BTeV Muon Trigger Algorithm: Timing: R&D: Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VDC Tracking P.E. Ulmer Old Dominion University Expert … or, nobody else wanted to talk about it; You decide Hall A Analysis Workshop December 11, 2001.
Advertisements

Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
SiD PFA Status and Calorimeter Performance Ron Cassell (SLAC) SiD Design Study Meeting 11/15/08.
Tentative flow chart of CMS Multi-Muon analysis 1 – DATASETS 2 - RESOLUTIONS 3 – FAKE RATES 4 – NUCLEAR INT MODEL 5 – IP TEMPLATES MODEL 6 – SAMPLE COMPOSITION.
TRACK DICTIONARY (UPDATE) RESOLUTION, EFFICIENCY AND L – R AMBIGUITY SOLUTION Claudio Chiri MEG meeting, 21 Jan 2004.
HLT - data compression vs event rejection. Assumptions Need for an online rudimentary event reconstruction for monitoring Detector readout rate (i.e.
HiT – Higgs and Top (Thursday, June 22, 2000) 1.News - Boaz/Meenakshi 2.Trigger Simulator Status – who?? 3.Proposal for a HiT workshop – Meenakshi/Boaz.
DSP online algorithms for the ATLAS TileCal Read Out Drivers Cristobal Cuenca Almenar IFIC (University of Valencia-CSIC)
Atmospheric Neutrino Event Reconstruction Andy Blake Cambridge University June 2004.
Increasing Field Integral between Velo and TT S. Blusk Sept 02, 2009 SU Group Meeting.
Fall 2001CS 4471 Chapter 2: Performance CS 447 Jason Bakos.
GLAST LAT Project Test Beam Meeting, June 6, 2006 S. Funk 1/6 PS Positron Simulations Stefan Funk June 6, 2006.
A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.
L3 Muon Trigger at D0 Status Report Thomas Hebbeker for Martin Wegner, RWTH Aachen, April 2002 The D0 muon system Functionality of the L3 muon trigger.
Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.
H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.
Level 3 Muon Software Paul Balm Muon Vertical Review May 22, 2000.
Darren Price – HLT B-trigger offline status report :: B-Physics meeting July 23 rd ‘08Page 1 HLT B-trigger offline monitoring status Darren Price, LANCASTER.
Archana Sharma, Suman Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan Updates on the RPC trigger efficiency work with data driven.
STS track recognition by 3D track-following method Gennady Ososkov, A.Airiyan, A.Lebedev, S.Lebedev, E.Litvinenko Laboratory of Information Technologies.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
March 13, 2002 Daniel Whiteson L3 tracking - muons! Daniel Whiteson LBL.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
A. BHASIN ALICE offline Software Week 13th June 2002 Dimuon High Lelvel Trigger (DHLT) ● Goals ● FM Algorithm ● Proposal for a new Algorithm.
Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.
1 Pad Chamber Simulation Results for Muon Trigger Upgrade 10/13/2003 Muon Trigger Upgrade meeting.
W/Z Plan For Winter Conferences Tom Diehl Saclay 12/2001.
PFA on sidloi3: update Ron Cassell 4/27/10. 2 Proposed changes Calibration Tracking Extrapolation Subcluster finding Muon finding Structure.
1 Occupancy, Rate Effects & Combinatorial Background By Rusty Towell January 8, 2009.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
1 Offline Week, October 28 th 2009 PWG3-Muon: Analysis Status From ESD to AOD:  inclusion of MC branch in the AOD  standard AOD creation for PDC09 files.
EM resolutions from low to high energy Jan Stark, LPSC Grenoble CAT Force meeting, May 13 th, 2003.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
MuID Twopack Efficiencies: Measurements with Cosmic Rays & High Voltage inforamtion.
Data vs MC … issues of the K +- group 1.Accidentals … contribution from Erika & Roberto 2.DC background.
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
The BTeV Pixel Detector and Trigger System Simon Kwan Fermilab P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA BEACH2002, June 29, 2002 Vancouver, Canada.
UIUC - BTeV Muon Trigger S. Davis, M. Haney, M. Selen, Use FPGA hardware + DSP algorithms to find tracks in muon detector subsystem. –Must provide adequate.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Mats Selen, HEP Measuring Strong Phases, Charm Mixing, and DCSD at CLEO-c Mats Selen, University of Illinois HEP 2005, July 22, Lisboa, Portugal.
ΜTPC Reconstruction Status Report (…mostly a late night / weekend project … ) D. A. Jensen March 1, 2007.
OD Tuning: SK-IV Roger Wendell TMC Meeting
Using IP Chi-Square Probability
F2F Tracking Meeting, Prague 12/12/2013
Developments of the PWG3 muon analysis code
Time Independent Analysis
Speed How fast does it go?.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
2000 Diffuse Analysis Jessica Hodges, Gary Hill, Jodi Cooley
Fast Track Fitting in the SiD01 Detector
eV-TEK Andrew Phillips Ben Laskowski Rob Swanson Shannon Abrell
Update on LHCb Level-1 trigger
Missing B-tracks in L1 trigger
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
J/Y Simulations for Trigger
Samples and MC Selection
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Chapter 2: Performance CS 447 Jason Bakos Fall 2001 CS 447.
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
A brief Update on secondary vertex tagged jets
Presentation transcript:

