND SETTLEMENT AT DIFFERENCE TEST SECTIONS

CONSTRUCTION CONTROL

CONTROL PARAMETERS PARAMETERS Effect on Adjoining Buildings Settlement at Different Stages of Excavation Angular Distortion of Buildings Placement of Strut Time Effect

FIELD MEASUREMENTS Observations Settlement of Plinth / floor Tilt Cracks in Walls / Floors

EFFECT ON ADJOINING BUILDINGS Observations Settlement of Plinth / floor Tilt Cracks in Walls / Floors

GROUP A BUILDINGS : 60 Buildings Monitored Small and Minor Damages in the form of * Cracks & Minor Tilts * No Structural Distress * No Detailed Observation done except monitoring cracks & tilts

GROUP B BUILDINGS 28 Buildings Required Detailed Study Moderate to severe damages Temporary Protective Measures Final Rectification after Construction

MAXIMUM SETTLEMENT OF BUILDINGS

Time of Construction

Building Settlement at Different Stages of Excavation

TIME EFFECT

SETTLEMENT OF ADJACENT BUILDINGS : EFFECT OF TIME OF CONSTRUCTION

SETTLEMENT OF PREMISES NO. 161, C. R. AVENUE : EFFECT OF TIME