Derepression by Depolymerization

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Advertisements

Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (April 2004)
Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Crystal Structure of Tetrameric Arabidopsis MYC2 Reveals the Mechanism of Enhanced Interaction with DNA  Teng-fei Lian, Yong-ping Xu, Lan-fen Li, Xiao-Dong.
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Myosin VI Undergoes Cargo-Mediated Dimerization
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
RNA Seeds Higher-Order Assembly of FUS Protein
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e5 (January 2019)
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Colin Kwok, Bernd B. Zeisig, Shuo Dong, Chi Wai Eric So  Cancer Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 143, Issue 2, Pages (October 2010)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Volume 25, Issue 21, Pages (November 2015)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Structural Basis for Specific Recognition of Reelin by Its Receptors
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Shiqian Qi, Do Jin Kim, Goran Stjepanovic, James H. Hurley  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (March 2016)
SUMO-1 Modification Represses Sp3 Transcriptional Activation and Modulates Its Subnuclear Localization  Sarah Ross, Jennifer L Best, Leonard I Zon, Grace.
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Michael M. Brent, Ruchi Anand, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
In Vitro Analysis of Huntingtin-Mediated Transcriptional Repression Reveals Multiple Transcription Factor Targets  Weiguo Zhai, Hyunkyung Jeong, Libin.
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 15, Issue 14, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Structural Basis of SOSS1 Complex Assembly and Recognition of ssDNA
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Derepression by Depolymerization Feng Qiao, Haiyun Song, Chongwoo A Kim, Michael R Sawaya, Jacob B Hunter, Mari Gingery, Ilaria Rebay, Albert J Courey, James U Bowie  Cell  Volume 118, Issue 2, Pages 163-173 (July 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.010 Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Relationships between Yan, Mae, and Yan's Human Ortholog, TEL (A) Domain structure of TEL, Yan, and Mae. The position of the critical regulatory phosphorylation site on Yan, Ser127, is indicated. (B) Polymeric structure of TEL-SAM. Nine subunits of the polymer viewed with the helix axis in the plane of the paper, pointing up. The ML and EH surfaces are shown in green and red, respectively. Two key residues in the interaction interface, A93 and V112, are shown in sticks. (C) Schematic illustration of the TEL-SAM polymer with two key residues, A93 and V112, in the ML and EH surfaces, respectively, highlighted. (D) Sequence alignment of Yan-SAM and TEL-SAM. The hydrophobic residues that make up the ML and EH surfaces are colored green and red, respectively. The sites that were targeted for hydrophobic to hydrophilic mutagenesis are indicated by cyan arrows. Cell 2004 118, 163-173DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.010) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Yan-SAM Forms a TEL-SAM-like Polymer (A) Electron microscopy image of Yan-SAM showing that the domain forms fibers. No fibers were observed for the monomeric mutants Yan-SAM A86R or Yan-SAM V105R (not shown). (B) Test of the Yan-SAM polymer model. The ability of Yan-SAM A86R or Yan-SAM V105R to bind to themselves or to each other was tested in surface plasmon resonance experiments. As shown in the sensograms, A86R bound to V105R but not to itself, and V105R bound to A86R but not to itself. (C) Equilibrium binding measurements by SPR. Yan-SAM A86R was crosslinked to the Biacore chip. (Left) Sensograms show response units as a function of time upon titrating with various concentrations of Yan-SAM V105R. (Right) A plot of equilibrium response units versus Yan-SAM V105R concentration. The curve represents a fit to a hyperbolic binding isotherm for a 1:1 complex and yields a dissociation constant of 7.4 ± 1.2 μM. (D) Structural alignment of Yan-SAM with TEL-SAM showing the ML (left) and EH (right) binding surfaces. Yan-SAM is shaded in slate while TEL-SAM is shaded in pink. The apolar residues that form the ML binding surface of Yan-SAM are colored green. The analogous TEL-SAM residues are colored yellow. The Yan-SAM hydrophobic residues that make up the core of the EH surface are red while the equivalent TEL-SAM residues are colored in wheat. (E) (Left) Yan-SAM polymer model. (Right) Closeup view of Yan-SAM polymer interface. Hydrophobic residues that are critical for the polymer formation are shown in green (for ML surface) or red (for EH