Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages (October 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 21, Issue 15, Pages (August 2011)
Advertisements

Soyoun Kim, Jaewon Hwang, Daeyeol Lee  Neuron 
Erman Misirlisoy, Patrick Haggard  Current Biology 
Topography of Head Direction Cells in Medial Entorhinal Cortex
Volume 21, Issue 15, Pages (August 2011)
Adaptive Evolution of Gene Expression in Drosophila
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 112, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
A Neoproterozoic Transition in the Marine Nitrogen Cycle
Aaron R. Seitz, Praveen K. Pilly, Christopher C. Pack  Current Biology 
Sizing up dogs Current Biology
Sensory-Motor Integration: More Variability Reduces Individuality
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 24, Pages (December 2011)
Fungus-Growing Termites Originated in African Rain Forest
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages R1156-R1158 (December 2015)
A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
Rates of Molecular Evolution Suggest Natural History of Life History Traits and a Post-K- Pg Nocturnal Bottleneck of Placentals  Jiaqi Wu, Takahiro Yonezawa,
Aaron C. Hartmann, Andrew H. Baird, Nancy Knowlton, Danwei Huang 
A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture
Nathan F. Putman, Katherine L. Mansfield  Current Biology 
Marianne Elias, Colin Fontaine, F.J. Frank van Veen  Current Biology 
Coupling Genetic and Ecological-Niche Models to Examine How Past Population Distributions Contribute to Divergence  L. Lacey Knowles, Bryan C. Carstens,
Molecular Phylogenetics and the Diversification of Hummingbirds
Young Children Do Not Integrate Visual and Haptic Form Information
Cultural Confusions Show that Facial Expressions Are Not Universal
Chimeric Synergy in Natural Social Groups of a Cooperative Microbe
Phylogenetic comparative methods
Morphological Phylogenetics in the Genomic Age
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 1-9 (January 2015)
Brain Evolution: Getting Better All the Time?
What We Know Currently about Mirror Neurons
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Jennifer L. Hoy, Iryna Yavorska, Michael Wehr, Cristopher M. Niell 
Walter Jetz, Dustin R. Rubenstein  Current Biology 
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Positive selection on gene expression in the human brain
Dustin R. Rubenstein, Irby J. Lovette  Current Biology 
Volume 25, Issue 15, Pages (August 2015)
Jeffrey A. Fawcett, Hideki Innan  Trends in Genetics 
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Value-Based Modulations in Human Visual Cortex
Sleep-Stage-Specific Regulation of Cortical Excitation and Inhibition
Jeroen B. Smaers, Aida Gómez-Robles, Ashley N. Parks, Chet C. Sherwood 
Adaptation can explain evidence for encoding of probabilistic information in macaque inferior temporal cortex  Kasper Vinken, Rufin Vogels  Current Biology 
Developmental Basis of Phallus Reduction during Bird Evolution
Pier Francesco Palamara, Todd Lencz, Ariel Darvasi, Itsik Pe’er 
Gilad A. Jacobson, Peter Rupprecht, Rainer W. Friedrich 
Cetaceans on a Molecular Fast Track to Ultrasonic Hearing
Auditory-Visual Crossmodal Integration in Perception of Face Gender
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
How Dopamine Enhances an Optimism Bias in Humans
Volume 16, Issue 20, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 23, Pages R1102-R1104 (December 2008)
Zuzana Burivalova, Çağan Hakkı Şekercioğlu, Lian Pin Koh 
Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Kevin R. Foster, Thomas Bell  Current Biology 
The challenge of measuring long-term positive aftereffects
Rapid Evolution of the Cerebellum in Humans and Other Great Apes
Volume 25, Issue 14, Pages R611-R613 (July 2015)
David A. McVea, Keir G. Pearson  Current Biology 
The Geography of Ecological Niche Evolution in Mammals
Anisotropic Diffusion of Macromolecules in the Contiguous Nucleocytoplasmic Fluid during Eukaryotic Cell Division  Nisha Pawar, Claudia Donth, Matthias.
Volume 18, Issue 15, Pages R648-R650 (August 2008)
Ella F. Cole, Julie Morand-Ferron, Amy E. Hinks, John L. Quinn 
Michael S.Y. Lee, Julien Soubrier, Gregory D. Edgecombe 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages 1508-1513 (October 2008) Accelerated Rates of Floral Evolution at the Upper Size Limit for Flowers  Todd J. Barkman, Mika Bendiksby, Seok-Hong Lim, Kamarudin Mat Salleh, Jamili Nais, Domingo Madulid, Trond Schumacher  Current Biology  Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages 1508-1513 (October 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.046 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Chronogram Showing Relationships and Divergence Times among the Three Genera of Rafflesiaceae In spite of considerable variation in floral size within Rafflesia, very little molecular variation is observed, as indicated by the short branch lengths. Grey bars at nodes represent the 95% highest posterior density interval of divergence-time estimates. Posterior probabilities for all nodes except those within Rafflesia are shown. Details of divergence times and relationships with posterior probabilities for clades within Rafflesia are shown in Figure 2. Images for representative species of the three genera are shown. Current Biology 2008 18, 1508-1513DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.046) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Expanded Chronogram Showing Phylogenetic Relationships and Divergence Times for the Rafflesia Clade Shown in Figure 1 Posterior probabilities of 0.8 or greater are shown at each node. Grey bars at nodes represent the 95% highest posterior density interval of divergence-time estimates with nodes placed at the mean posterior divergence-time estimate. Most speciation events are estimated to have occurred within the last 2 My. Shown in each labeled panel are the posterior distributions of ancestral floral diameters estimated for each labeled node, with mean sizes listed above. Although ancestral states were estimated with ln-transformed data, all sizes shown have been back log transformed. Ancestral floral sizes are inferred to have been more or less static over time, with mean sizes ranging from 27–37 cm for most of the history of the genus, with net changes along each branch less than 7 cm on average. However, within the last 1–2 My, large floral-size increases and decreases have occurred from these intermediate-sized ancestors. Species names shown in black are mostly found in Indonesia (Sumatra and Java), red are found in Peninsular Malaysia and Thailand, blue are restricted to Borneo, and green are endemic to the Philippines. Ranges of floral diameter are shown next to each extant species. Grey floral outlines are ancestral, black are extant. Current Biology 2008 18, 1508-1513DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.046) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Relationship of Net Rate of Floral-Size Change in Absolute Value of Darwins to log-Transformed Ancestral Floral Diameter for Each Branch in Figures 1 and 2 Mean rates of floral-size increase and decrease, with standard errors, are represented by triangles and circles, respectively. Rates of floral-size change are higher for larger ancestral floral sizes (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.71, p = 0.002). Rates for branches descending from shared nodes A, B, D, and F are labeled so that their paired, divergent rates of change can be compared. Best-fit exponential trend lines are shown for both floral-size increases (solid) and decreases (dashed). Darwins are calculated with the following formula: ln(descendant floral size) − ln(ancestral floral size) / elapsed time in My. Rates of change for trait values that increase over time are positive, whereas those that decrease are negative. Current Biology 2008 18, 1508-1513DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.046) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions