Week 11 Assignment Figures

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

P247. Figure 9-1 p248 Figure 9-2 p251 p251 Figure 9-3 p253.

Advertisements

ANOVA WTdZAP1 p < /6189 (31.42%)2264/6189 (36.58%) p < /6189 (24.67%)1445/6189 (23.35%) p < /6189 (13.90%)792/6189 (12.80%) p

Modeling the Gene Expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Δcin5 Under Cold Shock Conditions Kevin McKay Laura Terada Department of Biology Loyola Marymount.

Software Refactoring and Usability Enhancement for GRNmap, a Gene Regulatory Network Modeling Application Mathematical Model Equation 2. Equation 3. Future.

Determining the Identity and Dynamics of the Gene Regulatory Network Controlling the Response to Cold Shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae June 24, 2015.

Sarah Carratt and Carmen Castaneda Department of Biology Loyola Marymount University BIOL 398/MATH 388 March 24, 2011 Cold Adaption in Budding Yeast Babette.

Deletion of ZAP1 as a transcriptional factor has minor effects on S. cerevisiae regulatory network in cold shock KARA DISMUKE AND KRISTEN HORSTMANN MAY.

Open Source Projects for Undergraduate Research Experiences

Changes in Gene Regulation in Δ Zap1 Strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae due to Cold Shock Jim McDonald and Paul Magnano.

GRNmap and GRNsight June 24, Systems Biology Workflow DNA microarray data: wet lab-generated or published Generate gene regulatory network Modeling.

Data Analysis and GRNmap Testing Grace Johnson and Natalie Williams June 24, 2015.

Creating a Gene Regulatory Network Comparing a Wild Type Strain with a Mutant ΔGLN3 Deletion in S. cerevisiae Showed that ΔGLN3 Exhibits No Meaningful.

Index Slide 2-5: Statistical testing results 6-14: Clustering results 15-17: GRNsight visualization of YEASTRACT results 18-20: GRNmap output visualization.

WEEK 1 You have 10 seconds to name…

Within Strain ANOVA WTdHAP4 p < (38.4%)2387 (38.6%) p < (24.7%)1489 (24.1 %) p < (13.8%)679 (11.0%) p < (7.25%)240.

Comparison of the wild type of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Karina Alvarez and Natalie Williams.

Outline S. cerevisiae, a eukaryote known for cold-shock adaption, used in cold-shock experiments Deletion strand HMO1 and the comparison of microarray.

Comparison of wild type S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Natalie Williams and Karina Alvarez.

Comparison of the wild type of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus Karina Alvarez and Natalie Williams.

Supplementary figure 5.

Departments of Biology and Mathematics

Eddie Azinge, John Lopez, and Corinne Wong

Evaluating Hap4’s Role in the Gene Regulatory Network that Controls the Response to Cold Shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using GRNmap K. Grace Johnson1,

ASSIGNMENT NO.-2.

Final Presentation [work in progress… work completed for Week 11 Journal Assignment] Kara Dismuke.

Ahnert, S. E., & Fink, T. M. A. (2016). Form and function in gene regulatory networks: the structure of network motifs determines fundamental properties.

Evaluating Hap4’s Role in the Gene Regulatory Network that Controls the Response to Cold Shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using GRNmap K. Grace Johnson1,

Deletion of ZAP1 as a transcriptional factor has minor effects on S

Lauren Kelly April 19th, 2017 BIOL398-05

Network topology reflects target gene expression profile and function.

Biomathematical Modeling: The Deletion of HMO1 and its Effect on Cold Shock Reaction in S. cerevisiae Lauren Magee & Lucia Ramirez Department of Mathematics.

ANOVA Within Strain P-values

Cold Adaption in Budding Yeast

Lauren Kelly and Cameron Rehmani Seraji Loyola Marymount University

Loyola Marymount University

Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and ΔGLN3

Within Strain ANOVA for All Strains

Significance Table from Anova Test

Final Presentation [work in progress… work completed for Week 11 Journal Assignment] Kara Dismuke.

BIOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2013 Opening Assignments.

Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and ΔGLN3

Loyola Marymount Unviersity

ANOVA Within Strain P-values

Percentages of specific p-value data

Evaluating Hap4’s Role in the Gene Regulatory Network that Controls the Response to Cold Shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using GRNmap K. Grace Johnson1,

Statistical Analysis of Microarray Data

Within-strain ANOVA for dCIN5

Week 11 Assignment Figures

(Within-Strain ANOVA)

Comparison of the P-value significance between Wild Type and dGLN3

Chapter 25 Analysis of Gene Expression

Presence of motifs correlated with decreased expression of downstream genes. Presence of motifs correlated with decreased expression of downstream genes.

Chapter 6 Transcription of Genes

ANOVA WT STRAIN p < 0.05 number (%) p < 0.01 p < p <

Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron

Characterising dermis expansion and gene expression changes during mouse development (related to Fig 1)‏ Characterising dermis expansion and gene expression.

IIS‐dfoxo‐dependent regulation of proteasome activity in the gut enhances proteome maintenance IIS‐dfoxo‐dependent regulation of proteasome activity in.

Chapter 4 Genes, Genomes and DNA

Published in Thyroid. January 2014, 24(1): DOI: /thy

Supplementary Figure 5: Effect of S48168 on normalized organ and skeletal muscle weights after 12 weeks of treatment for all the experimental groups from.

Percentages of specific p-value data

Benjamini & Hochberg-corrected p < 0.05 Bonferroni-corrected

Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)

CPPED1 (A) and PPARγ2 (B) mRNA expressions in cultured SGBS cells during adipocyte differentiation. CPPED1 (A) and PPARγ2 (B) mRNA expressions in cultured.

NPC-derived oligodendrocytes are maintained long term after cuprizone challenge. NPC-derived oligodendrocytes are maintained long term after cuprizone.

Loyola Marymount University

Matthew W. Hahn, Gregory C. Lanzaro Current Biology

Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron

Jeffrey Crosson and William Gendron

Small RNA (smRNA) profiles in plasma of tuberculosis (TB) infected individuals before and after treatment. a–d) Wilcoxon paired analysis of plasma smRNA.

Presentation transcript:

Week 11 Assignment Figures Cameron Rehmani Seraji BIOL-398-05/S17 Department of Biology Loyola Marymount University

Over 50% of the Genes are Significant for the Different P-values ANOVA dHAP4 p < 0.05 5584 genes 90.22% p < 0.01 5154 genes 83.28% p < 0.001 4287 genes 69.27% p < 0.0001 3352 genes 54.16% B & H p < 0.05 5577 genes 90.11% Bonferroni p < 0.05 3325 genes 53.72%

Cold Shock Recovery t test t15 t30 t60 t90 t120 2039 genes 32.95% Average Log Fold Change > 0.25 and p < 0.05 2039 genes 32.95% 2126 genes 34.35% 2174 genes 35.13% 1859 genes 30.04% 1932 genes 31.22% Average Log Fold Change < -0.25 and 2176 genes 35.16% 2272 genes 36.71% 2177 genes 35.18% 1862 genes 30.09% 2199 genes 35.53% Total 5584 genes 90.22% Total B & H 5557 genes 89.80% Total Bonferroni 3325 genes 53.72%

12 Profiles are Statistically Significant

Profile 45 Included 566 Genes

Profile 9 Included 491 Genes

Profile 48 Included 359 Genes

Profile 22 Included 322 Genes

Profile 40 Included 220 Genes

Profile 16 Included 203 Genes

Profile 2 Included 162 Genes

Profile 11 Included 157 Genes

Profile 36 Included 125 Genes

Profile 7 Included 110 Genes

Profile 21 Included 109 Genes

Profile 28 Included 90 Genes

GRNsight Profile 45 Network