BTeV Muon Trigger Algorithm: Timing: R&D: Overview Mats Selen Aug 25, 2003 Algorithm: Overview Efficiency & Rejection Timing: Results of running DSP based trigger code on a large sample of Monte Carlo events. R&D: What's Next.

Muon system has 3 stations with 4 views each (R,U,V,S)

How to trigger on muon tracks: In each octant: For a given view (R,U,V, or S): Examine correlations between hit tubes in all 3 stations

Distance-To-Plane Cut R2 R0 R1 Distance-To-Plane Cut Muon tracks line on a simple plane: R2 = 27.69 - 1.26*R0 + 2.20*R1 (R0,R1,R2) in raw “tube numbers” muon tracks uds events Distance to “plane” s=1.5 tubes good m events R2 R0 R1 Strategy: Cut on closest distance to this plane for each crossing/octant/view.

Determining track charge is simple ! All we need to do is look at R2 vs R0. R0 R2 = 1.275*R0 -125

Crude kinematic measurements are also possible: Ptotal Not exploited further in this study. Can (for example) imagine calculating a crude dimuon mass. R0 R2 Sin2q R0

Di-Muon Trigger: m+ m- Look for tracks by octant. Look for tracks in one or more views (R,U,V or S). Tag each octant as NO, POS or NEG A “dimuon” event has at least one POS and one NEG octant

Example Trigger Study Conditions for these plots: Use all 384 tubes/view (also studied using only the outermost 352, 320 tubes) “2/4” and “3/4” means that 2 and 3 planes respectively, out of the possible 4, were needed to pass “D-Cut” to identify a track in an octant.

D-cut = 1 <N> = 2 Dimuon Trigger Efficiency vs. Tube Hit Efficiency (this example is for Cut = 1) There is a large parameter space that yields e > 60% and Rej > 500

Performance vs. <N> (average number of min-bias events/crossing) “3/4”, e = 97% Even for <N> = 5 we can get a rejection of ~ 500 with an efficiency of ~ 60%.

Size & Speed Work done by UIUC ECE grad student John Cassel: Ported RTES file-I/O code to the muon trigger. Implement “clock-cycle” counting technique for timing tests. Re-wrote & optimized PC code for DSP (i.e. made it run fast !! ) DSP results for efficiency & rejection agree with PC! TMS320C6711

Executable Code: 91.3 kBytes <Time> = 760 ticks (~6 ms @ 133 MHz) <Time> = 1686 ticks (~13 ms @ 133 MHz) Unless something changes, speed is not an issue.

Muon Trigger Status Work to date is a “existence proof”. Trigger algorithm in good shape. Speed adequate. System will evolve as design continues

BTeV Future You tell us!