SCEC UGMS Committee Meeting No. 6

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PREDICTION OF RESPONSE SPECTRAL PARAMETERS FOR BHUJ EARTHQUAKE (26TH JANUARY 2001) USING COMPONENT ATTENUATION MODELLING TECHNIQUE By DR. SAROSH.H. LODI.
Advertisements

Ground Motion Scaling Based on 1-D Rock Simulations N. Abrahamson NGA Workshop #5 March 24, 2004.
CyberShake Project and ShakeMaps. CyberShake Project CyberShake is a SCEC research project that is a physics-based high performance computational approach.
TBI Committee Members Y. Bozorgnia C.B. Crouse J.P. Stewart
Faults in Focus: Earthquake Science Accomplishments Thomas H. Jordan Director, Southern California Earthquake Cente r 28 February 2014.
Further Development of Site Response in NGA Models PEER Lifelines Program NGA-West2 Project Topic #8 Working Group Meeting Kickoff MeetingApril 20, 2010.
EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models SCEC GMSV Workshop: Summary of Other Validation Methodologies/Applications Nicolas Luco, Research Structural.
1 High Performance Computing at SCEC Scott Callaghan Southern California Earthquake Center University of Southern California.
Panel Discussion: PBEE Practice and Needs Paul Somerville, URS Joe Maffei, R&C Ron Hamburger, SGH Lloyd Cluff, PG&E Tom Shantz, Caltrans Jim Malley, Degenkolb.
103/25/04 NGA Workshop Parameterization of Basin Response Based on 3D Simulations by PEER/SCEC 3D Ground Motion Project Team PI: Steven M. Day San Diego.
Brian Chiou NGA Workshop July 19, 2004 NGA Dataset.
Further Development of Site Response in NGA Models PEER Lifelines Program NGA-West2 Project Topic #8 Working Group Meeting Meeting #2October 26, 2010.
Science for a changing world The USGS and the Development of the Nevada Great Basin Community Velocity Model.
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
Overview of NGA Database, Model Development to Date, and Next Steps PEER-NGA Workshop April 12, 2005.
Database of Ground Motions For NGA East A Presentation by Chris Cramer at the Stakeholder NGA East Workshop NIST Gaithersburg, MD March 7, 2008.
Preliminary Models for PGA and 1-Sec Spectral Acceleration B. Chiou and R. Youngs (NGA Workshop, December 3, 2004)
PEER “Sponsored” Research Projects Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. PEER Associate Director October 9, 2007.
Belgrade, Apr 2013 Radmila Salic, MSc. 2 nd Project Workshop Improvements in the Harmonized Seismic Hazard Maps for the Western Balkan Countries|
LESSONS FROM PAST NOTABLE EARTHQUAKES. Part III Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
WA ST Dept. of Ecology Dam Safety Office Draft Seismic Practice Jerald LaVassar 1, Lead Engineer July
NSF Geoinformatics Project (Sept 2012 – August 2014) Geoinformatics: Community Computational Platforms for Developing Three-Dimensional Models of Earth.
IMPLEMENTATION OF SCEC RESEARCH IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING ONGOING PROJECTS SCEC PROPOSAL TO NSF SCEC 2004 RFP.
Major Ongoing Ground Motion Research Programs at PEER Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. PEER, University of California, Berkeley.
Broadband Ground Motion Simulation Plans Paul Somerville URS SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation Progress Workshop Sept 9, 2012.
AMIT CHOURASIA VISUALIZATION SCIENTIST VISUALIZATION SERVICES SAN DIEGO SUPERCOMPUTER CENTER PRESENTED AT : GEOINFORMATICS 2007, MAY 18 TH VISUAL REPRESENTATION.
Fig. 1. A wiring diagram for the SCEC computational pathways of earthquake system science (left) and large-scale calculations exemplifying each of the.
SCEC Workshop on Earthquake Ground Motion Simulation and Validation Development of an Integrated Ground Motion Simulation Validation Program.
Probabilistic Ground Motions for Scoggins Dam, Oregon Chris Wood Seismotectonics & Geophysics Group Technical Service Center July 2012.
Status of ENA Database of Ground Motions for NGA East A Presentation by Chris Cramer At the NGA East Workshop on Database Development September 29, 2009.
Epistemic Uncertainty on the Median Ground Motion of Next-Generation Attenuation (NGA) Models Brian Chiou and Robert Youngs The Next Generation of Research.
Translating the 2009 Provisions into ASCE 7-10: Ground Motions Maps
Crisis2007. Map data Enter GIS files,.shp (ArcGIS) format Not necessary. Only usefull to see where the sources are.
Engineering Perspective on Application of Simulated Ground Motions Jonathan P. Stewart & Emel Seyhan University of California, Los Angeles Robert W. Graves.
Ground motion simulations in the Pollino region (Southern Italy) for Mw 6.4 scenario events.
Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data (CESMD) Update March 25, 2013 CISN Advisory & Steering Committees Meeting.
Southern California Earthquake Center SCEC Technical Activity Groups (TAGs) Self-organized to develop and test critical methodologies for solving specific.
06/22/041 Data-Gathering Systems IRIS Stanford/ USGS UNAVCO JPL/UCSD Data Management Organizations PI’s, Groups, Centers, etc. Publications, Presentations,
Some General Implications of Results Because hazard estimates at a point are often dominated by one or a few faults, an important metric is the participation.
INCORPORATION OF EARTHQUAKE SOURCE, PROPAGATION PATH AND SITE UNCERTAINTIES INTO ASSESSMENT OF LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL Bob Darragh Nick Gregor Walt Silva.
Phase 1: Comparison of Results at 4Hz Phase 1 Goal: Compare 4Hz ground motion results from different codes to establish whether the codes produce equivalent.
Southern California Earthquake Center CyberShake Progress Update 3 November 2014 through 4 May 2015 UGMS May 2015 Meeting Philip Maechling SCEC IT Architect.
GIS APPLICATIONS IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING: NORTHWEST TURKEY
UCERF3 Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3) 14 Full-3D tomographic model CVM-S4.26 of S. California 2 CyberShake 14.2 seismic hazard.
Southern California Earthquake Center SI2-SSI: Community Software for Extreme-Scale Computing in Earthquake System Science (SEISM2) Wrap-up Session Thomas.
CyberShake and NGA MCER Results Scott Callaghan UGMS Meeting November 3, 2014.
NGA Project Review and Status Norm Abrahamson NGA Workshop #5 March, 2004.
Southern California Earthquake Center CyberShake Progress Update November 3, 2014 – 4 May 2015 UGMS May 2015 Meeting Philip Maechling SCEC IT Architect.
Novel Approach to Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Modeling Vladimir Graizer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Erol Kalkan California Geological Survey.
EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models Updates to Maps for the 2015 NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC)
National Center for Supercomputing Applications University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Recent TeraGrid Visualization Support Projects at NCSA Dave.
Brief summary of Seattle URM Policy Committee actions
NGA Dataset Brian Chiou NGA Workshop #5 March 24, 2004.
SCEC UGMS Committee Meeting
2020 NEHRP Provisions Issues Ground Motion
Project 17 Report to Provisions Update Committee April 12, 2017
NGA-East Tentative Plan
Meeting Objectives Discuss proposed CISM structure and activities
Scott Callaghan Southern California Earthquake Center
NEHRP Research: U.S. Geological Survey
Brazilian “Strong-Motion” Data Stéphane Drouet, ON, Rio de Janeiro Marlon Pirchiner, IAG/USP, São Paulo Marcelo Assumpção, IAG/USP, São Paulo Luis Carlos.
Philip J. Maechling (SCEC) September 13, 2015
LA Basin Story Tectonics Geology Faults Velocity Structure Seismicity
CyberShake Study 17.3 Science Readiness Review
03/24/04 NGA Workshop: Fling.
Norm Abrahamson NGA workshop #5 March 24, 2004
SCEC GMSV Workshop: Overview of Agenda
Southern California Earthquake Center
CyberShake Study 18.8 Technical Readiness Review
Presentation transcript:

SCEC UGMS Committee Meeting No. 6 Utilization of Ground-Motion Simulations to Develop MCER Spectral Acceleration Maps for Los Angeles Region SCEC UGMS Committee Meeting No. 6 May 16, 2016

MCER Sa for 14 Sites (2015)

LAPD MCER

PAS MCER

COO MCER

MCER Response Spectra, Multiple Sites, L.A. Region

Logic Tree for PSHA/DSHA for MCER Source Model G-M Models Weights GMPE Collective Weights for Periods, T - sec   Individual ≤ 1.0 2 3 4 ≥ 5 NGA West2 weight AKS 0.25 BASS 1 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 CB CY UCERF CyberShake 0.2 0.3 0.4

May 16, 2016 UGMS Meeting Present MCER Sa for 50 Additional Sites Deaggregation Data

Deaggregation Plot for L.A.

Site-Response Analysis Purpose: Check Effect on long period response spectra to realistic soil properties in upper 200m

Los Angeles Sites

Proposal for MCER Sa Construction Original 14 sites Additional 50 sites

Logic Tree for PSHA/DSHA for MCER Source Model G-M Models Weights GMPE Collective Weights for Periods, T - sec   Individual ≤ 1.0 2 3 4 ≥ 5 NGA West2 weight AKS 0.25 BASS 1 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 CB CY UCERF CyberShake 0.2 0.3 0.4

1994 Northridge Earthquake Validations 1994 Northridge Earthquake CyberShake Simulations of M~6.7 on Northridge fault Ground motions recorded at stations close to CyberShake grid pts. Ground motions computed from NGA West2 GMPEs

Limitation of Empirical Approach – Los Angeles Lack of Local Strong Motion Records (Only 1994 M6.7 Northridge & 1971 M6.6 San Fernando EQ)

Look-up tool ~ USGS web app tool Goal of UGMS for 2016 MCER Sa maps for L. A. City Amendment to ASCE 7-16 maps for City Resource to City and consultants Look-up tool ~ USGS web app tool

MCER Look-up Tool for L. A. City Enter Site lat./long. Lat. 34.05204 Long. -118.25713 L. A. City Map

MCER Look-up Tool for L. A. City Output Site Class = C VS30 = 390 km/sec Z1.0 = 0.31 km Z2.5 = 2.08 km Table : MCER Sa vs T SDS & SD1 per new rules in Ch. 21 of ASCE 7-16 MCER

UGMS 2016 Schedule for Look-up Tool Finalize calcs in summer/fall Develop tool – start summer; Beta version in fall/winter

What is best approach to accomplish this task? Promotion of “Maps” What is best approach to accomplish this task?