Water Quality Protection Zones

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Siskiyou County Land Development Manual 2006 Update Planning Commission Hearing Land Development Manual Update.
Advertisements

LID Overview Low Impact Development “Redefining Storm Water” In Mecklenburg County Presented by: David Woodie, PE, CPSWQ Project Manager, Charlotte-Mecklenburg.
Stream Corridors Christine Hall Natural Resources Conservation Service North Jersey RC&D Slides 1-12.
IV. 1 IV. Overview Of State Standards A.SS1-97: Requirement for Flood Study Technical Documentation.
Regulatory Context Natural Environment Chapter Tukwila Comprehensive Plan.
City of Sunset Valley Drainage Master Plan Assessment Final Recommendation Report March 24, 2009.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) Project Implementation.
Proposed Stormwater Regulations Public Forum Richland County Government September 2009.
Draft Kane County 2040 Green Infrastructure Plan Energy and Environment Committee November 14, 2013.
Carson City Freeway Paul M. Frost, P.E. Principal Hydraulic Engineer Nevada Department of Transportation Mark E. Forest, P.E. Executive Vice-President.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
& Community Design LSU Green Laws Research Project Green Laws Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry EBR Parish Tree And Landscape Commission Louisiana.
Stevens-Rugg Brook: Diversion Structure Improvement Alternatives St Albans, Vermont.
Shale Gas Drilling Deep Creek watershed SURFACE DRILLING CONSTRAINTS SPATIAL ANALYSIS EXERCISE.
Northeast Corridor Greenway Acquisition – Mitigation Feasibility Study Results City Council Workshop June 24, 2014.
State of Water: Minnesota’s Lakes, Rivers and Wetlands John Jaschke Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Nov 13, 2014.
Examples for Mitigation Category 1 and 2 Streams.
Ch  Know what design frequency means  Know how to delineate a drainage area on a topographic map 2.
Every Acre Counts The Newfound Watershed Master Plan Land Conservation Priorities In the Newfound Lake Watershed January 23, 2015 Dan Sundquist GreenFire.
LCRA Highland Lakes Watershed Ordinance
Ecology and environment, inc. International Specialists in the Environment The McKinstry Creek & Riparian Area NYSDOT Rt. 219 Mitigation Project Analysis.
Crafting Stormwater Programs Oregon Coastal Planners Fall Network Meeting October 9, 2008 Florence Event Center Alissa Maxwell, PE.
1 ELEMENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PLANNING APPROACH Issued May 2009 Level II: Introduction to Design Education and Certification for Persons.
Rush Creek: A Story of Redemption. Arlington Stormwater Division  Stormwater Division of Public Works is:  Engineers  Education  Environmental Compliance.
Integration Of Stormwater Master Plans with Watershed Plans The Link between Flooding and Development September 23, 2008 Bob Murdock, P.E., CFM.
Ohio Balanced Growth Program Best Local Land Use Practices Development Incentives Kirby Date, AICP, Cleveland State University.
Summit #1 San Juan County Shoreline Master Program Update March 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd
Protective Regulations Ohio Lake Erie Commission Best Local Land Use Practices January, 2007 Kirby Date, Countryside Program Coordinator.
Agua Hedionda Watershed Management Plan Watershed Planning Group Meeting June 5, 2008 Carlsbad, CA.
Planning a World-Class Greenway System for Greenville County Presented by: Charles A. Flink, FASLA President Greenways Incorporated.
Slide Title Use this slide style primarily for text Title Subtitle goes here Ames Post Construction Ordinance Eric Cowles, PE City of Ames.
Stormwater 101 Ohio Lake Erie Commission Best Local Land Use Practices Kirby Date, AICP.
Applying Stream Buffer Science to the Lake George Watershed Lake George Stream Corridor Management Stakeholder Meeting May 28, 2008.
CleanWaterManagementTrustFund Clean Water Management Trust Fund Need For program History of CWMTF Eligible projects Examples of Projects Across State Questions.
Bassett Creek Water Management Commission Joint Advisory Group Meeting January 23, 2001.
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Stormwater Overview Board of County Commissioners Planning Conference March 1, 2007.
Cumberland Park CCB Project Virginia Department of Environmental Quality October 9, 2007.
SAGHA Annual Homeowners Meeting August 28, Agenda  Collect ballots  Treasurer’s Report  Common Area Maintenance Presentation  Election Results.
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN Prince George’s County MNCPP-C Draft: December, 2004.
Kitsap County Department of Community Development Updating Kitsap County’s Shoreline Master Program (SMP) – process overview, public outreach, involvement.
Mason’s Stormwater Utility Program Kathleen Wade-Dorman, P.E. City of Mason.
Planning Commission Public Hearing: SUB Proposed 6-lot Subdivision at Bland Circle December 2, 2015.
Update: Where We Are and Feedback Lake George Stream Corridor Management Stake Holder Meeting June 25, 2008.
Riparian Buffers And Their Role In Coastal Georgia By Jackie Jackson & Bethany Jewell Water Resource Planners.
1 Community Hydrology in a Watershed World The Fulton County Experience Amy Bergbreiter, PE, CFM Monica Urisko, PE, CFM.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
“State Road 100 MPC Lots” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing November 17, 2015.
Sustainable Vineyard Practices Replanting Strategies & Economics December 13, 2012 Conditional Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements Vineyards in Napa.
Community Development Department Ryan’s Landing Planned Unit Development Application No
J5 UDC Amendment Clustering January 20, 2015 Chance Sparks, Director of Planning.
City of Clarksville Storm Water Management Manual Revisions 2014.
GREEN GROWTH TOOLBOX Wildlife & Natural Resource Stewardship in Planning Wildlife & Natural Resource Stewardship in Planning Black-crowned night heron.
City of Fort Collins REGULATORY CHANGES AFTER A NATURAL DISASTER Susan L. Duba Hayes, PE, CFM CASFM 2005.
Andrew Lyon and Daniel Storm Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering
Why Watersheds Matter Tuesday, August 16, 2016
Jefferson County SA Red Rocks Site Approval
Chagrin River Watershed Partners, Inc. January 19, 2008
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
Integrating Wetlands and Watershed Management: Lessons from the U.S.
Marina Del Palma Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Map Amendment
Minnesota Resort and Campground Association Fall Conference
By: Lucas Hendrickson, Ian Strasburg, John Koets, and Shenquan Li
Land Use and Zoning Committee Special Workshop
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Regulation Amendment AM April 3, 2018.
Pre-Proposal Conference March 27, 2019, 1:00 p.m.
One Company. Unlimited Potential.
City of Austin Watershed Protection Department CIP Project design/implementation Thank you for the opportunity to show the committee what the Watershed.
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality Protection Zones Kathryn L. Walker City of Norman City Attorney’s Office

