Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Criteria and their Assessment:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Patrick Campbell - March 17, 2009.
Advertisements

Clean Water Act SAFE 210. History/Amendments Recent major amendments were enacted in 1972, 1977, and – Established the National Pollutant Discharge.
1 Nevada Bureau of Water Quality Planning Nevada Water Quality Standards 2011.
Defining Restored Bay and Tidal Tributary Water Quality  Round Two  Draft Revised Oxygen, Water Clarity and Chlorophyll Criteria.
Estuaries Where Fresh Water Meets Salt Water. Estuary Defined An estuary is a partially enclosed body of water formed where fresh water from rivers and.
Notebook Ref 6.3. Questions Tier 3 discussion has been addressed separately... How is Tier 1 / Tier 2 protection applied? ALL waterbodies are protected.
1 State Water Quality Assessments Under the Clean Water Act Charles Spooner Assessment and Watershed Protection Division Monitoring Branch National Water.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Lake Erie HABs Workshop Bill Fischbein Supervising Attorney Water Programs March 16, 2012 – Toledo March 30, Columbus.
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
Water Quality Standards, TMDLs and Bioassessment Tom Porta, P.E. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning.
By Mary Waters, Texas Stream Team. Outline  About the Arroyo Colorado  Basic information (geography)  History  Major uses  Water quality summary.
Chesapeake Bay: An Introduction to an Ecosystem Section 4: Habitats II-1D View this quiz as a slide show from “the beginning” During the slide show, you.
An Overview of Barnegat Bay New Jersey Habitats of the Barnegat Bay Ecosystem OCC 2012.
Chesapeake Bay Hypoxia: History and Management Response Rich Batiuk Associate Director for Science Chesapeake Bay Program Office U.S. Environmental Protection.
Water Quality and the Chesapeake Bay David O’Brien NOAA Fisheries Service Gloucester Point, VA.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its Watershed Scott Phillips, USGS Jonathan.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Inter-Agency Coordination BLM PILOT VERNAL & GLENWOOD SPRINGS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & U.S. Bureau of Land.
Chesapeake Bay Program’s Baywide and Basinwide Monitoring Networks: Options for Adapting Monitoring Networks and Realigning Resources to Address Partner.
Arkansas Water Quality Standards Ryan Benefield Deputy Director.
Indicator Status Updates Overview Nita Sylvester, EPA CBPO Chair of STAR’s Indicator Workgroup.
Clean Water Act Mrs. Perryman Mrs. Trimble. Clean Water Act “Restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters”
The Hydrosphere and Us BPS Our Good Health Depends Upon…  Monitoring of the hydrosphere  Water quality standards  Methods of water treatment.
Water quality challenges in the Bay Delta Estuary.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
Criteria Attainment and Assessing Management Effectiveness Peter Tango CBPO Co-chair Bob Hirsch USGS Staff Expert Katie Foreman May 20,
CHESAPEAKE BAY. Chesapeake as an Estuary An estuary is a semi-enclosed body of water that has a free connection with the sea An estuary is a semi-enclosed.
Environmental Flow Instream Flow “Environmental flow” is the term for the amount of water needed in a watercourse to maintain healthy, natural ecosystems.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
The Iowa Water Quality Standards: an overview Nutrient Science Committee June 13, 2007 John Olson Watershed Monitoring & Assessment Section Iowa DNR.
Canal Restoration Regulatory Background The Clean Water Act, an introduction: Basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into U.S. waters,
Arkansas Dept. of Environmental Quality Regulation No
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
U.S. Clean Water Act: Water Quality Standards Overview
Shirley Birosik Environmental Specialist
Cara Cowan Watts Graduate Student Biosystems Engineering
Use Attainability Analyses & Criteria Development
Use Attainability Analyses & Criteria Development
Great Salt Lake Water Quality Strategy Update
Request Approval of (d) Listing Methodology
Module 45 Water Pollution Laws
Tim Cawthon TCEQ Nonpoint Source Program
Michael, B. D. , Trice, T. M. , Heyer, C. J. , Stankelis, R. M
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Fitting the pieces together
Mike Bira EPA Region 6 NPS Program
Lake Erie HABs Workshop
The Clean Water Acts of 1977, 1981, & 1987
Local Government Advisory Committee
Clean Water Act (CWA) Purpose
Rich Batiuk U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office
Bay Grass Abundance 42% Bay Grass Abundance of Goal Achieved
303(d) List March 9, 2016 WQC Jeff Manning, DWR
TOWARDS THE GOAL OF SETTING NUTRIENT CRITERIA FOR THE DELAWARE ESTUARY
Request for Approval to Proceed to Public Hearing on the Triennial Review of Surface Water Quality Standards.
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
CHESAPEAKE BAY ECOLOGY
Achievement of Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Standards
Frequently asked questions Part I: Objectives and differences in scope of the WFD and BHD Workshop: Biodiversity and Water - Links between EU nature and.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Agricultural Order 4.0 Discussion
Presentation transcript:

Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Criteria and their Assessment: The Monitoring and Assessment Framework Supporting the Chesapeake Bay TMDL Peter Tango, USGS@CBPO ELPR Symposium William and Mary School of Law March 29, 2015 Harding et al. 2012

Law: Clean Water Act (1972) The Clean Water Act (CWA) establishes the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States and regulating quality standards for surface waters.

To understand the importance of criteria we need to ask: What are Water Quality Standards? Standards are the foundation of the water quality- based control program mandated by the Clean Water Act. Water quality standards (WQS) legally binding describe the desired ambient condition (i.e., level of protection) for a waterbody and consist of the following three principle elements: designated uses criteria antidegradation requirements

Criteria Criteria: specify the amounts of various pollutants, in either numeric or narrative form, that may be present in those waters without impairing the designated uses

Monitoring and Assessment Framework Supporting the Chesapeake Bay TMDL Water Quality Criteria Development Management Segmentation Water Quality Criteria Assessment Designated Uses

Outline Monitoring and Assessment Framework Supporting the Chesapeake Bay TMDL Chesapeake Bay Management Segmentation Designated Use Development  Water Quality Criteria Development  Water Quality Criteria Assessment

Chesapeake Bay Segmentation Scheme: Bay Segments

Chesapeake Bay Segmentation Scheme Historical data sets 1949-1980s + Contemporary data 1984-present Boundary Characterization Biological plankton, fish Chemical Salinity Turbidity max D.O. Nutrients Year 1983 1997 2003 2008 Segments 78 89 104 92 (TMDL) USEPA CBPO 2008 Hydrodynamics Bathymetric Geographical

Monitoring Applications supporting Outline Monitoring Applications supporting the Chesapeake Bay TMDL Chesapeake Bay Management Segmentation Designated Use Development

Designated Uses under the Clean Water Act Protection and propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife Recreation Public water supplies Agriculture Industry Navigation Coral reef preservation Marinas Groundwater recharge Aquifer protection Hydroelectric power

Designated Uses under the Clean Water Act Protection and propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife Recreation

Designated Uses under the Clean Water Act coldwater fish, warmwater fish, and shellfish The use may also include protection of aquatic flora Protection and propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife Recreation primary contact secondary contact

Chesapeake Bay Designated Uses Migratory Nursery and Spawning Habitat: Shad, Herring, Perch and Rockfish Spawning Habitat Shallow Water: Bay Grasses Habitat Open Water: Rockfish, Bluefish Menhaden Habitat Benthic Community: Oyster, Crab, Croaker and Spot Habitat Deep Water: Summertime Crab Food Habitat Deep Channel: Seasonal Refuge Source: EPA

Translate Local Habitats Information for Designated Use Delineation 1933 Photo courtesy of W. Boynton. Field survey support GIS coverage mapping of SAV beds Mining our historical and recent aerial photographs Bay Grasses Habitat Chesapeake Bay Photo courtesy of MD DNR/VIMS

Translate the Best Scientific Information available for Designated Use Delineation Migratory Nursery and Spawning Habitat: Shad, Herring, Perch and Rockfish Spawning Habitat Chesapeake Bay Funderburk et al. 1991

Designated Uses Space: Summer Source: EPA Migratory Nursery and Spawning Habitat: Shad, Herring, Perch and Rockfish Spawning Habitat Shallow Water: Bay Grasses Habitat Open Water: Rockfish, Bluefish Menhaden Habitat Benthic Community: Oyster, Crab, Croaker and Spot Habitat Deep Water: Summertime Crab Food Habitat Deep Channel: Seasonal Refuge Summer Source: EPA

Time: Seasonal Space: Summer Fall, Winter Spring Designated Uses Open Water Open Water Source: EPA

Outline Monitoring and Assessment Framework Supporting the Chesapeake Bay TMDL Chesapeake Bay Management Segmentation Designated Use Development Water Quality Criteria Development Water Quality Criteria Assessment

Water Quality Criteria DISSOLVED OXYGEN WATER CLARITY/SAV Historical and Contemporary data CHLOROPHYLL CRITERIA

