Developing a common approach for typology and classification of inland waters in the Nordic region Anders Hobæk Norwegian Institute for Water Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
River Fish Intercalibration group Coordination: D. Pont,Cemagref, France) N. Jepsen (JRC Ispra)
Advertisements

The implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive in Norway Eva Skarbøvik and Stig A. Borgvang Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA) with.
PROJECT :EVK PROGRAMME:EESD-ESD-3 THEMATIC PRIORITY:EESD WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE.
October 31 st, 2007 – “BLACK SEA CELEBRATION DAY” - CONSTANTA.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IN HUNGARY Eszter HAVAS-SZILÁGYI Ministry of Transport and Water Management Eszter HAVAS-SZILÁGYI Ministry.
Powerpoint Templates Page 1 Powerpoint Templates Black Sea Basin Directorate – presentation of the scope, responsibilities and project interests Mrs. TANYA.
Monitoring macroinvertebrater in Norwegian rivers? Torleif Bækken, NIVA.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification River.
NGIG lake fish IC ECOSTAT meeting, Ispra 21 March 2012 MIKKO OLIN 1, MARTTI RASK 2, FIONA KELLY 3, KERSTIN HOLMGREN 4 & TRYGVE HESTHAGEN 5 1 University.
Austrian Approach for Identification of Water Bodies Workshop on Identification of Surface Water Bodies Brussels, 25/26 September 2003 Birgit Vogel Austrian.
CLASSIFICATION OF RIVERS AND LAKES
Water Bodies in Europe: Integrated Systems to assess Ecological Status and Recovery Funded under FP7, Theme 6: Environment (including Climate Change) Contract.
Framework for the intercalibration process  Must be simple  Aiming to identify and resolve big inconsistencies with the normative definitions and big.
FI: Ansa Pilke and Liisa Lepisto, Finnish Environment Institute NO: Dag Rosland, Norwegian National Pollution Control Authority Anne Lyche Solheim, Norwegian.
WISER Water bodies in Europe: Integrative Systems to assess Ecological status and Recovery.
Peter Kristensen Europan Environment Agency
NE ATLANTIC GEOGRAPHICAL INTERCALIBRATION GROUP (NEA GIG)
REFCOND EU Water Framework Directive project funded by the European Commission DG Environment Included in the EU Water Directors “Common Strategy on.
IC network selection process
Results of the metadata analysis Meeting of the Working Group 2A on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT) March 4-5 , 2004, Ispra, Italy Peeter Nõges Anna-Stiina.
Types, Pressures and Quality Elements - Rivers
CW-TW Intercalibration results
ECOSTAT WG 2A, JRC - Ispra (I), 7-8 July 2004
Task 1 - Intercalibration WG 2A ECOSTAT - Intercalibration
CIS-Workshop on River Basin Management Plans
SoE Guidance – Biological reporting sheets
Lakes - Central GIG progress report July 2004
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Intercalibration process - state of play Wouter van de Bund & Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Ana Cristina Cardoso & Mark Dowell
Dr. Ursula Schmedtje ICPDR Secretariat
Alpine GIG - Rivers Gisela Ofenböck
Task on harmonization WFD Annex V 1.3.6
Expert drafting group on lakes report:
Carolin Meier & Daniel Hering (University of Duisburg-Essen)
Development of a protocol for identification of reference conditions, and boundaries between high, good and moderate status in lakes and watercourses (REFCOND)
Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom
COAST Lisbon February Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom.
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
COAST Intercalibration Types Ispra March
Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom
The normal balance of ingredients
Broad European types of lakes and rivers
CBriv GIG Macrophyte Intercalibration Status Overview
Northern GIG - Organisation
Nutrient Standards: Proposals for further work
Update on progress since last WG meeting (13-14 June 2002)
Outcome of 2^ Seminar of the WG 2.7 Roma, January
on a protocol for Intercalibration of Surface Water
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
EU Water Framework Directive
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
ECOSTAT 2013 – 2015 Tasks and Deliverables
WG 2.3 REFCOND Progress report for the SCG meeting 30 Sep-1 Oct 2002
EU Water Framework Directive
FITTING THE ITALIAN METHOD FOR EVALUATING LAKE ECOLOGICAL QUALITY FROM BENTHIC DIATOMS (EPI-L) IN THE “PHYTOBENTHOS CROSS-GIG” INTERCALIBRATION EXERCISE.
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
Intercalibration: problems of selecting types
Juhani Gustafsson, Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE
Claire Vincent - EHS United Kingdom
Presented by Ana Cristina Cardoso
ASSIGNING WATER BODY TYPES IN THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION Wouter van de Bund EC Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and sustainability,
River Fish Intercalibration group D. Pont,Cemagref, France)
Working Group D Reporting, Brussels 31 March – 1 April 2008
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE
EU Water Framework Directive
Typology and Intercalibration Typology System
History EU+Norway Water Directors meeting in Paris Oct 2000 Member States and the European Commission agreed in Paris to developed a Common Strategy.
Joint REFCOND and Intercalibration Meeting
Deriving river TP standards from lake standards
Presentation transcript:

Developing a common approach for typology and classification of inland waters in the Nordic region Anders Hobæk Norwegian Institute for Water Research

Project aim Evaluate the suggested Nordic core types according to applicability and possible usefulness in a forthcoming international intercalibration exercise according to Water Framework Directive (WFD).

Project organisation Coordinated efforts funded by the Nordic Council of Ministers Finland, Sweden, Norway, some integration with Denmark Four workshops, compilation of national monitoring data between workshops

The Nordic Ecoregion I Kart!!

The Nordic Ecoregion (II)

Approach Evaluate common core types of water bodies in the Nordic Ecoregion based on preliminary typology by JRC Ispra Assess availability of monitoring data for all quality elements Suggest preliminary sites for inter-calibration of common water body types

Typology: Common Criteria Geography Climate Geology Ecoregions, biogeography Lowland, Boreal, Highland Siliceous Low Alk. (<0.2 meq/L ) Siliceous Moderate Alk. (0.2 - 1 meq/L) Calcareous (Alk >0.2 - 1 meq/L ) Peat (colour > 30 mgPt/L) Clear (colour < 30 mgPt/L)

Typology: Lake criteria Size (Area) Mean Depth Small (0.5 - 5 km2) Medium (5 - 40 km2) Large (>40 km2) Very shallow (<3 m) Shallow (3-15 m) Deep (>15 m) => 9*12*3 = 384 potential lake types ...

Nordic Lake Types

Lake Quality Elements

Typology: River Criteria Catchment (system A) Small (10-100 km2) Medium (100-1,000 km2) Large (1,000 - 10,000 km2)

Nordic River Types

River Quality Elements

Water body type validation Correspondence analysis of species abundance (Reciprocal averaging) Weighted lake scores, test for significant differences between lake types (ANOVA) Example: Phytoplankton, 16 lake types, - only potential reference lakes - disregard lake size and ecoregion

Reciprocal averaging, sorted

Site score correlations

Type validation, phytoplankton

Species contribution to site scores => indicator species ?

Further work (?) What can be made of questionable types? Handle high altitude lakes Include additional types Reference conditions, including lowlands Common test of the morpho-edaphic index for estimating [P], with inclusion of humic content