surface). Cell 2004 118, 163-173DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.010) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Yan Polymerization-Defective Mutants Cannot Repress Transcription (A) Luciferase assays were performed by using Drosophila S2 cells transfected with the pEBS-luciferase reporter, transcription activator PNT-P1, and either Yan wild-type or polymerization-defective mutant constructs. A pAC5.1-lacZ reporter was used as an internal control. The normalized units are shown from a representative experiment performed in triplicate. Inset shows Yan expression levels as determined by Western blots. (B) Scatchard plots of electrophoretic mobility shift assay results for MBP-Yan variants binding to a single Ets binding site probe. Cell 2004 118, 163-173DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.010) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Quantitative Measurement of the Interaction between Yan-SAM and Mae-SAM (A) SPR sensograms showing the binding of MBP-Mae-SAM at various concentrations to immobilized Yan-SAM A86R. (B) Summary of the binding affinity between different combinations of Yan-SAM and MBP-Mae-SAM variants. Cell 2004 118, 163-173DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.010) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Structure of the Yan-SAM/Mae-SAM Complex (A) Overall structure of Yan-SAM/Mae-SAM compared with Yan-SAM polymer model. Yan-SAM and Mae-SAM are shown in slate and violet, respectively. ML surface residues are colored green while EH surface residues are colored red. The corresponding Yan-SAM subunits in the Yan-SAM polymer and the Yan-SAM/Mae-SAM complex are connected by an arrow. (B) Detailed view comparing the Yan-SAM polymer and the Yan-SAM/Mae-SAM interfaces. Yan-SAM and Mae-SAM are colored as in (A). Hydrophobic residues that make up the core of the interface are colored by atom type. They are C—gray, S—orange, N—blue, and O—red. Hydrogen bonds are indicated by dotted lines. (C) Sequence alignment of Mae- and Yan-SAM. The hydrophobic residues that make up the ML and EH surfaces are colored green and red, respectively. (D) Mae-SAM disrupts Yan-SAM self-association in vitro. GST-Yan-SAM A86R, which can bind both Yan-SAM and Mae-SAM, was immobilized on glutathione resin, and Yan-SAM was incubated with the beads for 1 hr. An Increasing amount of MBP-Mae-SAM was then added to the beads. Two MBP-Mae-SAM mutants were also added as controls. After separation by SDS-PAGE, the gel was visualized by Western blotting using antibody that recognizes a C-terminal His6. More MBP-Mae-SAM remained bound after the washing steps than Yan-SAM because of the much slower offrate for MBP-Mae-SAM binding, so the Western blot was exposed for different lengths of time to visualize MBP-Mae-SAM and Yan-SAM. Cell 2004 118, 163-173DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.010) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Specific Interactions between Mae-SAM and Yan-SAM Mediate Transcription Derepression in the Absence of Rolled MAPK Activation (A) Overexpression of Mae inhibits Yan-mediated transcriptional repression but not a Mae-SAM domain mutant that cannot interact with Yan-SAM. Inset shows myc-tagged Mae expression levels as determined by Western blots. (B) Mae-mediated transcription derepression is not due to the nuclear export of Yan. S2 cultured cells transfected with Yan and various Mae constructs and stained with anti-Yan. Yan localization is restricted to the nucleus in the presence of Mae and its mutants but is almost entirely cytoplasmic in the presence of RASV12. Cell 2004 118, 163-173DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.010) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Derepression by Depolymerization: A Model for Downregulation of Yan by Mae In the absence of RTK activation, Yan binds to DNA in the form of higher order polymer, which on one hand enhances its DNA binding affinity and on the other hand precludes transcriptional activators from accessing the DNA. The activation of RTK produces an active form of MAPK/Rolled, which will phosphorylate the small amount of free Yan/Mae complex. Phophorylation of Yan triggers export from the nucleus in a CRM1-dependent manner. The decrease in free Yan would drive the equilibrium away from DNA bound polymer. As Mae is regulated by Yan, Mae expression should increase, resulting in additional depolymerization and export of Yan, ultimately leading to full derepression. We have drawn a flexible linker between the SAM domain of Yan and the DNA binding domain, but we do not know the structural relationship, if any, between these domains. Cell 2004 118, 163-173DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.010) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions