Interoperability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

PORTFOLIO.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Developing and Supporting Highly Effective Teachers in Every Classroom Leaders of Learning Implementation Norman Public Schools Date.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Web Conferences to develop awareness of the Ministry of Education’s Financial Literacy Initiative Financial Literacy… Continuing the conversation.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Welcome to I-CAT Training! Iowa Core Outcome 4 …increase the degree of alignment of each and every student’s enacted curriculum … to the Iowa Core I A.
Differentiating Instruction Professional Development.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
1 PD3 P rofessional D evelopment D ecisions Using D ata.
Learning4Life or Lifelong learning? Warren Goetzel, PhD GaETC – CTO Clinic Atlanta, GA 2013.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
Q Education Transform Resources. Intel® is Committed to Transforming Education for the Next Generation Intel supports education transformation 
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
AdvancED Accreditation External Review October 23-26, 2016
Course Director’s Strategy Day
Instructional Design Groundwork:
This training references results from the 2017 TELL Kentucky Survey available online at The intent is to begin discussion among staff.
A community of learners improving our world
Oregon Mentoring Program
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Interact 2: Communicating
Education Transform Resources
Session 4, Grading Practices
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Digital Learning rEvolution Program
its MANY benefits of investing time and effort
Superintendents.
Connectivity.
By Pam Rumage and Carmen Carr White Station Middle School
Best Practices.
Digital Citizenship.
Essential Components.
Collaborative Leadership
Instructional Materials
Procurement.
School Boards.
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Homework Gap.
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
A3 – Improving State Level Supports and Stakeholder Engagement through Effective Evaluation Kim Gulbrandson, Justyn Poulos – Wisconsin RtI Center Key.
What have we learned, where do we need to go?
Budget.
2018 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
About SETDA SETDA is a 15 year old non-profit that serves, supports, and represents U.S. state digital learning leaders. Mission is to build and increase.
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Professional Learning
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Student Data & Privacy.
Employee engagement Delivery guide
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
The Nuts and Bolts of National Board Certification
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Re-Framing Agendas: From the Personal to the Policy Level
Feedback from Teacher Superintendent Council & Next Steps
Key Initiative: Student Success
Improving academic performance Building language skills Developing critical thinking Expressing ideas and opinions Ask the audience: What are the core.
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Presentation transcript:

Interoperability

Session Overview Welcome & Introductions Background Exemplar Rapid Fire Presentations Overview of Interoperability Standards Brainstorming Activity Diagram It Activity Policies Reflection & Wrap-Up Introduce yourself, review the key sections and any logistics for the session.

Purpose of the Workshop Provide participants with the opportunity to gain knowledge and resources to better understand interoperability standards and how to best address interoperability needs as current technology based education resources are reviewed and new resources are considered for purchase. Refer to FG, Page 1-2.

Objectives Understand interoperability needs Review national interoperability standards and tools Hear from exemplars on how to overcome challenges Interact with your peers to learn what tools they use Develop and maintain relationships with other district and state leaders Refer to FG, Page 1-2.

Rank Yourself Activity 10 – I’m an expert and I am looking forward to sharing my expertise. 7 – I deal with this topic regularly however, I’m here to learn more from others. 5 – I know enough to be dangerous. 3 – I have a general idea of the topic however, this is an area of growth for me. 1 – I know this is an important topic so I am here to learn. Introduce the welcome activity to help you better understand who is in the audience and to get participants engaged. Refer to FG, Welcome Activity, page 2 for activity instructions

Overview School leaders and educators lack the ability to easily transform data to information to Guide decisions about instruction, school administration, and operations. Systems used to collect, manage, analyze, and report on data are often disconnected and don’t work well together Provide background information Refer to FG, Background, page 3-4.

Overview Aggregate data accumulated over years and from multiple sources can be used for program evaluation Information generated through digital learning and various applications can track a specific student’s progress over time Information can be made accessible to teachers and parents through real-time reporting tools

Digital Learning & Interoperability Refer to FG, Background, page 3. Video Link https://youtu.be/OgxrAtKzHn4

Discussion Questions How has your school/district addressed interoperability needs? Has your school/district addressed the legal provisions and disclosures about student records? How has your school/district addressed student and family access to a student’s personal data—such as test results or the need for special accommodations? How has your district/school addressed data storage?

Exemplar Rapid Fire Presentations Add presenter name, district/school Discussion Questions How is your school/district similar to the exemplar? Are there practices shared that your school/district can implement in the short-term? How has your school/district tackled interoperability challenges? How much progress has your district made in establishing minimum standards? Ask one or two exemplar schools/districts to share their background and experience regarding collaborative leadership for learning. The presentations should be 5-7 minutes and prepared in advance of the workshop. Additional information about presentations can be found in the Logistics resource. Refer to FG, Collaborative Leadership for instructions. You can also refer to the Logistics Resource for tips

Interoperability Standards Allow data to flow between applications that are developed by different groups Companies develop products to align to certain standards Ensures compatibility with other products on the market 

Interoperability Standards Standards for student information, assessment, digital content, and other needs have emerged for educational applications Educators should ensure that each product is aligned to the same interoperability standards 

Key Areas of Standards CoSN highlights the most important, widely used, and emerging key areas of standards: Digital content Data connectivity Data integration Authentication, authorization and identity management Portals and portlets File sharing Network infrastructure Digital accessibility

Interoperability Standards Common Education Data Standards (CEDS): CEDS provides a common vocabulary and reference structure through a data dictionary and logical data model for information that needs to be shared across education organizations. IMS Global Learning Consortium Specifications: IMS content, application, and data standards enable teachers to mix and match educational content and software from different sources into the same learning platforms. P20W Education Standards Council (PESC): PESC consists of numerous standards for sharing specific types of education data, such as financial aid, transcript, and admissions information. SIF Implementation Specification is a technical standard that is used by developers of education software to ease the transfer of data among applications in use by schools, districts and state education agencies.

Interoperability Tools Future Ready Schools: Building Technology Infrastructure for Learning guide provides practical, actionable information intended to help district leaders (superintendents, principals, and teacher leaders) navigate the many decisions required to deliver cutting-edge connectivity to students. It presents a variety of options for district leaders to consider when making technology infrastructure decisions, recognizing that circumstances and context vary greatly from district to district. Ed-Fi Alliance is a data model combined with a tool suite that streamlines the sharing of student data and also provides the dashboard elements for educators to improve the academic outcomes of students. OneRoster® is a subset of Learning Information Services (LIS) and focus on a school’s needs to exchange roster information, grades, and related data.

Brainstorming Activity Has your school or district adopted any of these standards? If yes, which ones? Are you familiar with these interoperability tools and resources? Are you using any of these tools? If so, can you provide feedback to the group? Refer to FG, Brainstorming, page 5 for activity instructions

Diagram It Activity Refer to FG, page 6 for activity instructions

Policies Are there local policies/practices that can be updated to support interoperability? Which stakeholders need to be involved in the conversations? Engage the participants in a discussion regarding state and local policies related to interoperability. Refer to FG, page 7

Reflection & Wrap-Up TAB Ask the audience to share one “Ah-Ha” moment from the session discussions and share how they might implement that new information in their work. Take a few moments to reflect on the session, share details about additional events related to the remainder of the day and engage the participants to take action when they return to their schools/districts. Refer to the FG, Reflection, page 7

Wrap Up Think about what tools and resources you can use to: Maintain relationships Encourage collaboration Identify opportunities for on-going professional learning and workshops. Refer to FG, Wrap Up, page 7.

Thank You! Learn more at: Transforming Digital Learning: Toolkit to Support Educators and Stakeholders