Storm Water Master Plan Began in 2007 after citizen-led development of a scope of work and RFP process Identified Goals Reduce flooding dangers Protect water quality Enhance the environment Advance recreational opportunities (studied separately through the Greenway Master Plan)

Storm Water Master Plan – Methodology Analyzed 36 watersheds – problem areas received more detailed study Hydrologic analyses performed for 307 square miles of drainage area Hydraulic analyses and floodplain mapping developed for almost 400 stream miles (59 miles of detailed stream analysis and 333 miles of approximate stream analysis)

Storm Water Master Plan – Key Points Focus on stream flooding, stream erosion, water quality and local drainage Although existing conditions were reviewed, the identification and evaluation of flooding along major streams focused on future build-out watershed conditions (Norman 2025 land use plan)

Storm Water Master Plan Water Quality - Key Issues Utilizing structural and non-structural water quality controls in new developments including low impact development techniques Providing enhanced maintenance of creeks and storm water detention facilities in existing and new developments Incorporating regulatory floodplain or “Stream Planning Corridors” dedications in new developments Area inundated by the 100 year flood assuming full build-out conditions in those areas with 40 or more acres of drainage area

Sources of Information Publications and Model Ordinances EPA Model Ordinance to Protect Local Resources Protecting Stream & River Corridors, UGA Buffer Protection & Management Ordinance, Baltimore, MD Vegetated Riparian Buffers & Buffer Ordinance, State of South Carolina Ordinances in Other Cities Lenexa, KS San Antonio, TX Austin, TX Overland Park, KS Kansas City, MO Tulsa, OK (regulatory floodplain)

WQPZ – Process for Adoption Public Meeting to review regional approaches and how they would apply in Norman – Dec. 2009 Internal drafting – 1 year Meetings of SW Task Force – 5 + months Planning Commission recommendation – June 2011 City Council adoption – June 2011

WQPZ Regulations - Structure Part of Norman’s subdivision regulations Limited to new applications for Preliminary Plats and Norman Rural Certificates of Survey for developments in the Lake Thunderbird watershed A WQPZ would be designated along each stream to serve as a natural vegetative buffer on new or expired (and not grandfathered in ) plats and certificates of survey

What is a WQPZ? A vegetated strip of land that lies along a Stream or Lake Thunderbird and its adjacent wetlands, floodplains or slopes that is comprised of the stream bed and areas adjacent to the stream bed

WQPZ – How big is it? Base width – the greater of 100 feet in width, measured from top of bank, on each side of the stream; or Designated full build-out floodplain; or Designated FEMA floodplain

WQPZ Base Width – When it Decreases Water quality targets must be met thru approved engineered process (using Wichita/Sedgwick County Stormwater Manual) Phosphorus – 58% removal Nitrogen – 75% removal Must document protection against flooding and bank erosion anticipated from the 1% flood assuming full-buildout in those areas with 40 or more acres of drainage area Base width reduced to 25 feet

WQPZ Base Width – When It Increases Slope of a 25 feet segment is over 20% (increase by 25 feet) Stream is a 2nd order stream with continuous water (increase by 25 feet) Stream is 3rd order and higher (increase by 25 feet)

Significance of WQPZ Designated on plat No structures or septic systems in the zone except structural controls or other enhancing design features Protective covenants required to limit activity in the WQPZ in perpetuity

Other Features Allows for modification of Norman’s current Engineering Design Criteria to accommodate Low Impact Development strategies Drainage easement required to be granted to City for area flooded in a 1% rainfall event Buffer averaging allowed to accommodate unusual development patterns, shallow lots, stream crossings or storm water ponds

Questions?