Water Quality Criteria (e.g. CHLA) CHLOROPHYLL CRITERIA DEVELOPMENT Historical and Contemporary data

Water Quality Criteria (e.g. CHLA) NARRATIVE CHLOROPHYLL CRITERIA Concentrations of chlorophyll a in free-floating microscopic aquatic plants (algae) shall not exceed levels that result in ecologically undesirable consequences — such as reduced water clarity, low dissolved oxygen, Historical and Contemporary data food supply imbalances, proliferation of species deemed potentially harmful to aquatic life or humans or aesthetically objectionable conditions — or otherwise render tidal waters unsuitable for designated uses (USEPA 2003).

Water Quality Criteria (e.g. CHLA) NARRATIVE CHLOROPHYLL CRITERIA Concentrations of chlorophyll a in free-floating microscopic aquatic plants (algae) shall not exceed levels that result in ecologically undesirable consequences — such as reduced water clarity, low dissolved oxygen, Historical and Contemporary data food supply imbalances, proliferation of species deemed potentially harmful to aquatic life or humans or aesthetically objectionable conditions — or otherwise render tidal waters unsuitable for designated uses (USEPA 2003). QUANTITATIVE CHLORPHYLL CRITERIA 7000 Lack of Blooms Microcystis Bloom region M. aeruginosa Colony Count/ml 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 2007 1000 20 40 60 CHLOROPHYLL a 80 100 120 USEPA 2007

Water Quality Criteria (e.g. CHLA) NARRATIVE CHLOROPHYLL CRITERIA Concentrations of chlorophyll a in free-floating microscopic aquatic plants (algae) shall not exceed levels that result in ecologically undesirable consequences — such as reduced water clarity, low dissolved oxygen, Historical and Contemporary data food supply imbalances, proliferation of species deemed potentially harmful to aquatic life or humans or aesthetically objectionable conditions — or otherwise render tidal waters unsuitable for designated uses (USEPA 2003). QUANTITATIVE CHLORPHYLL CRITERIA Applicable Criteria Seasons Spring: March 1- May 31 Summer: June 1 – September 30

Outline Monitoring and Assessment Framework Supporting the Chesapeake Bay TMDL Chesapeake Bay Management Segmentation Designated Use Development Water Quality Criteria Development Water Quality Criteria Assessment

Monitoring and Assessment – as easy as baking a cake! Create a layer, and then another, … Collect the ingredients Follow the Recipe as the rules for Creating a cake Voila! Assemble into the finished product!

Water Quality Criteria Assessment Water Quality Data Collection

Water Quality Criteria Assessment Water Quality Data Collection Interpolation of Water Quality Monitoring Results Dissolved Oxygen Picture courtesy of A. Muller, USNA

Water Quality Criteria Assessment Single month Criteria assessment Water Quality Data Collection Interpolation of Water Quality Monitoring Results SPACE… Dissolved Oxygen Season x 3-year Criteria assessment …and TIME Picture courtesy of A. Muller, USNA

Water Quality Criteria Assessment 100 CFD Curve Reference Curve Area of Criteria 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Percent of Time Exceedence Area of Allowable Monitoring Data 1 segment Over time Criteria Exceedence 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent of Space USEPA 2003 Pass or Fail Assessment 1 segment

Water Quality Criteria Assessment Standards 100 CFD Curve Reference Curve Area of Criteria Attainment “Eithe r you’re in or your out!” 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Percent of Time Exceedence Area of Allowable Monitoring Data 1 segment Over time Criteria Exceedence 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent of Space USEPA 2003 Pass or Fail Assessment 1 segment

Water Quality Criteria Assessment Standards Attainment 100 CFD Curve Reference Curve Area of Criteria 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Percent of Time 92 segement Baywide Assessment Summary Exceedence Area of Allowable Monitoring Data 1 segment Over time Criteria Exceedence 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent of Space USEPA 2003 Pass or Fail Assessment 1 segment

Thank you Water Quality Criteria Development Management Segmentation Water Quality Criteria Assessment Designated Uses

Chesapeake Bay Criteria 5 Components of Chesapeake Bay Criteria Assessment Space Time Magnitude Duration Frequency

Law: Clean Water Act (1972) Objective: “restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters” (Clean Water Act 101(a)) Interim goal: “water quality which provides for the protection and propagation of fish, shellfish and wildlife and provides for recreation in and on the water” wherever attainable by 1983 (Clean Water Act 101(a)(2)) Implementation by States, Territories, and authorized Tribes